Loading…

Proximal humerus fracture–dislocation managed by mini-open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation

Background We describe a minimally open reduction and percutaneous fixation technique for three- and four-part proximal humeral fracture–dislocations which preserves soft tissues. Methods Eleven consecutive patients with three-and four-part proximal humeral fracture–dislocations (eight anterior, thr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Shoulder & elbow 2019-10, Vol.11 (5), p.353-358
Main Authors: Johnson, NA, Pandey, R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-ab25f015edf911e2f6478eda24e5f4ae069ff84e32f9c3a548f82cc3dad35be63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-ab25f015edf911e2f6478eda24e5f4ae069ff84e32f9c3a548f82cc3dad35be63
container_end_page 358
container_issue 5
container_start_page 353
container_title Shoulder & elbow
container_volume 11
creator Johnson, NA
Pandey, R
description Background We describe a minimally open reduction and percutaneous fixation technique for three- and four-part proximal humeral fracture–dislocations which preserves soft tissues. Methods Eleven consecutive patients with three-and four-part proximal humeral fracture–dislocations (eight anterior, three posterior dislocations) were treated this way. The dislocation is reduced using a mini-open deltopectoral approach with a horizontal split in subscapularis. Fracture fragments are fixed with percutaneous screws. Constant and Oxford Shoulder Score were collected prospectively. Results Mean age was 51 years (range 32–65). Mean follow-up was 36 months (range 24–72 months). At last follow-up mean Constant score was 75 (range 64–86) compared to 88 (range 85–92) for the uninjured shoulder. Mean Oxford shoulder score was 41 (range 34–46). One patient developed avascular necrosis. Screw back out was seen in three patients. These were removed under local anaesthesia. There were no screw penetrations of articular surface. One patient suffered a radial nerve neuropraxia which resolved. Conclusion These results are promising and comparable to published literature with other means of fixation for this complex problem. Due to minimal soft tissue dissection the complications rate is low.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1758573218791815
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6739749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1758573218791815</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2293982438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-ab25f015edf911e2f6478eda24e5f4ae069ff84e32f9c3a548f82cc3dad35be63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUha2qVQdo911VWbIJxH-xvUGqRuVHGgkW7dry2NdglNiDnRTY9R14Q56EDENHgNSVLd9zvut7D0LfcHOAsRCHWHDJBSVYCoUl5h_Qzvqp5oI1H7d3SmZot5TrpmlFK_hnNKOYU8Yk30H-Iqe70Juuuhp7yGOpfDZ2GDM8_n1woXTJmiGkWPUmmktw1fK-6kMMdVpBrDK40T6XTXTVCrIdBxMhTZhiM9xWPtw927-gT950Bb6-nHvo9_HPX_PTenF-cjb_sagtZYrXZkm4bzAH5xXGQHzLhARnCAPumYGmVd5LBpR4ZanhTHpJrKXOOMqX0NI9dLThrsZlD85CHLLp9CpPI-Z7nUzQbysxXOnL9Ee3girB1ATYfwHkdDNCGXQfioWu24ylCVFUScKonKTNRmpzKiWD37bBjV7Ho9_HM1m-v_7e1vAvj0lQbwRlWra-TmOO07r-D3wCvdqc0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2293982438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proximal humerus fracture–dislocation managed by mini-open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Johnson, NA ; Pandey, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, NA ; Pandey, R</creatorcontrib><description>Background We describe a minimally open reduction and percutaneous fixation technique for three- and four-part proximal humeral fracture–dislocations which preserves soft tissues. Methods Eleven consecutive patients with three-and four-part proximal humeral fracture–dislocations (eight anterior, three posterior dislocations) were treated this way. The dislocation is reduced using a mini-open deltopectoral approach with a horizontal split in subscapularis. Fracture fragments are fixed with percutaneous screws. Constant and Oxford Shoulder Score were collected prospectively. Results Mean age was 51 years (range 32–65). Mean follow-up was 36 months (range 24–72 months). At last follow-up mean Constant score was 75 (range 64–86) compared to 88 (range 85–92) for the uninjured shoulder. Mean Oxford shoulder score was 41 (range 34–46). One patient developed avascular necrosis. Screw back out was seen in three patients. These were removed under local anaesthesia. There were no screw penetrations of articular surface. One patient suffered a radial nerve neuropraxia which resolved. Conclusion These results are promising and comparable to published literature with other means of fixation for this complex problem. Due to minimal soft tissue dissection the complications rate is low.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5732</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1758573218791815</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31534485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Shoulder</subject><ispartof>Shoulder &amp; elbow, 2019-10, Vol.11 (5), p.353-358</ispartof><rights>2018 The British Elbow &amp; Shoulder Society</rights><rights>2018 The British Elbow &amp; Shoulder Society 2018 The British Elbow &amp; Shoulder Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-ab25f015edf911e2f6478eda24e5f4ae069ff84e32f9c3a548f82cc3dad35be63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-ab25f015edf911e2f6478eda24e5f4ae069ff84e32f9c3a548f82cc3dad35be63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5543-6384</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6739749/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6739749/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27911,27912,53778,53780,79119</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, NA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, R</creatorcontrib><title>Proximal