Loading…
Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?
Background. To assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) compared with liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Methods. From January 2010 to December 2017, 721 patients underwent MRI as a part of preoperative workup within 1...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of oncology 2019, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-8 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3 |
container_end_page | 8 |
container_issue | 2019 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of oncology |
container_volume | 2019 |
creator | Ferrero, Alessandro Mele, Caterina Perotti, Serena Panettieri, Elena Russolillo, Nadia Ardito, Francesco Langella, Serena Giuliante, Felice |
description | Background. To assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) compared with liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Methods. From January 2010 to December 2017, 721 patients underwent MRI as a part of preoperative workup within 1 month before hepatectomy and were considered for the study. Early intrahepatic recurrence (relapse at cut surface excluded) was assessed 6 months after the resection and was considered as residual disease undetected by IOUS and/or MRI. IOUS and MRI performance was compared on a patient-by-patient basis. Long-term results were also studied. Results. A total of 2845 CRLMs were detected by MRI, and the median number of CRLMs per patient was 2 (1–31). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 489 patients (67.8%). In 177 patients, 379 new nodules were intraoperatively found and resected. Among 379 newly identified nodules, 317 were histologically proven CRLMs (11.1% of entire series). The median size of new CRLMs was 6 ± 2.5 mm. Relationships between intrahepatic vessels and tumors differed between IOUS and MRI in 128 patients (17.7%). The preoperative surgical plan was intraoperatively changed for 171 patients (23.7%). Overall, early intrahepatic recurrence occurred in 8.7% of cases. To assess the diagnostic performance, 24 (3.3%) recurrences at the cut surface were excluded; thus, 5.4% of early relapses were considered for analysis. The sensitivity of IOUS was superior to MRI (94.5% vs 75.1%), while the specificity was similar (95.7% vs 95.9%). Multivariate analysis at the hepatic dome or subglissonian and mucinous histology revealed predictive factors of metastases missing at MRI. The 5-year OS (52.1% vs 37.8%, p=0.006) and DF survival (45.1% vs 33%, p=0.002) were significantly worse among patients with new CRLMs than without. Conclusions. IOUS improves staging in patients undergoing resection for CRLMs even in the era of liver-specific MRI. Intraoperative detection of new CRLMs negatively affects oncologic outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2019/1369274 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6778901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A607787541</galeid><sourcerecordid>A607787541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktFr1TAUxosobk7ffJaAL4LWJU172vigjMvUwh2Cc_gYYnvaZuQm1yTd8N_wLzb1XrfpkxDICefH9-Ucvix7yuhrxqrquKBMHDMOoqjLe9khg6bOm7Ki9-_UB9mjEC4phZIKeJgdcAaQcHGY_Wxt9Mpt0auor5BcmPQMbrY9OY9q1HYkg_Nk5Yzz2EVlyDphnpxhVCEdDERbEickp14RN-za-fkWOz3ojpyp0WJMxWcMzirbIWk3v3XfkDaQNiYbbQz56nycridt8N3j7MGgTMAn-_sou3h_-mX1MV9_-tCuTtZ5VwoR86JsAGrgPWJBac9AFQJYLyhnqoEC03J4mQZlXY1cQS_qumnYAAC8YaJU_Ch7u9Pdzt822He4bMLIrdcb5X9Ip7T8u2P1JEd3JSEpCcqSwIu9gHffZwxRbnTo0Bhl0c1BFpxRqJqmKhL6_B_00s3epvFkUdIaKig5v6VGZVBqO7jk2y2i8gRocq2rcrF9taM670LwONx8mVG5REIukZD7SCT82d0xb-A_GUjAyx0wadura_2fcpgYHNQtzRouqOC_AF0Oxxo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407656433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ferrero, Alessandro ; Mele, Caterina ; Perotti, Serena ; Panettieri, Elena ; Russolillo, Nadia ; Ardito, Francesco ; Langella, Serena ; Giuliante, Felice</creator><contributor>Kovacs, György ; György Kovacs</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ferrero, Alessandro ; Mele, Caterina ; Perotti, Serena ; Panettieri, Elena ; Russolillo, Nadia ; Ardito, Francesco ; Langella, Serena ; Giuliante, Felice ; Kovacs, György ; György Kovacs</creatorcontrib><description>Background. To assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) compared with liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Methods. From January 2010 to December 2017, 721 patients underwent MRI as a part of preoperative workup within 1 month before hepatectomy and were considered for the study. Early intrahepatic recurrence (relapse at cut surface excluded) was assessed 6 months after the resection and was considered as residual disease undetected by IOUS and/or MRI. IOUS and MRI performance was compared on a patient-by-patient basis. Long-term results were also studied. Results. A total of 2845 CRLMs were detected by MRI, and the median number of CRLMs per patient was 2 (1–31). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 489 patients (67.8%). In 177 patients, 379 new nodules were intraoperatively found and resected. Among 379 newly identified nodules, 317 were histologically proven CRLMs (11.1% of entire series). The median size of new CRLMs was 6 ± 2.5 mm. Relationships between intrahepatic vessels and tumors differed between IOUS and MRI in 128 patients (17.7%). The preoperative surgical plan was intraoperatively changed for 171 patients (23.7%). Overall, early intrahepatic recurrence occurred in 8.7% of cases. To assess the diagnostic performance, 24 (3.3%) recurrences at the cut surface were excluded; thus, 5.4% of early relapses were considered for analysis. The sensitivity of IOUS was superior to MRI (94.5% vs 75.1%), while the specificity was similar (95.7% vs 95.9%). Multivariate analysis at the hepatic dome or subglissonian and mucinous histology revealed predictive factors of metastases missing at MRI. The 5-year OS (52.1% vs 37.8%, p=0.006) and DF survival (45.1% vs 33%, p=0.002) were significantly worse among patients with new CRLMs than without. Conclusions. IOUS improves staging in patients undergoing resection for CRLMs even in the era of liver-specific MRI. Intraoperative detection of new CRLMs negatively affects oncologic outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-8450</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-8450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2019/1369274</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31662749</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Chemotherapy ; Comparative analysis ; Laparoscopy ; Liver ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging ; Metastasis ; Patients ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of oncology, 2019, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-8</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 Serena Langella et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Serena Langella et al. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Serena Langella et al. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0139-6890 ; 0000-0003-2087-2589 ; 0000-0003-1504-5810 ; 0000-0003-1596-2862 ; 0000-0002-0627-186X ; 0000-0003-2300-0460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2407656433/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2407656433?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,25753,27923,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,74998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662749$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kovacs, György</contributor><contributor>György Kovacs</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ferrero, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mele, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perotti, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panettieri, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russolillo, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardito, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langella, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giuliante, Felice</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?</title><title>Journal of oncology</title><addtitle>J Oncol</addtitle><description>Background. To assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) compared with liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Methods. From January 2010 to December 2017, 721 patients underwent MRI as a part of preoperative workup within 1 month before hepatectomy and were considered for the study. Early intrahepatic recurrence (relapse at cut surface excluded) was assessed 6 months after the resection and was considered as residual disease undetected by IOUS and/or MRI. IOUS and MRI performance was compared on a patient-by-patient basis. Long-term results were also studied. Results. A total of 2845 CRLMs were detected by MRI, and the median number of CRLMs per patient was 2 (1–31). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 489 patients (67.8%). In 177 patients, 379 new nodules were intraoperatively found and resected. Among 379 newly identified nodules, 317 were histologically proven CRLMs (11.1% of entire series). The median size of new CRLMs was 6 ± 2.5 mm. Relationships between intrahepatic vessels and tumors differed between IOUS and MRI in 128 patients (17.7%). The preoperative surgical plan was intraoperatively changed for 171 patients (23.7%). Overall, early intrahepatic recurrence occurred in 8.7% of cases. To assess the diagnostic performance, 24 (3.3%) recurrences at the cut surface were excluded; thus, 5.4% of early relapses were considered for analysis. The sensitivity of IOUS was superior to MRI (94.5% vs 75.1%), while the specificity was similar (95.7% vs 95.9%). Multivariate analysis at the hepatic dome or subglissonian and mucinous histology revealed predictive factors of metastases missing at MRI. The 5-year OS (52.1% vs 37.8%, p=0.006) and DF survival (45.1% vs 33%, p=0.002) were significantly worse among patients with new CRLMs than without. Conclusions. IOUS improves staging in patients undergoing resection for CRLMs even in the era of liver-specific MRI. Intraoperative detection of new CRLMs negatively affects oncologic outcomes.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>1687-8450</issn><issn>1687-8450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNktFr1TAUxosobk7ffJaAL4LWJU172vigjMvUwh2Cc_gYYnvaZuQm1yTd8N_wLzb1XrfpkxDICefH9-Ucvix7yuhrxqrquKBMHDMOoqjLe9khg6bOm7Ki9-_UB9mjEC4phZIKeJgdcAaQcHGY_Wxt9Mpt0auor5BcmPQMbrY9OY9q1HYkg_Nk5Yzz2EVlyDphnpxhVCEdDERbEickp14RN-za-fkWOz3ojpyp0WJMxWcMzirbIWk3v3XfkDaQNiYbbQz56nycridt8N3j7MGgTMAn-_sou3h_-mX1MV9_-tCuTtZ5VwoR86JsAGrgPWJBac9AFQJYLyhnqoEC03J4mQZlXY1cQS_qumnYAAC8YaJU_Ch7u9Pdzt822He4bMLIrdcb5X9Ip7T8u2P1JEd3JSEpCcqSwIu9gHffZwxRbnTo0Bhl0c1BFpxRqJqmKhL6_B_00s3epvFkUdIaKig5v6VGZVBqO7jk2y2i8gRocq2rcrF9taM670LwONx8mVG5REIukZD7SCT82d0xb-A_GUjAyx0wadura_2fcpgYHNQtzRouqOC_AF0Oxxo</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Ferrero, Alessandro</creator><creator>Mele, Caterina</creator><creator>Perotti, Serena</creator><creator>Panettieri, Elena</creator><creator>Russolillo, Nadia</creator><creator>Ardito, Francesco</creator><creator>Langella, Serena</creator><creator>Giuliante, Felice</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0139-6890</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-2589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1504-5810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-2862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0627-186X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-0460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?