Loading…
Outcomes of ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients with different hormonal receptor profiles
Purpose To evaluate fertility preservation outcomes in breast cancer women with different hormonal receptor profiles before oncological treatment. Methods The study population included women with a diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent fertility preservation from 2009 until 2018 at a university-a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2020-04, Vol.37 (4), p.913-921 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-228c3f3748b4cc1d6b89683adb75df1ff46df32e722eddeea94d0535d7b65c5f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-228c3f3748b4cc1d6b89683adb75df1ff46df32e722eddeea94d0535d7b65c5f3 |
container_end_page | 921 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 913 |
container_title | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Balayla, Jacques Tulandi, Togas Buckett, William Holzer, Hananel Steiner, Naama Shrem, Guy Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander |
description | Purpose
To evaluate fertility preservation outcomes in breast cancer women with different hormonal receptor profiles before oncological treatment.
Methods
The study population included women with a diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent fertility preservation from 2009 until 2018 at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital. Stimulation parameters and fertility preservation outcomes were compared among the following receptor-specific profile groups: (1) estrogen receptor positive (ER+) versus estrogen receptor negative (ER−), (2) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus estrogen and progesterone receptor positive (ER+/PR+), and (3) TNBC versus non-TNBC. Primary outcome was the total number of mature oocytes. Secondary outcomes included the number of retrieved oocytes, the peak estradiol level, and the number of follicles > 14 mm on the final oocyte maturation trigger day.
Results
A total of 155 cycles were included in the final analysis. These were divided into the exposure groups of ER+ (
n
= 97), ER− (
n
= 58), ER+/PR+ (
n
= 85), TNBC (
n
= 57), and non-TNBC (
n
= 98). Cycle outcomes revealed similar number of retrieved oocytes and follicles > 14 mm on the trigger day. Women with TNBC had significantly lower number of mature oocytes compared with those with ER + PR+ (7 (5–11) versus 9 (7–15);
p
= 0.02) and non-TNBC (7 (5–11) versus 9 (7–16);
p
= 0.01) status. Triple-negative breast cancer profile was associated with a significant reduction in the chance of developing over 10 mature oocytes (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19–0.92).
Conclusion
Among the different hormonal receptor profiles in breast cancer, the TNBC subtype has a negative effect on fertility preservation outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10815-020-01730-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7183026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2374357707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-228c3f3748b4cc1d6b89683adb75df1ff46df32e722eddeea94d0535d7b65c5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhSNERUvhD7BAltiwCfUzTjZIqOIlVeoG1pZjj3tdJXawnVt1w2_Hl5QCXXTlx_nmzIxO07wi-B3BWJ5lgnsiWkxxi4lkuB2eNCdESNZKxvDTeseibzHv-uPmec7XGOOhp-xZc8wo4VxQftL8vFyLiTNkFB2Ke528DigXP6-TLj4GpINFDlLxky-3aEmQIe03yQc0JtC5IKODgYSW-g-hZHTjyw5Z72phfaNdTHMMekIJDCwlVjJF5yfIL5ojp6cML-_O0-b7p4_fzr-0F5efv55_uGgNl7y0lPaGOSZ5P3JjiO3Gfuh6pu0ohXXEOd5ZxyhISsFaAD1wiwUTVo6dMMKx0-b95rus4wzW1KmSntSS_KzTrYraq_-V4HfqKu6VJD3DtKsGb-8MUvyxQi5q9tnANOkAcc2K1uGYkBLLir55gF7HNdX1D9TAO9YxNlSKbpRJMecE7n4YgtUhXrXFq2q86ne86lD0-t817kv-5FkBtgG5SuEK0t_ej9j-Ar6AtQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2394636339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients with different hormonal receptor profiles</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Balayla, Jacques ; Tulandi, Togas ; Buckett, William ; Holzer, Hananel ; Steiner, Naama ; Shrem, Guy ; Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Balayla, Jacques ; Tulandi, Togas ; Buckett, William ; Holzer, Hananel ; Steiner, Naama ; Shrem, Guy ; Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To evaluate fertility preservation outcomes in breast cancer women with different hormonal receptor profiles before oncological treatment.
Methods
The study population included women with a diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent fertility preservation from 2009 until 2018 at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital. Stimulation parameters and fertility preservation outcomes were compared among the following receptor-specific profile groups: (1) estrogen receptor positive (ER+) versus estrogen receptor negative (ER−), (2) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus estrogen and progesterone receptor positive (ER+/PR+), and (3) TNBC versus non-TNBC. Primary outcome was the total number of mature oocytes. Secondary outcomes included the number of retrieved oocytes, the peak estradiol level, and the number of follicles > 14 mm on the final oocyte maturation trigger day.
