Loading…

Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?

Background. To assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) compared with liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Methods. From January 2010 to December 2017, 721 patients underwent MRI as a part of preoperative workup within 1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of oncology 2019, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-8
Main Authors: Ferrero, Alessandro, Mele, Caterina, Perotti, Serena, Panettieri, Elena, Russolillo, Nadia, Ardito, Francesco, Langella, Serena, Giuliante, Felice
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3
container_end_page 8
container_issue 2019
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of oncology
container_volume 2019
creator Ferrero, Alessandro
Mele, Caterina
Perotti, Serena
Panettieri, Elena
Russolillo, Nadia
Ardito, Francesco
Langella, Serena
Giuliante, Felice
description Background. To assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) compared with liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Methods. From January 2010 to December 2017, 721 patients underwent MRI as a part of preoperative workup within 1 month before hepatectomy and were considered for the study. Early intrahepatic recurrence (relapse at cut surface excluded) was assessed 6 months after the resection and was considered as residual disease undetected by IOUS and/or MRI. IOUS and MRI performance was compared on a patient-by-patient basis. Long-term results were also studied. Results. A total of 2845 CRLMs were detected by MRI, and the median number of CRLMs per patient was 2 (1–31). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 489 patients (67.8%). In 177 patients, 379 new nodules were intraoperatively found and resected. Among 379 newly identified nodules, 317 were histologically proven CRLMs (11.1% of entire series). The median size of new CRLMs was 6 ± 2.5 mm. Relationships between intrahepatic vessels and tumors differed between IOUS and MRI in 128 patients (17.7%). The preoperative surgical plan was intraoperatively changed for 171 patients (23.7%). Overall, early intrahepatic recurrence occurred in 8.7% of cases. To assess the diagnostic performance, 24 (3.3%) recurrences at the cut surface were excluded; thus, 5.4% of early relapses were considered for analysis. The sensitivity of IOUS was superior to MRI (94.5% vs 75.1%), while the specificity was similar (95.7% vs 95.9%). Multivariate analysis at the hepatic dome or subglissonian and mucinous histology revealed predictive factors of metastases missing at MRI. The 5-year OS (52.1% vs 37.8%, p=0.006) and DF survival (45.1% vs 33%, p=0.002) were significantly worse among patients with new CRLMs than without. Conclusions. IOUS improves staging in patients undergoing resection for CRLMs even in the era of liver-specific MRI. Intraoperative detection of new CRLMs negatively affects oncologic outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2019/1369274
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6778901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A607787541</galeid><sourcerecordid>A607787541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktFr1TAUxosobk7ffJaAL4LWJU172vigjMvUwh2Cc_gYYnvaZuQm1yTd8N_wLzb1XrfpkxDICefH9-Ucvix7yuhrxqrquKBMHDMOoqjLe9khg6bOm7Ki9-_UB9mjEC4phZIKeJgdcAaQcHGY_Wxt9Mpt0auor5BcmPQMbrY9OY9q1HYkg_Nk5Yzz2EVlyDphnpxhVCEdDERbEickp14RN-za-fkWOz3ojpyp0WJMxWcMzirbIWk3v3XfkDaQNiYbbQz56nycridt8N3j7MGgTMAn-_sou3h_-mX1MV9_-tCuTtZ5VwoR86JsAGrgPWJBac9AFQJYLyhnqoEC03J4mQZlXY1cQS_qumnYAAC8YaJU_Ch7u9Pdzt822He4bMLIrdcb5X9Ip7T8u2P1JEd3JSEpCcqSwIu9gHffZwxRbnTo0Bhl0c1BFpxRqJqmKhL6_B_00s3epvFkUdIaKig5v6VGZVBqO7jk2y2i8gRocq2rcrF9taM670LwONx8mVG5REIukZD7SCT82d0xb-A_GUjAyx0wadura_2fcpgYHNQtzRouqOC_AF0Oxxo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407656433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ferrero, Alessandro ; Mele, Caterina ; Perotti, Serena ; Panettieri, Elena ; Russolillo, Nadia ; Ardito, Francesco ; Langella, Serena ; Giuliante, Felice</creator><contributor>Kovacs, György ; György Kovacs</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ferrero, Alessandro ; Mele, Caterina ; Perotti, Serena ; Panettieri, Elena ; Russolillo, Nadia ; Ardito, Francesco ; Langella, Serena ; Giuliante, Felice ; Kovacs, György ; György Kovacs</creatorcontrib><description>Background. To assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) compared with liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Methods. From January 2010 to December 2017, 721 patients underwent MRI as a part of preoperative workup within 1 month before hepatectomy and were considered for the study. Early intrahepatic recurrence (relapse at cut surface excluded) was assessed 6 months after the resection and was considered as residual disease undetected by IOUS and/or MRI. IOUS and MRI performance was compared on a patient-by-patient basis. Long-term results were also studied. Results. A total of 2845 CRLMs were detected by MRI, and the median number of CRLMs per patient was 2 (1–31). