Loading…
Efficacy of submucosal bupivacaine injection for pain relief after endoscopic submucosal dissection: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, and double-blind trial
Although abdominal pain is a common adverse event related to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), it can be sometimes underestimated by endoscopists. There are some endoscopic interventions available for the prevention of post-ESD pain, but their efficacy has not been established. We investigated...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medicine (Baltimore) 2019-04, Vol.98 (17), p.e15360-e15360 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3551-391ce77a4b12cfcd0a090b8df98f749c422491cd6b98496edb4f9be87e0b780f3 |
container_end_page | e15360 |
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | e15360 |
container_title | Medicine (Baltimore) |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Jung, Jang Han Jang, Hyun Joo Bang, Chang Seok Baik, Gwang Ho Park, Se Woo |
description | Although abdominal pain is a common adverse event related to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), it can be sometimes underestimated by endoscopists. There are some endoscopic interventions available for the prevention of post-ESD pain, but their efficacy has not been established. We investigated whether a submucosal injection of bupivacaine (BP) can reduce procedure-related abdominal pain compared with the standard method.
We performed a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial of 86 adult patients referred for ESD as treatment for gastric neoplasms. Patients were randomly assigned to either the BP submucosal or conventional solution group. Questionnaires were collected when the study began (baseline) and immediately after ESD, as well as at 6, 12, and 24 hours post-operatively. The primary outcome was indicated by the visual analog scale (VAS) evaluated at 6 hours after procedure.
There were no significant differences in primary outcomes between groups and among all time points (immediately, 12, and 24 hours after ESD). The VAS and short-form McGill pain (SF-MP) scores were higher immediately after ESD than at 6, 12, or 24 hours post-operatively. The incidence of abdominal pain immediately after ESD was 94.0% (78/83) for all patients of both groups, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the rate of abdominal pain immediately after ESD (BP group 37/40 [92.5%] versus non-BP group 41/43 [95.3%], P = .934). In univariable and multivariable analyses, BP did not have protective effect on post-ESD abdominal pain.
Submucosal BP injection does not promote pain relief or mitigate the effects of post-ESD abdominal pain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/MD.0000000000015360 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6831157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2216289611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3551-391ce77a4b12cfcd0a090b8df98f749c422491cd6b98496edb4f9be87e0b780f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhCZCQjxw2xXacOOaAVLWlILXiAmfLdsasixMHO9mqfSieEW-3lIIvI898_-_xDEKvKTmiRIp3l6dH5O-hTd2SJ2i1i1UjW_4UrQhhTSWk4AfoRc5XBaoF48_RQU0JE5SRFfp15py32t7g6HBezLDYmHXAZpn8VlvtR8B-vAI7-zhiFxOeSg4nCB4c1m6GhGHsY7Zx8vaxQ-9z3sve42M8LGH2FsbCr_GUYp52tS2scdJFPvhb6LGN45xiCNCvccniPi4mQGWCL5c5eR1eomdOhwyv7uMh-vbx7OvJp-riy_nnk-OLytZNQ6taUgtCaG4os872RBNJTNc72TnBpeWM8YL0rZEdly30hjtpoBNAjOiIqw_Rh73vVD4E_a7xpIOakh90ulFRe_VvZfQb9T1uVdvVlDaiGLy9N0jx5wJ5VoPPFkLQI8QlK8ZoyzrZUlrQeo_aMpacwD08Q4nabVpdnqr_N11Ubx53-KD5s9oC8D1wHUOZev4RlmtIagM6zJs7v0ZIVjFCJeGsJVXJCFr_BhlSuWU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2216289611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of submucosal bupivacaine injection for pain relief after endoscopic submucosal dissection: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, and double-blind trial</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><source>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</source><creator>Jung, Jang Han ; Jang, Hyun Joo ; Bang, Chang Seok ; Baik, Gwang Ho ; Park, Se Woo</creator><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jang Han ; Jang, Hyun Joo ; Bang, Chang Seok ; Baik, Gwang Ho ; Park, Se Woo</creatorcontrib><description>Although abdominal pain is a common adverse event related to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), it can be sometimes underestimated by endoscopists. There are some endoscopic interventions available for the prevention of post-ESD pain, but their efficacy has not been established. We investigated whether a submucosal injection of bupivacaine (BP) can reduce procedure-related abdominal pain compared with the standard method.
