Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England

An invisible threat has visibly altered the world. Governments and key institutions have had to implement decisive responses to the danger posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Imposed change will increase the likelihood that alternative explanations take hold. In a proportion of the general population...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychological Medicine 2022-01, Vol.52 (2), p.251-263
Main Authors: Freeman, Daniel, Waite, Felicity, Rosebrock, Laina, Petit, Ariane, Causier, Chiara, East, Anna, Jenner, Lucy, Teale, Ashley-Louise, Carr, Lydia, Mulhall, Sophie, Bold, Emily, Lambe, Sinéad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Beliefs
Climate change
Compliance
Conspiracy
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Fringes
Government
Humans
Immunization
National guidelines
Original
Original Article
Pandemics
Paranoia
Perceptions
Population
SARS-CoV-2
Trust
Vaccination
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:An invisible threat has visibly altered the world. Governments and key institutions have had to implement decisive responses to the danger posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Imposed change will increase the likelihood that alternative explanations take hold. In a proportion of the general population there may be strong scepticism, fear of being misled, and false conspiracy theories. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of conspiracy thinking about the pandemic and test associations with reduced adherence to government guidelines. A non-probability online survey with 2501 adults in England, quota sampled to match the population for age, gender, income, and region. Approximately 50% of this population showed little evidence of conspiracy thinking, 25% showed a degree of endorsement, 15% showed a consistent pattern of endorsement, and 10% had very high levels of endorsement. Higher levels of coronavirus conspiracy thinking were associated with less adherence to all government guidelines and less willingness to take diagnostic or antibody tests or to be vaccinated. Such ideas were also associated with paranoia, general vaccination conspiracy beliefs, climate change conspiracy belief, a conspiracy mentality, and distrust in institutions and professions. Holding coronavirus conspiracy beliefs was also associated with being more likely to share opinions. In England there is appreciable endorsement of conspiracy beliefs about coronavirus. Such ideas do not appear confined to the fringes. The conspiracy beliefs connect to other forms of mistrust and are associated with less compliance with government guidelines and greater unwillingness to take up future tests and treatment.
ISSN:0033-2917
1469-8978
DOI:10.1017/S0033291720001890