Loading…

Static Wettability of Differently Mechanically Treated and Amphiphobic-Coated Aluminium Surfaces

Wettability, roughness and surface treatment methods are essential for the majority of practical applications, where liquid-solid surface interactions take place. The present study experimentally investigated the influence of different mechanical surface treatment methods on the static wettability o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials 2020-05, Vol.13 (10), p.2240
Main Authors: Fedorova, Nataliia, Ottinger, Bettina, Jovicic, Vojislav, Zbogar-Rasic, Ana, Delgado, Antonio, Virtanen, Sannakaisa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Wettability, roughness and surface treatment methods are essential for the majority of practical applications, where liquid-solid surface interactions take place. The present study experimentally investigated the influence of different mechanical surface treatment methods on the static wettability of uncoated and amphiphobic-coated aluminium alloy (AlMg ) samples, specially focusing on the interaction between surface finishing and coating. Five different surfaces were prepared: as-received substrate, polished, sandpapered, fleece-abraded and sandblasted. After characterisation, the samples were spray-coated using an amphiphobic coating. The characterisation of the uncoated and coated samples involved measurements of the roughness parameters and the apparent contact angles of demineralized water and rapeseed oil. The coating was initially characterised regarding its adhesion to the sample and elevated temperature stability. The applied surface treatments resulted in the scattered sample roughness in the range of Sa = 0.3-15.8 µm, water contact angles of θ a p , w = 78°-106° and extremely low oil contact angles. Coating the samples more than doubled the surface roughness to Sa = 13.3-29 µm, whereas the initial surface treatment properties (structure, anisotropy, etc.) were entirely repressed by the coating properties. Coating led the water contact angles to increase to θ a p , w _ c o a t e d = 162°-173° and even more pronounced oil contact angles to increase to θ a p , o _ c o a t e d = 139°-150°, classifying the surfaces as superhydrophobic and oleophobic.
ISSN:1996-1944
1996-1944
DOI:10.3390/ma13102240