We performed a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial of 86 adult patients referred for ESD as treatment for gastric neoplasms. Patients were randomly assigned to either the BP submucosal or conventional solution group. Questionnaires were collected when the study began (baseline) and immediately after ESD, as well as at 6, 12, and 24 hours post-operatively. The primary outcome was indicated by the visual analog scale (VAS) evaluated at 6 hours after procedure.
There were no significant differences in primary outcomes between groups and among all time points (immediately, 12, and 24 hours after ESD). The VAS and short-form McGill pain (SF-MP) scores were higher immediately after ESD than at 6, 12, or 24 hours post-operatively. The incidence of abdominal pain immediately after ESD was 94.0% (78/83) for all patients of both groups, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the rate of abdominal pain immediately after ESD (BP group 37/40 [92.5%] versus non-BP group 41/43 [95.3%], P = .934). In univariable and multivariable analyses, BP did not have protective effect on post-ESD abdominal pain.
Submucosal BP injection does not promote pain relief or mitigate the effects of post-ESD abdominal pain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015360</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31027120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage ; Bupivacaine - administration & dosage ; Clinical Trial/Experimental Study ; Double-Blind Method ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Management ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2019-04, Vol.98 (17), p.e15360-e15360</ispartof><rights>the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3551-391ce77a4b12cfcd0a090b8df98f749c422491cd6b98496edb4f9be87e0b780f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6831157/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6831157/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31027120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jang Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Hyun Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Chang Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baik, Gwang Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Se Woo</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of submucosal bupivacaine injection for pain relief after endoscopic submucosal dissection: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, and double-blind trial</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>Although abdominal pain is a common adverse event related to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), it can be sometimes underestimated by endoscopists. There are some endoscopic interventions available for the prevention of post-ESD pain, but their efficacy has not been established. We investigated whether a submucosal injection of bupivacaine (BP) can reduce procedure-related abdominal pain compared with the standard method.
We performed a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial of 86 adult patients referred for ESD as treatment for gastric neoplasms. Patients were randomly assigned to either the BP submucosal or conventional solution group. Questionnaires were collected when the study began (baseline) and immediately after ESD, as well as at 6, 12, and 24 hours post-operatively. The primary outcome was indicated by the visual analog scale (VAS) evaluated at 6 hours after procedure.
There were no significant differences in primary outcomes between groups and among all time points (immediately, 12, and 24 hours after ESD). The VAS and short-form McGill pain (SF-MP) scores were higher immediately after ESD than at 6, 12, or 24 hours post-operatively. The incidence of abdominal pain immediately after ESD was 94.0% (78/83) for all patients of both groups, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the rate of abdominal pain immediately after ESD (BP group 37/40 [92.5%] versus non-BP group 41/43 [95.3%], P = .934). In univariable and multivariable analyses, BP did not have protective effect on post-ESD abdominal pain.
