Loading…

Value of [18F]-FDG positron emission tomography in patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab

Abstract Background Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with bevacizumab can induce MRI changes that confound the determination of progression. We sought to determine the value of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in GBM patients receiving bevacizumab at the tim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neuro-oncology advances 2020-01, Vol.2 (1), p.vdaa050-vdaa050
Main Authors: Graham, Maya S, Krebs, Simone, Bale, Tejus, Domfe, Kwaku, Lobaugh, Stephanie M, Zhang, Zhigang, Dunphy, Mark P, Kaley, Thomas, Young, Robert J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-c45750b369d9b2d84d0a75e44a022850c39f4cd5047e8546c486f0318ae886353
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-c45750b369d9b2d84d0a75e44a022850c39f4cd5047e8546c486f0318ae886353
container_end_page vdaa050
container_issue 1
container_start_page vdaa050
container_title Neuro-oncology advances
container_volume 2
creator Graham, Maya S
Krebs, Simone
Bale, Tejus
Domfe, Kwaku
Lobaugh, Stephanie M
Zhang, Zhigang
Dunphy, Mark P
Kaley, Thomas
Young, Robert J
description Abstract Background Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with bevacizumab can induce MRI changes that confound the determination of progression. We sought to determine the value of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in GBM patients receiving bevacizumab at the time of suspected progression and, thereby, its utility as a potential prognostic adjunct in progressive disease. Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent brain FDG PET within 4 weeks of receiving bevacizumab for recurrent GBM with suspected progression. Volumes-of-interest were placed over the reference lesion with measurement of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak), metabolic tumor volume, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and tumor-to-normal contralateral white matter ratios (TNR-WM). Tumors were additionally categorized as non-avid or avid based on qualitative FDG uptake. Associations between baseline variables and overall survival (OS) were examined using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, with P < .05 considered significant. Results Thirty-one patients were analyzed. Qualitative FDG uptake was significantly associated with OS (P = .03), with a median OS of 9.0 months in non-avid patients versus 4.5 months in avid patients. SUVmax, SUVpeak, TNR-WM, and TLG were significantly associated with OS (P < .001, TLG: P = .009). FDG avidity and SUVmax remained significantly associated with OS (P = .046 and .048, respectively) in the multivariable analysis including age, KPS, and MGMT status. Dichotomizing patients using an SUVmax cutoff of 15.3 was associated with OS (adjusted P = .048). Conclusion FDG PET is a promising imaging tool to further stratify prognosis in recurrent GBM patients on antiangiogenic therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa050
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7236386</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/noajnl/vdaa050</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2422004567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-c45750b369d9b2d84d0a75e44a022850c39f4cd5047e8546c486f0318ae886353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhi3UCtCWa4_Ix_awMPFH4lyQKuhSpJW4QC9VZU0cZ9coiVM7WbT99fVqF0RPXMYznmdej_wS8jmDiwxKftl7fOrby02NCBKOyCnLOZszUaoPb_ITchbjEwAwKaQAdkxOOMsFK4Cfku4ntpOlvqG_MrX4PV_c3NLBRzcG31PbuRhdSkbf-VXAYb2lrqcDjs72Y6TPblzTYM0UQqrpqnW-ajEmGnfX1m1cv6KV3aBxf6cOq0_kY4NttGeHc0YeF98frn_Ml_e3d9fflnMjmBhTlIWEiudlXVasVqIGLKQVAoExJcHwshGmliAKq6TIjVB5AzxTaJXKueQzcrXXHaaqs7VJ2wVs9RBch2GrPTr9f6d3a73yG10wnvMkMSNfDgLB_5lsHHX6CmPbFnvrp6iZYAxAyLxI6MUeNcHHGGzz-kwGemeT3tukDzalgfO3y73iL6Yk4Ose8NPwntg_v9agYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2422004567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value of [18F]-FDG positron emission tomography in patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Graham, Maya S ; Krebs, Simone ; Bale, Tejus ; Domfe, Kwaku ; Lobaugh, Stephanie M ; Zhang, Zhigang ; Dunphy, Mark P ; Kaley, Thomas ; Young, Robert J</creator><creatorcontrib>Graham, Maya S ; Krebs, Simone ; Bale, Tejus ; Domfe, Kwaku ; Lobaugh, Stephanie M ; Zhang, Zhigang ; Dunphy, Mark P ; Kaley, Thomas ; Young, Robert J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with bevacizumab can induce MRI changes that confound the determination of progression. We sought to determine the value of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in GBM patients receiving bevacizumab at the time of suspected progression and, thereby, its utility as a potential prognostic adjunct in progressive disease. Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent brain FDG PET within 4 weeks of receiving bevacizumab for recurrent GBM with suspected progression. Volumes-of-interest were placed over the reference lesion with measurement of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak), metabolic tumor volume, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and tumor-to-normal contralateral white matter ratios (TNR-WM). Tumors were additionally categorized as non-avid or avid based on qualitative FDG uptake. Associations between baseline variables and overall survival (OS) were examined using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, with P &lt; .05 considered significant. Results Thirty-one patients were analyzed. Qualitative FDG uptake was significantly associated with OS (P = .03), with a median OS of 9.0 months in non-avid patients versus 4.5 months in avid patients. SUVmax, SUVpeak, TNR-WM, and TLG were significantly associated with OS (P &lt; .001, TLG: P = .009). FDG avidity and SUVmax remained significantly associated with OS (P = .046 and .048, respectively) in the multivariable analysis including age, KPS, and MGMT status. Dichotomizing patients using an SUVmax cutoff of 15.3 was associated with OS (adjusted P = .048). Conclusion FDG PET is a promising imaging tool to further stratify prognosis in recurrent GBM patients on antiangiogenic therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2632-2498</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2632-2498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32642703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Clinical Investigations</subject><ispartof>Neuro-oncology advances, 2020-01, Vol.2 (1), p.vdaa050-vdaa050</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-c45750b369d9b2d84d0a75e44a022850c39f4cd5047e8546c486f0318ae886353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-c45750b369d9b2d84d0a75e44a022850c39f4cd5047e8546c486f0318ae886353</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4748-974X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236386/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7236386/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,1598,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graham, Maya S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bale, Tejus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domfe, Kwaku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobaugh, Stephanie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunphy, Mark P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaley, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Robert J</creatorcontrib><title>Value of [18F]-FDG positron emission tomography in patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab</title><title>Neuro-oncology advances</title><addtitle>Neurooncol Adv</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with bevacizumab can induce MRI changes that confound the determination of progression. We sought to determine the value of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in GBM patients receiving bevacizumab at the time of suspected progression and, thereby, its utility as a potential prognostic adjunct in progressive disease. Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent brain FDG PET within 4 weeks of receiving bevacizumab for recurrent GBM with suspected progression. Volumes-of-interest were placed over the reference lesion with measurement of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak), metabolic tumor volume, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and tumor-to-normal contralateral white matter ratios (TNR-WM). Tumors were additionally categorized as non-avid or avid based on qualitative FDG uptake. Associations between baseline variables and overall survival (OS) were examined using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, with P &lt; .05 considered significant. Results Thirty-one patients were analyzed. Qualitative FDG uptake was significantly associated with OS (P = .03), with a median OS of 9.0 months in non-avid patients versus 4.5 months in avid patients. SUVmax, SUVpeak, TNR-WM, and TLG were significantly associated with OS (P &lt; .001, TLG: P = .009). FDG avidity and SUVmax remained significantly associated with OS (P = .046 and .048, respectively) in the multivariable analysis including age, KPS, and MGMT status. Dichotomizing patients using an SUVmax cutoff of 15.3 was associated with OS (adjusted P = .048). Conclusion FDG PET is a promising imaging tool to further stratify prognosis in recurrent GBM patients on antiangiogenic therapy.