Loading…

Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification

Inertial sensors are a useful instrument for long term monitoring in healthcare. In many cases, inertial sensor devices can be worn as an accessory or integrated into smart textiles. In some situations, it may be beneficial to have data from multiple inertial sensors, rather than relying on a single...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2019-12, Vol.20 (1), p.82
Main Authors: Jayasinghe, Udeni, Harwin, William S, Hwang, Faustina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 82
container_title Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
container_volume 20
creator Jayasinghe, Udeni
Harwin, William S
Hwang, Faustina
description Inertial sensors are a useful instrument for long term monitoring in healthcare. In many cases, inertial sensor devices can be worn as an accessory or integrated into smart textiles. In some situations, it may be beneficial to have data from multiple inertial sensors, rather than relying on a single worn sensor, since this may increase the accuracy of the analysis and better tolerate sensor errors. Integrating multiple sensors into clothing improves the feasibility and practicality of wearing multiple devices every day, in approximately the same location, with less likelihood of incorrect sensor orientation. To facilitate this, the current work investigates the consequences of attaching lightweight sensors to loose clothes. The intention of this paper is to discuss how data from these clothing sensors compare with similarly placed body worn sensors, with additional consideration of the resulting effects on activity recognition. This study compares the similarity between the two signals (body worn and clothing), collected from three different clothing types (slacks, pencil skirt and loose frock), across multiple daily activities (walking, running, sitting, and riding a bus) by calculating correlation coefficients for each sensor pair. Even though the two data streams are clearly different from each other, the results indicate that there is good potential of achieving high classification accuracy when using inertial sensors in clothing.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/s20010082
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6983049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2550310970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1rFEEQxRtRzIce_AdkwIsexlR_zM70RVgWjUKCBxWPTU1vdbaXmem1u2dl_3s7JC5JTvWo-vF41GPsDYePUmq4SAKAA3TiGTvlSqi6EwKeP9An7CylLYCQUnYv2YnkXdu2HZyy7SqMO4x-uqlWQ8ibIurrME-Z1tUPmlKIqfrr86b6TRixH-i4dSFW12FPI025Wk44HJJPFU7rammz3_t8KI6YknfeYvZhesVeOBwSvb6f5-zXl88_V1_rq--X31bLq9oqkLm2FqnXHZdatUq5pghsUTgiazsipAUXqufOCYWoFVjhGmhIi8Vage57ec4-3fnu5n6ktS35Ig5mF_2I8WACevP4MvmNuQl7s9CdBKWLwft7gxj-zJSyGX2yNAw4UZiTKV_kohGtbAr67gm6DXMszyhU04DkoFso1Ic7ysaQUiR3DMPB3DZojg0W9u3D9Efyf2XyH8ymmDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550310970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Jayasinghe, Udeni ; Harwin, William S ; Hwang, Faustina</creator><creatorcontrib>Jayasinghe, Udeni ; Harwin, William S ; Hwang, Faustina</creatorcontrib><description>Inertial sensors are a useful instrument for long term monitoring in healthcare. In many cases, inertial sensor devices can be worn as an accessory or integrated into smart textiles. In some situations, it may be beneficial to have data from multiple inertial sensors, rather than relying on a single worn sensor, since this may increase the accuracy of the analysis and better tolerate sensor errors. Integrating multiple sensors into clothing improves the feasibility and practicality of wearing multiple devices every day, in approximately the same location, with less likelihood of incorrect sensor orientation. To facilitate this, the current work investigates the consequences of attaching lightweight sensors to loose clothes. The intention of this paper is to discuss how data from these clothing sensors compare with similarly placed body worn sensors, with additional consideration of the resulting effects on activity recognition. This study compares the similarity between the two signals (body worn and clothing), collected from three different clothing types (slacks, pencil skirt and loose frock), across multiple daily activities (walking, running, sitting, and riding a bus) by calculating correlation coefficients for each sensor pair. Even though the two data streams are clearly different from each other, the results indicate that there is good potential of achieving high classification accuracy when using inertial sensors in clothing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/s20010082</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31877780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accelerometry - instrumentation ; Accelerometry - methods ; Activity recognition ; Classification ; Correlation analysis ; Correlation coefficients ; Data transmission ; Humans ; Movement - physiology ; Older people ; Running ; Sensors ; Smart materials ; Walking ; Wearable Electronic Devices</subject><ispartof>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019-12, Vol.20 (1), p.82</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 by the authors. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1648-8074 ; 0000-0002-3243-3869 ; 0000-0002-3928-3381</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2550310970/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2550310970?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31877780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jayasinghe, Udeni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harwin, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Faustina</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification</title><title>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><description>Inertial sensors are a useful instrument for long term monitoring in healthcare. In many cases, inertial sensor devices can be worn as an accessory or integrated into smart textiles. In some situations, it may be beneficial to have data from multiple inertial sensors, rather than relying on a single worn sensor, since this may increase the accuracy of the analysis and better tolerate sensor errors. Integrating multiple sensors into clothing improves the feasibility and practicality of wearing multiple devices every day, in approximately the same location, with less likelihood of incorrect sensor orientation. To facilitate this, the current work investigates the consequences of attaching lightweight sensors to loose clothes. The intention of this paper is to discuss how data from these clothing sensors compare with similarly placed body worn sensors, with additional consideration of the resulting effects on activity recognition. This study compares the similarity between the two signals (body worn and clothing), collected from three different clothing types (slacks, pencil skirt and loose frock), across multiple daily activities (walking, running, sitting, and riding a bus) by calculating correlation coefficients for each sensor pair. Even though the two data streams are clearly different from each other, the results indicate that there is good potential of achieving high classification accuracy when using inertial sensors in clothing.