Submucosal BP injection does not promote pain relief or mitigate the effects of post-ESD abdominal pain.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Bupivacaine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Clinical Trial/Experimental Study</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain Management</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhCZCQjxw2xXacOOaAVLWlILXiAmfLdsasixMHO9mqfSieEW-3lIIvI898_-_xDEKvKTmiRIp3l6dH5O-hTd2SJ2i1i1UjW_4UrQhhTSWk4AfoRc5XBaoF48_RQU0JE5SRFfp15py32t7g6HBezLDYmHXAZpn8VlvtR8B-vAI7-zhiFxOeSg4nCB4c1m6GhGHsY7Zx8vaxQ-9z3sve42M8LGH2FsbCr_GUYp52tS2scdJFPvhb6LGN45xiCNCvccniPi4mQGWCL5c5eR1eomdOhwyv7uMh-vbx7OvJp-riy_nnk-OLytZNQ6taUgtCaG4os872RBNJTNc72TnBpeWM8YL0rZEdly30hjtpoBNAjOiIqw_Rh73vVD4E_a7xpIOakh90ulFRe_VvZfQb9T1uVdvVlDaiGLy9N0jx5wJ5VoPPFkLQI8QlK8ZoyzrZUlrQeo_aMpacwD08Q4nabVpdnqr_N11Ubx53-KD5s9oC8D1wHUOZev4RlmtIagM6zJs7v0ZIVjFCJeGsJVXJCFr_BhlSuWU</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Jung, Jang Han</creator><creator>Jang, Hyun Joo</creator><creator>Bang, Chang Seok</creator><creator>Baik, Gwang Ho</creator><creator>Park, Se Woo</creator><general>the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Efficacy of submucosal bupivacaine injection for pain relief after endoscopic submucosal dissection: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, and double-blind trial</title><author>Jung, Jang Han ; Jang, Hyun Joo ; Bang, Chang Seok ; Baik, Gwang Ho ; Park, Se Woo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3551-391ce77a4b12cfcd0a090b8df98f749c422491cd6b98496edb4f9be87e0b780f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Bupivacaine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Clinical Trial/Experimental Study</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain Management</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jang Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Hyun Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Chang Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baik, Gwang Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Se Woo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jung, Jang Han</au><au>Jang, Hyun Joo</au><au>Bang, Chang Seok</au><au>Baik, Gwang Ho</au><au>Park, Se Woo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of submucosal bupivacaine injection for pain relief after endoscopic submucosal dissection: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, and double-blind trial</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>e15360</spage><epage>e15360</epage><pages>e15360-e15360</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>Although abdominal pain is a common adverse event related to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), it can be sometimes underestimated by endoscopists. There are some endoscopic interventions available for the prevention of post-ESD pain, but their efficacy has not been established. We investigated whether a submucosal injection of bupivacaine (BP) can reduce procedure-related abdominal pain compared with the standard method.
We performed a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial of 86 adult patients referred for ESD as treatment for gastric neoplasms. Patients were randomly assigned to either the BP submucosal or conventional solution group. Questionnaires were collected when the study began (baseline) and immediately after ESD, as well as at 6, 12, and 24 hours post-operatively. The primary outcome was indicated by the visual analog scale (VAS) evaluated at 6 hours after procedure.
There were no significant differences in primary outcomes between groups and among all time points (immediately, 12, and 24 hours after ESD). The VAS and short-form McGill pain (SF-MP) scores were higher immediately after ESD than at 6, 12, or 24 hours post-operatively. The incidence of abdominal pain immediately after ESD was 94.0% (78/83) for all patients of both groups, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the rate of abdominal pain immediately after ESD (BP group 37/40 [92.5%] versus non-BP group 41/43 [95.3%], P = .934). In univariable and multivariable analyses, BP did not have protective effect on post-ESD abdominal pain.
Submucosal BP injection does not promote pain relief or mitigate the effects of post-ESD abdominal pain.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</pub><pmid>31027120</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000015360</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-7974 |
ispartof | Medicine (Baltimore), 2019-04, Vol.98 (17), p.e15360-e15360 |
issn | 0025-7974 1536-5964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6831157 |
source | PubMed Central (Open Access); IngentaConnect Journals; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
subjects | Aged Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage Bupivacaine - administration & dosage Clinical Trial/Experimental Study Double-Blind Method Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Female Humans Male Middle Aged Pain Management Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
title | Efficacy of submucosal bupivacaine injection for pain relief after endoscopic submucosal dissection: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, and double-blind trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A29%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20submucosal%20bupivacaine%20injection%20for%20pain%20relief%20after%20endoscopic%20submucosal%20dissection:%20A%20multicenter,%20prospective,%20randomized%20controlled,%20and%20double-blind%20trial&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Jung,%20Jang%20Han&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=e15360&rft.epage=e15360&rft.pages=e15360-e15360&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000015360&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2216289611%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3551-391ce77a4b12cfcd0a090b8df98f749c422491cd6b98496edb4f9be87e0b780f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2216289611&rft_id=info:pmid/31027120&rfr_iscdi=true |