Loading…
Unsatisfactory testicular position after inguinal orchidopexy: Is there a role for upfront laparoscopy?
Objectives: To examine the role of laparoscopy in managing unsatisfactory testicular position after an open inguinal orchidopexy. We hypothesised that testes that were originally peeping, where short vessels represented a difficulty and testes that only reached a high scrotal position under tension,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Arab Journal of Urology 2020-01, Vol.18 (1), p.48-53 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-459ecca5fe314a030df0f77ef1628234117733b63b5f2ffe65d97daa9f88e2f13 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 53 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 48 |
container_title | Arab Journal of Urology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Youssef, Ahmed Abdelhaseeb Marei, Mahmoud Marei Abouelfadl, Mohamed Hamed Mahmoud, Wesam Mohamed Elbarawy, Atef Salaheldin Abdulaziz Yassin, Tamer Yassin Mohamed |
description | Objectives: To examine the role of laparoscopy in managing unsatisfactory testicular position after an open inguinal orchidopexy. We hypothesised that testes that were originally peeping, where short vessels represented a difficulty and testes that only reached a high scrotal position under tension, especially after an initial surgery performed with the appropriate expertise, are candidates for initial laparoscopic dissection.
Patients and methods: Nineteen boys with an initial open inguinal orchidopexy, with a mean age of 31 months, were considered. Twelve were then treated by a laparoscopic-assisted orchidopexy technique. Standard laparoscopy was established and utilised to mobilise the spermatic cord from above, then completed by an open inguinal mobilisation.
Results: The mean age at surgery was 26 months. The laparoscopic redo surgery took place at a mean interval of 11.9 months after the initial operation. The mean operative time was 72 min. A good position and size of the testis were achieved in all cases, evidenced by ultrasonography at 6 months postoperatively and clinically thereafter.
Conclusion: An upfront combined laparoscopic and inguinal approach to redo orchidopexy for recurrent palpable undescended testes is suitable in selected patients. This study identifies the selection criteria and outlines the operative considerations. This laparoscopic-assisted approach is a safe and feasible way to correct unsatisfactory position of the testis, with diminished risk of injury to the vas and vessels, while gaining the maximum possible length by high retroperitoneal dissection.
Abbreviation: UDT: undescended testis/testes |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1686895 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7006643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7006643</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-459ecca5fe314a030df0f77ef1628234117733b63b5f2ffe65d97daa9f88e2f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkV1LwzAUhoMobsz9BCF_oDNp2jT1wg-GH4OBNw68C6dpsgW6pCSZ2n_vxibo1Xk5Lzzw8iB0TcmMEkFuclKTshYfs5zQeka54KIuz9D48M8OxfmfPELTGG1DiqJihAh-iUYsJyLnrBij9cpFSDYaUMmHAScdk1W7DgLufbTJeofBJB2wdeudddBhH9TGtr7X38MtXkScNjpoDDj4TmPjA971JniXcAc9BB-V74f7K3RhoIt6eroTtHp-ep-_Zsu3l8X8cZmpgouUFWWtlYLSaEYLIIy0hpiq0obyXOSsoLSqGGs4a0qTG6N52dZVC1AbIXRuKJuguyO33zVb3SrtUoBO9sFuIQzSg5X_G2c3cu0_ZUUI5wXbAx6OAOv2W7bw5UPXygRD54MJ4JSNklEiDx7krwd58CBPHtgPIsZ-4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unsatisfactory testicular position after inguinal orchidopexy: Is there a role for upfront laparoscopy?</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Youssef, Ahmed Abdelhaseeb ; Marei, Mahmoud Marei ; Abouelfadl, Mohamed Hamed ; Mahmoud, Wesam Mohamed ; Elbarawy, Atef Salaheldin Abdulaziz ; Yassin, Tamer Yassin Mohamed</creator><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Ahmed Abdelhaseeb ; Marei, Mahmoud Marei ; Abouelfadl, Mohamed Hamed ; Mahmoud, Wesam Mohamed ; Elbarawy, Atef Salaheldin Abdulaziz ; Yassin, Tamer Yassin Mohamed</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To examine the role of laparoscopy in managing unsatisfactory testicular position after an open inguinal orchidopexy. We hypothesised that testes that were originally peeping, where short vessels represented a difficulty and testes that only reached a high scrotal position under tension, especially after an initial surgery performed with the appropriate expertise, are candidates for initial laparoscopic dissection.
Patients and methods: Nineteen boys with an initial open inguinal orchidopexy, with a mean age of 31 months, were considered. Twelve were then treated by a laparoscopic-assisted orchidopexy technique. Standard laparoscopy was established and utilised to mobilise the spermatic cord from above, then completed by an open inguinal mobilisation.
