Loading…

Low-Profile Intra-Aneurysmal Flow Disruptor WEB 17 versus WEB Predecessor Systems for Treatment of Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparative Analysis of Procedural Safety and Feasibility

The Woven EndoBridge 17 has recently been introduced to the market for facilitated endovascular treatment of small bifurcation aneurysms (≤7 mm) with low-profile microcatheters. We compared the Woven EndoBridge 17 with its predecessor versions in terms of procedural safety and feasibility. This was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR 2019-10, Vol.40 (10), p.1766-1772
Main Authors: Goertz, L, Liebig, T, Siebert, E, Herzberg, M, Pennig, L, Schlamann, M, Borggrefe, J, Krischek, B, Dorn, F, Kabbasch, C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-b5ca527396038fed3e8e820dd88f700ee5f8bfe6e15696dbe7cf2a347caaba333
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-b5ca527396038fed3e8e820dd88f700ee5f8bfe6e15696dbe7cf2a347caaba333
container_end_page 1772
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1766
container_title American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR
container_volume 40
creator Goertz, L
Liebig, T
Siebert, E
Herzberg, M
Pennig, L
Schlamann, M
Borggrefe, J
Krischek, B
Dorn, F
Kabbasch, C
description The Woven EndoBridge 17 has recently been introduced to the market for facilitated endovascular treatment of small bifurcation aneurysms (≤7 mm) with low-profile microcatheters. We compared the Woven EndoBridge 17 with its predecessor versions in terms of procedural safety and feasibility. This was a multicenter review of aneurysms ranging from 3 to 7 mm treated with the Woven EndoBridge between 2011 and 2019. Aneurysm characteristics, procedural parameters, and complications were retrospectively compared between treatment with the Woven EndoBridge 17 and a control group that was treated with its predecessor versions, using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Thirty-eight aneurysms treated with a Woven EndoBridge 17 (mean size, 4.9 ± 1.5 mm) and 70 treated with a predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 (mean size, 5.6 ± 1.4 mm) were included. The predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 had a higher failure rate (10.3%) than the Woven EndoBridge 17 (0%, = .05). Additional stent placement was performed more often with the predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 (10.0%) than with the Woven EndoBridge 17 (2.6%, adjusted = .005). The predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 was associated with a higher thromboembolic event rate (14.3%) than the Woven EndoBridge 17 (5.3%, adjusted = .002). Neurologic complications (Woven EndoBridge 17: 2.6%; predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17: 2.9%, adjusted = 1.0) and immediate complete aneurysm occlusion rates (Woven EndoBridge 17: 57.9%; predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17: 54.3%, adjusted = .21) did not differ significantly between groups. In the current study, the Woven EndoBridge 17 was associated with a potentially lower thromboembolic event rate than the predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17, without compromising the immediate aneurysm occlusion rate. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcome analysis will be necessary to draw a definite conclusion.
