Loading…
Comparative Analysis of Urine Fractions for Optimal Bladder Cancer Detection Using DNA Methylation Markers
DNA methylation analysis of full void urine and urine pellet seems promising for bladder cancer (BC) detection and surveillance. Urinary cell-free DNA from urine supernatant is now gaining interest for other molecular tests in BC. This study aims to evaluate which urine fraction is preferred for BC...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancers 2020-04, Vol.12 (4), p.859 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 859 |
container_title | Cancers |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Hentschel, Anouk E Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A Bosschieter, Judith Splunter, Annina P van Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I Voorn, J Patrick van der Segerink, Loes I Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van Steenbergen, Renske D M |
description | DNA methylation analysis of full void urine and urine pellet seems promising for bladder cancer (BC) detection and surveillance. Urinary cell-free DNA from urine supernatant is now gaining interest for other molecular tests in BC. This study aims to evaluate which urine fraction is preferred for BC diagnosis using methylation markers: full void urine, urine pellet or supernatant. Methylation levels of nine markers were determined in the three urine fractions and correlated with their respective tumor tissues in BC patients and compared to controls. For all markers and marker panel
, diagnostic performance was determined by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the respective receiver operating characteristic curves. For most of the markers, there was a significant correlation between the methylation levels in each of the urine fractions and the matched tumor tissues. Urine pellet was the most representative fraction. Generally, AUCs for BC diagnosis were comparable among the fractions. The highest AUC was obtained for
in urine pellet: AUC 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.00), corresponding to a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 91.7%. Our results demonstrate that cellular and cell-free DNA in urine can be used for BC diagnosis by urinary methylation analysis. Based on our comparative analysis and for practical reasons, we recommend the use of urine pellet. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/cancers12040859 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7226114</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2387261059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkb1PwzAQxS0EAgSd2ZBHloK_EtsLUikUkIAudLauyaUY0rjYKVL_e0ILFeDlrLvfvXvSI-SEs3MpLbsooCkwJi6YYiazO-RQMC36eW7V7q__Aeml9Mq6JyXXud4nB1KITAhrD8nrMMwXEKH1H0gHDdSr5BMNFZ1E3yAdRShaH5pEqxDpeNH6OdT0qoayxEiHawP0GltcU3SSfDOj108D-ojty6qGdfcR4lvn85jsVVAn7H3XIzIZ3TwP7_oP49v74eChX6jMtn0jjdQZhymCLqfAxBS1zRSWSilT2YJJsJUuuajyCktuuQHUihubK8PRSHlELje6i-V0jmWBTRuhdovYeY8rF8C7v5PGv7hZ-HBaiJxz1QmcfQvE8L7E1Lq5TwXWNTQYlskJaXRHssx26MUGLWJIKWK1PcOZ-wrJ_Qup2zj97W7L_0QiPwEQeJBC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2387261059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of Urine Fractions for Optimal Bladder Cancer Detection Using DNA Methylation Markers</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Hentschel, Anouk E ; Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A ; Bosschieter, Judith ; Splunter, Annina P van ; Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I ; Voorn, J Patrick van der ; Segerink, Loes I ; Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van ; Steenbergen, Renske D M</creator><creatorcontrib>Hentschel, Anouk E ; Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A ; Bosschieter, Judith ; Splunter, Annina P van ; Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I ; Voorn, J Patrick van der ; Segerink, Loes I ; Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van ; Steenbergen, Renske D M</creatorcontrib><description>DNA methylation analysis of full void urine and urine pellet seems promising for bladder cancer (BC) detection and surveillance. Urinary cell-free DNA from urine supernatant is now gaining interest for other molecular tests in BC. This study aims to evaluate which urine fraction is preferred for BC diagnosis using methylation markers: full void urine, urine pellet or supernatant. Methylation levels of nine markers were determined in the three urine fractions and correlated with their respective tumor tissues in BC patients and compared to controls. For all markers and marker panel
, diagnostic performance was determined by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the respective receiver operating characteristic curves. For most of the markers, there was a significant correlation between the methylation levels in each of the urine fractions and the matched tumor tissues. Urine pellet was the most representative fraction. Generally, AUCs for BC diagnosis were comparable among the fractions. The highest AUC was obtained for
in urine pellet: AUC 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.00), corresponding to a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 91.7%. Our results demonstrate that cellular and cell-free DNA in urine can be used for BC diagnosis by urinary methylation analysis. Based on our comparative analysis and for practical reasons, we recommend the use of urine pellet.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers12040859</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32252299</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI</publisher><ispartof>Cancers, 2020-04, Vol.12 (4), p.859</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6943-8156 ; 0000-0002-2327-9839 ; 0000-0002-8977-5501</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7226114/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7226114/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252299$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hentschel, Anouk E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosschieter, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Splunter, Annina P van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voorn, J Patrick van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segerink, Loes I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenbergen, Renske D M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of Urine Fractions for Optimal Bladder Cancer Detection Using DNA Methylation Markers</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>DNA methylation analysis of full void urine and urine pellet seems promising for bladder cancer (BC) detection and surveillance. Urinary cell-free DNA from urine supernatant is now gaining interest for other molecular tests in BC. This study aims to evaluate which urine fraction is preferred for BC diagnosis using methylation markers: full void urine, urine pellet or supernatant. Methylation levels of nine markers were determined in the three urine fractions and correlated with their respective tumor tissues in BC patients and compared to controls. For all markers and marker panel
