Loading…

Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England

An invisible threat has visibly altered the world. Governments and key institutions have had to implement decisive responses to the danger posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Imposed change will increase the likelihood that alternative explanations take hold. In a proportion of the general population...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychological Medicine 2022-01, Vol.52 (2), p.251-263
Main Authors: Freeman, Daniel, Waite, Felicity, Rosebrock, Laina, Petit, Ariane, Causier, Chiara, East, Anna, Jenner, Lucy, Teale, Ashley-Louise, Carr, Lydia, Mulhall, Sophie, Bold, Emily, Lambe, Sinéad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793
container_end_page 263
container_issue 2
container_start_page 251
container_title Psychological Medicine
container_volume 52
creator Freeman, Daniel
Waite, Felicity
Rosebrock, Laina
Petit, Ariane
Causier, Chiara
East, Anna
Jenner, Lucy
Teale, Ashley-Louise
Carr, Lydia
Mulhall, Sophie
Bold, Emily
Lambe, Sinéad
description An invisible threat has visibly altered the world. Governments and key institutions have had to implement decisive responses to the danger posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Imposed change will increase the likelihood that alternative explanations take hold. In a proportion of the general population there may be strong scepticism, fear of being misled, and false conspiracy theories. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of conspiracy thinking about the pandemic and test associations with reduced adherence to government guidelines. A non-probability online survey with 2501 adults in England, quota sampled to match the population for age, gender, income, and region. Approximately 50% of this population showed little evidence of conspiracy thinking, 25% showed a degree of endorsement, 15% showed a consistent pattern of endorsement, and 10% had very high levels of endorsement. Higher levels of coronavirus conspiracy thinking were associated with less adherence to all government guidelines and less willingness to take diagnostic or antibody tests or to be vaccinated. Such ideas were also associated with paranoia, general vaccination conspiracy beliefs, climate change conspiracy belief, a conspiracy mentality, and distrust in institutions and professions. Holding coronavirus conspiracy beliefs was also associated with being more likely to share opinions. In England there is appreciable endorsement of conspiracy beliefs about coronavirus. Such ideas do not appear confined to the fringes. The conspiracy beliefs connect to other forms of mistrust and are associated with less compliance with government guidelines and greater unwillingness to take up future tests and treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0033291720001890
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_COVID</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7264452</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0033291720001890</cupid><sourcerecordid>2405372553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS1UBMPjB3RTWbAl4FdsZ1OpGkFBQmIBbLEcxxmMEju1E6r593hgyqMVXd3F-c659-oA8BWjY4ywOLlGiFJSYUEQQlhWaAPMMONVISshv4DZSi5W-jbYSekhMxQzsgW2KWGUM1nOwN08xOD1o4tTgib4NLiozRLWtnO2TUewd2nM2ngEtW8y0Q-d095Y-NuN93ARHm30vfUjXEyuySZvE3QenvpFlw17YLPVXbL767kLbs9Ob-bnxeXVz4v5j8vClKQcC241p4S01gijWcVK0rSoZrWpm0pi1MiGypbWlmvdckSZoaRlkhMjK2yFqOgu-P6SO0x1bxuTD4q6U0N0vY5LFbRTHxXv7lU-XgnCWV6XAw7WATH8mmwaVbRDiGNShCGJMWec_R8qqSBlSTN0-Bf0EKbo8_eKcCIoofJ5H36hTAwpRdu-3oqRWpWr_ik3e769f_LV8afNDNB1qO7r6JqFfdv9eewTr-Su5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627323852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England</title><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Freeman, Daniel ; Waite, Felicity ; Rosebrock, Laina ; Petit, Ariane ; Causier, Chiara ; East, Anna ; Jenner, Lucy ; Teale, Ashley-Louise ; Carr, Lydia ; Mulhall, Sophie ; Bold, Emily ; Lambe, Sinéad</creator><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Daniel ; Waite, Felicity ; Rosebrock, Laina ; Petit, Ariane ; Causier, Chiara ; East, Anna ; Jenner, Lucy ; Teale, Ashley-Louise ; Carr, Lydia ; Mulhall, Sophie ; Bold, Emily ; Lambe, Sinéad</creatorcontrib><description>An invisible threat has visibly altered the world. Governments and key institutions have had to implement decisive responses to the danger posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Imposed change will increase the likelihood that alternative explanations take hold. In a proportion of the general population there may be strong scepticism, fear of being misled, and false conspiracy theories. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of conspiracy thinking about the pandemic and test associations with reduced adherence to government guidelines. A non-probability online survey with 2501 adults in England, quota sampled to match the population for age, gender, income, and region. Approximately 50% of this population showed little evidence of conspiracy thinking, 25% showed a degree of endorsement, 15% showed a consistent pattern of endorsement, and 10% had very high levels of endorsement. Higher levels of coronavirus conspiracy thinking were associated with less adherence to all government guidelines and less willingness to take diagnostic or antibody tests or to be vaccinated. Such ideas were also associated with paranoia, general vaccination conspiracy beliefs, climate change conspiracy belief, a conspiracy mentality, and distrust in institutions and professions. Holding coronavirus conspiracy beliefs was also associated with being more likely to share opinions. In England there is appreciable endorsement of conspiracy beliefs about coronavirus. Such ideas do not appear confined to the fringes. The conspiracy beliefs connect to other forms of mistrust and are associated with less compliance with government guidelines and greater unwillingness to take up future tests and treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0033291720001890</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32436485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Beliefs ; Climate change ; Compliance ; Conspiracy ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Fringes ; Government ; Humans ; Immunization ; National guidelines ; Original ; Original Article ; Pandemics ; Paranoia ; Perceptions ; Population ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Trust ; Vaccination</subject><ispartof>Psychological Medicine, 2022-01, Vol.52 (2), p.251-263</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – Share Alike License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://www.stm-assoc.org/about-the-industry/coronavirus-2019-ncov/.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020 2020 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2541-2197</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2627323852/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2408116464?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,12846,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,33611,34530,38516,43733,43895,44115,72960,74221,74639</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2408116464?pq-origsite=primo$$EView_record_in_ProQuest$$FView_record_in_$$GProQuest</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32436485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waite, Felicity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosebrock, Laina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petit, Ariane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Causier, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenner, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teale, Ashley-Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulhall, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bold, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambe, Sinéad</creatorcontrib><title>Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England</title><title>Psychological Medicine</title><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><description>An invisible threat has visibly altered the world. Governments and key institutions have had to implement decisive responses to the danger posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Imposed change will increase the likelihood that alternative explanations take hold. In a proportion of the general population there may be strong scepticism, fear of being misled, and false conspiracy theories. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of conspiracy thinking about the pandemic and test associations with reduced adherence to government guidelines. A non-probability online survey with 2501 adults in England, quota sampled to match the population for age, gender, income, and region. Approximately 50% of this population showed little evidence of conspiracy thinking, 25% showed a degree of endorsement, 15% showed a consistent pattern of endorsement, and 10% had very high levels of endorsement. Higher levels of coronavirus conspiracy thinking were associated with less adherence to all government guidelines and less willingness to take diagnostic or antibody tests or to be vaccinated. Such ideas were also associated with paranoia, general vaccination conspiracy beliefs, climate change conspiracy belief, a conspiracy mentality, and distrust in institutions and professions. Holding coronavirus conspiracy beliefs was also associated with being more likely to share opinions. In England there is appreciable endorsement of conspiracy beliefs about coronavirus. Such ideas do not appear confined to the fringes. The conspiracy beliefs connect to other forms of mistrust and are associated with less compliance with government guidelines and greater unwillingness to take up future tests and treatment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Conspiracy</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Fringes</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>National guidelines</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Paranoia</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><issn>0033-2917</issn><issn>1469-8978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS1UBMPjB3RTWbAl4FdsZ1OpGkFBQmIBbLEcxxmMEju1E6r593hgyqMVXd3F-c659-oA8BWjY4ywOLlGiFJSYUEQQlhWaAPMMONVISshv4DZSi5W-jbYSekhMxQzsgW2KWGUM1nOwN08xOD1o4tTgib4NLiozRLWtnO2TUewd2nM2ngEtW8y0Q-d095Y-NuN93ARHm30vfUjXEyuySZvE3QenvpFlw17YLPVXbL767kLbs9Ob-bnxeXVz4v5j8vClKQcC241p4S01gijWcVK0rSoZrWpm0pi1MiGypbWlmvdckSZoaRlkhMjK2yFqOgu-P6SO0x1bxuTD4q6U0N0vY5LFbRTHxXv7lU-XgnCWV6XAw7WATH8mmwaVbRDiGNShCGJMWec_R8qqSBlSTN0-Bf0EKbo8_eKcCIoofJ5H36hTAwpRdu-3oqRWpWr_ik3e769f_LV8afNDNB1qO7r6JqFfdv9eewTr-Su5g</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Freeman, Daniel</creator><creator>Waite, Felicity</creator><creator>Rosebrock, Laina</creator><creator>Petit, Ariane</creator><creator>Causier, Chiara</creator><creator>East, Anna</creator><creator>Jenner, Lucy</creator><creator>Teale, Ashley-Louise</creator><creator>Carr, Lydia</creator><creator>Mulhall, Sophie</creator><creator>Bold, Emily</creator><creator>Lambe, Sinéad</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2541-2197</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England</title><author>Freeman, Daniel ; Waite, Felicity ; Rosebrock, Laina ; Petit, Ariane ; Causier, Chiara ; East, Anna ; Jenner, Lucy ; Teale, Ashley-Louise ; Carr, Lydia ; Mulhall, Sophie ; Bold, Emily ; Lambe, Sinéad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Conspiracy</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Fringes</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>National guidelines</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Paranoia</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waite, Felicity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosebrock, Laina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petit, Ariane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Causier, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenner, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teale, Ashley-Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulhall, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bold, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambe, Sinéad</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge University Press:Open Access(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest sociology</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychological Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freeman, Daniel</au><au>Waite, Felicity</au><au>Rosebrock, Laina</au><au>Petit, Ariane</au><au>Causier, Chiara</au><au>East, Anna</au><au>Jenner, Lucy</au><au>Teale, Ashley-Louise</au><au>Carr, Lydia</au><au>Mulhall, Sophie</au><au>Bold, Emily</au><au>Lambe, Sinéad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England</atitle><jtitle>Psychological Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>251-263</pages><issn>0033-2917</issn><eissn>1469-8978</eissn><abstract>An invisible threat has visibly altered the world. Governments and key institutions have had to implement decisive responses to the danger posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Imposed change will increase the likelihood that alternative explanations take hold. In a proportion of the general population there may be strong scepticism, fear of being misled, and false conspiracy theories. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of conspiracy thinking about the pandemic and test associations with reduced adherence to government guidelines. A non-probability online survey with 2501 adults in England, quota sampled to match the population for age, gender, income, and region. Approximately 50% of this population showed little evidence of conspiracy thinking, 25% showed a degree of endorsement, 15% showed a consistent pattern of endorsement, and 10% had very high levels of endorsement. Higher levels of coronavirus conspiracy thinking were associated with less adherence to all government guidelines and less willingness to take diagnostic or antibody tests or to be vaccinated. Such ideas were also associated with paranoia, general vaccination conspiracy beliefs, climate change conspiracy belief, a conspiracy mentality, and distrust in institutions and professions. Holding coronavirus conspiracy beliefs was also associated with being more likely to share opinions. In England there is appreciable endorsement of conspiracy beliefs about coronavirus. Such ideas do not appear confined to the fringes. The conspiracy beliefs connect to other forms of mistrust and are associated with less compliance with government guidelines and greater unwillingness to take up future tests and treatment.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>32436485</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0033291720001890</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2541-2197</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0033-2917
ispartof Psychological Medicine, 2022-01, Vol.52 (2), p.251-263
issn 0033-2917
1469-8978
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7264452
source Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Adult
Beliefs
Climate change
Compliance
Conspiracy
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Fringes
Government
Humans
Immunization
National guidelines
Original
Original Article
Pandemics
Paranoia
Perceptions
Population
SARS-CoV-2
Trust
Vaccination
title Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A13%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_COVID&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coronavirus%20conspiracy%20beliefs,%20mistrust,%20and%20compliance%20with%20government%20guidelines%20in%20England&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20Medicine&rft.au=Freeman,%20Daniel&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=251-263&rft.issn=0033-2917&rft.eissn=1469-8978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0033291720001890&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_COVID%3E2405372553%3C/proquest_COVID%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-6ea6322fec7ca49452df0b4bcbd9810d8d38f3be6aaf6034c32f4862c891e7793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627323852&rft_id=info:pmid/32436485&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0033291720001890&rfr_iscdi=true