Loading…
Sex Differences in Ultrasound-Based Muscle Size and Mechanical Properties of the Cervical-Flexor and -Extensor Muscles
Neck pain (NP), neck injuries, and concussions are more prevalent in female athletes than in their male counterparts. Females exhibit less neck girth, strength, and stiffness against a perturbation. As part of the clinical examination for individuals with NP, ultrasound (US)-based imaging of the cer...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of athletic training 2020-03, Vol.55 (3), p.282-288 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-314594677dda16c214d137bd1ca9e2e6dddd6b004005614392d90e51b1f338e43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-314594677dda16c214d137bd1ca9e2e6dddd6b004005614392d90e51b1f338e43 |
container_end_page | 288 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 282 |
container_title | Journal of athletic training |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Nagai, Takashi Schilaty, Nathan D Krause, David A Crowley, Eric M Hewett, Timothy E |
description | Neck pain (NP), neck injuries, and concussions are more prevalent in female athletes than in their male counterparts. Females exhibit less neck girth, strength, and stiffness against a perturbation. As part of the clinical examination for individuals with NP, ultrasound (US)-based imaging of the cervical muscles has become common. Muscle size or thickness and stiffness can be measured with US-based B-mode and shear-wave elastography (SWE), respectively. Information on reliability, normative values, and sex differences based on US-based muscle size or thickness and stiffness in young and athletic individuals is limited.
To evaluate sex differences in US-based muscle size or thickness and biomechanical properties of the cervical-flexor and -extensor muscles.
Cross-sectional study.
Laboratory.
A total of 13 women (age = 23.7 ± 1.9 years, height = 167.1 ± 6.1 cm, mass = 63.8 ± 5.6 kg) and 11 men (age = 25.6 ± 4.9 years, height = 178.7 ± 8.3 cm, mass = 78.9 ± 12.0 kg).
The same examiner collected all measures, using US B-mode to scan the cross-sectional area and thickness of the longus colli (LC), sternocleidomastoid (SCM), cervical-extensor muscles, and upper trapezius (UT) muscle. The US SWE-mode was used to measure the stiffness of the SCM and UT. Independent
tests or Mann-Whitney
tests were calculated to determine sex differences. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) measured intrarater test-retest reliability.
Men had thicker SCMs than women (
= .01). No sex differences were present for longus colli cross-sectional area, cervical-extensor muscle thickness, or UT thickness (
> .05). In addition, no sex differences were evident for SCM (
= .302) or UT (
= .703) SWE stiffness. Reliability was good to excellent (ICC = 0.715-0.890) except for SCM SWE stiffness (ICC = 0.554).
The only sex difference was in SCM thickness. However, smaller SCMs in women did not result in less SCM SWE stiffness. We provided normative values for US-based imaging of the cervical-flexor and -extensor muscles in young and athletic men and women. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4085/1062-6050-482-18 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7093927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2344227932</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-314594677dda16c214d137bd1ca9e2e6dddd6b004005614392d90e51b1f338e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1rVDEUDaLYWt27koAbN9F8veRlI-jYqlBRqAV3IZPc56S8ScbkvWHsr2_GaYt6N7mX80EOB6HnjL6WtO_eMKo4UbSjRPacsP4BOmZG9IQp_uNh2-_gI_Sk1itKGe-MeoyOBDNK90oeo-0F7PCHOAxQIHmoOCZ8OU7F1TynQN67CgF_masfAV_Ea8AutRv8yqXo3Yi_lbyBMsWmzAOeVoAXULZ7iJyNsMvlj4Cc7iZItV0Hq_oUPRrcWOHZ7XuCLs9Ovy8-kfOvHz8v3p0TL7mciGCyM1JpHYJjynMmAxN6GZh3Bjio0EYtKZWUdopJYXgwFDq2ZIMQPUhxgt4efDfzcg3BQ2rRRrspce3Kb5tdtP8iKa7sz7y1mprmppvBq1uDkn_NUCe7jtXDOLoEea6WCyk510bwRn35H_UqzyW1eI2lDZVCC9pY9MDyJddaYLj_DKN2X6rdt2b3rdlWqmV9k7z4O8S94K5FcQO0bZ0r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2379043730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex Differences in Ultrasound-Based Muscle Size and Mechanical Properties of the Cervical-Flexor and -Extensor Muscles</title><source>SPORTDiscus database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Nagai, Takashi ; Schilaty, Nathan D ; Krause, David A ; Crowley, Eric M ; Hewett, Timothy E</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagai, Takashi ; Schilaty, Nathan D ; Krause, David A ; Crowley, Eric M ; Hewett, Timothy E</creatorcontrib><description>Neck pain (NP), neck injuries, and concussions are more prevalent in female athletes than in their male counterparts. Females exhibit less neck girth, strength, and stiffness against a perturbation. As part of the clinical examination for individuals with NP, ultrasound (US)-based imaging of the cervical muscles has become common. Muscle size or thickness and stiffness can be measured with US-based B-mode and shear-wave elastography (SWE), respectively. Information on reliability, normative values, and sex differences based on US-based muscle size or thickness and stiffness in young and athletic individuals is limited.