humerus fracture–dislocation managed by mini-open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation</title><title>Shoulder &amp; elbow</title><addtitle>Shoulder Elbow</addtitle><description>Background We describe a minimally open reduction and percutaneous fixation technique for three- and four-part proximal humeral fracture–dislocations which preserves soft tissues. Methods Eleven consecutive patients with three-and four-part proximal humeral fracture–dislocations (eight anterior, three posterior dislocations) were treated this way. The dislocation is reduced using a mini-open deltopectoral approach with a horizontal split in subscapularis. Fracture fragments are fixed with percutaneous screws. Constant and Oxford Shoulder Score were collected prospectively. Results Mean age was 51 years (range 32–65). Mean follow-up was 36 months (range 24–72 months). At last follow-up mean Constant score was 75 (range 64–86) compared to 88 (range 85–92) for the uninjured shoulder. Mean Oxford shoulder score was 41 (range 34–46). One patient developed avascular necrosis. Screw back out was seen in three patients. These were removed under local anaesthesia. There were no screw penetrations of articular surface. One patient suffered a radial nerve neuropraxia which resolved. Conclusion These results are promising and comparable to published literature with other means of fixation for this complex problem. Due to minimal soft tissue dissection the complications rate is low.</description><subject>Shoulder</subject><issn>1758-5732</issn><issn>1758-5740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUha2qVQdo911VWbIJxH-xvUGqRuVHGgkW7dry2NdglNiDnRTY9R14Q56EDENHgNSVLd9zvut7D0LfcHOAsRCHWHDJBSVYCoUl5h_Qzvqp5oI1H7d3SmZot5TrpmlFK_hnNKOYU8Yk30H-Iqe70Juuuhp7yGOpfDZ2GDM8_n1woXTJmiGkWPUmmktw1fK-6kMMdVpBrDK40T6XTXTVCrIdBxMhTZhiM9xWPtw927-gT950Bb6-nHvo9_HPX_PTenF-cjb_sagtZYrXZkm4bzAH5xXGQHzLhARnCAPumYGmVd5LBpR4ZanhTHpJrKXOOMqX0NI9dLThrsZlD85CHLLp9CpPI-Z7nUzQbysxXOnL9Ee3girB1ATYfwHkdDNCGXQfioWu24ylCVFUScKonKTNRmpzKiWD37bBjV7Ho9_HM1m-v_7e1vAvj0lQbwRlWra-TmOO07r-D3wCvdqc0w</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Johnson, NA</creator><creator>Pandey, R</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5543-6384</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Proximal humerus fracture–dislocation managed by mini-open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation</title><author>Johnson, NA ; Pandey, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-ab25f015edf911e2f6478eda24e5f4ae069ff84e32f9c3a548f82cc3dad35be63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Shoulder</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, NA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, R</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Shoulder &amp; elbow</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, NA</au><au>Pandey, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proximal humerus fracture–dislocation managed by mini-open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation</atitle><jtitle>Shoulder &amp; elbow</jtitle><addtitle>Shoulder Elbow</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>358</epage><pages>353-358</pages><issn>1758-5732</issn><eissn>1758-5740</eissn><abstract>Background We describe a minimally open reduction and percutaneous fixation technique for three- and four-part proximal humeral fracture–dislocations which preserves soft tissues. Methods Eleven consecutive patients with three-and four-part proximal humeral fracture–dislocations (eight anterior, three posterior dislocations) were treated this way. The dislocation is reduced using a mini-open deltopectoral approach with a horizontal split in subscapularis. Fracture fragments are fixed with percutaneous screws. Constant and Oxford Shoulder Score were collected prospectively. Results Mean age was 51 years (range 32–65). Mean follow-up was 36 months (range 24–72 months). At last follow-up mean Constant score was 75 (range 64–86) compared to 88 (range 85–92) for the uninjured shoulder. Mean Oxford shoulder score was 41 (range 34–46). One patient developed avascular necrosis. Screw back out was seen in three patients. These were removed under local anaesthesia. There were no screw penetrations of articular surface. One patient suffered a radial nerve neuropraxia which resolved. Conclusion These results are promising and comparable to published literature with other means of fixation for this complex problem. Due to minimal soft tissue dissection the complications rate is low.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31534485</pmid><doi>10.1177/1758573218791815</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5543-6384</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1758-5732
ispartof Shoulder & elbow, 2019-10, Vol.11 (5), p.353-358
issn 1758-5732
1758-5740
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6739749
source Sage Journals Online; PubMed Central
subjects Shoulder
title Proximal humerus fracture–dislocation managed by mini-open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A02%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proximal%20humerus%20fracture%E2%80%93dislocation%20managed%20by%20mini-open%20reduction%20and%20percutaneous%20screw%20fixation&rft.jtitle=Shoulder%20&%20elbow&rft.au=Johnson,%20NA&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=358&rft.pages=353-358&rft.issn=1758-5732&rft.eissn=1758-5740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1758573218791815&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2293982438%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-ab25f015edf911e2f6478eda24e5f4ae069ff84e32f9c3a548f82cc3dad35be63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2293982438&rft_id=info:pmid/31534485&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1758573218791815&rfr_iscdi=true