Loading…

Differences in Body Mass Index Z-Scores Among Children and Adolescent Participants of NHANES 2003–2016 with Different Temporal Eating Patterns

To determine if body mass index z-scores (zBMI) differ among children and adolescents who reported an early temporal eating pattern when compared to those who reported other temporal eating patterns. Data from children (6–12 years) and adolescents (13–19 years) participating in the National Health a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current developments in nutrition 2020-06, Vol.4 (Supplement_2), p.586-586, Article nzaa047_006
Main Authors: Douglas, Steve, Raynor, Hollie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 586
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page 586
container_title Current developments in nutrition
container_volume 4
creator Douglas, Steve
Raynor, Hollie
description To determine if body mass index z-scores (zBMI) differ among children and adolescents who reported an early temporal eating pattern when compared to those who reported other temporal eating patterns. Data from children (6–12 years) and adolescents (13–19 years) participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2016 were used. Children and adolescents were analyzed separately because of the phase delay in circadian rhythms experienced during adolescence. Energy intake and timing of intake was assessed using two 24-hour dietary recalls. Children (n = 2,565) and adolescents (n = 2,321) were included if they reported plausible intakes (≥500 kcals/day) with the same temporal eating patterns on both days. Temporal eating patterns were defined by the following morning and evening parameters: consumed 20% of total caloric intake before 10 AM (EAM); didn’t consume 20% before 10 AM (LAM); consumed at least 80% of total caloric intake before 7 PM (EPM); didn’t consume 80% before 7 PM (LPM). These parameters provided four temporal eating patterns: EAM-EPM, EAM-LPM, LAM-EPM, LAM-LPM. A covariate adjusted general linear models, adjusted for the complex sampling design, was used to compare zBMI of those participating in the different patterns. Data are reported as means ± SEM and P < 0.0125 was considered significant. zBMI for EAM-EPM (n = 887; 0.460 ± 0.037) children was lower when compared to LAM-LPM (n = 455; 0.641 ± 0.056; P = 0.007) children. For adolescents, zBMI for EAM-EPM (n = 445; 0.516 ± 0.048; P = 0.005), EAM-LPM (n = 172; 0.370 ± 0.089; P = 0.001), and LAM-LPM (n = 839; 0.549 ± 0.039; P = 0.011) adolescents were lower when compared to LAM-EPM (n = 1,097; 0.683 ± 0.035) adolescents. No other differences were observed. Children between the ages of 6 and 12 who reported consuming an early eating pattern have a lower zBMI when compared to those who reported consuming a later eating pattern. Adolescents who didn’t consume 20% of their total energy intake before 10 am and did consume more than 80% of their total intake before 7 pm have a greater zBMI than their peers who consistently reported consuming alternative eating patterns. None
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cdn/nzaa047_006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7258092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cdn/nzaa047_006</oup_id><els_id>S2475299123081040</els_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/cdn/nzaa047_006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2216-fb4a7c5810d43301a9018f5f3da8794ef1bb61058a5a23161f138f46c70d52933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUUtLXDEUvhQLFXXdbdaF2zlJ7isbYTqOD1AraDfdhDN5OJGZ5JJkfHTVnyD0H_aXeIdR0UWhq3Pge5zHVxSfKXylIPhIaT_yvxChaiVA86HYZlVbl0wIuvWm_1TspXQDAFQI0YDYLh4PnLUmGq9MIs6Tb0E_kDNMiZx4be7Jz_JShThg42Xw12Qydws9sAl6TcY6LExSxmdygTE75Xr0OZFgyfnx-Hx6SRgA__v7DwPakDuX5-RlWiZXZtmHiAsyxewG5wvM2USfdouPFhfJ7D3XneLH4fRqclyefj86mYxPS8UYbUo7q7BVdUdBV5wDRQG0s7XlGrtWVMbS2ayhUHdYI-O0oZbyzlaNakHXTHC-U-xvfPvVbGn0-ophG9lHt8T4IAM6-R7xbi6vw61sWd2BYIPBaGOgYkgpGvuqpSDXocghFPkmlEHxZaMIq_4_yGJDNsMTbp2JMim3jkm7aFSWOrh_ap8AGXykoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in Body Mass Index Z-Scores Among Children and Adolescent Participants of NHANES 2003–2016 with Different Temporal Eating Patterns</title><source>Oxford University Press Open Access</source><creator>Douglas, Steve ; Raynor, Hollie</creator><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Steve ; Raynor, Hollie</creatorcontrib><description>To determine if body mass index z-scores (zBMI) differ among children and adolescents who reported an early temporal eating pattern when compared to those who reported other temporal eating patterns. Data from children (6–12 years) and adolescents (13–19 years) participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2016 were used. Children and adolescents were analyzed separately because of the phase delay in circadian rhythms experienced during adolescence. Energy intake and timing of intake was assessed using two 24-hour dietary recalls. Children (n = 2,565) and