</description><subject>Accelerometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Accelerometry - methods</subject><subject>Activity recognition</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Data transmission</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Running</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Smart materials</subject><subject>Walking</subject><subject>Wearable Electronic Devices</subject><issn>1424-8220</issn><issn>1424-8220</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1rFEEQxRtRzIce_AdkwIsexlR_zM70RVgWjUKCBxWPTU1vdbaXmem1u2dl_3s7JC5JTvWo-vF41GPsDYePUmq4SAKAA3TiGTvlSqi6EwKeP9An7CylLYCQUnYv2YnkXdu2HZyy7SqMO4x-uqlWQ8ibIurrME-Z1tUPmlKIqfrr86b6TRixH-i4dSFW12FPI025Wk44HJJPFU7rammz3_t8KI6YknfeYvZhesVeOBwSvb6f5-zXl88_V1_rq--X31bLq9oqkLm2FqnXHZdatUq5pghsUTgiazsipAUXqufOCYWoFVjhGmhIi8Vage57ec4-3fnu5n6ktS35Ig5mF_2I8WACevP4MvmNuQl7s9CdBKWLwft7gxj-zJSyGX2yNAw4UZiTKV_kohGtbAr67gm6DXMszyhU04DkoFso1Ic7ysaQUiR3DMPB3DZojg0W9u3D9Efyf2XyH8ymmDQ</recordid><startdate>20191221</startdate><enddate>20191221</enddate><creator>Jayasinghe, Udeni</creator><creator>Harwin, William S</creator><creator>Hwang, Faustina</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1648-8074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3243-3869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3928-3381</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191221</creationdate><title>Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification</title><author>Jayasinghe, Udeni ; Harwin, William S ; Hwang, Faustina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accelerometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Accelerometry - methods</topic><topic>Activity recognition</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Data transmission</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Running</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Smart materials</topic><topic>Walking</topic><topic>Wearable Electronic Devices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jayasinghe, Udeni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harwin, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Faustina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jayasinghe, Udeni</au><au>Harwin, William S</au><au>Hwang, Faustina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification</atitle><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><date>2019-12-21</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><pages>82-</pages><issn>1424-8220</issn><eissn>1424-8220</eissn><abstract>Inertial sensors are a useful instrument for long term monitoring in healthcare. In many cases, inertial sensor devices can be worn as an accessory or integrated into smart textiles. In some situations, it may be beneficial to have data from multiple inertial sensors, rather than relying on a single worn sensor, since this may increase the accuracy of the analysis and better tolerate sensor errors. Integrating multiple sensors into clothing improves the feasibility and practicality of wearing multiple devices every day, in approximately the same location, with less likelihood of incorrect sensor orientation. To facilitate this, the current work investigates the consequences of attaching lightweight sensors to loose clothes. The intention of this paper is to discuss how data from these clothing sensors compare with similarly placed body worn sensors, with additional consideration of the resulting effects on activity recognition. This study compares the similarity between the two signals (body worn and clothing), collected from three different clothing types (slacks, pencil skirt and loose frock), across multiple daily activities (walking, running, sitting, and riding a bus) by calculating correlation coefficients for each sensor pair. Even though the two data streams are clearly different from each other, the results indicate that there is good potential of achieving high classification accuracy when using inertial sensors in clothing.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>31877780</pmid><doi>10.3390/s20010082</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1648-8074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3243-3869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3928-3381</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1424-8220
ispartof Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019-12, Vol.20 (1), p.82
issn 1424-8220
1424-8220
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6983049
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Accelerometry - instrumentation
Accelerometry - methods
Activity recognition
Classification
Correlation analysis
Correlation coefficients
Data transmission
Humans
Movement - physiology
Older people
Running
Sensors
Smart materials
Walking
Wearable Electronic Devices
title Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T08%3A03%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Clothing-Mounted%20Sensors%20with%20Wearable%20Sensors%20for%20Movement%20Analysis%20and%20Activity%20Classification&rft.jtitle=Sensors%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Jayasinghe,%20Udeni&rft.date=2019-12-21&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.pages=82-&rft.issn=1424-8220&rft.eissn=1424-8220&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/s20010082&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2550310970%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ccaeb981394744f5139a7a2feecc8eeae6124b1ff24aa940c2f505e926d409bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550310970&rft_id=info:pmid/31877780&rfr_iscdi=true