Loading…

Using social media images to assess ecosystem services in a remote protected area in the Argentinean Andes

Social media images are a novel source of data to assess how people view and value the environment. Access to these images is often free, the volume and spread of images is expanding rapidly and hence they are an increasingly valuable source of data complementing and expanding on other data. Recentl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ambio 2020-06, Vol.49 (6), p.1146-1160
Main Authors: Rossi, Sebastian Dario, Barros, Agustina, Walden-Schreiner, Chelsey, Pickering, Catherine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-249544348425ef218ae013b653d40a9923d1472c01055edefa6a76c72ad9b9723
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-249544348425ef218ae013b653d40a9923d1472c01055edefa6a76c72ad9b9723
container_end_page 1160
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1146
container_title Ambio
container_volume 49
creator Rossi, Sebastian Dario
Barros, Agustina
Walden-Schreiner, Chelsey
Pickering, Catherine
description Social media images are a novel source of data to assess how people view and value the environment. Access to these images is often free, the volume and spread of images is expanding rapidly and hence they are an increasingly valuable source of data complementing and expanding on other data. Recently, coding images has been used to assess sociocultural values relating to ecosystem services including those provided by national parks. To further explore the use of social media images, including for remote environments, we analysed the content of images posted to Flickr by people visiting a national park that contains the highest mountain in the southern hemisphere, Mt. Aconcagua, in Argentina, South America. The saliency of aesthetic landscapes, recreation, social relations and fresh-water provisioning was high across the 334 images posted to Flickr by 104 visitors to the Park, but location mattered. Images from visitors in easily accessible day-use areas were significantly more likely to include content that reflects biodiversityexistence, geology, culture and education services, while the content of images from remote areas was more likely to reflect social relations and fresh-water provision services. Comparisons of the content of images from Mt. Aconcagua with other studies in Europe, South America, Asia, Africa and Australia highlight similarities and differences in people’s views of the diversity of locations, but also the benefits and limitations of user-generated social media content when assessing environmental and management issues.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13280-019-01268-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7128015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48727232</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48727232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-249544348425ef218ae013b653d40a9923d1472c01055edefa6a76c72ad9b9723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EotPCH0ACWWLDJuBnbG-QRhUUpEps6NryOHdSj5J48M206r-vS8rwWLDwQzrfPb7Xh5BXnL3njJkPyKWwrGHc1SVa29w-ISveatUYwdxTsmJM1btS5oScIu4YY62U8jk5kbxlrbVyRXZXmKaeYo4pDHSELgWaxtAD0jnTgAiIFGLGO5xhpAjlJsUqpokGWmDMM9B9qXucoaOhQHiQ5mug69LDNKcJwkTXUwf4gjzbhgHh5eN5Rq4-f_p-_qW5_Hbx9Xx92USt3NwI5bRSUlklNGwFtwEYl5tWy06x4JyQHVdGRMaZ1tDBNrTBtNGI0LmNM0KekY-L7_6wqQPF2kUJg9-XOle58zkk_7cypWvf5xtveP1OrqvBu0eDkn8cAGc_JowwDGGCfEAvJNPKGGdNRd_-g-7yoUx1vEpZ7ZytYKXEQsWSEQtsj81w5h-i9EuUvkbpf0bpb2vRmz_HOJb8yq4CcgGwSlMP5ffb_7V9vVTtcM7l6KqsEfXvhLwH7IS0UQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2385998477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using social media images to assess ecosystem services in a remote protected area in the Argentinean Andes</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rossi, Sebastian Dario ; Barros, Agustina ; Walden-Schreiner, Chelsey ; Pickering, Catherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Sebastian Dario ; Barros, Agustina ; Walden-Schreiner, Chelsey ; Pickering, Catherine</creatorcontrib><description>Social media images are a novel source of data to assess how people view and value the environment. Access to these images is often free, the volume and spread of images is expanding rapidly and hence they are an increasingly valuable source of data complementing and expanding on other data. Recently, coding images has been used to assess sociocultural values relating to ecosystem services including those provided by national parks. To further explore the use of social media images, including for remote environments, we analysed the content of images posted to Flickr by people visiting a national park that contains the highest mountain in the southern hemisphere, Mt. Aconcagua, in Argentina, South America. The saliency of aesthetic landscapes, recreation, social relations and fresh-water provisioning was high across the 334 images posted to Flickr by 104 visitors to the Park, but location mattered. Images from visitors in easily accessible day-use areas were significantly more likely to include content that reflects biodiversityexistence, geology, culture and education services, while the content of images from remote areas was more likely to reflect social