Loading…

A social–ecological analysis of the global agrifood system

Eradicating world hunger—the aim of Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG2)—requires a social–ecological approach to agrifood systems. However, previous work has mostly focused on one or the other. Here, we apply such a holistic approach to depicting the global food panorama through a quantitative mul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2019-12, Vol.116 (52), p.26465-26473
Main Authors: Oteros-Rozas, Elisa, Ruiz-Almeida, Adriana, Aguado, Mateo, González, José A., Rivera-Ferre, Marta G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-6ff928b7a18429724948df53c8e17c97d673f610498477266bbbb1b5afd740893
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-6ff928b7a18429724948df53c8e17c97d673f610498477266bbbb1b5afd740893
container_end_page 26473
container_issue 52
container_start_page 26465
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 116
creator Oteros-Rozas, Elisa
Ruiz-Almeida, Adriana
Aguado, Mateo
González, José A.
Rivera-Ferre, Marta G.
description Eradicating world hunger—the aim of Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG2)—requires a social–ecological approach to agrifood systems. However, previous work has mostly focused on one or the other. Here, we apply such a holistic approach to depicting the global food panorama through a quantitative multivariate assessment of 43 indicators of food sovereignty and 28 indicators of sociodemographics, social being, and environmental sustainability in 150 countries. The results identify 5 world regions and indicate the existence of an agrifood debt (i.e., disequilibria between regions in the natural resources consumed, the environmental impacts produced, and the social wellbeing attained by populations that play different roles within the globalized agrifood system). Three spotlights underpin this debt: 1) a severe contrast in diets and food security between regions, 2) a concern about the role that international agrifood trade is playing in regional food security, and 3) a mismatch between regional biocapacity and food security. Our results contribute to broadening the debate beyond food security from a social–ecological perspective, incorporating environmental and social dimensions.
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.1912710116
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6936430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26897118</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26897118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-6ff928b7a18429724948df53c8e17c97d673f610498477266bbbb1b5afd740893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1qGzEUhUVpiZ00665aBrLJZmJdSdYPlEII-QNDN-1aaDTSZIw8cqVxwLu-Q94wT5IZ7LhJ70Zwz6dzpXsQ-gL4ArCgs3Vn8gUoIAIwAP-ApoAVlJwp_BFNMSailIywCTrOeYkxVnOJj9CEgmRUSjJF3y-LHG1rwvPfJ2djiE1rTShMZ8I2t7mIvugfXNGEWI3tJrU-xrrI29y71Wf0yZuQ3en-PEG_b65_Xd2Vi5-391eXi9IyRvuSe6-IrIQZphIlCFNM1n5OrXQgrBI1F9RzwExJJgThvBoKqrnxtWBYKnqCfux815tq5Wrruj6ZoNepXZm01dG0-r3StQ-6iY-aK8oZxYPB-d4gxT8bl3u9arN1IZjOxU3WhBKhKJF4RM_-Q5dxk4Z1jBQFMux3DgM121E2xZyT84fHANZjMnpMRv9LZrjx7e0fDvxrFAPwdQcscx_TQSdcKgEg6QvKEZOJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2331210951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A social–ecological analysis of the global agrifood system</title><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Oteros-Rozas, Elisa ; Ruiz-Almeida, Adriana ; Aguado, Mateo ; González, José A. ; Rivera-Ferre, Marta G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oteros-Rozas, Elisa ; Ruiz-Almeida, Adriana ; Aguado, Mateo ; González, José A. ; Rivera-Ferre, Marta G.</creatorcontrib><description>Eradicating world hunger—the aim of Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG2)—requires a social–ecological approach to agrifood systems. However, previous work has mostly focused on one or the other. Here, we apply such a holistic approach to depicting the global food panorama through a quantitative multivariate assessment of 43 indicators of food sovereignty and 28 indicators of sociodemographics, social being, and environmental sustainability in 150 countries. The results identify 5 world regions and indicate the existence of an agrifood debt (i.e., disequilibria between regions in the natural resources consumed, the environmental impacts produced, and the social wellbeing attained by populations that play different roles within the globalized agrifood system). Three spotlights underpin this debt: 1) a severe contrast in diets and food security between regions, 2) a concern about the role that international agrifood trade is playing in regional food security, and 3) a mismatch between regional biocapacity and food security. Our results contribute to broadening the debate beyond food security from a social–ecological perspective, incorporating environmental and social dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1912710116</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31843882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Agribusiness ; Agricultural production ; Ecological monitoring ; Environmental impact ; Food ; Food security ; Food sovereignty ; Hunger ; Indicators ; Natural resources ; Social factors ; Social Sciences ; Sustainable development ; Traditional foods</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2019-12, Vol.116 (52), p.26465-26473</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Dec 26, 2019</rights><rights>2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-6ff928b7a18429724948df53c8e17c97d673f610498477266bbbb1b5afd740893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-6ff928b7a18429724948df53c8e17c97d673f610498477266bbbb1b5afd740893</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8183-8398 ; 0000-0001-5917-9314 ; 0000-0003-4313-3041 ; 0000-0002-0510-4912 ; 0000-0002-8831-7613</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26897118$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26897118$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791,58236,58469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31843882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oteros-Rozas, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Almeida, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguado, Mateo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, José A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivera-Ferre, Marta G.