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 489 patients (67.8%). In 177 patients, 379 new nodules were intraoperatively found and resected. Among 379 newly identified nodules, 317 were histologically proven CRLMs (11.1% of entire series). The median size of new CRLMs was 6 ± 2.5 mm. Relationships between intrahepatic vessels and tumors differed between IOUS and MRI in 128 patients (17.7%). The preoperative surgical plan was intraoperatively changed for 171 patients (23.7%). Overall, early intrahepatic recurrence occurred in 8.7% of cases. To assess the diagnostic performance, 24 (3.3%) recurrences at the cut surface were excluded; thus, 5.4% of early relapses were considered for analysis. The sensitivity of IOUS was superior to MRI (94.5% vs 75.1%), while the specificity was similar (95.7% vs 95.9%). Multivariate analysis at the hepatic dome or subglissonian and mucinous histology revealed predictive factors of metastases missing at MRI. The 5-year OS (52.1% vs 37.8%, p=0.006) and DF survival (45.1% vs 33%, p=0.002) were significantly worse among patients with new CRLMs than without. Conclusions. IOUS improves staging in patients undergoing resection for CRLMs even in the era of liver-specific MRI. Intraoperative detection of new CRLMs negatively affects oncologic outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-8450</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-8450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2019/1369274</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31662749</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Chemotherapy ; Comparative analysis ; Laparoscopy ; Liver ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging ; Metastasis ; Patients ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of oncology, 2019, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-8</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 Serena Langella et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Serena Langella et al. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Serena Langella et al. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0139-6890 ; 0000-0003-2087-2589 ; 0000-0003-1504-5810 ; 0000-0003-1596-2862 ; 0000-0002-0627-186X ; 0000-0003-2300-0460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2407656433/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2407656433?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,25753,27923,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,74998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662749$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kovacs, György</contributor><contributor>György Kovacs</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ferrero, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mele, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perotti, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panettieri, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russolillo, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardito, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langella, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giuliante, Felice</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?</title><title>Journal of oncology</title><addtitle>J Oncol</addtitle><description>Background. To assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) compared with liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Methods. From January 2010 to December 2017, 721 patients underwent MRI as a part of preoperative workup within 1 month before hepatectomy and were considered for the study. Early intrahepatic recurrence (relapse at cut surface excluded) was assessed 6 months after the resection and was considered as residual disease undetected by IOUS and/or MRI. IOUS and MRI performance was compared on a patient-by-patient basis. Long-term results were also studied. Results. A total of 2845 CRLMs were detected by MRI, and the median number of CRLMs per patient was 2 (1–31). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 489 patients (67.8%). In 177 patients, 379 new nodules were intraoperatively found and resected. Among 379 newly identified nodules, 317 were histologically proven CRLMs (11.1% of entire series). The median size of new CRLMs was 6 ± 2.5 mm. Relationships between intrahepatic vessels and tumors differed between IOUS and MRI in 128 patients (17.7%). The preoperative surgical plan was intraoperatively changed for 171 patients (23.7%). Overall, early intrahepatic recurrence occurred in 8.7% of cases. To assess the diagnostic performance, 24 (3.3%) recurrences at the cut surface were excluded; thus, 5.4% of early relapses were considered for analysis. The sensitivity of IOUS was superior to MRI (94.5% vs 75.1%), while the specificity was similar (95.7% vs 95.9%). Multivariate analysis at the hepatic dome or subglissonian and mucinous histology revealed predictive factors of metastases missing at MRI. The 5-year OS (52.1% vs 37.8%, p=0.006) and DF survival (45.1% vs 33%, p=0.002) were significantly worse among patients with new CRLMs than without. Conclusions. IOUS improves staging in patients undergoing resection for CRLMs even in the era of liver-specific MRI. Intraoperative detection of new CRLMs negatively affects oncologic outcomes.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>1687-8450</issn><issn>1687-8450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNktFr1TAUxosobk7ffJaAL4LWJU172vigjMvUwh2Cc_gYYnvaZuQm1yTd8N_wLzb1XrfpkxDICefH9-Ucvix7yuhrxqrquKBMHDMOoqjLe9khg6bOm7Ki9-_UB9mjEC4phZIKeJgdcAaQcHGY_Wxt9Mpt0auor5BcmPQMbrY9OY9q1HYkg_Nk5Yzz2EVlyDphnpxhVCEdDERbEickp14RN-za-fkWOz3ojpyp0WJMxWcMzirbIWk3v3XfkDaQNiYbbQz56nycridt8N3j7MGgTMAn-_sou3h_-mX1MV9_-tCuTtZ5VwoR86JsAGrgPWJBac9AFQJYLyhnqoEC03J4mQZlXY1cQS_qumnYAAC8YaJU_Ch7u9Pdzt822He4bMLIrdcb5X9Ip7T8u2P1JEd3JSEpCcqSwIu9gHffZwxRbnTo0Bhl0c1BFpxRqJqmKhL6_B_00s3epvFkUdIaKig5v6VGZVBqO7jk2y2i8gRocq2rcrF9taM670LwONx8mVG5REIukZD7SCT82d0xb-A_GUjAyx0wadura_2fcpgYHNQtzRouqOC_AF0Oxxo</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Ferrero, Alessandro</creator><creator>Mele, Caterina</creator><creator>Perotti, Serena</creator><creator>Panettieri, Elena</creator><creator>Russolillo, Nadia</creator><creator>Ardito, Francesco</creator><creator>Langella, Serena</creator><creator>Giuliante, Felice</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0139-6890</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-2589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1504-5810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-2862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0627-186X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-0460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?