To evaluate sex differences in US-based muscle size or thickness and biomechanical properties of the cervical-flexor and -extensor muscles.
Cross-sectional study.
Laboratory.
A total of 13 women (age = 23.7 ± 1.9 years, height = 167.1 ± 6.1 cm, mass = 63.8 ± 5.6 kg) and 11 men (age = 25.6 ± 4.9 years, height = 178.7 ± 8.3 cm, mass = 78.9 ± 12.0 kg).
The same examiner collected all measures, using US B-mode to scan the cross-sectional area and thickness of the longus colli (LC), sternocleidomastoid (SCM), cervical-extensor muscles, and upper trapezius (UT) muscle. The US SWE-mode was used to measure the stiffness of the SCM and UT. Independent
tests or Mann-Whitney
tests were calculated to determine sex differences. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) measured intrarater test-retest reliability.
Men had thicker SCMs than women (
= .01). No sex differences were present for longus colli cross-sectional area, cervical-extensor muscle thickness, or UT thickness (
> .05). In addition, no sex differences were evident for SCM (
= .302) or UT (
= .703) SWE stiffness. Reliability was good to excellent (ICC = 0.715-0.890) except for SCM SWE stiffness (ICC = 0.554).
The only sex difference was in SCM thickness. However, smaller SCMs in women did not result in less SCM SWE stiffness. We provided normative values for US-based imaging of the cervical-flexor and -extensor muscles in young and athletic men and women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-6050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-162X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-482-18</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31967864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Athletic Trainers Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Athletic Injuries - physiopathology ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Body Composition ; Concussion ; Control Groups ; Correlation ; Female ; Females ; Gender differences ; Humans ; Ice hockey ; Individual Characteristics ; Injuries ; Male ; Males ; Measurement Techniques ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Neck Muscles - anatomy & histology ; Neck Muscles - diagnostic imaging ; Neck Muscles - physiology ; Neck pain ; Neck Pain - physiopathology ; Physical Activities ; Physical Characteristics ; Pregnancy ; Reproducibility of Results ; Researchers ; Sample Size ; Scientific Concepts ; Sex Characteristics ; Spine ; Studies ; Superficial Back Muscles - anatomy & histology ; Superficial Back Muscles - diagnostic imaging ; Superficial Back Muscles - physiology ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography ; Women ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of athletic training, 2020-03, Vol.55 (3), p.282-288</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Athletic Trainers Association Mar 2020</rights><rights>by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc 2020 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-314594677dda16c214d137bd1ca9e2e6dddd6b004005614392d90e51b1f338e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-314594677dda16c214d137bd1ca9e2e6dddd6b004005614392d90e51b1f338e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2379043730/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2379043730?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,33877,33878,43733,43880,53791,53793,74221,74397</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31967864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagai, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schilaty, Nathan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, Eric M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewett, Timothy E</creatorcontrib><title>Sex Differences in Ultrasound-Based Muscle Size and Mechanical Properties of the Cervical-Flexor and -Extensor Muscles</title><title>Journal of athletic training</title><addtitle>J Athl Train</addtitle><description>Neck pain (NP), neck injuries, and concussions are more prevalent in female athletes than in their male counterparts. Females exhibit less neck girth, strength, and stiffness against a perturbation. As part of the clinical examination for individuals with NP, ultrasound (US)-based imaging of the cervical muscles has become common. Muscle size or thickness and stiffness can be measured with US-based B-mode and shear-wave elastography (SWE), respectively. Information on reliability, normative values, and sex differences based on US-based muscle size or thickness and stiffness in young and athletic individuals is limited.