</creatorcontrib><title>A social–ecological analysis of the global agrifood system</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>Eradicating world hunger—the aim of Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG2)—requires a social–ecological approach to agrifood systems. However, previous work has mostly focused on one or the other. Here, we apply such a holistic approach to depicting the global food panorama through a quantitative multivariate assessment of 43 indicators of food sovereignty and 28 indicators of sociodemographics, social being, and environmental sustainability in 150 countries. The results identify 5 world regions and indicate the existence of an agrifood debt (i.e., disequilibria between regions in the natural resources consumed, the environmental impacts produced, and the social wellbeing attained by populations that play different roles within the globalized agrifood system). Three spotlights underpin this debt: 1) a severe contrast in diets and food security between regions, 2) a concern about the role that international agrifood trade is playing in regional food security, and 3) a mismatch between regional biocapacity and food security. Our results contribute to broadening the debate beyond food security from a social–ecological perspective, incorporating environmental and social dimensions.</description><subject>Agribusiness</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Food sovereignty</subject><subject>Hunger</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Traditional foods</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc1qGzEUhUVpiZ00665aBrLJZmJdSdYPlEII-QNDN-1aaDTSZIw8cqVxwLu-Q94wT5IZ7LhJ70Zwz6dzpXsQ-gL4ArCgs3Vn8gUoIAIwAP-ApoAVlJwp_BFNMSailIywCTrOeYkxVnOJj9CEgmRUSjJF3y-LHG1rwvPfJ2djiE1rTShMZ8I2t7mIvugfXNGEWI3tJrU-xrrI29y71Wf0yZuQ3en-PEG_b65_Xd2Vi5-391eXi9IyRvuSe6-IrIQZphIlCFNM1n5OrXQgrBI1F9RzwExJJgThvBoKqrnxtWBYKnqCfux815tq5Wrruj6ZoNepXZm01dG0-r3StQ-6iY-aK8oZxYPB-d4gxT8bl3u9arN1IZjOxU3WhBKhKJF4RM_-Q5dxk4Z1jBQFMux3DgM121E2xZyT84fHANZjMnpMRv9LZrjx7e0fDvxrFAPwdQcscx_TQSdcKgEg6QvKEZOJ</recordid><startdate>20191226</startdate><enddate>20191226</enddate><creator>Oteros-Rozas, Elisa</creator><creator>Ruiz-Almeida, Adriana</creator><creator>Aguado, Mateo</creator><creator>González, José A.</creator><creator>Rivera-Ferre, Marta G.</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-8398</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5917-9314</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4313-3041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0510-4912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8831-7613</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191226</creationdate><title>A social–ecological analysis of the global agrifood system</title><author>Oteros-Rozas, Elisa ; Ruiz-Almeida, Adriana ; Aguado, Mateo ; González, José A. ; Rivera-Ferre, Marta G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-6ff928b7a18429724948df53c8e17c97d673f610498477266bbbb1b5afd740893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agribusiness</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Food sovereignty</topic><topic>Hunger</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Traditional foods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oteros-Rozas, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Almeida, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguado, Mateo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, José A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivera-Ferre, Marta G.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oteros-Rozas, Elisa</au><au>Ruiz-Almeida, Adriana</au><au>Aguado, Mateo</au><au>González, José A.</au><au>Rivera-Ferre, Marta G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A social–ecological analysis of the global agrifood system</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2019-12-26</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>52</issue><spage>26465</spage><epage>26473</epage><pages>26465-26473</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Eradicating world hunger—the aim of Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG2)—requires a social–ecological approach to agrifood systems. However, previous work has mostly focused on one or the other. Here, we apply such a holistic approach to depicting the global food panorama through a quantitative multivariate assessment of 43 indicators of food sovereignty and 28 indicators of sociodemographics, social being, and environmental sustainability in 150 countries. The results identify 5 world regions and indicate the existence of an agrifood debt (i.e., disequilibria between regions in the natural resources consumed, the environmental impacts produced, and the social wellbeing attained by populations that play different roles within the globalized agrifood system). Three spotlights underpin this debt: 1) a severe contrast in diets and food security between regions, 2) a concern about the role that international agrifood trade is playing in regional food security, and 3) a mismatch between regional biocapacity and food security. Our results contribute to broadening the debate beyond food security from a social–ecological perspective, incorporating environmental and social dimensions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>31843882</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.1912710116</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-8398</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5917-9314</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4313-3041</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0510-4912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8831-7613</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2019-12, Vol.116 (52), p.26465-26473
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6936430
source PubMed Central (PMC); JSTOR
subjects Agribusiness
Agricultural production
Ecological monitoring
Environmental impact
Food
Food security
Food sovereignty
Hunger
Indicators
Natural resources
Social factors
Social Sciences
Sustainable development
Traditional foods
title A social–ecological analysis of the global agrifood system
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T09%3A58%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20social%E2%80%93ecological%20analysis%20of%20the%20global%20agrifood%20system&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Oteros-Rozas,%20Elisa&rft.date=2019-12-26&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=52&rft.spage=26465&rft.epage=26473&rft.pages=26465-26473&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.1912710116&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26897118%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-6ff928b7a18429724948df53c8e17c97d673f610498477266bbbb1b5afd740893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2331210951&rft_id=info:pmid/31843882&rft_jstor_id=26897118&rfr_iscdi=true