Loading…
Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England
An invisible threat has visibly altered the world. Governments and key institutions have had to implement decisive responses to the danger posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Imposed change will increase the likelihood that alternative explanations take hold. In a proportion of the general population...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychological Medicine 2022-01, Vol.52 (2), p.251-263 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793 |
container_end_page | 263 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 251 |
container_title | Psychological Medicine |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Freeman, Daniel Waite, Felicity Rosebrock, Laina Petit, Ariane Causier, Chiara East, Anna Jenner, Lucy Teale, Ashley-Louise Carr, Lydia Mulhall, Sophie Bold, Emily Lambe, Sinéad |
description | An invisible threat has visibly altered the world. Governments and key institutions have had to implement decisive responses to the danger posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Imposed change will increase the likelihood that alternative explanations take hold. In a proportion of the general population there may be strong scepticism, fear of being misled, and false conspiracy theories. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of conspiracy thinking about the pandemic and test associations with reduced adherence to government guidelines.
A non-probability online survey with 2501 adults in England, quota sampled to match the population for age, gender, income, and region.
Approximately 50% of this population showed little evidence of conspiracy thinking, 25% showed a degree of endorsement, 15% showed a consistent pattern of endorsement, and 10% had very high levels of endorsement. Higher levels of coronavirus conspiracy thinking were associated with less adherence to all government guidelines and less willingness to take diagnostic or antibody tests or to be vaccinated. Such ideas were also associated with paranoia, general vaccination conspiracy beliefs, climate change conspiracy belief, a conspiracy mentality, and distrust in institutions and professions. Holding coronavirus conspiracy beliefs was also associated with being more likely to share opinions.
In England there is appreciable endorsement of conspiracy beliefs about coronavirus. Such ideas do not appear confined to the fringes. The conspiracy beliefs connect to other forms of mistrust and are associated with less compliance with government guidelines and greater unwillingness to take up future tests and treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0033291720001890 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_COVID</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7264452</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0033291720001890</cupid><sourcerecordid>2405372553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS1UBMPjB3RTWbAl4FdsZ1OpGkFBQmIBbLEcxxmMEju1E6r593hgyqMVXd3F-c659-oA8BWjY4ywOLlGiFJSYUEQQlhWaAPMMONVISshv4DZSi5W-jbYSekhMxQzsgW2KWGUM1nOwN08xOD1o4tTgib4NLiozRLWtnO2TUewd2nM2ngEtW8y0Q-d095Y-NuN93ARHm30vfUjXEyuySZvE3QenvpFlw17YLPVXbL767kLbs9Ob-bnxeXVz4v5j8vClKQcC241p4S01gijWcVK0rSoZrWpm0pi1MiGypbWlmvdckSZoaRlkhMjK2yFqOgu-P6SO0x1bxuTD4q6U0N0vY5LFbRTHxXv7lU-XgnCWV6XAw7WATH8mmwaVbRDiGNShCGJMWec_R8qqSBlSTN0-Bf0EKbo8_eKcCIoofJ5H36hTAwpRdu-3oqRWpWr_ik3e769f_LV8afNDNB1qO7r6JqFfdv9eewTr-Su5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627323852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England</title><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Freeman, Daniel ; Waite, Felicity ; Rosebrock, Laina ; Petit, Ariane ; Causier, Chiara ; East, Anna ; Jenner, Lucy ; Teale, Ashley-Louise ; Carr, Lydia ; Mulhall, Sophie ; Bold, Emily ; Lambe, Sinéad</creator><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Daniel ; Waite, Felicity ; Rosebrock, Laina ; Petit, Ariane ; Causier, Chiara ; East, Anna ; Jenner, Lucy ; Teale, Ashley-Louise ; Carr, Lydia ; Mulhall, Sophie ; Bold, Emily ; Lambe, Sinéad</creatorcontrib><description>An invisible threat has visibly altered the world. Governments and key institutions have had to implement decisive responses to the danger posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Imposed change will increase the likelihood that alternative explanations take hold. In a proportion of the general population there may be strong scepticism, fear of being misled, and false conspiracy theories. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of conspiracy thinking about the pandemic and test associations with reduced adherence to government guidelines.