adolescents (n = 2,321) were included if they reported plausible intakes (≥500 kcals/day) with the same temporal eating patterns on both days. Temporal eating patterns were defined by the following morning and evening parameters: consumed 20% of total caloric intake before 10 AM (EAM); didn’t consume 20% before 10 AM (LAM); consumed at least 80% of total caloric intake before 7 PM (EPM); didn’t consume 80% before 7 PM (LPM). These parameters provided four temporal eating patterns: EAM-EPM, EAM-LPM, LAM-EPM, LAM-LPM. A covariate adjusted general linear models, adjusted for the complex sampling design, was used to compare zBMI of those participating in the different patterns. Data are reported as means ± SEM and P &lt; 0.0125 was considered significant. zBMI for EAM-EPM (n = 887; 0.460 ± 0.037) children was lower when compared to LAM-LPM (n = 455; 0.641 ± 0.056; P = 0.007) children. For adolescents, zBMI for EAM-EPM (n = 445; 0.516 ± 0.048; P = 0.005), EAM-LPM (n = 172; 0.370 ± 0.089; P = 0.001), and LAM-LPM (n = 839; 0.549 ± 0.039; P = 0.011) adolescents were lower when compared to LAM-EPM (n = 1,097; 0.683 ± 0.035) adolescents. No other differences were observed. Children between the ages of 6 and 12 who reported consuming an early eating pattern have a lower zBMI when compared to those who reported consuming a later eating pattern. Adolescents who didn’t consume 20% of their total energy intake before 10 am and did consume more than 80% of their total intake before 7 pm have a greater zBMI than their peers who consistently reported consuming alternative eating patterns. None</description><identifier>ISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa047_006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Eating Frequency and Chrononutrition</subject><ispartof>Current developments in nutrition, 2020-06, Vol.4 (Supplement_2), p.586-586, Article nzaa047_006</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7258092/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299123081040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1604,3549,27924,27925,45780,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa047_006$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raynor, Hollie</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in Body Mass Index Z-Scores Among Children and Adolescent Participants of NHANES 2003–2016 with Different Temporal Eating Patterns</title><title>Current developments in nutrition</title><description>To determine if body mass index z-scores (zBMI) differ among children and adolescents who reported an early temporal eating pattern when compared to those who reported other temporal eating patterns. Data from children (6–12 years) and adolescents (13–19 years) participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2016 were used. Children and adolescents were analyzed separately because of the phase delay in circadian rhythms experienced during adolescence. Energy intake and timing of intake was assessed using two 24-hour dietary recalls. Children (n = 2,565) and adolescents (n = 2,321) were included if they reported plausible intakes (≥500 kcals/day) with the same temporal eating patterns on both days. Temporal eating patterns were defined by the following morning and evening parameters: consumed 20% of total caloric intake before 10 AM (EAM); didn’t consume 20% before 10 AM (LAM); consumed at least 80% of total caloric intake before 7 PM (EPM); didn’t consume 80% before 7 PM (LPM). These parameters provided four temporal eating patterns: EAM-EPM, EAM-LPM, LAM-EPM, LAM-LPM. A covariate adjusted general linear models, adjusted for the complex sampling design, was used to compare zBMI of those participating in the different patterns. Data are reported as means ± SEM and P &lt; 0.0125 was considered significant. zBMI for EAM-EPM (n = 887; 0.460 ± 0.037) children was lower when compared to LAM-LPM (n = 455; 0.641 ± 0.056; P = 0.007) children. For adolescents, zBMI for EAM-EPM (n = 445; 0.516 ± 0.048; P = 0.005), EAM-LPM (n = 172; 0.370 ± 0.089; P = 0.001), and LAM-LPM (n = 839; 0.549 ± 0.039; P = 0.011) adolescents were lower when compared to LAM-EPM (n = 1,097; 0.683 ± 0.035) adolescents. No other differences were observed. Children between the ages of 6 and 12 who reported consuming an early eating pattern have a lower zBMI when compared to those who reported consuming a later eating pattern. Adolescents who didn’t consume 20% of their total energy intake before 10 am and did consume more than 80% of their total intake before 7 pm have a greater zBMI than their peers who consistently reported consuming alternative eating patterns. None</description><subject>Eating Frequency and