doi_str_mv 10.3174/ajnr.A6183
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7028555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2286912518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-b5ca527396038fed3e8e820dd88f700ee5f8bfe6e15696dbe7cf2a347caaba333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd9u0zAUhy0EYqVwwwMgXyKkDDuuE4cLpFJWmFSJSR2CO8txjsGTE3e20ymvtqebu24TXPnP-fk7x_oQekvJKaP14qO6GsLpsqKCPUMz2rCqaHjz-zmaEdrwoqJEnKBXMV4RQnhTly_RCaMLIRZNM0O3G39TXARvrAN8PqSgiuUAY5hirxxeO3-Dv9oYxl3yAf86-4JpjfcQ4hjvTxcBOtAQY65up5igj9jk_WUAlXoYEvYGbzPKHeE6qMFm8GOP-AmvfL9TQSW7h3yt3BRtPLzKQ2noxpDTW2UgTVgNHV6Dira1zqbpNXphlIvw5mGdo5_rs8vV92Lz49v5arkpNKtFKlquFS9r1lSECQMdAwGiJF0nhKkJAeBGtAYqoLxqqq6FWptSsUWtlWoVY2yOPh-5u7HtodNw-IiTu2B7FSbplZX_Vwb7V_7xe1mTUnDOM-D9AyD46xFikr2NGpxTA_gxyrIUVUNLngXO0YdjVAcfYwDz1IYSeZAtD7LlvewcfvfvYE_RR7vsDha5q8s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2286912518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Low-Profile Intra-Aneurysmal Flow Disruptor WEB 17 versus WEB Predecessor Systems for Treatment of Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparative Analysis of Procedural Safety and Feasibility</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><creator>Goertz, L ; Liebig, T ; Siebert, E ; Herzberg, M ; Pennig, L ; Schlamann, M ; Borggrefe, J ; Krischek, B ; Dorn, F ; Kabbasch, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Goertz, L ; Liebig, T ; Siebert, E ; Herzberg, M ; Pennig, L ; Schlamann, M ; Borggrefe, J ; Krischek, B ; Dorn, F ; Kabbasch, C</creatorcontrib><description>The Woven EndoBridge 17 has recently been introduced to the market for facilitated endovascular treatment of small bifurcation aneurysms (≤7 mm) with low-profile microcatheters. We compared the Woven EndoBridge 17 with its predecessor versions in terms of procedural safety and feasibility. This was a multicenter review of aneurysms ranging from 3 to 7 mm treated with the Woven EndoBridge between 2011 and 2019. Aneurysm characteristics, procedural parameters, and complications were retrospectively compared between treatment with the Woven EndoBridge 17 and a control group that was treated with its predecessor versions, using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Thirty-eight aneurysms treated with a Woven EndoBridge 17 (mean size, 4.9 ± 1.5 mm) and 70 treated with a predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 (mean size, 5.6 ± 1.4 mm) were included. The predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 had a higher failure rate (10.3%) than the Woven EndoBridge 17 (0%, = .05). Additional stent placement was performed more often with the predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 (10.0%) than with the Woven EndoBridge 17 (2.6%, adjusted = .005). The predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 was associated with a higher thromboembolic event rate (14.3%) than the Woven EndoBridge 17 (5.3%, adjusted = .002). Neurologic complications (Woven EndoBridge 17: 2.6%; predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17: 2.9%, adjusted = 1.0) and immediate complete aneurysm occlusion rates (Woven EndoBridge 17: 57.9%; predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17: 54.3%, adjusted = .21) did not differ significantly between groups. In the current study, the Woven EndoBridge 17 was associated with a potentially lower thromboembolic event rate than the predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17, without compromising the immediate aneurysm occlusion rate. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcome analysis will be necessary to draw a definite conclusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-959X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6183</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31488499</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Neuroradiology</publisher><subject>Interventional</subject><ispartof>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2019-10, Vol.40 (10), p.1766-1772</ispartof><rights>2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.</rights><rights>2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology 2019 American Journal of Neuroradiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-b5ca527396038fed3e8e820dd88f700ee5f8bfe6e15696dbe7cf2a347caaba333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-b5ca527396038fed3e8e820dd88f700ee5f8bfe6e15696dbe7cf2a347caaba333</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5640-7780 ; 0000-0002-2620-7611 ; 0000-0003-2908-7560 ; 0000-0001-7395-6546 ; 0000-0003-4455-7874 ; 0000-0002-8799-9333 ; 0000-0002-6606-9313 ; 0000-0001-9093-8307 ; 0000-0002-7734-611X ; 0000-0003-3712-2258</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028555/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028555/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488499$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goertz, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebig, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siebert, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzberg, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennig, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlamann, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borggrefe, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krischek, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorn, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabbasch, C</creatorcontrib><title>Low-Profile