A non-probability online survey with 2501 adults in England, quota sampled to match the population for age, gender, income, and region.
Approximately 50% of this population showed little evidence of conspiracy thinking, 25% showed a degree of endorsement, 15% showed a consistent pattern of endorsement, and 10% had very high levels of endorsement. Higher levels of coronavirus conspiracy thinking were associated with less adherence to all government guidelines and less willingness to take diagnostic or antibody tests or to be vaccinated. Such ideas were also associated with paranoia, general vaccination conspiracy beliefs, climate change conspiracy belief, a conspiracy mentality, and distrust in institutions and professions. Holding coronavirus conspiracy beliefs was also associated with being more likely to share opinions.
In England there is appreciable endorsement of conspiracy beliefs about coronavirus. Such ideas do not appear confined to the fringes. The conspiracy beliefs connect to other forms of mistrust and are associated with less compliance with government guidelines and greater unwillingness to take up future tests and treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0033291720001890</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32436485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Beliefs ; Climate change ; Compliance ; Conspiracy ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Fringes ; Government ; Humans ; Immunization ; National guidelines ; Original ; Original Article ; Pandemics ; Paranoia ; Perceptions ; Population ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Trust ; Vaccination</subject><ispartof>Psychological Medicine, 2022-01, Vol.52 (2), p.251-263</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – Share Alike License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://www.stm-assoc.org/about-the-industry/coronavirus-2019-ncov/.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020 2020 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2541-2197</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2627323852/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2408116464?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,12846,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,33611,34530,38516,43733,43895,44115,72960,74221,74639</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2408116464?pq-origsite=primo$$EView_record_in_ProQuest$$FView_record_in_$$GProQuest</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32436485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waite, Felicity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosebrock, Laina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petit, Ariane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Causier, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenner, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teale, Ashley-Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulhall, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bold, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambe, Sinéad</creatorcontrib><title>Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England</title><title>Psychological Medicine</title><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><description>An invisible threat has visibly altered the world. Governments and key institutions have had to implement decisive responses to the danger posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Imposed change will increase the likelihood that alternative explanations take hold. In a proportion of the general population there may be strong scepticism, fear of being misled, and false conspiracy theories. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of conspiracy thinking about the pandemic and test associations with reduced adherence to government guidelines.
A non-probability online survey with 2501 adults in England, quota sampled to match the population for age, gender, income, and region.
Approximately 50% of this population showed little evidence of conspiracy thinking, 25% showed a degree of endorsement, 15% showed a consistent pattern of endorsement, and 10% had very high levels of endorsement. Higher levels of coronavirus conspiracy thinking were associated with less adherence to all government guidelines and less willingness to take diagnostic or antibody tests or to be vaccinated. Such ideas were also associated with paranoia, general vaccination conspiracy beliefs, climate change conspiracy belief, a conspiracy mentality, and distrust in institutions and professions. Holding coronavirus conspiracy beliefs was also associated with being more likely to share opinions.