, diagnostic performance was determined by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the respective receiver operating characteristic curves. For most of the markers, there was a significant correlation between the methylation levels in each of the urine fractions and the matched tumor tissues. Urine pellet was the most representative fraction. Generally, AUCs for BC diagnosis were comparable among the fractions. The highest AUC was obtained for
in urine pellet: AUC 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.00), corresponding to a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 91.7%. Our results demonstrate that cellular and cell-free DNA in urine can be used for BC diagnosis by urinary methylation analysis. Based on our comparative analysis and for practical reasons, we recommend the use of urine pellet.</description><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkb1PwzAQxS0EAgSd2ZBHloK_EtsLUikUkIAudLauyaUY0rjYKVL_e0ILFeDlrLvfvXvSI-SEs3MpLbsooCkwJi6YYiazO-RQMC36eW7V7q__Aeml9Mq6JyXXud4nB1KITAhrD8nrMMwXEKH1H0gHDdSr5BMNFZ1E3yAdRShaH5pEqxDpeNH6OdT0qoayxEiHawP0GltcU3SSfDOj108D-ojty6qGdfcR4lvn85jsVVAn7H3XIzIZ3TwP7_oP49v74eChX6jMtn0jjdQZhymCLqfAxBS1zRSWSilT2YJJsJUuuajyCktuuQHUihubK8PRSHlELje6i-V0jmWBTRuhdovYeY8rF8C7v5PGv7hZ-HBaiJxz1QmcfQvE8L7E1Lq5TwXWNTQYlskJaXRHssx26MUGLWJIKWK1PcOZ-wrJ_Qup2zj97W7L_0QiPwEQeJBC</recordid><startdate>20200402</startdate><enddate>20200402</enddate><creator>Hentschel, Anouk E</creator><creator>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</creator><creator>Bosschieter, Judith</creator><creator>Splunter, Annina P van</creator><creator>Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I</creator><creator>Voorn, J Patrick van der</creator><creator>Segerink, Loes I</creator><creator>Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van</creator><creator>Steenbergen, Renske D M</creator><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6943-8156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2327-9839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8977-5501</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200402</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of Urine Fractions for Optimal Bladder Cancer Detection Using DNA Methylation Markers</title><author>Hentschel, Anouk E ; Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A ; Bosschieter, Judith ; Splunter, Annina P van ; Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I ; Voorn, J Patrick van der ; Segerink, Loes I ; Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van ; Steenbergen, Renske D M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hentschel, Anouk E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosschieter, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Splunter, Annina P van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voorn, J Patrick van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segerink, Loes I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenbergen, Renske D M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hentschel, Anouk E</au><au>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</au><au>Bosschieter, Judith</au><au>Splunter, Annina P van</au><au>Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I</au><au>Voorn, J Patrick van der</au><au>Segerink, Loes I</au><au>Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van</au><au>Steenbergen, Renske D M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of Urine Fractions for Optimal Bladder Cancer Detection Using DNA Methylation Markers</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2020-04-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>859</spage><pages>859-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>DNA methylation analysis of full void urine and urine pellet seems promising for bladder cancer (BC) detection and surveillance. Urinary cell-free DNA from urine supernatant is now gaining interest for other molecular tests in BC. This study aims to evaluate which urine fraction is preferred for BC diagnosis using methylation markers: full void urine, urine pellet or supernatant. Methylation levels of nine markers were determined in the three urine fractions and correlated with their respective tumor tissues in BC patients and compared to controls. For all markers and marker panel
, diagnostic performance was determined by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the respective receiver operating characteristic curves. For most of the markers, there was a significant correlation between the methylation levels in each of the urine fractions and the matched tumor tissues. Urine pellet was the most representative fraction. Generally, AUCs for BC diagnosis were comparable among the fractions. The highest AUC was obtained for
in urine pellet: AUC 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.00), corresponding to a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 91.7%. Our results demonstrate that cellular and cell-free DNA in urine can be used for BC diagnosis by urinary methylation analysis. Based on our comparative analysis and for practical reasons, we recommend the use of urine pellet.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI</pub><pmid>32252299</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers12040859</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6943-8156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2327-9839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8977-5501</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-6694 |
ispartof | Cancers, 2020-04, Vol.12 (4), p.859 |
issn | 2072-6694 2072-6694 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7226114 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database |
title | Comparative Analysis of Urine Fractions for Optimal Bladder Cancer Detection Using DNA Methylation Markers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A10%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Urine%20Fractions%20for%20Optimal%20Bladder%20Cancer%20Detection%20Using%20DNA%20Methylation%20Markers&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Hentschel,%20Anouk%20E&rft.date=2020-04-02&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=859&rft.pages=859-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers12040859&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2387261059%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2387261059&rft_id=info:pmid/32252299&rfr_iscdi=true |