</title><author>Ferrero, Alessandro ; Mele, Caterina ; Perotti, Serena ; Panettieri, Elena ; Russolillo, Nadia ; Ardito, Francesco ; Langella, Serena ; Giuliante, Felice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferrero, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mele, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perotti, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panettieri, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russolillo, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardito, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langella, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giuliante, Felice</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferrero, Alessandro</au><au>Mele, Caterina</au><au>Perotti, Serena</au><au>Panettieri, Elena</au><au>Russolillo, Nadia</au><au>Ardito, Francesco</au><au>Langella, Serena</au><au>Giuliante, Felice</au><au>Kovacs, György</au><au>György Kovacs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Oncol</addtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>2019</volume><issue>2019</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>1687-8450</issn><eissn>1687-8450</eissn><abstract>Background. To assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) compared with liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Methods. From January 2010 to December 2017, 721 patients underwent MRI as a part of preoperative workup within 1 month before hepatectomy and were considered for the study. Early intrahepatic recurrence (relapse at cut surface excluded) was assessed 6 months after the resection and was considered as residual disease undetected by IOUS and/or MRI. IOUS and MRI performance was compared on a patient-by-patient basis. Long-term results were also studied. Results. A total of 2845 CRLMs were detected by MRI, and the median number of CRLMs per patient was 2 (1–31). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 489 patients (67.8%). In 177 patients, 379 new nodules were intraoperatively found and resected. Among 379 newly identified nodules, 317 were histologically proven CRLMs (11.1% of entire series). The median size of new CRLMs was 6 ± 2.5 mm. Relationships between intrahepatic vessels and tumors differed between IOUS and MRI in 128 patients (17.7%). The preoperative surgical plan was intraoperatively changed for 171 patients (23.7%). Overall, early intrahepatic recurrence occurred in 8.7% of cases. To assess the diagnostic performance, 24 (3.3%) recurrences at the cut surface were excluded; thus, 5.4% of early relapses were considered for analysis. The sensitivity of IOUS was superior to MRI (94.5% vs 75.1%), while the specificity was similar (95.7% vs 95.9%). Multivariate analysis at the hepatic dome or subglissonian and mucinous histology revealed predictive factors of metastases missing at MRI. The 5-year OS (52.1% vs 37.8%, p=0.006) and DF survival (45.1% vs 33%, p=0.002) were significantly worse among patients with new CRLMs than without. Conclusions. IOUS improves staging in patients undergoing resection for CRLMs even in the era of liver-specific MRI. Intraoperative detection of new CRLMs negatively affects oncologic outcomes.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><pmid>31662749</pmid><doi>10.1155/2019/1369274</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0139-6890</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-2589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1504-5810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-2862</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0627-186X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-0460</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1687-8450 |
ispartof | Journal of oncology, 2019, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-8 |
issn | 1687-8450 1687-8450 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6778901 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Wiley Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Cancer Chemotherapy Comparative analysis Laparoscopy Liver Magnetic resonance imaging Medical imaging Metastasis Patients Surgeons Surgery Tumors Ultrasonic imaging |
title | Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A48%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20Ultrasound%20Staging%20for%20Colorectal%20Liver%20Metastases%20in%20the%20Era%20of%20Liver-Specific%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging:%20Is%20It%20Still%20Worthwhile?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oncology&rft.au=Ferrero,%20Alessandro&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=2019&rft.issue=2019&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=1687-8450&rft.eissn=1687-8450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2019/1369274&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA607787541%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-24866763dee200d16a2961d9031a862e115343161c7e3a6d977881f66638194a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407656433&rft_id=info:pmid/31662749&rft_galeid=A607787541&rfr_iscdi=true |