relations and fresh-water provision services. Comparisons of the content of images from Mt. Aconcagua with other studies in Europe, South America, Asia, Africa and Australia highlight similarities and differences in people’s views of the diversity of locations, but also the benefits and limitations of user-generated social media content when assessing environmental and management issues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-7447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1654-7209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01268-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31606883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Argentina ; Asia ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Australia ; Biodiversity ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Digital media ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem assessment ; Ecosystem services ; Environment ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Environmental Management ; Europe ; Geology ; Image coding ; Mountains ; National parks ; Physical Geography ; Protected areas ; Provisioning ; RESEARCH ARTICLE ; Social Media ; Social networks ; South America ; Southern Hemisphere</subject><ispartof>Ambio, 2020-06, Vol.49 (6), p.1146-1160</ispartof><rights>Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2019</rights><rights>Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-249544348425ef218ae013b653d40a9923d1472c01055edefa6a76c72ad9b9723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-249544348425ef218ae013b653d40a9923d1472c01055edefa6a76c72ad9b9723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2385998477/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2385998477?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11688,21376,21394,21395,27924,27925,33611,33612,33769,33770,34530,34531,36060,36061,43733,43814,44115,44363,53791,53793,58238,58471,74093,74182,74511,74767</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31606883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Sebastian Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Agustina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walden-Schreiner, Chelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickering, Catherine</creatorcontrib><title>Using social media images to assess ecosystem services in a remote protected area in the Argentinean Andes</title><title>Ambio</title><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><description>Social media images are a novel source of data to assess how people view and value the environment. Access to these images is often free, the volume and spread of images is expanding rapidly and hence they are an increasingly valuable source of data complementing and expanding on other data. Recently, coding images has been used to assess sociocultural values relating to ecosystem services including those provided by national parks. To further explore the use of social media images, including for remote environments, we analysed the content of images posted to Flickr by people visiting a national park that contains the highest mountain in the southern hemisphere, Mt. Aconcagua, in Argentina, South America. The saliency of aesthetic landscapes, recreation, social relations and fresh-water provisioning was high across the 334 images posted to Flickr by 104 visitors to the Park, but location mattered. Images from visitors in easily accessible day-use areas were significantly more likely to include content that reflects biodiversityexistence, geology, culture and education services, while the content of images from remote areas was more likely to reflect social relations and fresh-water provision services. Comparisons of the content of images from Mt. Aconcagua with other studies in Europe, South America, Asia, Africa and Australia highlight similarities and differences in people’s views of the diversity of locations, but also the benefits and limitations of user-generated social media content when assessing environmental and management issues.</description><subject>Argentina</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem assessment</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Image coding</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Physical Geography</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Provisioning</subject><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>South America</subject><subject>Southern Hemisphere</subject><issn>0044-7447</issn><issn>1654-7209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EotPCH0ACWWLDJuBnbG-QRhUUpEps6NryOHdSj5J48M206r-vS8rwWLDwQzrfPb7Xh5BXnL3njJkPyKWwrGHc1SVa29w-ISveatUYwdxTsmJM1btS5oScIu4YY62U8jk5kbxlrbVyRXZXmKaeYo4pDHSELgWaxtAD0jnTgAiIFGLGO5xhpAjlJsUqpokGWmDMM9B9qXucoaOhQHiQ5mug69LDNKcJwkTXUwf4gjzbhgHh5eN5Rq4-f_p-_qW5_Hbx9Xx92USt3NwI5bRSUlklNGwFtwEYl5tWy06x4JyQHVdGRMaZ1tDBNrTBtNGI0LmNM0KekY-L7_6wqQPF2kUJg9-XOle58zkk_7cypWvf5xtveP1OrqvBu0eDkn8cAGc_JowwDGGCfEAvJNPKGGdNRd_-g-7yoUx1vEpZ7ZytYKXEQsWSEQtsj81w5h-i9EuUvkbpf0bpb2vRmz_HOJb8yq4CcgGwSlMP5ffb_7V9vVTtcM7l6KqsEfXvhLwH7IS0UQ</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Rossi, Sebastian Dario</creator><creator>Barros, Agustina</creator><creator>Walden-Schreiner, Chelsey</creator><creator>Pickering, Catherine</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Using