Just a click away: Action–state orientation moderates the impact of task interruptions on initiative

Objective The present research examines the role of individual differences in self‐regulation (i.e., demand‐related action–state orientation) on initiative to resume an interrupted task. Method In three studies (N1 = 208, 55% male, Mage = 33.2; N2 = 457, 62% male, Mage = 31.7; N3 = 210, 60% male, Ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of personality 2020-04, Vol.88 (2), p.373-390
Main Authors: Birk, Max V., Mandryk, Regan L., Baumann, Nicola
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Action orientation
action versus state orientation
Adult
Computer & video games
daily hassles
Dismissal
Female
Goals
Humans
Individual differences
Individuality
initiative versus hesitation
Intention
intention–behavior gap
Interruptions
Male
Males
Motivation
Notification
Original
Personality Systems Interactions (PSI) theory
Repetition
Self-Control
task interruption
Task Performance and Analysis
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective The present research examines the role of individual differences in self‐regulation (i.e., demand‐related action–state orientation) on initiative to resume an interrupted task. Method In three studies (N1 = 208, 55% male, Mage = 33.2; N2 = 457, 62% male, Mage = 31.7; N3 = 210, 60% male, Mage = 32.6), participants were notified about a network interruption while playing a computer game. Participants could dismiss the interrupting notification by clicking a continue button or wait until the notification timed out. We manipulated demand by presenting notifications during (demand) versus after game rounds (no demand). Results Demand‐related action orientation was associated with higher probability to dismiss the notification during a game round, controlling for dismissal after a game round. Findings occurred when controlling for task ability and task motivation, were specific for demand‐ and not threat‐related action orientation, were complemented by shorter dismissal latencies, and were stable across interruption timeouts (Studies 1–3). Exposure through repetition resulted in adaptation (Study 3). Conclusion The findings suggest that people with lower action orientation have less self‐regulatory ability to initiate goal‐directed action and resume interrupted tasks—even if they are just a click away. Findings are discussed within the framework of Personality Systems Interactions theory.
ISSN:0022-3506
1467-6494
DOI:10.1111/jopy.12498