Loading…
Impact of brand drug discount cards on private insurer, government and patient expenditures
Brand discount cards have become a popular way for patients to reduce out-of-pocket spending on drugs; however, controversy exists over their potential to increase insurers' costs. We estimated the impact of brand discount cards on Canadian drug expenditures. Using national claims-level pharmac...
Saved in:
Published in: | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) 2019-11, Vol.191 (45), p.E1237-E1241 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-8d20317ce21f9c68dbf5470c26ec70d1151e12e8d3de41c35d9a37f25ab561853 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | E1241 |
container_issue | 45 |
container_start_page | E1237 |
container_title | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) |
container_volume | 191 |
creator | Law, Michael R Chan, Fiona K I Harrison, Mark Worthington, Heather C |
description | Brand discount cards have become a popular way for patients to reduce out-of-pocket spending on drugs; however, controversy exists over their potential to increase insurers' costs. We estimated the impact of brand discount cards on Canadian drug expenditures.
Using national claims-level pharmacy adjudication data, we performed a retrospective comparison of prescriptions filled using a brand discount card matched to equivalent generic prescriptions between September 2014 and September 2017. We investigated the impact on expenditures for 3 groups of prescriptions: those paid only through private insurance, those paid only through public insurance and those paid only out of pocket.
We studied 2.82 million prescriptions for 89 different medications for which brand discount cards were used. Use of discount cards resulted in 46% higher private insurance expenditures than comparable generic prescriptions (+$23.09 per prescription, 95% confidence interval [CI] $22.97 to $23.21). Public insurance expenditures were only slightly higher with cards: an increase of 1.3% or $0.37 per prescription (95% CI $0.33 to $0.41). Finally, out-of-pocket transactions using a card resulted in mean patient savings of 7% or $3.49 per prescription (95% CI -$3.55 to -$3.43). The impact varied widely among medicines across all 3 analyses.
The use of brand discount cards increased costs to private insurers, had little impact on public insurers and resulted in mixed impacts for patients. These effects likely resulted from private insurers reimbursing brand drug prices even when generics were available and from discount cards being adjudicated after claims were sent to other insurers in most cases. Patients and their clinicians should recognize that discount cards have mixed impacts on out-of-pocket costs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1503/cmaj.190098 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6861153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A605610976</galeid><sourcerecordid>A605610976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-8d20317ce21f9c68dbf5470c26ec70d1151e12e8d3de41c35d9a37f25ab561853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV0s2L1DAYB-AgijuunrxLcUEU7ZiPNm0vwrL4MbAo-HHyEDLJ25kMbdJN0mX9702ZdZ3KXGwOLemTX98mL0JPCV6SErO3qpe7JWkwbup7aEGKus4po819tMA1xTlrCn6CHoWww-litHqIThipCGVltUA_V_0gVcxcm629tDrTftxk2gTlRhszJb0OmbPZ4M21jJAZG0YP_k22cdfgbQ8JTcsGGc30DDcDWG1iQuExetDKLsCT2_sp-vHh_feLT_nll4-ri_PLXPECx7zWFKeCFFDSNorXet2WRYUV5aAqrAkpCRAKtWYaCqJYqRvJqpaWcl1yUpfsFL3b5w7jugetUh1ediKV3Ev_SzhpxPyNNVuR6he85imdpYCXtwHeXY0QoujTBkDXSQtuDIIyUqS9qyhJ9OwfunOjt-n3JsUrxgre_FUb2YEwtnXpu2oKFeccp6pxU_Gk8iNqAxZSkc5Ca9L0zD8_4tVgrsQhWh5BaWjojTqa-mq2IJkIN3EjxxDE6tvX_7Cf5_bFgd2C7OI2uG6Mxtkwh6_3UHkXgof27uQIFlOHi6nDxb7Dk352eNh39k9Ls9_8KPH_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2316733469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of brand drug discount cards on private insurer, government and patient expenditures</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><creator>Law, Michael R ; Chan, Fiona K I ; Harrison, Mark ; Worthington, Heather C</creator><creatorcontrib>Law, Michael R ; Chan, Fiona K I ; Harrison, Mark ; Worthington, Heather C</creatorcontrib><description>Brand discount cards have become a popular way for patients to reduce out-of-pocket spending on drugs; however, controversy exists over their potential to increase insurers' costs. We estimated the impact of brand discount cards on Canadian drug expenditures.
Using national claims-level pharmacy adjudication data, we performed a retrospective comparison of prescriptions filled using a brand discount card matched to equivalent generic prescriptions between September 2014 and September 2017. We investigated the impact on expenditures for 3 groups of prescriptions: those paid only through private insurance, those paid only through public insurance and those paid only out of pocket.