Chrononutrition</subject><issn>2475-2991</issn><issn>2475-2991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUUtLXDEUvhQLFXXdbdaF2zlJ7isbYTqOD1AraDfdhDN5OJGZ5JJkfHTVnyD0H_aXeIdR0UWhq3Pge5zHVxSfKXylIPhIaT_yvxChaiVA86HYZlVbl0wIuvWm_1TspXQDAFQI0YDYLh4PnLUmGq9MIs6Tb0E_kDNMiZx4be7Jz_JShThg42Xw12Qydws9sAl6TcY6LExSxmdygTE75Xr0OZFgyfnx-Hx6SRgA__v7DwPakDuX5-RlWiZXZtmHiAsyxewG5wvM2USfdouPFhfJ7D3XneLH4fRqclyefj86mYxPS8UYbUo7q7BVdUdBV5wDRQG0s7XlGrtWVMbS2ayhUHdYI-O0oZbyzlaNakHXTHC-U-xvfPvVbGn0-ophG9lHt8T4IAM6-R7xbi6vw61sWd2BYIPBaGOgYkgpGvuqpSDXocghFPkmlEHxZaMIq_4_yGJDNsMTbp2JMim3jkm7aFSWOrh_ap8AGXykoA</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Douglas, Steve</creator><creator>Raynor, Hollie</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Differences in Body Mass Index Z-Scores Among Children and Adolescent Participants of NHANES 2003–2016 with Different Temporal Eating Patterns</title><author>Douglas, Steve ; Raynor, Hollie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2216-fb4a7c5810d43301a9018f5f3da8794ef1bb61058a5a23161f138f46c70d52933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Eating Frequency and Chrononutrition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raynor, Hollie</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Douglas, Steve</au><au>Raynor, Hollie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in Body Mass Index Z-Scores Among Children and Adolescent Participants of NHANES 2003–2016 with Different Temporal Eating Patterns</atitle><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><spage>586</spage><epage>586</epage><pages>586-586</pages><artnum>nzaa047_006</artnum><issn>2475-2991</issn><eissn>2475-2991</eissn><abstract>To determine if body mass index z-scores (zBMI) differ among children and adolescents who reported an early temporal eating pattern when compared to those who reported other temporal eating patterns. Data from children (6–12 years) and adolescents (13–19 years) participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2016 were used. Children and adolescents were analyzed separately because of the phase delay in circadian rhythms experienced during adolescence. Energy intake and timing of intake was assessed using two 24-hour dietary recalls. Children (n = 2,565) and adolescents (n = 2,321) were included if they reported plausible intakes (≥500 kcals/day) with the same temporal eating patterns on both days. Temporal eating patterns were defined by the following morning and evening parameters: consumed 20% of total caloric intake before 10 AM (EAM); didn’t consume 20% before 10 AM (LAM); consumed at least 80% of total caloric intake before 7 PM (EPM); didn’t consume 80% before 7 PM (LPM). These parameters provided four temporal eating patterns: EAM-EPM, EAM-LPM, LAM-EPM, LAM-LPM. A covariate adjusted general linear models, adjusted for the complex sampling design, was used to compare zBMI of those participating in the different patterns. Data are reported as means ± SEM and P &lt; 0.0125 was considered significant. zBMI for EAM-EPM (n = 887; 0.460 ± 0.037) children was lower when compared to LAM-LPM (n = 455; 0.641 ± 0.056; P = 0.007) children. For adolescents, zBMI for EAM-EPM (n = 445; 0.516 ± 0.048; P = 0.005), EAM-LPM (n = 172; 0.370 ± 0.089; P = 0.001), and LAM-LPM (n = 839; 0.549 ± 0.039; P = 0.011) adolescents were lower when compared to LAM-EPM (n = 1,097; 0.683 ± 0.035) adolescents. No other differences were observed. Children between the ages of 6 and 12 who reported consuming an early eating pattern have a lower zBMI when compared to those who reported consuming a later eating pattern. Adolescents who didn’t consume 20% of their total energy intake before 10 am and did consume more than 80% of their total intake before 7 pm have a greater zBMI than their peers who consistently reported consuming alternative eating patterns. None</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1093/cdn/nzaa047_006</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2475-2991
ispartof Current developments in nutrition, 2020-06, Vol.4 (Supplement_2), p.586-586, Article nzaa047_006
issn 2475-2991
2475-2991
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7258092
source Oxford University Press Open Access
subjects Eating Frequency and Chrononutrition
title Differences in Body Mass Index Z-Scores Among Children and Adolescent Participants of NHANES 2003–2016 with Different Temporal Eating Patterns
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A51%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20Body%20Mass%20Index%20Z-Scores%20Among%20Children%20and%20Adolescent%20Participants%20of%20NHANES%202003%E2%80%932016%20with%20Different%20Temporal%20Eating%20Patterns&rft.jtitle=Current%20developments%20in%20nutrition&rft.au=Douglas,%20Steve&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.spage=586&rft.epage=586&rft.pages=586-586&rft.artnum=nzaa047_006&rft.issn=2475-2991&rft.eissn=2475-2991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cdn/nzaa047_006&rft_dat=%3Coup_TOX%3E10.1093/cdn/nzaa047_006%3C/oup_TOX%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2216-fb4a7c5810d43301a9018f5f3da8794ef1bb61058a5a23161f138f46c70d52933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cdn/nzaa047_006&rfr_iscdi=true