Trends and Complications in Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release in Private Payer and Medicare Patient Populations

• Published in: Hand (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-07, Vol.14 (4), p.455-461
• Main Authors: Devana, Sai K., Jensen, Andrew R., Yamaguchi, Kent T., D’Oro, Anthony, Buser, Zorica, Wang, Jeffrey C., Petrigliano, Frank A., Dowd, Casimir
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - epidemiology; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - surgery; Child; Databases, Factual; Decompression, Surgical - economics; Decompression, Surgical - methods; Decompression, Surgical - statistics & numerical data; Endoscopy - economics; Female; Humans; Insurance, Health; Male; Medicare; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Retrospective Studies; Surgery; United States - epidemiology; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1558-9447; 1558-9455
• DOI: 10.1177/1558944717751196

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report trends, complications, and costs associated with endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). Methods: Using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, patients who had open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release (CTR) were identified retrospectively in the PearlDiver database from both the Medicare and Humana (a private payer health insurance) populations from 2005 to 2014. These groups were then evaluated for postoperative complications, including wound infection within 90 days, wound dehiscence within 90 days, and intraoperative median nerve injury. We also used the data output for each group to compare the cost of the 2 procedure types. Data were analyzed via the Student t test. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Results: A significantly lower percentage of patients in the endoscopic CTR group had a postoperative infection (5.21 vs 7.97 per 1000 patients per year, P < .001; 7.36 vs 11.23 per 1000 patients per year, P < .001) and wound dehiscence (1.58 vs 2.87 per 1000 patients per year, P < .001; 2.14 vs 3.73 per 1000 patients per year, P < .05) than open CTR group in the Medicare and Humana populations, respectively. Median nerve injury occurred 0.59/1000 ECTRs versus 1.69/1000 OCTRs (Medicare) and 1.96/1000 ECTRs versus 3.72/1000 OCTRs (Humana). Endoscopic CTR cost was more than open CTR for both the Medicare population ($1643 vs $1015 per procedure, P < .001) and Humana population ($1928 vs $1191 per procedure, P < .001). Conclusions: In both the Medicare and private insurance patient populations, endoscopic CTR is associated with fewer postoperative complications than open CTR, but is associated with greater expenses.