In England there is appreciable endorsement of conspiracy beliefs about coronavirus. Such ideas do not appear confined to the fringes. The conspiracy beliefs connect to other forms of mistrust and are associated with less compliance with government guidelines and greater unwillingness to take up future tests and treatment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Conspiracy</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Fringes</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>National guidelines</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Paranoia</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><issn>0033-2917</issn><issn>1469-8978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS1UBMPjB3RTWbAl4FdsZ1OpGkFBQmIBbLEcxxmMEju1E6r593hgyqMVXd3F-c659-oA8BWjY4ywOLlGiFJSYUEQQlhWaAPMMONVISshv4DZSi5W-jbYSekhMxQzsgW2KWGUM1nOwN08xOD1o4tTgib4NLiozRLWtnO2TUewd2nM2ngEtW8y0Q-d095Y-NuN93ARHm30vfUjXEyuySZvE3QenvpFlw17YLPVXbL767kLbs9Ob-bnxeXVz4v5j8vClKQcC241p4S01gijWcVK0rSoZrWpm0pi1MiGypbWlmvdckSZoaRlkhMjK2yFqOgu-P6SO0x1bxuTD4q6U0N0vY5LFbRTHxXv7lU-XgnCWV6XAw7WATH8mmwaVbRDiGNShCGJMWec_R8qqSBlSTN0-Bf0EKbo8_eKcCIoofJ5H36hTAwpRdu-3oqRWpWr_ik3e769f_LV8afNDNB1qO7r6JqFfdv9eewTr-Su5g</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Freeman, Daniel</creator><creator>Waite, Felicity</creator><creator>Rosebrock, Laina</creator><creator>Petit, Ariane</creator><creator>Causier, Chiara</creator><creator>East, Anna</creator><creator>Jenner, Lucy</creator><creator>Teale, Ashley-Louise</creator><creator>Carr, Lydia</creator><creator>Mulhall, Sophie</creator><creator>Bold, Emily</creator><creator>Lambe, Sinéad</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2541-2197</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England</title><author>Freeman, Daniel ; Waite, Felicity ; Rosebrock, Laina ; Petit, Ariane ; Causier, Chiara ; East, Anna ; Jenner, Lucy ; Teale, Ashley-Louise ; Carr, Lydia ; Mulhall, Sophie ; Bold, Emily ; Lambe, Sinéad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Conspiracy</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Fringes</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>National guidelines</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Paranoia</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waite, Felicity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosebrock, Laina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petit, Ariane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Causier, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenner, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teale, Ashley-Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulhall, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bold, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambe, Sinéad</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge University Press:Open Access(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest sociology</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychological Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freeman, Daniel</au><au>Waite, Felicity</au><au>Rosebrock, Laina</au><au>Petit, Ariane</au><au>Causier, Chiara</au><au>East, Anna</au><au>Jenner, Lucy</au><au>Teale, Ashley-Louise</au><au>Carr, Lydia</au><au>Mulhall, Sophie</au><au>Bold, Emily</au><au>Lambe, Sinéad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England</atitle><jtitle>Psychological Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>251-263</pages><issn>0033-2917</issn><eissn>1469-8978</eissn><abstract>An invisible threat has visibly altered the world. Governments and key institutions have had to implement decisive responses to the danger posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Imposed change will increase the likelihood that alternative explanations take hold. In a proportion of the general population there may be strong scepticism, fear of being misled, and false conspiracy theories. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of conspiracy thinking about the pandemic and test associations with reduced adherence to government guidelines.
A non-probability online survey with 2501 adults in England, quota sampled to match the population for age, gender, income, and region.
Approximately 50% of this population showed little evidence of conspiracy thinking, 25% showed a degree of endorsement, 15% showed a consistent pattern of endorsement, and 10% had very high levels of endorsement. Higher levels of coronavirus conspiracy thinking were associated with less adherence to all government guidelines and less willingness to take diagnostic or antibody tests or to be vaccinated. Such ideas were also associated with paranoia, general vaccination conspiracy beliefs, climate change conspiracy belief, a conspiracy mentality, and distrust in institutions and professions. Holding coronavirus conspiracy beliefs was also associated with being more likely to share opinions.
In England there is appreciable endorsement of conspiracy beliefs about coronavirus. Such ideas do not appear confined to the fringes. The conspiracy beliefs connect to other forms of mistrust and are associated with less compliance with government guidelines and greater unwillingness to take up future tests and treatment.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>32436485</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0033291720001890</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2541-2197</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2917 |
ispartof | Psychological Medicine, 2022-01, Vol.52 (2), p.251-263 |
issn | 0033-2917 1469-8978 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7264452 |
source | Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Adult Beliefs Climate change Compliance Conspiracy Coronaviruses COVID-19 Fringes Government Humans Immunization National guidelines Original Original Article Pandemics Paranoia Perceptions Population SARS-CoV-2 Trust Vaccination |
title | Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A13%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_COVID&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coronavirus%20conspiracy%20beliefs,%20mistrust,%20and%20compliance%20with%20government%20guidelines%20in%20England&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20Medicine&rft.au=Freeman,%20Daniel&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=251-263&rft.issn=0033-2917&rft.eissn=1469-8978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0033291720001890&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_COVID%3E2405372553%3C/proquest_COVID%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627323852&rft_id=info:pmid/32436485&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0033291720001890&rfr_iscdi=true |