Loading…

Diagnostic Value of Bone SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis

The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the contribution of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT for the assessment of osteomyelitis (OM) and patient’s management. Eighty-five patients who were suspected as having...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy 2019-10, Vol.28 (3), p.89-95
Main Authors: Arıcan, Pelin, Okudan, Berna, Şefizade, Rıza, Naldöken, Seniha
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-c375d4cdc1bc5ab46cfee2f529c2e92bad4c531efc1007abdbdef783febdafcd3
cites
container_end_page 95
container_issue 3
container_start_page 89
container_title Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy
container_volume 28
creator Arıcan, Pelin
Okudan, Berna
Şefizade, Rıza
Naldöken, Seniha
description The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the contribution of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT for the assessment of osteomyelitis (OM) and patient’s management. Eighty-five patients who were suspected as having OM were included in this study. Tc-99m MDP three phase bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT were performed to the region of suspected OM. SPECT/CT findings were compared with the findings of planar images/SPECT. Both planar bone scan/SPECT and SPECT/CT findings were divided into two groups: With OM and without OM. In all patients, scintigraphic diagnosis was confirmed by clinical follow up, laboratory findings, microscopic-bacteriological examinations, radiological, surgical, and pathological findings. SPECT/CT changed the diagnosis and treatment planning in 14/85 (16.5%) patients. SPECT/CT was significantly superior to planar scan/SPECT imaging for determining OM (kappa value was 0.626 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.929 for SPECT/CT). SPECT/CT was statistically more successful in detection of chronic OM, and useful in differentiating chronic OM from acute OM (kappa value was 0.541 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.944 for SPECT/CT). SPECT/CT increases accuracy of the diagnosis in the evaluation of OM when it is compared to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT. SPECT/CT can change the diagnosis and management of the patients.
doi_str_mv 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.20053
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6746013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2287046298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-c375d4cdc1bc5ab46cfee2f529c2e92bad4c531efc1007abdbdef783febdafcd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtq3DAQhkVpaMI2r9AKetMbb3SyZd8U0s22TVlIINveClkebRRka2vJKXn7apNtTiOYEcw_PzN8CH2kZC6YFCe9G9N8oz0MIc4ZoU1OpORv0BGjQha0KZu39_-qoIKKQ3Qc4w3JUbOK1PU7dMhpSSQV5Aj9PHN6k32SM_i39hPgYPHXMAC-ulwu1ieLNXYDvtTJwZAi_uvSNb6a4hZMgg5fxAShvwPvkovv0YHVPsLxvs7Qr2_L9eJHsbr4fr44XRVGsCYVhsuyE6YztDWlbkVlLACzJWsMg4a1OjdLTsEaSojUbdd2YGXNLbSdtqbjM_TlwXc7tT10Ji82aq-2o-v1eKeCduplZ3DXahNuVSVFRSjPBp_3BmP4M0FMqnfRgPd6gDBFxVhdS1oLSbP00yvpTZjGIZ-3U0kiKtbUT4auA-3D4N0AT8Lzs-XpSlHCm_xmSD5IzRhiHME-7k2J2tFVO7pqT1ft6Kp7unnyw_OzH-f-s-T_ACcQpZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287046298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic Value of Bone SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Arıcan, Pelin ; Okudan, Berna ; Şefizade, Rıza ; Naldöken, Seniha</creator><contributor>Özcan,Zehra</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arıcan, Pelin ; Okudan, Berna ; Şefizade, Rıza ; Naldöken, Seniha ; Özcan,Zehra</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the contribution of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT for the assessment of osteomyelitis (OM) and patient’s management. Eighty-five patients who were suspected as having OM were included in this study. Tc-99m MDP three phase bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT were performed to the region of suspected OM. SPECT/CT findings were compared with the findings of planar images/SPECT. Both planar bone scan/SPECT and SPECT/CT findings were divided into two groups: With OM and without OM. In all patients, scintigraphic diagnosis was confirmed by clinical follow up, laboratory findings, microscopic-bacteriological examinations, radiological, surgical, and pathological findings. SPECT/CT changed the diagnosis and treatment planning in 14/85 (16.5%) patients. SPECT/CT was significantly superior to planar scan/SPECT imaging for determining OM (kappa value was 0.626 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.929 for SPECT/CT). SPECT/CT was statistically more successful in detection of chronic OM, and useful in differentiating chronic OM from acute OM (kappa value was 0.541 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.944 for SPECT/CT). SPECT/CT increases accuracy of the diagnosis in the evaluation of OM when it is compared