</description><subject>Clinical Investigations</subject><issn>2632-2498</issn><issn>2632-2498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhi3UCtCWa4_Ix_awMPFH4lyQKuhSpJW4QC9VZU0cZ9coiVM7WbT99fVqF0RPXMYznmdej_wS8jmDiwxKftl7fOrby02NCBKOyCnLOZszUaoPb_ITchbjEwAwKaQAdkxOOMsFK4Cfku4ntpOlvqG_MrX4PV_c3NLBRzcG31PbuRhdSkbf-VXAYb2lrqcDjs72Y6TPblzTYM0UQqrpqnW-ajEmGnfX1m1cv6KV3aBxf6cOq0_kY4NttGeHc0YeF98frn_Ml_e3d9fflnMjmBhTlIWEiudlXVasVqIGLKQVAoExJcHwshGmliAKq6TIjVB5AzxTaJXKueQzcrXXHaaqs7VJ2wVs9RBch2GrPTr9f6d3a73yG10wnvMkMSNfDgLB_5lsHHX6CmPbFnvrp6iZYAxAyLxI6MUeNcHHGGzz-kwGemeT3tukDzalgfO3y73iL6Yk4Ose8NPwntg_v9agYw</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Graham, Maya S</creator><creator>Krebs, Simone</creator><creator>Bale, Tejus</creator><creator>Domfe, Kwaku</creator><creator>Lobaugh, Stephanie M</creator><creator>Zhang, Zhigang</creator><creator>Dunphy, Mark P</creator><creator>Kaley, Thomas</creator><creator>Young, Robert J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4748-974X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Value of [18F]-FDG positron emission tomography in patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab</title><author>Graham, Maya S ; Krebs, Simone ; Bale, Tejus ; Domfe, Kwaku ; Lobaugh, Stephanie M ; Zhang, Zhigang ; Dunphy, Mark P ; Kaley, Thomas ; Young, Robert J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-c45750b369d9b2d84d0a75e44a022850c39f4cd5047e8546c486f0318ae886353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Clinical Investigations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graham, Maya S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bale, Tejus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domfe, Kwaku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobaugh, Stephanie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunphy, Mark P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaley, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Robert J</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neuro-oncology advances</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graham, Maya S</au><au>Krebs, Simone</au><au>Bale, Tejus</au><au>Domfe, Kwaku</au><au>Lobaugh, Stephanie M</au><au>Zhang, Zhigang</au><au>Dunphy, Mark P</au><au>Kaley, Thomas</au><au>Young, Robert J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value of [18F]-FDG positron emission tomography in patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab</atitle><jtitle>Neuro-oncology advances</jtitle><addtitle>Neurooncol Adv</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>vdaa050</spage><epage>vdaa050</epage><pages>vdaa050-vdaa050</pages><issn>2632-2498</issn><eissn>2632-2498</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with bevacizumab can induce MRI changes that confound the determination of progression. We sought to determine the value of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in GBM patients receiving bevacizumab at the time of suspected progression and, thereby, its utility as a potential prognostic adjunct in progressive disease. Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent brain FDG PET within 4 weeks of receiving bevacizumab for recurrent GBM with suspected progression. Volumes-of-interest were placed over the reference lesion with measurement of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak), metabolic tumor volume, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and tumor-to-normal contralateral white matter ratios (TNR-WM). Tumors were additionally categorized as non-avid or avid based on qualitative FDG uptake. Associations between baseline variables and overall survival (OS) were examined using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, with P &lt; .05 considered significant. Results Thirty-one patients were analyzed. Qualitative FDG uptake was significantly associated with OS (P = .03), with a median OS of 9.0 months in non-avid patients versus 4.5 months in avid patients. SUVmax, SUVpeak, TNR-WM, and TLG were significantly associated with OS (P &lt; .001, TLG: P = .009). FDG avidity and SUVmax remained significantly associated with OS (P = .046 and .048, respectively) in the multivariable analysis including age, KPS, and MGMT status. Dichotomizing patients using an SUVmax cutoff of 15.3 was associated with OS (adjusted P = .048). Conclusion FDG PET is a promising imaging tool to further stratify prognosis in recurrent GBM patients on antiangiogenic therapy.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32642703</pmid><doi>10.1093/noajnl/vdaa050</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4748-974X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2632-2498
ispartof Neuro-oncology advances, 2020-01, Vol.2 (1), p.vdaa050-vdaa050
issn 2632-2498
2632-2498
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7236386
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central
subjects Clinical Investigations
title Value of [18F]-FDG positron emission tomography in patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A13%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20of%20%5B18F%5D-FDG%20positron%20emission%20tomography%20in%20patients%20with%20recurrent%20glioblastoma%20receiving%20bevacizumab&rft.jtitle=Neuro-oncology%20advances&rft.au=Graham,%20Maya%20S&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=vdaa050&rft.epage=vdaa050&rft.pages=vdaa050-vdaa050&rft.issn=2632-2498&rft.eissn=2632-2498&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2422004567%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-c45750b369d9b2d84d0a75e44a022850c39f4cd5047e8546c486f0318ae886353%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2422004567&rft_id=info:pmid/32642703&rft_oup_id=10.1093/noajnl/vdaa050&rfr_iscdi=true