Assessment of economic vulnerability to infectious disease crises

Summary Infectious disease crises have substantial economic impact. Yet mainstream macroeconomic forecasting rarely takes account of the risk of potential pandemics. This oversight contributes to persistent underestimation of infectious disease risk and consequent underinvestment in preparedness and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Lancet (British edition) 2016-11, Vol.388 (10058), p.2443-2448
Main Authors: Sands, Peter, MPA, El Turabi, Anas, MPhil, Saynisch, Philip A, BA, Dzau, Victor J, Dr Prof
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Disaster Planning - economics
Disease Outbreaks - economics
Economic impact
Economics
Epidemics
Global Health
Health risks
Humans
Infectious diseases
Internal Medicine
Pandemics
Pandemics - economics
Public health
Risk Factors
Viewpoint
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Infectious disease crises have substantial economic impact. Yet mainstream macroeconomic forecasting rarely takes account of the risk of potential pandemics. This oversight contributes to persistent underestimation of infectious disease risk and consequent underinvestment in preparedness and response to infectious disease crises. One reason why economists fail to include economic vulnerability to infectious disease threats in their assessments is the absence of readily available and digestible input data to inform such analysis. In this Viewpoint we suggest an approach by which the global health community can help to generate such inputs, and a framework to use these inputs to assess the economic vulnerability to infectious disease crises of individual countries and regions. We argue that incorporation of these risks in influential macroeconomic analyses such as the reports from the International Monetary Fund's Article IV consultations, rating agencies and risk consultancies would simultaneously improve the quality of economic risk forecasting and reinforce individual government and donor incentives to mitigate infectious disease risks.
ISSN:0140-6736
1474-547X
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30594-3