to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT. SPECT/CT can change the diagnosis and management of the patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2146-1414</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2147-1959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.20053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31507140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Türkiye Nükleer Tıp Derneği</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Biomedical materials ; Computation ; Computed tomography ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Drug dosages ; Emission analysis ; Infections ; Laboratories ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Nuclear medicine ; Original ; Osteomyelitis ; Patients ; Photon emission ; Prostheses ; Scintigraphy ; Single photon emission computed tomography ; Systematic review ; Tıp ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy, 2019-10, Vol.28 (3), p.89-95</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2019 by Turkish Society of Nuclear Medicine | Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy published by Galenos Yayınevi. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-c375d4cdc1bc5ab46cfee2f529c2e92bad4c531efc1007abdbdef783febdafcd3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3930-0177 ; 0000-0002-4806-4375 ; 0000-0003-4278-9508 ; 0000-0001-8076-3988</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2287046298/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2287046298?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31507140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Özcan,Zehra</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arıcan, Pelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okudan, Berna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şefizade, Rıza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naldöken, Seniha</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic Value of Bone SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis</title><title>Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy</title><addtitle>Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther</addtitle><description>The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the contribution of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT for the assessment of osteomyelitis (OM) and patient’s management. Eighty-five patients who were suspected as having OM were included in this study. Tc-99m MDP three phase bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT were performed to the region of suspected OM. SPECT/CT findings were compared with the findings of planar images/SPECT. Both planar bone scan/SPECT and SPECT/CT findings were divided into two groups: With OM and without OM. In all patients, scintigraphic diagnosis was confirmed by clinical follow up, laboratory findings, microscopic-bacteriological examinations, radiological, surgical, and pathological findings. SPECT/CT changed the diagnosis and treatment planning in 14/85 (16.5%) patients. SPECT/CT was significantly superior to planar scan/SPECT imaging for determining OM (kappa value was 0.626 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.929 for SPECT/CT). SPECT/CT was statistically more successful in detection of chronic OM, and useful in differentiating chronic OM from acute OM (kappa value was 0.541 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.944 for SPECT/CT). SPECT/CT increases accuracy of the diagnosis in the evaluation of OM when it is compared to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT. SPECT/CT can change the diagnosis and management of the patients.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Photon emission</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Scintigraphy</subject><subject>Single photon emission computed tomography</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tıp</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>2146-1414</issn><issn>2147-1959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtq3DAQhkVpaMI2r9AKetMbb3SyZd8U0s22TVlIINveClkebRRka2vJKXn7apNtTiOYEcw_PzN8CH2kZC6YFCe9G9N8oz0MIc4ZoU1OpORv0BGjQha0KZu39_-qoIKKQ3Qc4w3JUbOK1PU7dMhpSSQV5Aj9PHN6k32SM_i39hPgYPHXMAC-ulwu1ieLNXYDvtTJwZAi_uvSNb6a4hZMgg5fxAShvwPvkovv0YHVPsLxvs7Qr2_L9eJHsbr4fr44XRVGsCYVhsuyE6YztDWlbkVlLACzJWsMg4a1OjdLTsEaSojUbdd2YGXNLbSdtqbjM_TlwXc7tT10Ji82aq-2o-v1eKeCduplZ3DXahNuVSVFRSjPBp_3BmP4M0FMqnfRgPd6gDBFxVhdS1oLSbP00yvpTZjGIZ-3U0kiKtbUT4auA-3D4N0AT8Lzs-XpSlHCm_xmSD5IzRhiHME-7k2J2tFVO7pqT1ft6Kp7unnyw_OzH-f-s-T_ACcQpZE</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Arıcan, Pelin</creator><creator>Okudan, Berna</creator><creator>Şefizade, Rıza</creator><creator>Naldöken, Seniha</creator><general>Türkiye Nükleer Tıp Derneği</general><general>Galenos Publishing