Intra-Aneurysmal Flow Disruptor WEB 17 versus WEB Predecessor Systems for Treatment of Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparative Analysis of Procedural Safety and Feasibility</title><title>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</title><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><description>The Woven EndoBridge 17 has recently been introduced to the market for facilitated endovascular treatment of small bifurcation aneurysms (≤7 mm) with low-profile microcatheters. We compared the Woven EndoBridge 17 with its predecessor versions in terms of procedural safety and feasibility. This was a multicenter review of aneurysms ranging from 3 to 7 mm treated with the Woven EndoBridge between 2011 and 2019. Aneurysm characteristics, procedural parameters, and complications were retrospectively compared between treatment with the Woven EndoBridge 17 and a control group that was treated with its predecessor versions, using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Thirty-eight aneurysms treated with a Woven EndoBridge 17 (mean size, 4.9 ± 1.5 mm) and 70 treated with a predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 (mean size, 5.6 ± 1.4 mm) were included. The predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 had a higher failure rate (10.3%) than the Woven EndoBridge 17 (0%, = .05). Additional stent placement was performed more often with the predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 (10.0%) than with the Woven EndoBridge 17 (2.6%, adjusted = .005). The predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 was associated with a higher thromboembolic event rate (14.3%) than the Woven EndoBridge 17 (5.3%, adjusted = .002). Neurologic complications (Woven EndoBridge 17: 2.6%; predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17: 2.9%, adjusted = 1.0) and immediate complete aneurysm occlusion rates (Woven EndoBridge 17: 57.9%; predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17: 54.3%, adjusted = .21) did not differ significantly between groups. In the current study, the Woven EndoBridge 17 was associated with a potentially lower thromboembolic event rate than the predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17, without compromising the immediate aneurysm occlusion rate. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcome analysis will be necessary to draw a definite conclusion.</description><subject>Interventional</subject><issn>0195-6108</issn><issn>1936-959X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkd9u0zAUhy0EYqVwwwMgXyKkDDuuE4cLpFJWmFSJSR2CO8txjsGTE3e20ymvtqebu24TXPnP-fk7x_oQekvJKaP14qO6GsLpsqKCPUMz2rCqaHjz-zmaEdrwoqJEnKBXMV4RQnhTly_RCaMLIRZNM0O3G39TXARvrAN8PqSgiuUAY5hirxxeO3-Dv9oYxl3yAf86-4JpjfcQ4hjvTxcBOtAQY65up5igj9jk_WUAlXoYEvYGbzPKHeE6qMFm8GOP-AmvfL9TQSW7h3yt3BRtPLzKQ2noxpDTW2UgTVgNHV6Dira1zqbpNXphlIvw5mGdo5_rs8vV92Lz49v5arkpNKtFKlquFS9r1lSECQMdAwGiJF0nhKkJAeBGtAYqoLxqqq6FWptSsUWtlWoVY2yOPh-5u7HtodNw-IiTu2B7FSbplZX_Vwb7V_7xe1mTUnDOM-D9AyD46xFikr2NGpxTA_gxyrIUVUNLngXO0YdjVAcfYwDz1IYSeZAtD7LlvewcfvfvYE_RR7vsDha5q8s</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Goertz, L</creator><creator>Liebig, T</creator><creator>Siebert, E</creator><creator>Herzberg, M</creator><creator>Pennig, L</creator><creator>Schlamann, M</creator><creator>Borggrefe, J</creator><creator>Krischek, B</creator><creator>Dorn, F</creator><creator>Kabbasch, C</creator><general>American Society of Neuroradiology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5640-7780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2620-7611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2908-7560</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7395-6546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4455-7874</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-9333</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6606-9313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9093-8307</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7734-611X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3712-2258</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Low-Profile Intra-Aneurysmal Flow Disruptor WEB 17 versus WEB Predecessor Systems for Treatment of Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparative Analysis of Procedural Safety and Feasibility</title><author>Goertz, L ; Liebig, T ; Siebert, E ; Herzberg, M ; Pennig, L ; Schlamann, M ; Borggrefe, J ; Krischek, B ; Dorn, F ; Kabbasch, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-b5ca527396038fed3e8e820dd88f700ee5f8bfe6e15696dbe7cf2a347caaba333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Interventional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goertz, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebig, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siebert, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzberg, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennig, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlamann, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borggrefe, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krischek, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorn, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabbasch, C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goertz, L</au><au>Liebig, T</au><au>Siebert, E</au><au>Herzberg, M</au><au>Pennig, L</au><au>Schlamann, M</au><au>Borggrefe, J</au><au>Krischek, B</au><au>Dorn, F</au><au>Kabbasch, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Low-Profile Intra-Aneurysmal Flow Disruptor WEB 17 versus WEB Predecessor Systems for Treatment of Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparative Analysis of Procedural Safety and Feasibility</atitle><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1766</spage><epage>1772</epage><pages>1766-1772</pages><issn>0195-6108</issn><eissn>1936-959X</eissn><abstract>The Woven EndoBridge 17 has recently been introduced to the market for facilitated endovascular treatment of small bifurcation aneurysms (≤7 mm) with low-profile microcatheters. We compared the Woven EndoBridge 17 with its predecessor versions in terms of procedural safety and feasibility. This was a multicenter review of aneurysms ranging from 3 to 7 mm treated with the Woven EndoBridge between 2011 and 2019. Aneurysm characteristics, procedural parameters, and complications were retrospectively compared between treatment with the Woven EndoBridge 17 and a control group that was treated with its predecessor versions, using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Thirty-eight aneurysms treated with a Woven EndoBridge 17 (mean size, 4.9 ± 1.5 mm) and 70 treated with a predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 (mean size, 5.6 ± 1.4 mm) were included. The predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 had a higher failure rate (10.3%) than the Woven EndoBridge 17 (0%, = .05). Additional stent placement was performed more often with the predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 (10.0%) than with the Woven EndoBridge 17 (2.6%, adjusted = .005). The predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17 was associated with a higher thromboembolic event rate (14.3%) than the Woven EndoBridge 17 (5.3%, adjusted = .002). Neurologic complications (Woven EndoBridge 17: 2.6%; predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17: 2.9%, adjusted = 1.0) and immediate complete aneurysm occlusion rates (Woven EndoBridge 17: 57.9%; predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17: 54.3%, adjusted = .21) did not differ significantly between groups. In the current study, the Woven EndoBridge 17 was associated with a potentially lower thromboembolic event rate than the predecessor version of the Woven EndoBridge 17, without compromising the immediate aneurysm occlusion rate. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcome analysis will be necessary to draw a definite conclusion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Neuroradiology</pub><pmid>31488499</pmid><doi>10.3174/ajnr.A6183</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5640-7780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2620-7611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2908-7560</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7395-6546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4455-7874</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-9333</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6606-9313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9093-8307</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7734-611X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3712-2258</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6108
ispartof American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2019-10, Vol.40 (10), p.1766-1772
issn 0195-6108
1936-959X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7028555
source PubMed Central (Open Access)
subjects Interventional
title Low-Profile Intra-Aneurysmal Flow Disruptor WEB 17 versus WEB Predecessor Systems for Treatment of Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparative Analysis of Procedural Safety and Feasibility
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A21%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low-Profile%20Intra-Aneurysmal%20Flow%20Disruptor%20WEB%2017%20versus%20WEB%20Predecessor%20Systems%20for%20Treatment%20of%20Small%20Intracranial%20Aneurysms:%20Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Procedural%20Safety%20and%20Feasibility&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20neuroradiology%20:%20AJNR&rft.au=Goertz,%20L&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1766&rft.epage=1772&rft.pages=1766-1772&rft.issn=0195-6108&rft.eissn=1936-959X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3174/ajnr.A6183&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2286912518%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-b5ca527396038fed3e8e820dd88f700ee5f8bfe6e15696dbe7cf2a347caaba333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2286912518&rft_id=info:pmid/31488499&rfr_iscdi=true