Loading…

Influence of thermal tempering processes on color characteristics of different monolithic computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing ceramic materials

The optical properties of dental restoration were influenced by the sintering parameters. This study investigated the effects of different tempering processes on optical properties of three monolithic Cad-Cam ceramics. 135 monolithic material bars (4 mm width, 14 mm length, 1.2 mm thickness) were pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry 2019-07, Vol.11 (7), p.e614-e624
Main Authors: Juntavee, Niwut, Uasuwan, Pithiwat
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The optical properties of dental restoration were influenced by the sintering parameters. This study investigated the effects of different tempering processes on optical properties of three monolithic Cad-Cam ceramics. 135 monolithic material bars (4 mm width, 14 mm length, 1.2 mm thickness) were prepared from yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline (inCoris TZI, I), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Vita Suprinity, V), and lithium disilicate glass (e.max CAD, E) ceramics, with different tempering processes through slow (S), normal (N), and fast (F) cooling (n=15). The color appearance (∆EW), translucency parameter (TP), contrast ratio (CR), and opalescence parameter (OP) were determined. ANOVA and Bonferroni's multiple comparisons were determined for significant difference (α=0.05). The grain sizes were microscopically examined by scanning electron microscope. The phase transformation of zirconia was determined using X ray diffraction. The mean±sd of ΔEW, TP, CR, OP were 74.15±0.46, 1.26±0.15, 0.977±0.006, 1.02±0.12 for IS; 74.00±0.83, 1.27±0.19, 0.977±0.007, 1.02±0.12 for IN; 74.44±0.64, 1.70±0.08, 0.965±0.003, 1.30±0.07 for IF; 73.35±1.32, 2.44±0.24, 0.958±0.006, 2.10±0.20 for VS; 66.37±0.88, 4.05±0.3, 0.911±0.010, 3.18±0.20 for VN; 67.02±0.65, 3.79±0.17, 0.919±0.006, 3.01±0.13 for VF; 60.01±0.30, 5.53±0.17, 0.821±0.006, 2.71±0.06 for ES; 60.18±0.23, 5.49±0.17, 0.822±0.006, 2.66±0.05 for EN; and 59.82±0.26, 5.36±0.06, 0.826±0.002, 2.64±0.07 for EF. The color parameters were significantly affected by type of materials, tempering processes, and their interactions (
ISSN:1989-5488
1989-5488
DOI:10.4317/jced.55869