social media images to assess ecosystem services in a remote protected area in the Argentinean Andes</title><author>Rossi, Sebastian Dario ; Barros, Agustina ; Walden-Schreiner, Chelsey ; Pickering, Catherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-249544348425ef218ae013b653d40a9923d1472c01055edefa6a76c72ad9b9723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Argentina</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem assessment</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Image coding</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Physical Geography</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Provisioning</topic><topic>RESEARCH ARTICLE</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>South America</topic><topic>Southern Hemisphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Sebastian Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Agustina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walden-Schreiner, Chelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickering, Catherine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ambio</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rossi, Sebastian Dario</au><au>Barros, Agustina</au><au>Walden-Schreiner, Chelsey</au><au>Pickering, Catherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using social media images to assess ecosystem services in a remote protected area in the Argentinean Andes</atitle><jtitle>Ambio</jtitle><stitle>Ambio</stitle><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1146</spage><epage>1160</epage><pages>1146-1160</pages><issn>0044-7447</issn><eissn>1654-7209</eissn><abstract>Social media images are a novel source of data to assess how people view and value the environment. Access to these images is often free, the volume and spread of images is expanding rapidly and hence they are an increasingly valuable source of data complementing and expanding on other data. Recently, coding images has been used to assess sociocultural values relating to ecosystem services including those provided by national parks. To further explore the use of social media images, including for remote environments, we analysed the content of images posted to Flickr by people visiting a national park that contains the highest mountain in the southern hemisphere, Mt. Aconcagua, in Argentina, South America. The saliency of aesthetic landscapes, recreation, social relations and fresh-water provisioning was high across the 334 images posted to Flickr by 104 visitors to the Park, but location mattered. Images from visitors in easily accessible day-use areas were significantly more likely to include content that reflects biodiversityexistence, geology, culture and education services, while the content of images from remote areas was more likely to reflect social relations and fresh-water provision services. Comparisons of the content of images from Mt. Aconcagua with other studies in Europe, South America, Asia, Africa and Australia highlight similarities and differences in people’s views of the diversity of locations, but also the benefits and limitations of user-generated social media content when assessing environmental and management issues.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><pmid>31606883</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13280-019-01268-w</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0044-7447
ispartof Ambio, 2020-06, Vol.49 (6), p.1146-1160
issn 0044-7447
1654-7209
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7128015
source Criminology Collection; ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Springer Nature; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; JSTOR Archival Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Argentina
Asia
Atmospheric Sciences
Australia
Biodiversity
Conservation of Natural Resources
Digital media
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Ecosystem
Ecosystem assessment
Ecosystem services
Environment
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Environmental Management
Europe
Geology
Image coding
Mountains
National parks
Physical Geography
Protected areas
Provisioning
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Social Media
Social networks
South America
Southern Hemisphere
title Using social media images to assess ecosystem services in a remote protected area in the Argentinean Andes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A44%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20social%20media%20images%20to%20assess%20ecosystem%20services%20in%20a%20remote%20protected%20area%20in%20the%20Argentinean%20Andes&rft.jtitle=Ambio&rft.au=Rossi,%20Sebastian%20Dario&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1146&rft.epage=1160&rft.pages=1146-1160&rft.issn=0044-7447&rft.eissn=1654-7209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13280-019-01268-w&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E48727232%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-249544348425ef218ae013b653d40a9923d1472c01055edefa6a76c72ad9b9723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2385998477&rft_id=info:pmid/31606883&rft_jstor_id=48727232&rfr_iscdi=true