Loading…

Comparative Analysis of Urine Fractions for Optimal Bladder Cancer Detection Using DNA Methylation Markers

DNA methylation analysis of full void urine and urine pellet seems promising for bladder cancer (BC) detection and surveillance. Urinary cell-free DNA from urine supernatant is now gaining interest for other molecular tests in BC. This study aims to evaluate which urine fraction is preferred for BC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancers 2020-04, Vol.12 (4), p.859
Main Authors: Hentschel, Anouk E, Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A, Bosschieter, Judith, Splunter, Annina P van, Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I, Voorn, J Patrick van der, Segerink, Loes I, Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van, Steenbergen, Renske D M
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 859
container_title Cancers
container_volume 12
creator Hentschel, Anouk E
Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A
Bosschieter, Judith
Splunter, Annina P van
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I
Voorn, J Patrick van der
Segerink, Loes I
Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van
Steenbergen, Renske D M
description DNA methylation analysis of full void urine and urine pellet seems promising for bladder cancer (BC) detection and surveillance. Urinary cell-free DNA from urine supernatant is now gaining interest for other molecular tests in BC. This study aims to evaluate which urine fraction is preferred for BC diagnosis using methylation markers: full void urine, urine pellet or supernatant. Methylation levels of nine markers were determined in the three urine fractions and correlated with their respective tumor tissues in BC patients and compared to controls. For all markers and marker panel , diagnostic performance was determined by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the respective receiver operating characteristic curves. For most of the markers, there was a significant correlation between the methylation levels in each of the urine fractions and the matched tumor tissues. Urine pellet was the most representative fraction. Generally, AUCs for BC diagnosis were comparable among the fractions. The highest AUC was obtained for in urine pellet: AUC 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.00), corresponding to a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 91.7%. Our results demonstrate that cellular and cell-free DNA in urine can be used for BC diagnosis by urinary methylation analysis. Based on our comparative analysis and for practical reasons, we recommend the use of urine pellet.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/cancers12040859
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7226114</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2387261059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkb1PwzAQxS0EAgSd2ZBHloK_EtsLUikUkIAudLauyaUY0rjYKVL_e0ILFeDlrLvfvXvSI-SEs3MpLbsooCkwJi6YYiazO-RQMC36eW7V7q__Aeml9Mq6JyXXud4nB1KITAhrD8nrMMwXEKH1H0gHDdSr5BMNFZ1E3yAdRShaH5pEqxDpeNH6OdT0qoayxEiHawP0GltcU3SSfDOj108D-ojty6qGdfcR4lvn85jsVVAn7H3XIzIZ3TwP7_oP49v74eChX6jMtn0jjdQZhymCLqfAxBS1zRSWSilT2YJJsJUuuajyCktuuQHUihubK8PRSHlELje6i-V0jmWBTRuhdovYeY8rF8C7v5PGv7hZ-HBaiJxz1QmcfQvE8L7E1Lq5TwXWNTQYlskJaXRHssx26MUGLWJIKWK1PcOZ-wrJ_Qup2zj97W7L_0QiPwEQeJBC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2387261059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of Urine Fractions for Optimal Bladder Cancer Detection Using DNA Methylation Markers</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Hentschel, Anouk E ; Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A ; Bosschieter, Judith ; Splunter, Annina P van ; Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I ; Voorn, J Patrick van der ; Segerink, Loes I ; Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van ; Steenbergen, Renske D M</creator><creatorcontrib>Hentschel, Anouk E ; Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A ; Bosschieter, Judith ; Splunter, Annina P van ; Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I ; Voorn, J Patrick van der ; Segerink, Loes I ; Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van ; Steenbergen, Renske D M</creatorcontrib><description>DNA methylation analysis of full void urine and urine pellet seems promising for bladder cancer (BC) detection and surveillance. Urinary cell-free DNA from urine supernatant is now gaining interest for other molecular tests in BC. This study aims to evaluate which urine fraction is preferred for BC diagnosis using methylation markers: full void urine, urine pellet or supernatant. Methylation levels of nine markers were determined in the three urine fractions and correlated with their respective tumor tissues in BC patients and compared to controls. For all markers and marker panel , diagnostic performance was determined by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the respective receiver operating characteristic curves. For most of the markers, there was a significant correlation between the methylation levels in each of the urine fractions and the matched tumor tissues. Urine pellet was the most representative fraction. Generally, AUCs for BC diagnosis were comparable among the fractions. The highest AUC was obtained for in urine pellet: AUC 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.00), corresponding to a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 91.7%. Our results demonstrate that cellular and cell-free DNA in urine can be used for BC diagnosis by urinary methylation analysis. Based on our comparative analysis and for practical reasons, we recommend the use of urine pellet.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers12040859</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32252299</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI</publisher><ispartof>Cancers, 2020-04, Vol.12 (4), p.859</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6943-8156 ; 0000-0002-2327-9839 ; 0000-0002-8977-5501</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7226114/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7226114/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252299$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hentschel, Anouk E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosschieter, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Splunter, Annina P van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voorn, J Patrick van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segerink, Loes I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenbergen, Renske D M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of Urine Fractions for Optimal Bladder Cancer Detection Using DNA Methylation Markers</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>DNA methylation analysis of full void urine and urine pellet seems promising for bladder cancer (BC) detection and surveillance. Urinary cell-free DNA from