Loading…

Evaluation of the Precision of Different Intraoral Scanner-Computer Aided Design (CAD) Software Combinations in Digital Dentistry

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision of correlation between intraoral scanners and computer aided design (CAD) software programs used during scanning and designing phases of digital dentistry. In the present study, CAD software programs that accept data in Standard Tessella...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical science monitor 2020-01, Vol.26, p.e918529-e918529
Main Authors: Erozan, Çise, Ozan, Oğuz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-d80ec58648947f89fb712a216d3ec22b18a5d9460f6f1e619a6c91e6942a5c213
cites
container_end_page e918529
container_issue
container_start_page e918529
container_title Medical science monitor
container_volume 26
creator Erozan, Çise
Ozan, Oğuz
description BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision of correlation between intraoral scanners and computer aided design (CAD) software programs used during scanning and designing phases of digital dentistry. In the present study, CAD software programs that accept data in Standard Tessellation Language (STL) and proprietary format have been evaluated and data loss has been examined in the scanned data. MATERIAL AND METHODS A single unit crown preparation was conducted for maxillary right first molar on a fully dentulous model. The prepared tooth was scanned with a high precision industrial scanner (ATOS Core 80) and the reference digital model was obtained. The dental model was further scanned 10 times using 3 different intraoral scanners (CEREC Omnicam AC, TRIOS 3 Color Pod, and Aadva IOS 100). The data obtained from the reference scanner and intraoral scanners were transferred to different CAD programs (CEREC inLab, TRIOS Design Studio, Exocad) and digital crowns were designed for each scanned data-CAD combination. After that, the data losses that occurred between these transfers were evaluated by superimposition technique in a special software (VR Mesh v7.5) (alpha=0.05). RESULTS Among the all combinations of scanner and software, Omnicam AC-InLab was determined to be the most precise combination through the full digital workflow since the Omnicam AC-Exocad combination showed the highest deviations. CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was determined that the combinations of scanners and associated CAD programs yielded more accurate results, and data loss was revealed when the scanned data converted from the proprietary format to the STL format.
doi_str_mv 10.12659/MSM.918529
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6977629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2333602002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-d80ec58648947f89fb712a216d3ec22b18a5d9460f6f1e619a6c91e6942a5c213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1vEzEQhi0Eoh9w4o58LKq2-GPXa1-QoqS0lVqBFDhbjnecGm3sYHuLeuw_r2lCVU4eeR49Y8-L0AdKzigTnfp8s7w5U1R2TL1Ch1S0vOF9R16_qA_QUc6_CGFSkO4tOuBUKtG39BA9nN-ZcTLFx4Cjw-UW8PcE1uf9xcI7BwlCwVehJBOTGfHSmhAgNfO42U4FEp75AQa8gOzXAZ_MZ4tPeBld-WMS4AqtfHgakLEPVbj2pUoW1elzSffv0Btnxgzv9-cx-vn1_Mf8srn-dnE1n103lktamkESsJ0UrVRt76Ryq54yw6gYOFjGVlSablCtIE44CoIqI6yqhWqZ6Syj_Bh92Xm302oDg4W__xn1NvmNSfc6Gq__7wR_q9fxTgvV94KpKjjZC1L8PUEueuOzhXE0AeKUNeOcC8Lqlit6ukNtijkncM9jKNFPoekamt6FVumPL1_2zP5LiT8C9dmTxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2333602002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Precision of Different Intraoral Scanner-Computer Aided Design (CAD) Software Combinations in Digital Dentistry</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><creator>Erozan, Çise ; Ozan, Oğuz</creator><creatorcontrib>Erozan, Çise ; Ozan, Oğuz</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision of correlation between intraoral scanners and computer aided design (CAD) software programs used during scanning and designing phases of digital dentistry. In the present study, CAD software programs that accept data in Standard Tessellation Language (STL) and proprietary format have been evaluated and data loss has been examined in the scanned data. MATERIAL AND METHODS A single unit crown preparation was conducted for maxillary right first molar on a fully dentulous model. The prepared tooth was scanned with a high precision industrial scanner (ATOS Core 80) and the reference digital model was obtained. The dental model was further scanned 10 times