Loading…

Assessment of axonal recruitment using model-guided preclinical spinal cord stimulation in the ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used clinically to limit chronic pain, but fundamental questions remain on the identity of axonal populations recruited. We developed an ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord preparation to assess recruitment following delivery of clinically analogous stimuli determined by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neurophysiology 2019-10, Vol.122 (4), p.1406-1420
Main Authors: Idlett, Shaquia, Halder, Mallika, Zhang, Tianhe, Quevedo, Jorge, Brill, Natalie, Gu, Wendy, Moffitt, Michael, Hochman, Shawn
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-be0b68dd998fe82da0c1da083f00017a6afc7c872376c27801fd22dd7c8ebe373
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-be0b68dd998fe82da0c1da083f00017a6afc7c872376c27801fd22dd7c8ebe373
container_end_page 1420
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1406
container_title Journal of neurophysiology
container_volume 122
creator Idlett, Shaquia
Halder, Mallika
Zhang, Tianhe
Quevedo, Jorge
Brill, Natalie
Gu, Wendy
Moffitt, Michael
Hochman, Shawn
description Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used clinically to limit chronic pain, but fundamental questions remain on the identity of axonal populations recruited. We developed an ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord preparation to assess recruitment following delivery of clinically analogous stimuli determined by downscaling a finite element model of clinical SCS. Analogous electric field distributions were generated with 300-µm × 300-µm electrodes positioned 200 µm above the dorsal column (DC) with stimulation between 50 and 200 µA. We compared axonal recruitment using electrodes of comparable size and stimulus amplitudes when contacting the caudal thoracic DC and at 200 or 600 μm above. Antidromic responses recorded distally from the DC, the adjacent Lissauer tract (LT), and in dorsal roots (DRs) were found to be amplitude and site dependent. Responses in the DC included a unique component not seen in DRs, having the lowest SCS recruitment amplitude and fastest conduction velocity. At 200 μm above, mean cathodic SCS recruitment threshold for axons in DRs and LT were 2.6 and 4.4 times higher, respectively, than DC threshold. SCS recruited primary afferents in all (up to 8) caudal segments sampled. Whereas A and C fibers could be recruited at nearby segments, only A fiber recruitment and synaptically mediated dorsal root reflexes were observed in more distant (lumbar) segments. In sum, clinically analogous SCS led to multisegmental recruitment of several somatosensory-encoding axonal populations. Most striking is the possibility that the lowest threshold recruitment of a nonprimary afferent population in the DC are postsynaptic dorsal column tract cells (PSDCs) projecting to gracile nuclei. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used clinically to control pain. To identify axonal populations recruited, finite element modeling identified scaling parameters to deliver clinically analogous SCS in an ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord preparation. Results showed that SCS first recruited an axonal population in the dorsal column at a threshold severalfold lower than primary afferents. These putative postsynaptic dorsal column tract cells may represent a previously unconsidered population responsible for SCS-induced paresthesias necessary for analgesia.
doi_str_mv 10.1152/jn.00538.2018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6843088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2264225341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-be0b68dd998fe82da0c1da083f00017a6afc7c872376c27801fd22dd7c8ebe373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUbtOAzEQtBAIwqOkRS5pLviRO_saJIR4SUg0UFuOvRcc-exg30XQ8O04vASN15qdnd3RIHRMyZTSmp0tw5SQmsspI1RuoUnBWEXrVm6jCSHlz4kQe2g_5yUhRNSE7aI9TjlvRdtM0PtFzpBzD2HAscP6NQbtcQKTRjd8omN2YYH7aMFXi9FZsHhV-t4FZwo1r9xmwsRkcR5cP3o9uBiwC3h4BgyveO3WEWs7-qGojBn-jhyinU77DEff9QA9XV89Xt5W9w83d5cX95XhUgzVHMi8kda2rexAMquJoeWRvCueqNCN7owwUjAuGsOEJLSzjFlbMJgDF_wAnX_prsZ5D9YUY0l7tUqu1-lNRe3U_05wz2oR16qRM06kLAKn3wIpvoyQB9W7bMB7HaCYUow1M8ZqPqOFWn1RTYo5J-h-11CiNpmpZVCfmalNZoV_8ve2X_ZPSPwDjnKWnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2264225341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of axonal recruitment using model-guided preclinical spinal cord stimulation in the ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord</title><source>American Physiological Society:Jisc Collections:American Physiological Society Journals ‘Read Publish &amp; Join’ Agreement:2023-2024 (Reading list)</source><source>American Physiological Society Free</source><creator>Idlett, Shaquia ; Halder, Mallika ; Zhang, Tianhe ; Quevedo, Jorge ; Brill, Natalie ; Gu, Wendy ; Moffitt, Michael ; Hochman, Shawn</creator><creatorcontrib>Idlett, Shaquia ; Halder, Mallika ; Zhang, Tianhe ; Quevedo, Jorge ; Brill, Natalie ; Gu, Wendy ; Moffitt, Michael ; Hochman, Shawn</creatorcontrib><description>Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used clinically to limit chronic pain, but fundamental questions remain on the identity of axonal populations recruited. We developed an ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord preparation to assess recruitment following delivery of clinically analogous stimuli determined by downscaling a finite element model of clinical SCS. Analogous electric field distributions were generated with 300-µm × 300-µm electrodes positioned 200 µm above the dorsal column (DC) with stimulation between 50 and 200 µA. We compared axonal recruitment