Results: The mean age at surgery was 26 months. The laparoscopic redo surgery took place at a mean interval of 11.9 months after the initial operation. The mean operative time was 72 min. A good position and size of the testis were achieved in all cases, evidenced by ultrasonography at 6 months postoperatively and clinically thereafter.
Conclusion: An upfront combined laparoscopic and inguinal approach to redo orchidopexy for recurrent palpable undescended testes is suitable in selected patients. This study identifies the selection criteria and outlines the operative considerations. This laparoscopic-assisted approach is a safe and feasible way to correct unsatisfactory position of the testis, with diminished risk of injury to the vas and vessels, while gaining the maximum possible length by high retroperitoneal dissection.
Abbreviation: UDT: undescended testis/testes</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-598X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-598X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-5998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1686895</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32082634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>ascending testis ; Cryptorchidism ; laparoscopic orchidopexy ; Laparoscopy/Robotics ; recurrent undescended testis ; redo orchidopexy</subject><ispartof>Arab Journal of Urology, 2020-01, Vol.18 (1), p.48-53</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2019</rights><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2019 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-459ecca5fe314a030df0f77ef1628234117733b63b5f2ffe65d97daa9f88e2f13</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-8670-1830 ; 0000-0001-7288-1255 ; 0000-0001-5062-9315 ; 0000-0002-8010-2466</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006643/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7006643/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Ahmed Abdelhaseeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marei, Mahmoud Marei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abouelfadl, Mohamed Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Wesam Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbarawy, Atef Salaheldin Abdulaziz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yassin, Tamer Yassin Mohamed</creatorcontrib><title>Unsatisfactory testicular position after inguinal orchidopexy: Is there a role for upfront laparoscopy?</title><title>Arab Journal of Urology</title><description>Objectives: To examine the role of laparoscopy in managing unsatisfactory testicular position after an open inguinal orchidopexy. We hypothesised that testes that were originally peeping, where short vessels represented a difficulty and testes that only reached a high scrotal position under tension, especially after an initial surgery performed with the appropriate expertise, are candidates for initial laparoscopic dissection.
Patients and methods: Nineteen boys with an initial open inguinal orchidopexy, with a mean age of 31 months, were considered. Twelve were then treated by a laparoscopic-assisted orchidopexy technique. Standard laparoscopy was established and utilised to mobilise the spermatic cord from above, then completed by an open inguinal mobilisation.
Results: The mean age at surgery was 26 months. The laparoscopic redo surgery took place at a mean interval of 11.9 months after the initial operation. The mean operative time was 72 min. A good position and size of the testis were achieved in all cases, evidenced by ultrasonography at 6 months postoperatively and clinically thereafter.
Conclusion: An upfront combined laparoscopic and inguinal approach to redo orchidopexy for recurrent palpable undescended testes is suitable in selected patients. This study identifies the selection criteria and outlines the operative considerations. This laparoscopic-assisted approach is a safe and feasible way to correct unsatisfactory position of the testis, with diminished risk of injury to the vas and vessels, while gaining the maximum possible length by high retroperitoneal dissection.
Abbreviation: UDT: undescended testis/testes</description><subject>ascending testis</subject><subject>Cryptorchidism</subject><subject>laparoscopic orchidopexy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy/Robotics</subject><subject>recurrent undescended testis</subject><subject>redo orchidopexy</subject><issn>2090-598X</issn><issn>2090-598X</issn><issn>2090-5998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkV1LwzAUhoMobsz9BCF_oDNp2jT1wg-GH4OBNw68C6dpsgW6pCSZ2n_vxibo1Xk5Lzzw8iB0TcmMEkFuclKTshYfs5zQeka54KIuz9D48M8OxfmfPELTGG1DiqJihAh-iUYsJyLnrBij9cpFSDYaUMmHAScdk1W7DgLufbTJeofBJB2wdeudddBhH9TGtr7X38MtXkScNjpoDDj4TmPjA971JniXcAc9BB-V74f7K3RhoIt6eroTtHp-ep-_Zsu3l8X8cZmpgouUFWWtlYLSaEYLIIy0hpiq0obyXOSsoLSqGGs4a0qTG6N52dZVC1AbIXRuKJuguyO33zVb3SrtUoBO9sFuIQzSg5X_G2c3cu0_ZUUI5wXbAx6OAOv2W7bw5UPXygRD54MJ4JSNklEiDx7krwd58CBPHtgPIsZ-4A</recordid><startdate>20200102</startdate><enddate>20200102</enddate><creator>Youssef, Ahmed Abdelhaseeb</creator><creator>Marei, Mahmoud Marei</creator><creator>Abouelfadl, Mohamed Hamed</creator><creator>Mahmoud, Wesam Mohamed</creator><creator>Elbarawy, Atef Salaheldin Abdulaziz</creator><creator>Yassin, Tamer Yassin Mohamed</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8670-1830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-1255</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5062-9315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8010-2466</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200102</creationdate><title>Unsatisfactory testicular position after inguinal orchidopexy: Is there a role for upfront laparoscopy?