Loading…

Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Breast Cancer Prognosis: A Sonographic Elastography Study

BACKGROUND Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in women worldwide, and sonographic elastography has previously demonstrated good performance in detecting breast malignancies. However, the exact relationship between elastographic measures and clinical prognostic factors is sti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical science monitor 2019-12, Vol.25, p.9272-9279
Main Authors: You, Yue, Song, Yu, Li, Songxiu, Ma, Zhenhai, Bo, Huaying
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d6888442b4d1e7eb566d8815e2b5ea490971139bbbec6078022a5000fc5abf9b3
cites
container_end_page 9279
container_issue
container_start_page 9272
container_title Medical science monitor
container_volume 25
creator You, Yue
Song, Yu
Li, Songxiu
Ma, Zhenhai
Bo, Huaying
description BACKGROUND Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in women worldwide, and sonographic elastography has previously demonstrated good performance in detecting breast malignancies. However, the exact relationship between elastographic measures and clinical prognostic factors is still not well understood. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate any associations between major clinical prognostic factors and strain elastography and to validate the diagnostic value of elastography in breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 373 subjects with breast masses, of which 196 were benign and 177 were malignant, were included in the study. All subjects underwent routine ultrasound examination and strain elastography before biopsy. The elastographic measures - strain ratio (SR) for qualitative measures and Tsukuba score (TS) for quantitative measures - were obtained and compared with prognostic factors, including nuclear grade, lymph node status, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2). The SR demonstrated the best diagnostic performance in differentiation between malignant and benign lesions. RESULTS With the best cut-off value at 2.42, the SR achieved a sensitivity of 96.0% and specificity of 98.5%. Moreover, higher SRs and TSs were associated with breast lesions with a high nuclear grade and lymph node metastasis and with being ER-negative, PR-negative, and HER-2 negative. CONCLUSIONS Elastography is a useful imaging technique in differentiating benign breast masses from malignant ones. The strong relationship between prognostic factors and elastographic measures also demonstrated its excellent performance in predicting the prognosis of breast malignancies.
doi_str_mv 10.12659/MSM.918806
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6913513</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2322143637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d6888442b4d1e7eb566d8815e2b5ea490971139bbbec6078022a5000fc5abf9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdtLwzAYxYMobk6ffJc8CtKZS5OmPghzzAtsqEyfQ9KmW6VLZtIO9t9b7Db06bv9ON-BA8AlRkNMOEtvZ_PZMMVCIH4E-pjHNKIJQ8d_-h44C-ELISI4YqegR7FAJBGoD_L3Rtm6rFVdbgxUNoftotrPk42qmrZ1FroCPnijQg3HymbGwzfvFtaFMtzBEZw76xZerZdlBidVS3XTFs7rJt-eg5NCVcFc7OoAfD5OPsbP0fT16WU8mkZZHCd1lHMhRBwTHefYJEYzznMhMDNEM6PiFKUJxjTVWpuMo9Y-IYohhIqMKV2kmg7Afae7bvTK5JmxtVeVXPtypfxWOlXK_xdbLuXCbSRPMWWYtgLXOwHvvhsTarkqQ2aqSlnjmiAJJQTHlNOkRW86NPMuBG-KwxuM5G8uss1Fdrm09NVfZwd2HwT9ATJCimg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322143637</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Breast Cancer Prognosis: A Sonographic Elastography Study</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>You, Yue ; Song, Yu ; Li, Songxiu ; Ma, Zhenhai ; Bo, Huaying</creator><creatorcontrib>You, Yue ; Song, Yu ; Li, Songxiu ; Ma, Zhenhai ; Bo, Huaying</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in women worldwide, and sonographic elastography has previously demonstrated good performance in detecting breast malignancies. However, the exact relationship between elastographic measures and clinical prognostic factors is still not well understood. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate any associations between major clinical prognostic factors and strain elastography and to validate the diagnostic value of elastography in breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 373 subjects with breast masses, of which 196 were benign and 177 were malignant, were included in the study. All subjects underwent routine ultrasound examination and strain elastography before biopsy. The elastographic measures - strain ratio (SR) for qualitative measures and Tsukuba score (TS) for quantitative measures - were obtained and compared with prognostic factors, including nuclear grade, lymph node status, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2). The SR demonstrated the best diagnostic performance in differentiation between malignant and benign lesions. RESULTS With the best cut-off value at 2.42, the SR achieved a sensitivity of 96.0% and specificity of 98.5%. Moreover, higher SRs and TSs were associated with breast lesions with a high nuclear grade and lymph node metastasis and with being ER-negative, PR-negative, and HER-2 negative. CONCLUSIONS Elastography is a useful imaging technique in differentiating benign breast masses from malignant ones. The strong relationship between prognostic factors and elastographic measures also demonstrated its excellent performance in predicting the prognosis of breast malignancies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1643-3750</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1234-1010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1643-3750</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12659/MSM.918806</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31802780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: International Scientific Literature, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biopsy ; Breast - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; China ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology ; Medical Technology ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography - methods</subject><ispartof>Medical science monitor, 2019-12, Vol.25, p.9272-9279</ispartof><rights>Med Sci Monit, 2019 2019</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d6888442b4d1e7eb566d8815e2b5ea490971139bbbec6078022a5000fc5abf9b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913513/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913513/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31802780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>You, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Songxiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Zhenhai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bo, Huaying</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Breast Cancer Prognosis: A Sonographic Elastography Study</title><title>Medical science monitor</title><addtitle>Med Sci Monit</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in women worldwide, and sonographic elastography has previously demonstrated good performance in detecting breast malignancies. However, the exact relationship between elastographic measures and clinical prognostic factors is still not well understood. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate any associations between major clinical prognostic factors and strain elastography and to validate the diagnostic value of elastography in breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 373 subjects with breast masses, of which 196 were benign and 177 were malignant, were included in the study. All subjects underwent routine ultrasound examination and strain elastography before biopsy. The elastographic measures - strain ratio (SR) for qualitative measures and Tsukuba score (TS) for quantitative measures - were obtained and compared with prognostic factors, including nuclear grade, lymph node status, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2). The SR demonstrated the best diagnostic performance in differentiation between malignant and benign lesions. RESULTS With the best cut-off value at 2.42, the SR achieved a sensitivity of 96.0% and specificity of 98.5%. Moreover, higher SRs and TSs were associated with breast lesions with a high nuclear grade and lymph node metastasis and with being ER-negative, PR-negative, and HER-2 negative. CONCLUSIONS Elastography is a useful imaging technique in differentiating benign breast masses from malignant ones. The strong relationship between prognostic factors and elastographic measures also demonstrated its excellent performance in predicting the prognosis of breast malignancies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Medical Technology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><issn>1643-3750</issn><issn>1234-1010</issn><issn>1643-3750</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkdtLwzAYxYMobk6ffJc8CtKZS5OmPghzzAtsqEyfQ9KmW6VLZtIO9t9b7Db06bv9ON-BA8AlRkNMOEtvZ_PZMMVCIH4E-pjHNKIJQ8d_-h44C-ELISI4YqegR7FAJBGoD_L3Rtm6rFVdbgxUNoftotrPk42qmrZ1FroCPnijQg3HymbGwzfvFtaFMtzBEZw76xZerZdlBidVS3XTFs7rJt-eg5NCVcFc7OoAfD5OPsbP0fT16WU8mkZZHCd1lHMhRBwTHefYJEYzznMhMDNEM6PiFKUJxjTVWpuMo9Y-IYohhIqMKV2kmg7Afae7bvTK5JmxtVeVXPtypfxWOlXK_xdbLuXCbSRPMWWYtgLXOwHvvhsTarkqQ2aqSlnjmiAJJQTHlNOkRW86NPMuBG-KwxuM5G8uss1Fdrm09NVfZwd2HwT9ATJCimg</recordid><startdate>20191205</startdate><enddate>20191205</enddate><creator>You, Yue</creator><creator>Song, Yu</creator><creator>Li, Songxiu</creator><creator>Ma, Zhenhai</creator><creator>Bo, Huaying</creator><general>International Scientific Literature, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191205</creationdate><title>Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Breast Cancer Prognosis: A Sonographic Elastography Study</title><author>You, Yue ; Song, Yu ; Li, Songxiu ; Ma, Zhenhai ; Bo, Huaying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d6888442b4d1e7eb566d8815e2b5ea490971139bbbec6078022a5000fc5abf9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Medical Technology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>You, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Songxiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Zhenhai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bo, Huaying</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical science monitor</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>You, Yue</au><au>Song, Yu</au><au>Li, Songxiu</au><au>Ma, Zhenhai</au><au>Bo, Huaying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Breast Cancer Prognosis: A Sonographic Elastography Study</atitle><jtitle>Medical science monitor</jtitle><addtitle>Med Sci Monit</addtitle><date>2019-12-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><spage>9272</spage><epage>9279</epage><pages>9272-9279</pages><issn>1643-3750</issn><issn>1234-1010</issn><eissn>1643-3750</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in women worldwide, and sonographic elastography has previously demonstrated good performance in detecting breast malignancies. However, the exact relationship between elastographic measures and clinical prognostic factors is still not well understood. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate any associations between major clinical prognostic factors and strain elastography and to validate the diagnostic value of elastography in breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 373 subjects with breast masses, of which 196 were benign and 177 were malignant, were included in the study. All subjects underwent routine ultrasound examination and strain elastography before biopsy. The elastographic measures - strain ratio (SR) for qualitative measures and Tsukuba score (TS) for quantitative measures - were obtained and compared with prognostic factors, including nuclear grade, lymph node status, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2). The SR demonstrated the best diagnostic performance in differentiation between malignant and benign lesions. RESULTS With the best cut-off value at 2.42, the SR achieved a sensitivity of 96.0% and specificity of 98.5%. Moreover, higher SRs and TSs were associated with breast lesions with a high nuclear grade and lymph node metastasis and with being ER-negative, PR-negative, and HER-2 negative. CONCLUSIONS Elastography is a useful imaging technique in differentiating benign breast masses from malignant ones. The strong relationship between prognostic factors and elastographic measures also demonstrated its excellent performance in predicting the prognosis of breast malignancies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>International Scientific Literature, Inc</pub><pmid>31802780</pmid><doi>10.12659/MSM.918806</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1643-3750
ispartof Medical science monitor, 2019-12, Vol.25, p.9272-9279
issn 1643-3750
1234-1010
1643-3750
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6913513
source PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Biopsy
Breast - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
China
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diagnosis, Differential
Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods
Female
Humans
Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology
Medical Technology
Middle Aged
Prognosis
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ultrasonography - methods
title Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Breast Cancer Prognosis: A Sonographic Elastography Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A11%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20and%20Qualitative%20Evaluation%20of%20Breast%20Cancer%20Prognosis:%20A%20Sonographic%20Elastography%20Study&rft.jtitle=Medical%20science%20monitor&rft.au=You,%20Yue&rft.date=2019-12-05&rft.volume=25&rft.spage=9272&rft.epage=9279&rft.pages=9272-9279&rft.issn=1643-3750&rft.eissn=1643-3750&rft_id=info:doi/10.12659/MSM.918806&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2322143637%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d6888442b4d1e7eb566d8815e2b5ea490971139bbbec6078022a5000fc5abf9b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322143637&rft_id=info:pmid/31802780&rfr_iscdi=true