</title><author>Ferrero, Alessandro ; Mele, Caterina ; Perotti, Serena ; Panettieri, Elena ; Russolillo, Nadia ; Ardito, Francesco ; Langella, Serena ; Giuliante, Felice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferrero, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mele, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perotti, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panettieri, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russolillo, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardito, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langella, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giuliante, Felice</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferrero, Alessandro</au><au>Mele, Caterina</au><au>Perotti, Serena</au><au>Panettieri, Elena</au><au>Russolillo, Nadia</au><au>Ardito, Francesco</au><au>Langella, Serena</au><au>Giuliante, Felice</au><au>Kovacs, György</au><au>György Kovacs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Oncol</addtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>2019</volume><issue>2019</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>1687-8450</issn><eissn>1687-8450</eissn><abstract>Background. To assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) compared with liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Methods. From January 2010 to December 2017, 721 patients underwent MRI as a part of preoperative workup within 1 month before hepatectomy and were considered for the study. Early intrahepatic recurrence (relapse at cut surface excluded) was assessed 6 months after the resection and was considered as residual disease undetected by IOUS and/or MRI. IOUS and MRI performance was compared on a patient-by-patient basis. Long-term results were also studied. Results. A total of 2845 CRLMs were detected by MRI, and the median number of CRLMs per patient was 2 (1–31). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 489 patients (67.8%). In 177 patients, 379 new nodules were intraoperatively found and resected. Among 379 newly identified nodules, 317 were histologically proven CRLMs (11.1% of entire series). The median size of new CRLMs was 6 ± 2.5 mm. Relationships between intrahepatic vessels and tumors differed between IOUS and MRI in 128 patients (17.7%). The preoperative surgical plan was intraoperatively changed for 171 patients (23.7%). Overall, early intrahepatic recurrence occurred in 8.7% of cases. To assess the diagnostic performance, 24 (3.3%) recurrences at the cut surface were excluded; thus, 5.4% of early relapses were considered for analysis. The sensitivity of IOUS was superior to MRI (94.5% vs 75.1%), while the specificity was similar (95.7% vs 95.9%). Multivariate analysis at the hepatic dome or subglissonian and mucinous histology revealed predictive factors of metastases missing at MRI. The 5-year OS (52.1% vs 37.8%, p=0.006) and DF survival (45.1% vs 33%, p=0.002) were significantly worse among patients with new CRLMs than without. Conclusions. IOUS improves staging in patients undergoing resection for CRLMs even in the era of liver-specific MRI. Intraoperative detection of new CRLMs negatively affects oncologic outcomes.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><pmid>31662749</pmid><doi>10.1155/2019/1369274</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0139-6890</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-2589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1504-5810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-2862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0627-186X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-0460</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1687-8450
ispartof Journal of oncology, 2019, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-8
issn 1687-8450
1687-8450
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6778901
source Publicly Available Content Database; Wiley Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Cancer
Chemotherapy
Comparative analysis
Laparoscopy
Liver
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical imaging
Metastasis
Patients
Surgeons
Surgery
Tumors
Ultrasonic imaging
title Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A48%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20Ultrasound%20Staging%20for%20Colorectal%20Liver%20Metastases%20in%20the%20Era%20of%20Liver-Specific%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging:%20Is%20It%20Still%20Worthwhile?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oncology&rft.au=Ferrero,%20Alessandro&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=2019&rft.issue=2019&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=1687-8450&rft.eissn=1687-8450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2019/1369274&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA607787541%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407656433&rft_id=info:pmid/31662749&rft_galeid=A607787541&rfr_iscdi=true