Loading…
Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification
Inertial sensors are a useful instrument for long term monitoring in healthcare. In many cases, inertial sensor devices can be worn as an accessory or integrated into smart textiles. In some situations, it may be beneficial to have data from multiple inertial sensors, rather than relying on a single...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2019-12, Vol.20 (1), p.82 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 82 |
container_title | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Jayasinghe, Udeni Harwin, William S Hwang, Faustina |
description | Inertial sensors are a useful instrument for long term monitoring in healthcare. In many cases, inertial sensor devices can be worn as an accessory or integrated into smart textiles. In some situations, it may be beneficial to have data from multiple inertial sensors, rather than relying on a single worn sensor, since this may increase the accuracy of the analysis and better tolerate sensor errors. Integrating multiple sensors into clothing improves the feasibility and practicality of wearing multiple devices every day, in approximately the same location, with less likelihood of incorrect sensor orientation. To facilitate this, the current work investigates the consequences of attaching lightweight sensors to loose clothes. The intention of this paper is to discuss how data from these clothing sensors compare with similarly placed body worn sensors, with additional consideration of the resulting effects on activity recognition. This study compares the similarity between the two signals (body worn and clothing), collected from three different clothing types (slacks, pencil skirt and loose frock), across multiple daily activities (walking, running, sitting, and riding a bus) by calculating correlation coefficients for each sensor pair. Even though the two data streams are clearly different from each other, the results indicate that there is good potential of achieving high classification accuracy when using inertial sensors in clothing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/s20010082 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6983049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2550310970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1rFEEQxRtRzIce_AdkwIsexlR_zM70RVgWjUKCBxWPTU1vdbaXmem1u2dl_3s7JC5JTvWo-vF41GPsDYePUmq4SAKAA3TiGTvlSqi6EwKeP9An7CylLYCQUnYv2YnkXdu2HZyy7SqMO4x-uqlWQ8ibIurrME-Z1tUPmlKIqfrr86b6TRixH-i4dSFW12FPI025Wk44HJJPFU7rammz3_t8KI6YknfeYvZhesVeOBwSvb6f5-zXl88_V1_rq--X31bLq9oqkLm2FqnXHZdatUq5pghsUTgiazsipAUXqufOCYWoFVjhGmhIi8Vage57ec4-3fnu5n6ktS35Ig5mF_2I8WACevP4MvmNuQl7s9CdBKWLwft7gxj-zJSyGX2yNAw4UZiTKV_kohGtbAr67gm6DXMszyhU04DkoFso1Ic7ysaQUiR3DMPB3DZojg0W9u3D9Efyf2XyH8ymmDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550310970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Jayasinghe, Udeni ; Harwin, William S ; Hwang, Faustina</creator><creatorcontrib>Jayasinghe, Udeni ; Harwin, William S ; Hwang, Faustina</creatorcontrib><description>Inertial sensors are a useful instrument for long term monitoring in healthcare. In many cases, inertial sensor devices can be worn as an accessory or integrated into smart textiles. In some situations, it may be beneficial to have data from multiple inertial sensors, rather than relying on a single worn sensor, since this may increase the accuracy of the analysis and better tolerate sensor errors. Integrating multiple sensors into clothing improves the feasibility and practicality of wearing multiple devices every day, in approximately the same location, with less likelihood of incorrect sensor orientation. To facilitate this, the current work investigates the consequences of attaching lightweight sensors to loose clothes. The intention of this paper is to discuss how data from these clothing sensors compare with similarly placed body worn sensors, with additional consideration of the resulting effects on activity recognition. This study compares the similarity between the two signals (body worn and clothing), collected from three different clothing types (slacks, pencil skirt and loose frock), across multiple daily activities (walking, running, sitting, and riding a bus) by calculating correlation coefficients for each sensor pair. Even though the two data streams are clearly different from each other, the results indicate that there is good potential of achieving high classification accuracy when using inertial sensors in clothing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/s20010082</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31877780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accelerometry - instrumentation ; Accelerometry - methods ; Activity recognition ; Classification ; Correlation analysis ; Correlation coefficients ; Data transmission ; Humans ; Movement - physiology ; Older people ; Running ; Sensors ; Smart materials ; Walking ; Wearable Electronic Devices</subject><ispartof>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019-12, Vol.20 (1), p.82</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 by the authors. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1648-8074 ; 0000-0002-3243-3869 ; 0000-0002-3928-3381</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2550310970/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2550310970?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31877780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jayasinghe, Udeni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harwin, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Faustina</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification</title><title>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><description>Inertial sensors are a useful instrument for long term monitoring in healthcare. In many cases, inertial sensor devices can be worn as an accessory or integrated into smart textiles. In some situations, it may be beneficial to have data from multiple inertial sensors, rather than relying on a single worn sensor, since this may increase the accuracy of the analysis and better tolerate sensor errors. Integrating multiple sensors into clothing improves the feasibility and practicality of wearing multiple devices every day, in approximately the same location, with less likelihood of incorrect sensor orientation. To facilitate this, the current work investigates the consequences of attaching lightweight sensors to loose clothes. The intention of this paper is to discuss how data from these clothing sensors compare with similarly placed body worn sensors, with additional consideration of the resulting effects on activity recognition. This study compares the similarity between the two signals (body worn and clothing), collected from three different clothing types (slacks, pencil skirt and loose frock), across multiple daily activities (walking, running, sitting, and riding a bus) by calculating correlation coefficients for each sensor pair. Even though the two data streams are clearly different from each other, the results indicate that there is good potential of achieving high classification accuracy when using inertial sensors in clothing.