Comparison of Macintosh Laryngoscope and GlideScope® for Orotracheal Intubation in Children Older Than One Year

• Published in: Şişli Etfal Hastanesi tıp bülteni 2019-01, Vol.53 (2), p.143-147
• Main Authors: Kılınç, Leyla, Çınar, Ayşe Surhan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Intubation; Original Research
• ISSN: 1302-7123; 1308-5123
• DOI: 10.14744/SEMB.2019.55631

We aim to investigate intubation conditions, intubation times, and hemodynamic response with the GlideScope video laryngoscope or the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in children older than one year. Eighty patients aged 1-12 years, scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were included in a prospective, single-blinded, randomized trial. Exclusion criteria were risk of pulmonary aspiration, craniofacial malformation, difficult intubation, emergency surgery, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, and hemodynamic instability. After standard anesthesia induction, patients were randomized into two groups. The group G patients (n=40) were intubated with the GlideScope and the group M patients (n=40) were intubated with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Intubation time, number of attempts, Cormack-Lehane score, airway maneuvers, and visual analog score were recorded. Hemodynamic variables were recorded before and after anesthesia induction, at intubation, and 1., 3., and 5. minutes after intubation. Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and the χ test were used for statistical analysis, with p