We studied 2.82 million prescriptions for 89 different medications for which brand discount cards were used. Use of discount cards resulted in 46% higher private insurance expenditures than comparable generic prescriptions (+$23.09 per prescription, 95% confidence interval [CI] $22.97 to $23.21). Public insurance expenditures were only slightly higher with cards: an increase of 1.3% or $0.37 per prescription (95% CI $0.33 to $0.41). Finally, out-of-pocket transactions using a card resulted in mean patient savings of 7% or $3.49 per prescription (95% CI -$3.55 to -$3.43). The impact varied widely among medicines across all 3 analyses.
The use of brand discount cards increased costs to private insurers, had little impact on public insurers and resulted in mixed impacts for patients. These effects likely resulted from private insurers reimbursing brand drug prices even when generics were available and from discount cards being adjudicated after claims were sent to other insurers in most cases. Patients and their clinicians should recognize that discount cards have mixed impacts on out-of-pocket costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0820-3946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1488-2329</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.190098</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31712357</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Joule Inc</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Drugs ; Drugstores ; Escitalopram ; Generic drugs ; Government finance ; Insurance companies ; Insurance industry ; Marketing ; Pharmaceutical policy ; Pharmacy ; Prescription drugs ; Prescriptions (Drugs) ; Public expenditures ; Research: Health Services ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 2019-11, Vol.191 (45), p.E1237-E1241</ispartof><rights>2019 Joule Inc. or its licensors.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Joule Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Joule Inc Nov 11, 2019</rights><rights>2019 Joule Inc. or its licensors 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-8d20317ce21f9c68dbf5470c26ec70d1151e12e8d3de41c35d9a37f25ab561853</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861153/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861153/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712357$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Law, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Fiona K I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worthington, Heather C</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of brand drug discount cards on private insurer, government and patient expenditures</title><title>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</title><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><description>Brand discount cards have become a popular way for patients to reduce out-of-pocket spending on drugs; however, controversy exists over their potential to increase insurers' costs. We estimated the impact of brand discount cards on Canadian drug expenditures.
Using national claims-level pharmacy adjudication data, we performed a retrospective comparison of prescriptions filled using a brand discount card matched to equivalent generic prescriptions between September 2014 and September 2017. We investigated the impact on expenditures for 3 groups of prescriptions: those paid only through private insurance, those paid only through public insurance and those paid only out of pocket.
We studied 2.82 million prescriptions for 89 different medications for which brand discount cards were used. Use of discount cards resulted in 46% higher private insurance expenditures than comparable generic prescriptions (+$23.09 per prescription, 95% confidence interval [CI] $22.97 to $23.21). Public insurance expenditures were only slightly higher with cards: an increase of 1.3% or $0.37 per prescription (95% CI $0.33 to $0.41). Finally, out-of-pocket transactions using a card resulted in mean patient savings of 7% or $3.49 per prescription (95% CI -$3.55 to -$3.43). The impact varied widely among medicines across all 3 analyses.
The use of brand discount cards increased costs to private insurers, had little impact on public insurers and resulted in mixed impacts for patients. These effects likely resulted from private insurers reimbursing brand drug prices even when generics were available and from discount cards being adjudicated after claims were sent to other insurers in most cases. Patients and their clinicians should recognize that discount cards have mixed impacts on out-of-pocket costs.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Drugstores</subject><subject>Escitalopram</subject><subject>Generic drugs</subject><subject>Government finance</subject><subject>Insurance companies</subject><subject>Insurance industry</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical policy</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>Prescriptions (Drugs)</subject><subject>Public expenditures</subject><subject>Research: Health Services</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0820-3946</issn><issn>1488-2329</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqV0s2L1DAYB-AgijuunrxLcUEU7ZiPNm0vwrL4MbAo-HHyEDLJ25kMbdJN0mX9702ZdZ3KXGwOLemTX98mL0JPCV6SErO3qpe7JWkwbup7aEGKus4po819tMA1xTlrCn6CHoWww-litHqIThipCGVltUA_V_0gVcxcm629tDrTftxk2gTlRhszJb0OmbPZ4M21jJAZG0YP_k22cdfgbQ8JTcsGGc30DDcDWG1iQuExetDKLsCT2_sp-vHh_feLT_nll4-ri_PLXPECx7zWFKeCFFDSNorXet2WRYUV5aAqrAkpCRAKtWYaCqJYqRvJqpaWcl1yUpfsFL3b5w7jugetUh1ediKV3Ev_SzhpxPyNNVuR6he85imdpYCXtwHeXY0QoujTBkDXSQtuDIIyUqS9qyhJ9OwfunOjt-n3JsUrxgre_FUb2YEwtnXpu2oKFeccp6pxU_Gk8iNqAxZSkc5Ca9L0zD8_4tVgrsQhWh5BaWjojTqa-mq2IJkIN3EjxxDE6tvX_7Cf5_bFgd2C7OI2uG6Mxtkwh6_3UHkXgof27uQIFlOHi6nDxb7Dk352eNh39k9Ls9_8KPH_</recordid><startdate>20191111</startdate><enddate>20191111</enddate><creator>Law, Michael