To evaluate sex differences in US-based muscle size or thickness and biomechanical properties of the cervical-flexor and -extensor muscles.
Cross-sectional study.
Laboratory.
A total of 13 women (age = 23.7 ± 1.9 years, height = 167.1 ± 6.1 cm, mass = 63.8 ± 5.6 kg) and 11 men (age = 25.6 ± 4.9 years, height = 178.7 ± 8.3 cm, mass = 78.9 ± 12.0 kg).
The same examiner collected all measures, using US B-mode to scan the cross-sectional area and thickness of the longus colli (LC), sternocleidomastoid (SCM), cervical-extensor muscles, and upper trapezius (UT) muscle. The US SWE-mode was used to measure the stiffness of the SCM and UT. Independent
tests or Mann-Whitney
tests were calculated to determine sex differences. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) measured intrarater test-retest reliability.
Men had thicker SCMs than women (
= .01). No sex differences were present for longus colli cross-sectional area, cervical-extensor muscle thickness, or UT thickness (
> .05). In addition, no sex differences were evident for SCM (
= .302) or UT (
= .703) SWE stiffness. Reliability was good to excellent (ICC = 0.715-0.890) except for SCM SWE stiffness (ICC = 0.554).
The only sex difference was in SCM thickness. However, smaller SCMs in women did not result in less SCM SWE stiffness. We provided normative values for US-based imaging of the cervical-flexor and -extensor muscles in young and athletic men and women.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Athletic Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Concussion</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ice hockey</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Neck Muscles - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Neck Muscles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neck Muscles - physiology</subject><subject>Neck pain</subject><subject>Neck Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Physical Activities</subject><subject>Physical Characteristics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Scientific Concepts</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Superficial Back Muscles - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Superficial Back Muscles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Superficial Back Muscles - physiology</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1062-6050</issn><issn>1938-162X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUU1rVDEUDaLYWt27koAbN9F8veRlI-jYqlBRqAV3IZPc56S8ScbkvWHsr2_GaYt6N7mX80EOB6HnjL6WtO_eMKo4UbSjRPacsP4BOmZG9IQp_uNh2-_gI_Sk1itKGe-MeoyOBDNK90oeo-0F7PCHOAxQIHmoOCZ8OU7F1TynQN67CgF_masfAV_Ea8AutRv8yqXo3Yi_lbyBMsWmzAOeVoAXULZ7iJyNsMvlj4Cc7iZItV0Hq_oUPRrcWOHZ7XuCLs9Ovy8-kfOvHz8v3p0TL7mciGCyM1JpHYJjynMmAxN6GZh3Bjio0EYtKZWUdopJYXgwFDq2ZIMQPUhxgt4efDfzcg3BQ2rRRrspce3Kb5tdtP8iKa7sz7y1mprmppvBq1uDkn_NUCe7jtXDOLoEea6WCyk510bwRn35H_UqzyW1eI2lDZVCC9pY9MDyJddaYLj_DKN2X6rdt2b3rdlWqmV9k7z4O8S94K5FcQO0bZ0r</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Nagai, Takashi</creator><creator>Schilaty, Nathan D</creator><creator>Krause, David A</creator><creator>Crowley, Eric M</creator><creator>Hewett, Timothy E</creator><general>National Athletic Trainers Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Sex Differences in Ultrasound-Based Muscle Size and Mechanical Properties of the Cervical-Flexor and -Extensor Muscles</title><author>Nagai, Takashi ; Schilaty, Nathan D ; Krause, David A ; Crowley, Eric M ; Hewett, Timothy E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-314594677dda16c214d137bd1ca9e2e6dddd6b004005614392d90e51b1f338e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Athletic Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Concussion</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ice hockey</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Neck Muscles - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Neck Muscles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neck Muscles - physiology</topic><topic>Neck pain</topic><topic>Neck Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Physical Activities</topic><topic>Physical Characteristics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Scientific Concepts</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Superficial Back Muscles - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Superficial Back Muscles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Superficial Back Muscles - physiology</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagai, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schilaty, Nathan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, Eric M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewett, Timothy E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of athletic training</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagai, Takashi</au><au>Schilaty, Nathan D</au><au>Krause, David A</au><au>Crowley, Eric M</au><au>Hewett, Timothy E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex Differences in Ultrasound-Based Muscle Size and Mechanical Properties of the Cervical-Flexor and -Extensor Muscles</atitle><jtitle>Journal of athletic training</jtitle><addtitle>J Athl Train</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>282-288</pages><issn>1062-6050</issn><eissn>1938-162X</eissn><abstract>Neck pain (NP), neck injuries, and concussions are more prevalent in female athletes than in their male counterparts. Females exhibit less neck girth, strength, and stiffness against a perturbation. As part of the clinical examination for individuals with NP, ultrasound (US)-based imaging of the cervical muscles has become common. Muscle size or thickness and stiffness can be measured with US-based B-mode and shear-wave elastography (SWE), respectively. Information on reliability, normative values, and sex differences based on US-based muscle size or thickness and stiffness in young and athletic individuals is limited.
