Neural correlates of tactile simultaneity judgement: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Simultaneity judgement (SJ) is a temporal discrimination task in which the targets span an ultimately short time range (zero or not). Psychophysical studies suggest that SJ is adequate to probe the perceptual components of human time processing in pure form. Thus far, time-relevant neural correlates...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2019-12, Vol.9 (1), p.19481-13, Article 19481
Main Authors: Kimura, Takahiro, Kadota, Hiroshi, Kuroda, Tsuyoshi, Funai, Tomomi D., Iwata, Makoto, Kochiyama, Takanori, Miyazaki, Makoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
631/378/2649/1723
631/378/3917
Analysis of Variance
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain Mapping - methods
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
multidisciplinary
Neostriatum
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Photic Stimulation
Psychophysics
Reaction Time - physiology
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Statistical analysis
Statistics
Tactile discrimination
Tactile stimuli
Temporal discrimination
Temporal perception
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Simultaneity judgement (SJ) is a temporal discrimination task in which the targets span an ultimately short time range (zero or not). Psychophysical studies suggest that SJ is adequate to probe the perceptual components of human time processing in pure form. Thus far, time-relevant neural correlates for tactile SJ are unclear. We performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the neural correlates of tactile SJ using tactile number judgement as a time-irrelevant control task. As our main result, we demonstrated that the right inferior parietal lobule (IPL) is an SJ-specific region. The right IPL was detected by both parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses, and its activation intensity fulfilled a strict statistical criterion. In addition, we observed that some left-dominant regions (e.g., the striatum) were specifically activated by successive stimuli during SJ. Meanwhile, no region was specifically activated by simultaneous stimuli during SJ. Accordingly, we infer that the neural process for tactile SJ is as follows: the striatum estimates the time interval between tactile stimuli; based on this interval, the right IPL discriminates the successiveness or simultaneity of the stimuli. Moreover, taking detailed behavioural results into account, we further discuss possible concurrent or alternative mechanisms that can explain the fMRI results.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-54323-7