Results
A total of 155 cycles were included in the final analysis. These were divided into the exposure groups of ER+ (
n
= 97), ER− (
n
= 58), ER+/PR+ (
n
= 85), TNBC (
n
= 57), and non-TNBC (
n
= 98). Cycle outcomes revealed similar number of retrieved oocytes and follicles > 14 mm on the trigger day. Women with TNBC had significantly lower number of mature oocytes compared with those with ER + PR+ (7 (5–11) versus 9 (7–15);
p
= 0.02) and non-TNBC (7 (5–11) versus 9 (7–16);
p
= 0.01) status. Triple-negative breast cancer profile was associated with a significant reduction in the chance of developing over 10 mature oocytes (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19–0.92).
Conclusion
Among the different hormonal receptor profiles in breast cancer, the TNBC subtype has a negative effect on fertility preservation outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01730-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32144524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>17β-Estradiol ; Adult ; Breast cancer ; Cryopreservation ; Estrogen receptors ; Estrogens - genetics ; Female ; Fertility ; Fertility Preservation ; Follicles ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Maturation ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Oocyte Retrieval - methods ; Oocytes ; Oocytes - growth & development ; Oocytes - transplantation ; Ovulation Induction ; Population studies ; Preservation ; Progesterone ; Receptors, Estrogen - genetics ; Receptors, Progesterone - genetics ; Reproductive Medicine ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - complications ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020-04, Vol.37 (4), p.913-921</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-228c3f3748b4cc1d6b89683adb75df1ff46df32e722eddeea94d0535d7b65c5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-228c3f3748b4cc1d6b89683adb75df1ff46df32e722eddeea94d0535d7b65c5f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7901-3370</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183026/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183026/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32144524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balayla, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulandi, Togas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckett, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzer, Hananel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Naama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrem, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients with different hormonal receptor profiles</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><description>Purpose
To evaluate fertility preservation outcomes in breast cancer women with different hormonal receptor profiles before oncological treatment.
Methods
The study population included women with a diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent fertility preservation from 2009 until 2018 at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital. Stimulation parameters and fertility preservation outcomes were compared among the following receptor-specific profile groups: (1) estrogen receptor positive (ER+) versus estrogen receptor negative (ER−), (2) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus estrogen and progesterone receptor positive (ER+/PR+), and (3) TNBC versus non-TNBC. Primary outcome was the total number of mature oocytes. Secondary outcomes included the number of retrieved oocytes, the peak estradiol level, and the number of follicles > 14 mm on the final oocyte maturation trigger day.
Results
A total of 155 cycles were included in the final analysis. These were divided into the exposure groups of ER+ (
n
= 97), ER− (
n
= 58), ER+/PR+ (
n
= 85), TNBC (
n
= 57), and non-TNBC (
n
= 98). Cycle outcomes revealed similar number of retrieved oocytes and follicles > 14 mm on the trigger day. Women with TNBC had significantly lower number of mature oocytes compared with those with ER + PR+ (7 (5–11) versus 9 (7–15);
p
= 0.02) and non-TNBC (7 (5–11) versus 9 (7–16);
p
= 0.01) status. Triple-negative breast cancer profile was associated with a significant reduction in the chance of developing over 10 mature oocytes (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19–0.92).
