Loading…
Diagnostic Value of Bone SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis
The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the contribution of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT for the assessment of osteomyelitis (OM) and patient’s management. Eighty-five patients who were suspected as having...
Saved in:
Published in: | Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy 2019-10, Vol.28 (3), p.89-95 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-c375d4cdc1bc5ab46cfee2f529c2e92bad4c531efc1007abdbdef783febdafcd3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 95 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Arıcan, Pelin Okudan, Berna Şefizade, Rıza Naldöken, Seniha |
description | The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the contribution of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT for the assessment of osteomyelitis (OM) and patient’s management.
Eighty-five patients who were suspected as having OM were included in this study. Tc-99m MDP three phase bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT were performed to the region of suspected OM. SPECT/CT findings were compared with the findings of planar images/SPECT. Both planar bone scan/SPECT and SPECT/CT findings were divided into two groups: With OM and without OM. In all patients, scintigraphic diagnosis was confirmed by clinical follow up, laboratory findings, microscopic-bacteriological examinations, radiological, surgical, and pathological findings.
SPECT/CT changed the diagnosis and treatment planning in 14/85 (16.5%) patients. SPECT/CT was significantly superior to planar scan/SPECT imaging for determining OM (kappa value was 0.626 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.929 for SPECT/CT). SPECT/CT was statistically more successful in detection of chronic OM, and useful in differentiating chronic OM from acute OM (kappa value was 0.541 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.944 for SPECT/CT).
SPECT/CT increases accuracy of the diagnosis in the evaluation of OM when it is compared to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT. SPECT/CT can change the diagnosis and management of the patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.20053 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6746013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2287046298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-c375d4cdc1bc5ab46cfee2f529c2e92bad4c531efc1007abdbdef783febdafcd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtq3DAQhkVpaMI2r9AKetMbb3SyZd8U0s22TVlIINveClkebRRka2vJKXn7apNtTiOYEcw_PzN8CH2kZC6YFCe9G9N8oz0MIc4ZoU1OpORv0BGjQha0KZu39_-qoIKKQ3Qc4w3JUbOK1PU7dMhpSSQV5Aj9PHN6k32SM_i39hPgYPHXMAC-ulwu1ieLNXYDvtTJwZAi_uvSNb6a4hZMgg5fxAShvwPvkovv0YHVPsLxvs7Qr2_L9eJHsbr4fr44XRVGsCYVhsuyE6YztDWlbkVlLACzJWsMg4a1OjdLTsEaSojUbdd2YGXNLbSdtqbjM_TlwXc7tT10Ji82aq-2o-v1eKeCduplZ3DXahNuVSVFRSjPBp_3BmP4M0FMqnfRgPd6gDBFxVhdS1oLSbP00yvpTZjGIZ-3U0kiKtbUT4auA-3D4N0AT8Lzs-XpSlHCm_xmSD5IzRhiHME-7k2J2tFVO7pqT1ft6Kp7unnyw_OzH-f-s-T_ACcQpZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287046298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic Value of Bone SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Arıcan, Pelin ; Okudan, Berna ; Şefizade, Rıza ; Naldöken, Seniha</creator><contributor>Özcan,Zehra</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arıcan, Pelin ; Okudan, Berna ; Şefizade, Rıza ; Naldöken, Seniha ; Özcan,Zehra</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the contribution of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT for the assessment of osteomyelitis (OM) and patient’s management.
Eighty-five patients who were suspected as having OM were included in this study. Tc-99m MDP three phase bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT were performed to the region of suspected OM. SPECT/CT findings were compared with the findings of planar images/SPECT. Both planar bone scan/SPECT and SPECT/CT findings were divided into two groups: With OM and without OM. In all patients, scintigraphic diagnosis was confirmed by clinical follow up, laboratory findings, microscopic-bacteriological examinations, radiological, surgical, and pathological findings.
SPECT/CT changed the diagnosis and treatment planning in 14/85 (16.5%) patients. SPECT/CT was significantly superior to planar scan/SPECT imaging for determining OM (kappa value was 0.626 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.929 for SPECT/CT). SPECT/CT was statistically more successful in detection of chronic OM, and useful in differentiating chronic OM from acute OM (kappa value was 0.541 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.944 for SPECT/CT).
SPECT/CT increases accuracy of the diagnosis in the evaluation of OM when it is compared to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT. SPECT/CT can change the diagnosis and management of the patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2146-1414</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2147-1959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.20053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31507140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Türkiye Nükleer Tıp Derneği</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Biomedical materials ; Computation ; Computed tomography ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Drug dosages ; Emission analysis ; Infections ; Laboratories ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Nuclear medicine ; Original ; Osteomyelitis ; Patients ; Photon emission ; Prostheses ; Scintigraphy ; Single photon emission computed tomography ; Systematic review ; Tıp ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy, 2019-10, Vol.28 (3), p.89-95</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2019 by Turkish Society of Nuclear Medicine | Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy published by Galenos Yayınevi. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-c375d4cdc1bc5ab46cfee2f529c2e92bad4c531efc1007abdbdef783febdafcd3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3930-0177 ; 0000-0002-4806-4375 ; 0000-0003-4278-9508 ; 0000-0001-8076-3988</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2287046298/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2287046298?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31507140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Özcan,Zehra</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arıcan, Pelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okudan, Berna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şefizade, Rıza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naldöken, Seniha</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic Value of Bone SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis</title><title>Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy</title><addtitle>Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther</addtitle><description>The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the contribution of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT for the assessment of osteomyelitis (OM) and patient’s management.