</title><author>Youssef, Ahmed Abdelhaseeb ; Marei, Mahmoud Marei ; Abouelfadl, Mohamed Hamed ; Mahmoud, Wesam Mohamed ; Elbarawy, Atef Salaheldin Abdulaziz ; Yassin, Tamer Yassin Mohamed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-459ecca5fe314a030df0f77ef1628234117733b63b5f2ffe65d97daa9f88e2f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>ascending testis</topic><topic>Cryptorchidism</topic><topic>laparoscopic orchidopexy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy/Robotics</topic><topic>recurrent undescended testis</topic><topic>redo orchidopexy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Ahmed Abdelhaseeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marei, Mahmoud Marei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abouelfadl, Mohamed Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Wesam Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbarawy, Atef Salaheldin Abdulaziz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yassin, Tamer Yassin Mohamed</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Arab Journal of Urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Youssef, Ahmed Abdelhaseeb</au><au>Marei, Mahmoud Marei</au><au>Abouelfadl, Mohamed Hamed</au><au>Mahmoud, Wesam Mohamed</au><au>Elbarawy, Atef Salaheldin Abdulaziz</au><au>Yassin, Tamer Yassin Mohamed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unsatisfactory testicular position after inguinal orchidopexy: Is there a role for upfront laparoscopy?</atitle><jtitle>Arab Journal of Urology</jtitle><date>2020-01-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>48-53</pages><issn>2090-598X</issn><eissn>2090-598X</eissn><eissn>2090-5998</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To examine the role of laparoscopy in managing unsatisfactory testicular position after an open inguinal orchidopexy. We hypothesised that testes that were originally peeping, where short vessels represented a difficulty and testes that only reached a high scrotal position under tension, especially after an initial surgery performed with the appropriate expertise, are candidates for initial laparoscopic dissection.
Patients and methods: Nineteen boys with an initial open inguinal orchidopexy, with a mean age of 31 months, were considered. Twelve were then treated by a laparoscopic-assisted orchidopexy technique. Standard laparoscopy was established and utilised to mobilise the spermatic cord from above, then completed by an open inguinal mobilisation.
Results: The mean age at surgery was 26 months. The laparoscopic redo surgery took place at a mean interval of 11.9 months after the initial operation. The mean operative time was 72 min. A good position and size of the testis were achieved in all cases, evidenced by ultrasonography at 6 months postoperatively and clinically thereafter.
Conclusion: An upfront combined laparoscopic and inguinal approach to redo orchidopexy for recurrent palpable undescended testes is suitable in selected patients. This study identifies the selection criteria and outlines the operative considerations. This laparoscopic-assisted approach is a safe and feasible way to correct unsatisfactory position of the testis, with diminished risk of injury to the vas and vessels, while gaining the maximum possible length by high retroperitoneal dissection.
Abbreviation: UDT: undescended testis/testes</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>32082634</pmid><doi>10.1080/2090598X.2019.1686895</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8670-1830</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-1255</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5062-9315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8010-2466</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2090-598X |
ispartof | Arab Journal of Urology, 2020-01, Vol.18 (1), p.48-53 |
issn | 2090-598X 2090-598X 2090-5998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7006643 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; PubMed Central Free |
subjects | ascending testis Cryptorchidism laparoscopic orchidopexy Laparoscopy/Robotics recurrent undescended testis redo orchidopexy |
title | Unsatisfactory testicular position after inguinal orchidopexy: Is there a role for upfront laparoscopy? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A14%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unsatisfactory%20testicular%20position%20after%20inguinal%20orchidopexy:%20Is%20there%20a%20role%20for%20upfront%20laparoscopy?&rft.jtitle=Arab%20Journal%20of%20Urology&rft.au=Youssef,%20Ahmed%20Abdelhaseeb&rft.date=2020-01-02&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=48-53&rft.issn=2090-598X&rft.eissn=2090-598X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/2090598X.2019.1686895&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_infor%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7006643%3C/pubmedcentral_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-459ecca5fe314a030df0f77ef1628234117733b63b5f2ffe65d97daa9f88e2f13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32082634&rfr_iscdi=true |