using electrodes of comparable size and stimulus amplitudes when contacting the caudal thoracic DC and at 200 or 600 μm above. Antidromic responses recorded distally from the DC, the adjacent Lissauer tract (LT), and in dorsal roots (DRs) were found to be amplitude and site dependent. Responses in the DC included a unique component not seen in DRs, having the lowest SCS recruitment amplitude and fastest conduction velocity. At 200 μm above, mean cathodic SCS recruitment threshold for axons in DRs and LT were 2.6 and 4.4 times higher, respectively, than DC threshold. SCS recruited primary afferents in all (up to 8) caudal segments sampled. Whereas A and C fibers could be recruited at nearby segments, only A fiber recruitment and synaptically mediated dorsal root reflexes were observed in more distant (lumbar) segments. In sum, clinically analogous SCS led to multisegmental recruitment of several somatosensory-encoding axonal populations. Most striking is the possibility that the lowest threshold recruitment of a nonprimary afferent population in the DC are postsynaptic dorsal column tract cells (PSDCs) projecting to gracile nuclei. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used clinically to control pain. To identify axonal populations recruited, finite element modeling identified scaling parameters to deliver clinically analogous SCS in an ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord preparation. Results showed that SCS first recruited an axonal population in the dorsal column at a threshold severalfold lower than primary afferents. These putative postsynaptic dorsal column tract cells may represent a previously unconsidered population responsible for SCS-induced paresthesias necessary for analgesia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.00538.2018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31339796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physiological Society</publisher><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 2019-10, Vol.122 (4), p.1406-1420</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 the American Physiological Society 2019 American Physiological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-be0b68dd998fe82da0c1da083f00017a6afc7c872376c27801fd22dd7c8ebe373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-be0b68dd998fe82da0c1da083f00017a6afc7c872376c27801fd22dd7c8ebe373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31339796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Idlett, Shaquia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halder, Mallika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tianhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quevedo, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brill, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moffitt, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hochman, Shawn</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of axonal recruitment using model-guided preclinical spinal cord stimulation in the ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used clinically to limit chronic pain, but fundamental questions remain on the identity of axonal populations recruited. We developed an ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord preparation to assess recruitment following delivery of clinically analogous stimuli determined by downscaling a finite element model of clinical SCS. Analogous electric field distributions were generated with 300-µm × 300-µm electrodes positioned 200 µm above the dorsal column (DC) with stimulation between 50 and 200 µA. We compared axonal recruitment using electrodes of comparable size and stimulus amplitudes when contacting the caudal thoracic DC and at 200 or 600 μm above. Antidromic responses recorded distally from the DC, the adjacent Lissauer tract (LT), and in dorsal roots (DRs) were found to be amplitude and site dependent. Responses in the DC included a unique component not seen in DRs, having the lowest SCS recruitment amplitude and fastest conduction velocity. At 200 μm above, mean cathodic SCS recruitment threshold for axons in DRs and LT were 2.6 and 4.4 times higher, respectively, than DC threshold. SCS recruited primary afferents in all (up to 8) caudal segments sampled. Whereas A and C fibers could be recruited at nearby segments, only A fiber recruitment and synaptically mediated dorsal root reflexes were observed in more distant (lumbar) segments. In sum, clinically analogous SCS led to multisegmental recruitment of several somatosensory-encoding axonal populations. Most striking is the possibility that the lowest threshold recruitment of a nonprimary afferent population in the DC are postsynaptic dorsal column tract cells (PSDCs) projecting to gracile nuclei. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used clinically to control pain. To identify axonal populations recruited, finite element modeling identified scaling parameters to deliver clinically analogous SCS in an ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord preparation. Results showed that SCS first recruited an axonal population in the dorsal column at a threshold severalfold lower than primary afferents. These putative postsynaptic dorsal column tract cells may represent a previously unconsidered population responsible for SCS-induced paresthesias necessary for analgesia.