urine supernatant is now gaining interest for other molecular tests in BC. This study aims to evaluate which urine fraction is preferred for BC diagnosis using methylation markers: full void urine, urine pellet or supernatant. Methylation levels of nine markers were determined in the three urine fractions and correlated with their respective tumor tissues in BC patients and compared to controls. For all markers and marker panel , diagnostic performance was determined by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the respective receiver operating characteristic curves. For most of the markers, there was a significant correlation between the methylation levels in each of the urine fractions and the matched tumor tissues. Urine pellet was the most representative fraction. Generally, AUCs for BC diagnosis were comparable among the fractions. The highest AUC was obtained for in urine pellet: AUC 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.00), corresponding to a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 91.7%. Our results demonstrate that cellular and cell-free DNA in urine can be used for BC diagnosis by urinary methylation analysis. Based on our comparative analysis and for practical reasons, we recommend the use of urine pellet.</description><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkb1PwzAQxS0EAgSd2ZBHloK_EtsLUikUkIAudLauyaUY0rjYKVL_e0ILFeDlrLvfvXvSI-SEs3MpLbsooCkwJi6YYiazO-RQMC36eW7V7q__Aeml9Mq6JyXXud4nB1KITAhrD8nrMMwXEKH1H0gHDdSr5BMNFZ1E3yAdRShaH5pEqxDpeNH6OdT0qoayxEiHawP0GltcU3SSfDOj108D-ojty6qGdfcR4lvn85jsVVAn7H3XIzIZ3TwP7_oP49v74eChX6jMtn0jjdQZhymCLqfAxBS1zRSWSilT2YJJsJUuuajyCktuuQHUihubK8PRSHlELje6i-V0jmWBTRuhdovYeY8rF8C7v5PGv7hZ-HBaiJxz1QmcfQvE8L7E1Lq5TwXWNTQYlskJaXRHssx26MUGLWJIKWK1PcOZ-wrJ_Qup2zj97W7L_0QiPwEQeJBC</recordid><startdate>20200402</startdate><enddate>20200402</enddate><creator>Hentschel, Anouk E</creator><creator>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</creator><creator>Bosschieter, Judith</creator><creator>Splunter, Annina P van</creator><creator>Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I</creator><creator>Voorn, J Patrick van der</creator><creator>Segerink, Loes I</creator><creator>Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van</creator><creator>Steenbergen, Renske D M</creator><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6943-8156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2327-9839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8977-5501</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200402</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of Urine Fractions for Optimal Bladder Cancer Detection Using DNA Methylation Markers</title><author>Hentschel, Anouk E ; Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A ; Bosschieter, Judith ; Splunter, Annina P van ; Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I ; Voorn, J Patrick van der ; Segerink, Loes I ; Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van ; Steenbergen, Renske D M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hentschel, Anouk E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosschieter, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Splunter, Annina P van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voorn, J Patrick van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segerink, Loes I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steenbergen, Renske D M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hentschel, Anouk E</au><au>Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A</au><au>Bosschieter, Judith</au><au>Splunter, Annina P van</au><au>Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I</au><au>Voorn, J Patrick van der</au><au>Segerink, Loes I</au><au>Moorselaar, R Jeroen A van</au><au>Steenbergen, Renske D M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of Urine Fractions for Optimal Bladder Cancer Detection Using DNA Methylation Markers</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2020-04-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>859</spage><pages>859-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>DNA methylation analysis of full void urine and urine pellet seems promising for bladder cancer (BC) detection and surveillance. Urinary cell-free DNA from urine supernatant is now gaining interest for other molecular tests in BC. This study aims to evaluate which urine fraction is preferred for BC diagnosis using methylation markers: full void urine, urine pellet or supernatant. Methylation levels of nine markers were determined in the three urine fractions and correlated with their respective tumor tissues in BC patients and compared to controls. For all markers and marker panel , diagnostic performance was determined by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the respective receiver operating characteristic curves. For most of the markers, there was a significant correlation between the methylation levels in each of the urine fractions and the matched tumor tissues. Urine pellet was the most representative fraction. Generally, AUCs for BC diagnosis were comparable among the fractions. The highest AUC was obtained for in urine pellet: AUC 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.00), corresponding to a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 91.7%. Our results demonstrate that cellular and cell-free DNA in urine can be used for BC diagnosis by urinary methylation analysis. Based on our comparative analysis and for practical reasons, we recommend the use of urine pellet.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI</pub><pmid>32252299</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers12040859</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6943-8156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2327-9839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8977-5501</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6694
ispartof Cancers, 2020-04, Vol.12 (4), p.859
issn 2072-6694
2072-6694
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7226114
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database
title Comparative Analysis of Urine Fractions for Optimal Bladder Cancer Detection Using DNA Methylation Markers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A10%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Urine%20Fractions%20for%20Optimal%20Bladder%20Cancer%20Detection%20Using%20DNA%20Methylation%20Markers&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Hentschel,%20Anouk%20E&rft.date=2020-04-02&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=859&rft.pages=859-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers12040859&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2387261059%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-8383751abea7dba02be7954ed4448f9c03a9f7d12f6fed1918ae741896481e833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2387261059&rft_id=info:pmid/32252299&rfr_iscdi=true