Barriers and enablers to collaborative working between GPs and pharmacists: a qualitative interview study

• Published in: British journal of general practice 2020-03, Vol.70 (692), p.e155-e163
• Main Authors: Duncan, Polly, Ridd, Matthew J, McCahon, Deborah, Guthrie, Bruce, Cabral, Christie
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Attitude of Health Personnel; Collaboration; Community Pharmacy Services - organization & administration; Complex patients; Cooperative Behavior; England; Family physicians; Female; General Practice - organization & administration; General Practitioners - psychology; Humans; Male; Medical treatment; Middle Aged; Pharmacists; Pharmacists - psychology; Primary Health Care - organization & administration; Qualitative Research; Scotland
• ISSN: 0960-1643; 1478-5242
• DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X708197

Many UK GP practices now employ a practice pharmacist, but little is known about how GPs and pharmacists work together to optimise medications for complex patients with multimorbidity. To explore GP and pharmacist perspectives on collaborative working within the context of optimising medications for patients with multimorbidity. A qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with GPs and pharmacists working in the West of England, Northern England, and Scotland. Thirteen GPs and 10 pharmacists were sampled from practices enrolled in the 3D trial (a complex intervention for people with multimorbidity). Participants' views on collaborative working were explored with interviews that were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically. Saturation of data was achieved with no new insights arising from later interviews. GPs from surgeries that employed a pharmacist tended to value their expertise more than GPs who had not worked with one. Three key themes were identified: resources and competing priorities; responsibility; and professional boundaries. GPs valued pharmacist recommendations that were perceived to improve patient safety, as opposed to those that were technical and unlikely to benefit the patient. Pharmacists who were not known to GPs felt undervalued and wanted feedback from the GPs about their recommendations, particularly those that were not actioned. A good working relationship between the GP and pharmacist, where each profession understood the other's skills and expertise, was key. The importance of face-to-face meetings and feedback should be considered in future studies of interdisciplinary interventions, and by GP practices that employ pharmacists and other allied health professionals.