</description><subject>Accelerometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Accelerometry - methods</subject><subject>Activity recognition</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Data transmission</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Running</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Smart materials</subject><subject>Walking</subject><subject>Wearable Electronic Devices</subject><issn>1424-8220</issn><issn>1424-8220</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1rFEEQxRtRzIce_AdkwIsexlR_zM70RVgWjUKCBxWPTU1vdbaXmem1u2dl_3s7JC5JTvWo-vF41GPsDYePUmq4SAKAA3TiGTvlSqi6EwKeP9An7CylLYCQUnYv2YnkXdu2HZyy7SqMO4x-uqlWQ8ibIurrME-Z1tUPmlKIqfrr86b6TRixH-i4dSFW12FPI025Wk44HJJPFU7rammz3_t8KI6YknfeYvZhesVeOBwSvb6f5-zXl88_V1_rq--X31bLq9oqkLm2FqnXHZdatUq5pghsUTgiazsipAUXqufOCYWoFVjhGmhIi8Vage57ec4-3fnu5n6ktS35Ig5mF_2I8WACevP4MvmNuQl7s9CdBKWLwft7gxj-zJSyGX2yNAw4UZiTKV_kohGtbAr67gm6DXMszyhU04DkoFso1Ic7ysaQUiR3DMPB3DZojg0W9u3D9Efyf2XyH8ymmDQ</recordid><startdate>20191221</startdate><enddate>20191221</enddate><creator>Jayasinghe, Udeni</creator><creator>Harwin, William S</creator><creator>Hwang, Faustina</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1648-8074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3243-3869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3928-3381</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191221</creationdate><title>Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification</title><author>Jayasinghe, Udeni ; Harwin, William S ; Hwang, Faustina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accelerometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Accelerometry - methods</topic><topic>Activity recognition</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Data transmission</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Running</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Smart materials</topic><topic>Walking</topic><topic>Wearable Electronic Devices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jayasinghe, Udeni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harwin, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Faustina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jayasinghe, Udeni</au><au>Harwin, William S</au><au>Hwang, Faustina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification</atitle><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><date>2019-12-21</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><pages>82-</pages><issn>1424-8220</issn><eissn>1424-8220</eissn><abstract>Inertial sensors are a useful instrument for long term monitoring in healthcare. In many cases, inertial sensor devices can be worn as an accessory or integrated into smart textiles. In some situations, it may be beneficial to have data from multiple inertial sensors, rather than relying on a single worn sensor, since this may increase the accuracy of the analysis and better tolerate sensor errors. Integrating multiple sensors into clothing improves the feasibility and practicality of wearing multiple devices every day, in approximately the same location, with less likelihood of incorrect sensor orientation. To facilitate this, the current work investigates the consequences of attaching lightweight sensors to loose clothes. The intention of this paper is to discuss how data from these clothing sensors compare with similarly placed body worn sensors, with additional consideration of the resulting effects on activity recognition. This study compares the similarity between the two signals (body worn and clothing), collected from three different clothing types (slacks, pencil skirt and loose frock), across multiple daily activities (walking, running, sitting, and riding a bus) by calculating correlation coefficients for each sensor pair. Even though the two data streams are clearly different from each other, the results indicate that there is good potential of achieving high classification accuracy when using inertial sensors in clothing.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>31877780</pmid><doi>10.3390/s20010082</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1648-8074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3243-3869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3928-3381</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1424-8220 |
ispartof | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019-12, Vol.20 (1), p.82 |
issn | 1424-8220 1424-8220 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6983049 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Accelerometry - instrumentation Accelerometry - methods Activity recognition Classification Correlation analysis Correlation coefficients Data transmission Humans Movement - physiology Older people Running Sensors Smart materials Walking Wearable Electronic Devices |
title | Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T08%3A03%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Clothing-Mounted%20Sensors%20with%20Wearable%20Sensors%20for%20Movement%20Analysis%20and%20Activity%20Classification&rft.jtitle=Sensors%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Jayasinghe,%20Udeni&rft.date=2019-12-21&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.pages=82-&rft.issn=1424-8220&rft.eissn=1424-8220&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/s20010082&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2550310970%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550310970&rft_id=info:pmid/31877780&rfr_iscdi=true |