using 3 different intraoral scanners (CEREC Omnicam AC, TRIOS 3 Color Pod, and Aadva IOS 100). The data obtained from the reference scanner and intraoral scanners were transferred to different CAD programs (CEREC inLab, TRIOS Design Studio, Exocad) and digital crowns were designed for each scanned data-CAD combination. After that, the data losses that occurred between these transfers were evaluated by superimposition technique in a special software (VR Mesh v7.5) (alpha=0.05). RESULTS Among the all combinations of scanner and software, Omnicam AC-InLab was determined to be the most precise combination through the full digital workflow since the Omnicam AC-Exocad combination showed the highest deviations. CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was determined that the combinations of scanners and associated CAD programs yielded more accurate results, and data loss was revealed when the scanned data converted from the proprietary format to the STL format.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1643-3750</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1234-1010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1643-3750</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12659/MSM.918529</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31896741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: International Scientific Literature, Inc</publisher><subject>Medical Technology</subject><ispartof>Medical science monitor, 2020-01, Vol.26, p.e918529-e918529</ispartof><rights>Med Sci Monit, 2020 2020</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-d80ec58648947f89fb712a216d3ec22b18a5d9460f6f1e619a6c91e6942a5c213</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6977629/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6977629/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31896741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erozan, Çise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozan, Oğuz</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Precision of Different Intraoral Scanner-Computer Aided Design (CAD) Software Combinations in Digital Dentistry</title><title>Medical science monitor</title><addtitle>Med Sci Monit</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision of correlation between intraoral scanners and computer aided design (CAD) software programs used during scanning and designing phases of digital dentistry. In the present study, CAD software programs that accept data in Standard Tessellation Language (STL) and proprietary format have been evaluated and data loss has been examined in the scanned data. MATERIAL AND METHODS A single unit crown preparation was conducted for maxillary right first molar on a fully dentulous model. The prepared tooth was scanned with a high precision industrial scanner (ATOS Core 80) and the reference digital model was obtained. The dental model was further scanned 10 times using 3 different intraoral scanners (CEREC Omnicam AC, TRIOS 3 Color Pod, and Aadva IOS 100). The data obtained from the reference scanner and intraoral scanners were transferred to different CAD programs (CEREC inLab, TRIOS Design Studio, Exocad) and digital crowns were designed for each scanned data-CAD combination. After that, the data losses that occurred between these transfers were evaluated by superimposition technique in a special software (VR Mesh v7.5) (alpha=0.05). RESULTS Among the all combinations of scanner and software, Omnicam AC-InLab was determined to be the most precise combination through the full digital workflow since the Omnicam AC-Exocad combination showed the highest deviations. CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was determined that the combinations of scanners and associated CAD programs yielded more accurate results, and data loss was revealed when the scanned data converted from the proprietary format to the STL format.