</description><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUbtOAzEQtBAIwqOkRS5pLviRO_saJIR4SUg0UFuOvRcc-exg30XQ8O04vASN15qdnd3RIHRMyZTSmp0tw5SQmsspI1RuoUnBWEXrVm6jCSHlz4kQe2g_5yUhRNSE7aI9TjlvRdtM0PtFzpBzD2HAscP6NQbtcQKTRjd8omN2YYH7aMFXi9FZsHhV-t4FZwo1r9xmwsRkcR5cP3o9uBiwC3h4BgyveO3WEWs7-qGojBn-jhyinU77DEff9QA9XV89Xt5W9w83d5cX95XhUgzVHMi8kda2rexAMquJoeWRvCueqNCN7owwUjAuGsOEJLSzjFlbMJgDF_wAnX_prsZ5D9YUY0l7tUqu1-lNRe3U_05wz2oR16qRM06kLAKn3wIpvoyQB9W7bMB7HaCYUow1M8ZqPqOFWn1RTYo5J-h-11CiNpmpZVCfmalNZoV_8ve2X_ZPSPwDjnKWnQ</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Idlett, Shaquia</creator><creator>Halder, Mallika</creator><creator>Zhang, Tianhe</creator><creator>Quevedo, Jorge</creator><creator>Brill, Natalie</creator><creator>Gu, Wendy</creator><creator>Moffitt, Michael</creator><creator>Hochman, Shawn</creator><general>American Physiological Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Assessment of axonal recruitment using model-guided preclinical spinal cord stimulation in the ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord</title><author>Idlett, Shaquia ; Halder, Mallika ; Zhang, Tianhe ; Quevedo, Jorge ; Brill, Natalie ; Gu, Wendy ; Moffitt, Michael ; Hochman, Shawn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-be0b68dd998fe82da0c1da083f00017a6afc7c872376c27801fd22dd7c8ebe373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Idlett, Shaquia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halder, Mallika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tianhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quevedo, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brill, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moffitt, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hochman, Shawn</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Idlett, Shaquia</au><au>Halder, Mallika</au><au>Zhang, Tianhe</au><au>Quevedo, Jorge</au><au>Brill, Natalie</au><au>Gu, Wendy</au><au>Moffitt, Michael</au><au>Hochman, Shawn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of axonal recruitment using model-guided preclinical spinal cord stimulation in the ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1406</spage><epage>1420</epage><pages>1406-1420</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><abstract>Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used clinically to limit chronic pain, but fundamental questions remain on the identity of axonal populations recruited. We developed an ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord preparation to assess recruitment following delivery of clinically analogous stimuli determined by downscaling a finite element model of clinical SCS. Analogous electric field distributions were generated with 300-µm × 300-µm electrodes positioned 200 µm above the dorsal column (DC) with stimulation between 50 and 200 µA. We compared axonal recruitment using electrodes of comparable size and stimulus amplitudes when contacting the caudal thoracic DC and at 200 or 600 μm above. Antidromic responses recorded distally from the DC, the adjacent Lissauer tract (LT), and in dorsal roots (DRs) were found to be amplitude and site dependent. Responses in the DC included a unique component not seen in DRs, having the lowest SCS recruitment amplitude and fastest conduction velocity. At 200 μm above, mean cathodic SCS recruitment threshold for axons in DRs and LT were 2.6 and 4.4 times higher, respectively, than DC threshold. SCS recruited primary afferents in all (up to 8) caudal segments sampled. Whereas A and C fibers could be recruited at nearby segments, only A fiber recruitment and synaptically mediated dorsal root reflexes were observed in more distant (lumbar) segments. In sum, clinically analogous SCS led to multisegmental recruitment of several somatosensory-encoding axonal populations. Most striking is the possibility that the lowest threshold recruitment of a nonprimary afferent population in the DC are postsynaptic dorsal column tract cells (PSDCs) projecting to gracile nuclei. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used clinically to control pain. To identify axonal populations recruited, finite element modeling identified scaling parameters to deliver clinically analogous SCS in an ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord preparation. Results showed that SCS first recruited an axonal population in the dorsal column at a threshold severalfold lower than primary afferents. These putative postsynaptic dorsal column tract cells may represent a previously unconsidered population responsible for SCS-induced paresthesias necessary for analgesia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physiological Society</pub><pmid>31339796</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.00538.2018</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3077
ispartof Journal of neurophysiology, 2019-10, Vol.122 (4), p.1406-1420
issn 0022-3077
1522-1598
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6843088
source American Physiological Society:Jisc Collections:American Physiological Society Journals ‘Read Publish & Join’ Agreement:2023-2024 (Reading list); American Physiological Society Free
title Assessment of axonal recruitment using model-guided preclinical spinal cord stimulation in the ex vivo adult mouse spinal cord
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A49%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20axonal%20recruitment%20using%20model-guided%20preclinical%20spinal%20cord%20stimulation%20in%20the%20ex%20vivo%20adult%20mouse%20spinal%20cord&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Idlett,%20Shaquia&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1406&rft.epage=1420&rft.pages=1406-1420&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.00538.2018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2264225341%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-be0b68dd998fe82da0c1da083f00017a6afc7c872376c27801fd22dd7c8ebe373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2264225341&rft_id=info:pmid/31339796&rfr_iscdi=true