R</creator><creator>Chan, Fiona K I</creator><creator>Harrison, Mark</creator><creator>Worthington, Heather C</creator><general>Joule Inc</general><general>CMA Impact, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191111</creationdate><title>Impact of brand drug discount cards on private insurer, government and patient expenditures</title><author>Law, Michael R ; Chan, Fiona K I ; Harrison, Mark ; Worthington, Heather C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-8d20317ce21f9c68dbf5470c26ec70d1151e12e8d3de41c35d9a37f25ab561853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Drugstores</topic><topic>Escitalopram</topic><topic>Generic drugs</topic><topic>Government finance</topic><topic>Insurance companies</topic><topic>Insurance industry</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical policy</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>Prescriptions (Drugs)</topic><topic>Public expenditures</topic><topic>Research: Health Services</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Law, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Fiona K I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worthington, Heather C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health Management Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Law, Michael R</au><au>Chan, Fiona K I</au><au>Harrison, Mark</au><au>Worthington, Heather C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of brand drug discount cards on private insurer, government and patient expenditures</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><date>2019-11-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>191</volume><issue>45</issue><spage>E1237</spage><epage>E1241</epage><pages>E1237-E1241</pages><issn>0820-3946</issn><eissn>1488-2329</eissn><abstract>Brand discount cards have become a popular way for patients to reduce out-of-pocket spending on drugs; however, controversy exists over their potential to increase insurers' costs. We estimated the impact of brand discount cards on Canadian drug expenditures.
Using national claims-level pharmacy adjudication data, we performed a retrospective comparison of prescriptions filled using a brand discount card matched to equivalent generic prescriptions between September 2014 and September 2017. We investigated the impact on expenditures for 3 groups of prescriptions: those paid only through private insurance, those paid only through public insurance and those paid only out of pocket.
We studied 2.82 million prescriptions for 89 different medications for which brand discount cards were used. Use of discount cards resulted in 46% higher private insurance expenditures than comparable generic prescriptions (+$23.09 per prescription, 95% confidence interval [CI] $22.97 to $23.21). Public insurance expenditures were only slightly higher with cards: an increase of 1.3% or $0.37 per prescription (95% CI $0.33 to $0.41). Finally, out-of-pocket transactions using a card resulted in mean patient savings of 7% or $3.49 per prescription (95% CI -$3.55 to -$3.43). The impact varied widely among medicines across all 3 analyses.
The use of brand discount cards increased costs to private insurers, had little impact on public insurers and resulted in mixed impacts for patients. These effects likely resulted from private insurers reimbursing brand drug prices even when generics were available and from discount cards being adjudicated after claims were sent to other insurers in most cases. Patients and their clinicians should recognize that discount cards have mixed impacts on out-of-pocket costs.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Joule Inc</pub><pmid>31712357</pmid><doi>10.1503/cmaj.190098</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0820-3946 |
ispartof | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 2019-11, Vol.191 (45), p.E1237-E1241 |
issn | 0820-3946 1488-2329 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6861153 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central |
subjects | Comparative analysis Drugs Drugstores Escitalopram Generic drugs Government finance Insurance companies Insurance industry Marketing Pharmaceutical policy Pharmacy Prescription drugs Prescriptions (Drugs) Public expenditures Research: Health Services Systematic review |
title | Impact of brand drug discount cards on private insurer, government and patient expenditures |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T01%3A53%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20brand%20drug%20discount%20cards%20on%20private%20insurer,%20government%20and%20patient%20expenditures&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Medical%20Association%20journal%20(CMAJ)&rft.au=Law,%20Michael%20R&rft.date=2019-11-11&rft.volume=191&rft.issue=45&rft.spage=E1237&rft.epage=E1241&rft.pages=E1237-E1241&rft.issn=0820-3946&rft.eissn=1488-2329&rft_id=info:doi/10.1503/cmaj.190098&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA605610976%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c640t-8d20317ce21f9c68dbf5470c26ec70d1151e12e8d3de41c35d9a37f25ab561853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2316733469&rft_id=info:pmid/31712357&rft_galeid=A605610976&rfr_iscdi=true |