Conclusion
Among the different hormonal receptor profiles in breast cancer, the TNBC subtype has a negative effect on fertility preservation outcomes.</description><subject>17β-Estradiol</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Estrogen receptors</subject><subject>Estrogens - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fertility Preservation</subject><subject>Follicles</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maturation</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Oocyte Retrieval - methods</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Oocytes - growth & development</subject><subject>Oocytes - transplantation</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Progesterone</subject><subject>Receptors, Estrogen - genetics</subject><subject>Receptors, Progesterone - genetics</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhSNERUvhD7BAltiwCfUzTjZIqOIlVeoG1pZjj3tdJXawnVt1w2_Hl5QCXXTlx_nmzIxO07wi-B3BWJ5lgnsiWkxxi4lkuB2eNCdESNZKxvDTeseibzHv-uPmec7XGOOhp-xZc8wo4VxQftL8vFyLiTNkFB2Ke528DigXP6-TLj4GpINFDlLxky-3aEmQIe03yQc0JtC5IKODgYSW-g-hZHTjyw5Z72phfaNdTHMMekIJDCwlVjJF5yfIL5ojp6cML-_O0-b7p4_fzr-0F5efv55_uGgNl7y0lPaGOSZ5P3JjiO3Gfuh6pu0ohXXEOd5ZxyhISsFaAD1wiwUTVo6dMMKx0-b95rus4wzW1KmSntSS_KzTrYraq_-V4HfqKu6VJD3DtKsGb-8MUvyxQi5q9tnANOkAcc2K1uGYkBLLir55gF7HNdX1D9TAO9YxNlSKbpRJMecE7n4YgtUhXrXFq2q86ne86lD0-t817kv-5FkBtgG5SuEK0t_ej9j-Ar6AtQQ</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Balayla, Jacques</creator><creator>Tulandi, Togas</creator><creator>Buckett, William</creator><creator>Holzer, Hananel</creator><creator>Steiner, Naama</creator><creator>Shrem, Guy</creator><creator>Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7901-3370</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Outcomes of ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients with different hormonal receptor profiles</title><author>Balayla, Jacques ; Tulandi, Togas ; Buckett, William ; Holzer, Hananel ; Steiner, Naama ; Shrem, Guy ; Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-228c3f3748b4cc1d6b89683adb75df1ff46df32e722eddeea94d0535d7b65c5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>17β-Estradiol</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Estrogen receptors</topic><topic>Estrogens - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fertility Preservation</topic><topic>Follicles</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maturation</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Oocyte Retrieval - methods</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Oocytes - growth & development</topic><topic>Oocytes - transplantation</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Progesterone</topic><topic>Receptors, Estrogen - genetics</topic><topic>Receptors, Progesterone - genetics</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balayla, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulandi, Togas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckett, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzer, Hananel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Naama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrem, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balayla, Jacques</au><au>Tulandi, Togas</au><au>Buckett, William</au><au>Holzer, Hananel</au><au>Steiner, Naama</au><au>Shrem, Guy</au><au>Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients with different hormonal receptor profiles</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><stitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</stitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>913</spage><epage>921</epage><pages>913-921</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To evaluate fertility preservation outcomes in breast cancer women with different hormonal receptor profiles before oncological treatment.
Methods
The study population included women with a diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent fertility preservation from 2009 until 2018 at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital. Stimulation parameters and fertility preservation outcomes were compared among the following receptor-specific profile groups: (1) estrogen receptor positive (ER+) versus estrogen receptor negative (ER−), (2) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus estrogen and progesterone receptor positive (ER+/PR+), and (3) TNBC versus non-TNBC. Primary outcome was the total number of mature oocytes. Secondary outcomes included the number of retrieved oocytes, the peak estradiol level, and the number of follicles > 14 mm on the final oocyte maturation trigger day.
Results
A total of 155 cycles were included in the final analysis. These were divided into the exposure groups of ER+ (
n
= 97), ER− (
n
= 58), ER+/PR+ (
n
= 85), TNBC (
n
= 57), and non-TNBC (
n
= 98). Cycle outcomes revealed similar number of retrieved oocytes and follicles > 14 mm on the trigger day. Women with TNBC had significantly lower number of mature oocytes compared with those with ER + PR+ (7 (5–11) versus 9 (7–15);
p
= 0.02) and non-TNBC (7 (5–11) versus 9 (7–16);
p
= 0.01) status. Triple-negative breast cancer profile was associated with a significant reduction in the chance of developing over 10 mature oocytes (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19–0.92).
Conclusion
Among the different hormonal receptor profiles in breast cancer, the TNBC subtype has a negative effect on fertility preservation outcomes.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32144524</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10815-020-01730-9</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7901-3370</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-0468 |
ispartof | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020-04, Vol.37 (4), p.913-921 |
issn | 1058-0468 1573-7330 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7183026 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Springer Nature |
subjects | 17β-Estradiol Adult Breast cancer Cryopreservation Estrogen receptors Estrogens - genetics Female Fertility Fertility Preservation Follicles Gynecology Human Genetics Humans Maturation Medicine Medicine & Public Health Oocyte Retrieval - methods Oocytes Oocytes - growth & development Oocytes - transplantation Ovulation Induction Population studies Preservation Progesterone Receptors, Estrogen - genetics Receptors, Progesterone - genetics Reproductive Medicine Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - complications Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - genetics Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - pathology |
title | Outcomes of ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients with different hormonal receptor profiles |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T13%3A19%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20ovarian%20stimulation%20and%20fertility%20preservation%20in%20breast%20cancer%20patients%20with%20different%20hormonal%20receptor%20profiles&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=Balayla,%20Jacques&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=913&rft.epage=921&rft.pages=913-921&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10815-020-01730-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2374357707%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-228c3f3748b4cc1d6b89683adb75df1ff46df32e722eddeea94d0535d7b65c5f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2394636339&rft_id=info:pmid/32144524&rfr_iscdi=true |