House</general><general>Galenos Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IEBAR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-0177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4806-4375</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-9508</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8076-3988</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Diagnostic Value of Bone SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis</title><author>Arıcan, Pelin ; Okudan, Berna ; Şefizade, Rıza ; Naldöken, Seniha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-c375d4cdc1bc5ab46cfee2f529c2e92bad4c531efc1007abdbdef783febdafcd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Photon emission</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Scintigraphy</topic><topic>Single photon emission computed tomography</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tıp</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arıcan, Pelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okudan, Berna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şefizade, Rıza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naldöken, Seniha</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Idealonline online kütüphane - Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arıcan, Pelin</au><au>Okudan, Berna</au><au>Şefizade, Rıza</au><au>Naldöken, Seniha</au><au>Özcan,Zehra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic Value of Bone SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis</atitle><jtitle>Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>89-95</pages><issn>2146-1414</issn><eissn>2147-1959</eissn><abstract>The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the contribution of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT for the assessment of osteomyelitis (OM) and patient’s management. Eighty-five patients who were suspected as having OM were included in this study. Tc-99m MDP three phase bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT were performed to the region of suspected OM. SPECT/CT findings were compared with the findings of planar images/SPECT. Both planar bone scan/SPECT and SPECT/CT findings were divided into two groups: With OM and without OM. In all patients, scintigraphic diagnosis was confirmed by clinical follow up, laboratory findings, microscopic-bacteriological examinations, radiological, surgical, and pathological findings. SPECT/CT changed the diagnosis and treatment planning in 14/85 (16.5%) patients. SPECT/CT was significantly superior to planar scan/SPECT imaging for determining OM (kappa value was 0.626 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.929 for SPECT/CT). SPECT/CT was statistically more successful in detection of chronic OM, and useful in differentiating chronic OM from acute OM (kappa value was 0.541 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.944 for SPECT/CT). SPECT/CT increases accuracy of the diagnosis in the evaluation of OM when it is compared to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT. SPECT/CT can change the diagnosis and management of the patients.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Türkiye Nükleer Tıp Derneği</pub><pmid>31507140</pmid><doi>10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.20053</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-0177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4806-4375</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-9508</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8076-3988</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2146-1414
ispartof Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy, 2019-10, Vol.28 (3), p.89-95
issn 2146-1414
2147-1959
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6746013
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Accuracy
Biomedical materials
Computation
Computed tomography
Diagnosis
Diagnostic systems
Drug dosages
Emission analysis
Infections
Laboratories
Medical diagnosis
Medical imaging
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Nuclear medicine
Original
Osteomyelitis
Patients
Photon emission
Prostheses
Scintigraphy
Single photon emission computed tomography
Systematic review
Tıp
Tomography
title Diagnostic Value of Bone SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A42%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20Value%20of%20Bone%20SPECT/CT%20in%20Patients%20with%20Suspected%20Osteomyelitis&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20imaging%20and%20radionuclide%20therapy&rft.au=Ar%C4%B1can,%20Pelin&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=89-95&rft.issn=2146-1414&rft.eissn=2147-1959&rft_id=info:doi/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.20053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2287046298%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-c375d4cdc1bc5ab46cfee2f529c2e92bad4c531efc1007abdbdef783febdafcd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287046298&rft_id=info:pmid/31507140&rfr_iscdi=true