Eighty-five patients who were suspected as having OM were included in this study. Tc-99m MDP three phase bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT were performed to the region of suspected OM. SPECT/CT findings were compared with the findings of planar images/SPECT. Both planar bone scan/SPECT and SPECT/CT findings were divided into two groups: With OM and without OM. In all patients, scintigraphic diagnosis was confirmed by clinical follow up, laboratory findings, microscopic-bacteriological examinations, radiological, surgical, and pathological findings.
SPECT/CT changed the diagnosis and treatment planning in 14/85 (16.5%) patients. SPECT/CT was significantly superior to planar scan/SPECT imaging for determining OM (kappa value was 0.626 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.929 for SPECT/CT). SPECT/CT was statistically more successful in detection of chronic OM, and useful in differentiating chronic OM from acute OM (kappa value was 0.541 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.944 for SPECT/CT).
SPECT/CT increases accuracy of the diagnosis in the evaluation of OM when it is compared to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT. SPECT/CT can change the diagnosis and management of the patients.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Photon emission</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Scintigraphy</subject><subject>Single photon emission computed tomography</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tıp</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>2146-1414</issn><issn>2147-1959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtq3DAQhkVpaMI2r9AKetMbb3SyZd8U0s22TVlIINveClkebRRka2vJKXn7apNtTiOYEcw_PzN8CH2kZC6YFCe9G9N8oz0MIc4ZoU1OpORv0BGjQha0KZu39_-qoIKKQ3Qc4w3JUbOK1PU7dMhpSSQV5Aj9PHN6k32SM_i39hPgYPHXMAC-ulwu1ieLNXYDvtTJwZAi_uvSNb6a4hZMgg5fxAShvwPvkovv0YHVPsLxvs7Qr2_L9eJHsbr4fr44XRVGsCYVhsuyE6YztDWlbkVlLACzJWsMg4a1OjdLTsEaSojUbdd2YGXNLbSdtqbjM_TlwXc7tT10Ji82aq-2o-v1eKeCduplZ3DXahNuVSVFRSjPBp_3BmP4M0FMqnfRgPd6gDBFxVhdS1oLSbP00yvpTZjGIZ-3U0kiKtbUT4auA-3D4N0AT8Lzs-XpSlHCm_xmSD5IzRhiHME-7k2J2tFVO7pqT1ft6Kp7unnyw_OzH-f-s-T_ACcQpZE</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Arıcan, Pelin</creator><creator>Okudan, Berna</creator><creator>Şefizade, Rıza</creator><creator>Naldöken, Seniha</creator><general>Türkiye Nükleer Tıp Derneği</general><general>Galenos Publishing House</general><general>Galenos Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IEBAR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-0177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4806-4375</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-9508</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8076-3988</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Diagnostic Value of Bone SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis</title><author>Arıcan, Pelin ; Okudan, Berna ; Şefizade, Rıza ; Naldöken, Seniha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-c375d4cdc1bc5ab46cfee2f529c2e92bad4c531efc1007abdbdef783febdafcd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Photon emission</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Scintigraphy</topic><topic>Single photon emission computed tomography</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tıp</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arıcan, Pelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okudan, Berna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şefizade, Rıza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naldöken, Seniha</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Idealonline online kütüphane - Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arıcan, Pelin</au><au>Okudan, Berna</au><au>Şefizade, Rıza</au><au>Naldöken, Seniha</au><au>Özcan,Zehra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic Value of Bone SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis</atitle><jtitle>Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>89-95</pages><issn>2146-1414</issn><eissn>2147-1959</eissn><abstract>The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the contribution of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT for the assessment of osteomyelitis (OM) and patient’s management.
Eighty-five patients who were suspected as having OM were included in this study. Tc-99m MDP three phase bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT were performed to the region of suspected OM. SPECT/CT findings were compared with the findings of planar images/SPECT. Both planar bone scan/SPECT and SPECT/CT findings were divided into two groups: With OM and without OM. In all patients, scintigraphic diagnosis was confirmed by clinical follow up, laboratory findings, microscopic-bacteriological examinations, radiological, surgical, and pathological findings.
SPECT/CT changed the diagnosis and treatment planning in 14/85 (16.5%) patients. SPECT/CT was significantly superior to planar scan/SPECT imaging for determining OM (kappa value was 0.626 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.929 for SPECT/CT). SPECT/CT was statistically more successful in detection of chronic OM, and useful in differentiating chronic OM from acute OM (kappa value was 0.541 for planar scan/SPECT, 0.944 for SPECT/CT).
SPECT/CT increases accuracy of the diagnosis in the evaluation of OM when it is compared to three phase bone scintigraphy/SPECT. SPECT/CT can change the diagnosis and management of the patients.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Türkiye Nükleer Tıp Derneği</pub><pmid>31507140</pmid><doi>10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.20053</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-0177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4806-4375</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-9508</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8076-3988</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2146-1414 |
ispartof | Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy, 2019-10, Vol.28 (3), p.89-95 |
issn | 2146-1414 2147-1959 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6746013 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Accuracy Biomedical materials Computation Computed tomography Diagnosis Diagnostic systems Drug dosages Emission analysis Infections Laboratories Medical diagnosis Medical imaging NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Nuclear medicine Original Osteomyelitis Patients Photon emission Prostheses Scintigraphy Single photon emission computed tomography Systematic review Tıp Tomography |
title | Diagnostic Value of Bone SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A42%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20Value%20of%20Bone%20SPECT/CT%20in%20Patients%20with%20Suspected%20Osteomyelitis&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20imaging%20and%20radionuclide%20therapy&rft.au=Ar%C4%B1can,%20Pelin&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=89-95&rft.issn=2146-1414&rft.eissn=2147-1959&rft_id=info:doi/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.20053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2287046298%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-c375d4cdc1bc5ab46cfee2f529c2e92bad4c531efc1007abdbdef783febdafcd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287046298&rft_id=info:pmid/31507140&rfr_iscdi=true |