Loading…

Bond strength of lithium disilicate after cleaning methods of the remaining hydrofluoric acid

Different ceramic surface cleaning methods have been suggested after the acid conditioning. The aim was to evaluate the effect of different protocols used to remove the remaining hydrofluoric acid on the shear bond strength (SBS) between lithium disilicate and resin cement. Forty-four specimens of l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry 2020-02, Vol.12 (2), p.e103-e107
Main Authors: Dos Santos, Daniela-Micheline, Bitencourt, Sandro-Basso, da Silva, Emily-Vivianne-Freitas, Matos, Adaias-Oliveira, Benez, Georgia-de Castro, Rangel, Elidiane-Cipriano, Pesqueira, Aldiéris-Alves, Barão, Valentim-Adelino-Ricardo, Goiato, Marcelo-Coelho
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Different ceramic surface cleaning methods have been suggested after the acid conditioning. The aim was to evaluate the effect of different protocols used to remove the remaining hydrofluoric acid on the shear bond strength (SBS) between lithium disilicate and resin cement. Forty-four specimens of lithium disilicate (IPS e.max Press) were divided in 4 groups (n=11): group C (control, no treatment); group HF+S (5% hydrofluoric acid + silane); group HF+US+S (5% hydrofluoric acid + ultrasound cleaning + silane); group HF+PH+S (5% hydrofluoric acid + 37% phosphoric acid + silane). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were performed to characterize the surface morphology. The SBS test was performed on the resin/ceramic interface, and the failure mode was characterized. SBS values were submitted to 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (α=.05). The relation between surface treatment and failure modes was analyzed using the chi-squared test (α=.05). The surface treatment type interfered in the shear strength (
ISSN:1989-5488
1989-5488
DOI:10.4317/JCED.56412