Loading…
Reconciling the controversy regarding the functional importance of bullet- and football-shaped GroE complexes
The chaperonin GroEL and its co-chaperonin GroES form both GroEL–GroES bullet-shaped and GroEL–GroES2 football-shaped complexes. The residence time of protein substrates in the cavities of these complexes is about 10 and 1 s, respectively. There has been much controversy regarding which of these com...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of biological chemistry 2019-09, Vol.294 (37), p.13527-13529 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The chaperonin GroEL and its co-chaperonin GroES form both GroEL–GroES bullet-shaped and GroEL–GroES2 football-shaped complexes. The residence time of protein substrates in the cavities of these complexes is about 10 and 1 s, respectively. There has been much controversy regarding which of these complexes is the main functional form. Here, we show using computational analysis that GroEL protein substrates have a bimodal distribution of folding times, which matches these residence times, thereby suggesting that both bullet-shaped and football-shaped complexes are functional. More generally, co-existing complexes with different stoichiometries are not mutually exclusive with respect to having a functional role and can complement each other. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9258 1083-351X |
DOI: | 10.1074/jbc.AC119.010299 |