To evaluate sex differences in US-based muscle size or thickness and biomechanical properties of the cervical-flexor and -extensor muscles.
Cross-sectional study.
Laboratory.
A total of 13 women (age = 23.7 ± 1.9 years, height = 167.1 ± 6.1 cm, mass = 63.8 ± 5.6 kg) and 11 men (age = 25.6 ± 4.9 years, height = 178.7 ± 8.3 cm, mass = 78.9 ± 12.0 kg).
The same examiner collected all measures, using US B-mode to scan the cross-sectional area and thickness of the longus colli (LC), sternocleidomastoid (SCM), cervical-extensor muscles, and upper trapezius (UT) muscle. The US SWE-mode was used to measure the stiffness of the SCM and UT. Independent
tests or Mann-Whitney
tests were calculated to determine sex differences. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) measured intrarater test-retest reliability.
Men had thicker SCMs than women (
= .01). No sex differences were present for longus colli cross-sectional area, cervical-extensor muscle thickness, or UT thickness (
> .05). In addition, no sex differences were evident for SCM (
= .302) or UT (
= .703) SWE stiffness. Reliability was good to excellent (ICC = 0.715-0.890) except for SCM SWE stiffness (ICC = 0.554).
The only sex difference was in SCM thickness. However, smaller SCMs in women did not result in less SCM SWE stiffness. We provided normative values for US-based imaging of the cervical-flexor and -extensor muscles in young and athletic men and women.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Athletic Trainers Association</pub><pmid>31967864</pmid><doi>10.4085/1062-6050-482-18</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1062-6050 |
ispartof | Journal of athletic training, 2020-03, Vol.55 (3), p.282-288 |
issn | 1062-6050 1938-162X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7093927 |
source | SPORTDiscus database; Social Science Premium Collection; PubMed Central; Education Collection |
subjects | Adult Athletic Injuries - physiopathology Biomechanical Phenomena Biomechanics Body Composition Concussion Control Groups Correlation Female Females Gender differences Humans Ice hockey Individual Characteristics Injuries Male Males Measurement Techniques Muscle Strength - physiology Neck Muscles - anatomy & histology Neck Muscles - diagnostic imaging Neck Muscles - physiology Neck pain Neck Pain - physiopathology Physical Activities Physical Characteristics Pregnancy Reproducibility of Results Researchers Sample Size Scientific Concepts Sex Characteristics Spine Studies Superficial Back Muscles - anatomy & histology Superficial Back Muscles - diagnostic imaging Superficial Back Muscles - physiology Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography Women Young Adult |
title | Sex Differences in Ultrasound-Based Muscle Size and Mechanical Properties of the Cervical-Flexor and -Extensor Muscles |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T13%3A23%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20Differences%20in%20Ultrasound-Based%20Muscle%20Size%20and%20Mechanical%20Properties%20of%20the%20Cervical-Flexor%20and%20-Extensor%20Muscles&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20athletic%20training&rft.au=Nagai,%20Takashi&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=282-288&rft.issn=1062-6050&rft.eissn=1938-162X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4085/1062-6050-482-18&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2344227932%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-314594677dda16c214d137bd1ca9e2e6dddd6b004005614392d90e51b1f338e43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2379043730&rft_id=info:pmid/31967864&rfr_iscdi=true |