</description><subject>Medical Technology</subject><issn>1643-3750</issn><issn>1234-1010</issn><issn>1643-3750</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1vEzEQhi0Eoh9w4o58LKq2-GPXa1-QoqS0lVqBFDhbjnecGm3sYHuLeuw_r2lCVU4eeR49Y8-L0AdKzigTnfp8s7w5U1R2TL1Ch1S0vOF9R16_qA_QUc6_CGFSkO4tOuBUKtG39BA9nN-ZcTLFx4Cjw-UW8PcE1uf9xcI7BwlCwVehJBOTGfHSmhAgNfO42U4FEp75AQa8gOzXAZ_MZ4tPeBld-WMS4AqtfHgakLEPVbj2pUoW1elzSffv0Btnxgzv9-cx-vn1_Mf8srn-dnE1n103lktamkESsJ0UrVRt76Ryq54yw6gYOFjGVlSablCtIE44CoIqI6yqhWqZ6Syj_Bh92Xm302oDg4W__xn1NvmNSfc6Gq__7wR_q9fxTgvV94KpKjjZC1L8PUEueuOzhXE0AeKUNeOcC8Lqlit6ukNtijkncM9jKNFPoekamt6FVumPL1_2zP5LiT8C9dmTxQ</recordid><startdate>20200103</startdate><enddate>20200103</enddate><creator>Erozan, Çise</creator><creator>Ozan, Oğuz</creator><general>International Scientific Literature, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200103</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Precision of Different Intraoral Scanner-Computer Aided Design (CAD) Software Combinations in Digital Dentistry</title><author>Erozan, Çise ; Ozan, Oğuz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-d80ec58648947f89fb712a216d3ec22b18a5d9460f6f1e619a6c91e6942a5c213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Medical Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erozan, Çise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozan, Oğuz</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical science monitor</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erozan, Çise</au><au>Ozan, Oğuz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Precision of Different Intraoral Scanner-Computer Aided Design (CAD) Software Combinations in Digital Dentistry</atitle><jtitle>Medical science monitor</jtitle><addtitle>Med Sci Monit</addtitle><date>2020-01-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><spage>e918529</spage><epage>e918529</epage><pages>e918529-e918529</pages><issn>1643-3750</issn><issn>1234-1010</issn><eissn>1643-3750</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision of correlation between intraoral scanners and computer aided design (CAD) software programs used during scanning and designing phases of digital dentistry. In the present study, CAD software programs that accept data in Standard Tessellation Language (STL) and proprietary format have been evaluated and data loss has been examined in the scanned data. MATERIAL AND METHODS A single unit crown preparation was conducted for maxillary right first molar on a fully dentulous model. The prepared tooth was scanned with a high precision industrial scanner (ATOS Core 80) and the reference digital model was obtained. The dental model was further scanned 10 times using 3 different intraoral scanners (CEREC Omnicam AC, TRIOS 3 Color Pod, and Aadva IOS 100). The data obtained from the reference scanner and intraoral scanners were transferred to different CAD programs (CEREC inLab, TRIOS Design Studio, Exocad) and digital crowns were designed for each scanned data-CAD combination. After that, the data losses that occurred between these transfers were evaluated by superimposition technique in a special software (VR Mesh v7.5) (alpha=0.05). RESULTS Among the all combinations of scanner and software, Omnicam AC-InLab was determined to be the most precise combination through the full digital workflow since the Omnicam AC-Exocad combination showed the highest deviations. CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was determined that the combinations of scanners and associated CAD programs yielded more accurate results, and data loss was revealed when the scanned data converted from the proprietary format to the STL format.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>International Scientific Literature, Inc</pub><pmid>31896741</pmid><doi>10.12659/MSM.918529</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1643-3750
ispartof Medical science monitor, 2020-01, Vol.26, p.e918529-e918529
issn 1643-3750
1234-1010
1643-3750
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6977629
source PubMed (Medline)
subjects Medical Technology
title Evaluation of the Precision of Different Intraoral Scanner-Computer Aided Design (CAD) Software Combinations in Digital Dentistry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A16%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Precision%20of%20Different%20Intraoral%20Scanner-Computer%20Aided%20Design%20(CAD)%20Software%20Combinations%20in%20Digital%20Dentistry&rft.jtitle=Medical%20science%20monitor&rft.au=Erozan,%20%C3%87ise&rft.date=2020-01-03&rft.volume=26&rft.spage=e918529&rft.epage=e918529&rft.pages=e918529-e918529&rft.issn=1643-3750&rft.eissn=1643-3750&rft_id=info:doi/10.12659/MSM.918529&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2333602002%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-d80ec58648947f89fb712a216d3ec22b18a5d9460f6f1e619a6c91e6942a5c213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2333602002&rft_id=info:pmid/31896741&rfr_iscdi=true