Opinion: Why institutional review boards should have a role in the open science movement

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2019-10, Vol.116 (43), p.21336-21338
Main Authors: Grant, Sean, Bouskill, Kathryn E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological Sciences
Opinion
Review boards
Social Sciences
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 21338
container_issue 43
container_start_page 21336
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 116
creator Grant, Sean
Bouskill, Kathryn E
description
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.1916420116
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6815121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2309320801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1391-fbe97d46b0aaaf1ca753e258d2e3c4a71de7d21a959cfcfffedef6bd707a53773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLxTAQhYMoen2s3UnAjZurebRN40IQ8QWCG0V3ZdpMbaRNatNe8d-b6wt1NTDznTOHQ8guZ4ecKXnUOwiHXPMsEYzzbIXMONN8niWarZIZY0LN80QkG2QzhGfGmE5ztk42ZBREMJmRx9veOuvdMX1o3qh1YbTjNMYFtHTAhcVXWnoYTKCh8VNraAMLpEAH32LE6dgg9T06GiqLrkLa-QV26MZtslZDG3Dna26R-4vzu7Or-c3t5fXZ6c285zImrUvUyiRZyQCg5hWoVKJIcyNQVgkoblAZwUGnuqqruq7RYJ2VRjEFqVRKbpGTT99-Kjs0VXw9QFv0g-1geCs82OLvxdmmePKLIst5ygWPBgdfBoN_mTCMRWdDhW0LDv0UCiFZJLVMl-j-P_TZT0Os6oPSUrCcLam934l-onyXLt8BMAKGiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2309320801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opinion: Why institutional review boards should have a role in the open science movement</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Grant, Sean ; Bouskill, Kathryn E</creator><creatorcontrib>Grant, Sean ; Bouskill, Kathryn E</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1916420116</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31641094</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Biological Sciences ; Opinion ; Review boards ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2019-10, Vol.116 (43), p.21336-21338</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Oct 22, 2019</rights><rights>2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815121/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6815121/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641094$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grant, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouskill, Kathryn E</creatorcontrib><title>Opinion: Why institutional review boards should have a role in the open science movement</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Opinion</subject><subject>Review boards</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEtLxTAQhYMoen2s3UnAjZurebRN40IQ8QWCG0V3ZdpMbaRNatNe8d-b6wt1NTDznTOHQ8guZ4ecKXnUOwiHXPMsEYzzbIXMONN8niWarZIZY0LN80QkG2QzhGfGmE5ztk42ZBREMJmRx9veOuvdMX1o3qh1YbTjNMYFtHTAhcVXWnoYTKCh8VNraAMLpEAH32LE6dgg9T06GiqLrkLa-QV26MZtslZDG3Dna26R-4vzu7Or-c3t5fXZ6c285zImrUvUyiRZyQCg5hWoVKJIcyNQVgkoblAZwUGnuqqruq7RYJ2VRjEFqVRKbpGTT99-Kjs0VXw9QFv0g-1geCs82OLvxdmmePKLIst5ygWPBgdfBoN_mTCMRWdDhW0LDv0UCiFZJLVMl-j-P_TZT0Os6oPSUrCcLam934l-onyXLt8BMAKGiw</recordid><startdate>20191022</startdate><enddate>20191022</enddate><creator>Grant, Sean</creator><creator>Bouskill, Kathryn E</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191022</creationdate><title>Opinion: Why institutional review boards should have a role in the open science movement</title><author>Grant, Sean ; Bouskill, Kathryn E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1391-fbe97d46b0aaaf1ca753e258d2e3c4a71de7d21a959cfcfffedef6bd707a53773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Opinion</topic><topic>Review boards</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grant, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouskill, Kathryn E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grant, Sean</au><au>Bouskill, Kathryn E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opinion: Why institutional review boards should have a role in the open science movement</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2019-10-22</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>43</issue><spage>21336</spage><epage>21338</epage><pages>21336-21338</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>31641094</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.1916420116</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2019-10, Vol.116 (43), p.21336-21338
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6815121
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; PubMed Central
subjects Biological Sciences
Opinion
Review boards
Social Sciences
title Opinion: Why institutional review boards should have a role in the open science movement
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A31%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opinion:%20Why%20institutional%20review%20boards%20should%20have%20a%20role%20in%20the%20open%20science%20movement&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Grant,%20Sean&rft.date=2019-10-22&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=43&rft.spage=21336&rft.epage=21338&rft.pages=21336-21338&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.1916420116&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2309320801%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1391-fbe97d46b0aaaf1ca753e258d2e3c4a71de7d21a959cfcfffedef6bd707a53773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2309320801&rft_id=info:pmid/31641094&rfr_iscdi=true