Loading…

The value and practical utility of intraoperative touch imprint cytology of sentinel lymph node(s) in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective cytology-histology correlation study

OBJECTIVEIntraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) for patients with breast cancer is widely performed with frozen section (FS), cytology, or a combination of both. Touch imprint cytology (TIC) reportedly has an equivalent sensitivity to FS. We studied its diagnostic utility to detect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:CytoJournal 2020-05, Vol.17, p.11-11, Article 11
Main Authors: Uno, Yuji, Akiyama, Naoko, Yuzawa, Sayaka, Kitada, Masahiro, Takei, Hidehiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9af7c341b06c7cf4167249d769bc6646edb02267fb030c314b0aeffd263eec9c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9af7c341b06c7cf4167249d769bc6646edb02267fb030c314b0aeffd263eec9c3
container_end_page 11
container_issue
container_start_page 11
container_title CytoJournal
container_volume 17
creator Uno, Yuji
Akiyama, Naoko
Yuzawa, Sayaka
Kitada, Masahiro
Takei, Hidehiro
description OBJECTIVEIntraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) for patients with breast cancer is widely performed with frozen section (FS), cytology, or a combination of both. Touch imprint cytology (TIC) reportedly has an equivalent sensitivity to FS. We studied its diagnostic utility to detect SLN metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODSCases of 367 patients with breast cancer who underwent intraoperative valuation of SLNs (507 LNs) were evaluated. All FS and corresponding TIC slides of SLNs of each case were reviewed microscopically for the presence of metastases of any size. If present, the metastatic focus was measured on the FS. RESULTSOf these 507 SLNs, 82 LNs (16.2%) from 69 women were found to have metastases in the FS and consisted of 5 LNs of isolated tumor cells, 15 of micrometastasis, and 62 of macrometastasis. TIC identified metastases in 69 of these 82 SLNs (sensitivity: 84.1%, specificity: 100%, and accuracy: 97.4%). All macrometastases could be detected by TIC, whereas TIC identified approximately 50% of micrometastases and none of isolated tumor cells. The size detection limit of metastatic foci, defined as the smallest dimension of metastasis detected without false negatives, was 2 mm. The smallest metastatic focus identified was 0.8 mm. CONCLUSIONSTIC of SLNs is of great use given its negative predictive value of 100% for identification of macrometastasis in our study. For intraoperative evaluation of SLNs, based on our data, a practical two-step approach is proposed: SLN evaluation should be initially performed by TIC and then proceed to FS histological analysis only when cytologically positive to determine the size of metastatic focus.
doi_str_mv 10.25259/Cytojournal_80_2019
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7294180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2414408410</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9af7c341b06c7cf4167249d769bc6646edb02267fb030c314b0aeffd263eec9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1u3CAUhVHVqEmTvkEXLNOFW_4GD11Uikb9kyJlk6wRxtcxEQYX8ER-sr5emWRatVJXIJ1zvgv3IPSWkvdswzbqw24t8SEuKRivt0QzQtULdEZUK5qNkvzlX_dT9DrnB0I4F4q-QqecbUQrOT1DP29HwHvjF8Am9HhOxhZnjcdLcd6VFccBu1CSiTMkU9wecImLHbGb5lQFbOsrfLx_MmYIxQXw2K_TPOIQe7jM72oezzVaxYwfXRlxl8DkGjXBQvqIr3CCkmKewT4N-I1sRpePcBtTAl8hMeBcln69QCeD8RneHM9zdPfl8-3uW3N98_X77uq6sZxvS6PM0FouaEekbe0gqGyZUH0rVWelFBL6jjAm26EjnFhORUcMDEPPJAewyvJz9OmZOy_dBL2Fwy68rn-fTFp1NE7_qwQ36vu41y1Tgm5JBVweASn-WCAXPblswXsTIC5ZM0GFIFtBD1bxbLV1GTnB8GcMrfUeOtf_6Zz_Am82qfU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414408410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The value and practical utility of intraoperative touch imprint cytology of sentinel lymph node(s) in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective cytology-histology correlation study</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Uno, Yuji ; Akiyama, Naoko ; Yuzawa, Sayaka ; Kitada, Masahiro ; Takei, Hidehiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Uno, Yuji ; Akiyama, Naoko ; Yuzawa, Sayaka ; Kitada, Masahiro ; Takei, Hidehiro</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVEIntraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) for patients with breast cancer is widely performed with frozen section (FS), cytology, or a combination of both. Touch imprint cytology (TIC) reportedly has an equivalent sensitivity to FS. We studied its diagnostic utility to detect SLN metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODSCases of 367 patients with breast cancer who underwent intraoperative valuation of SLNs (507 LNs) were evaluated. All FS and corresponding TIC slides of SLNs of each case were reviewed microscopically for the presence of metastases of any size. If present, the metastatic focus was measured on the FS. RESULTSOf these 507 SLNs, 82 LNs (16.2%) from 69 women were found to have metastases in the FS and consisted of 5 LNs of isolated tumor cells, 15 of micrometastasis, and 62 of macrometastasis. TIC identified metastases in 69 of these 82 SLNs (sensitivity: 84.1%, specificity: 100%, and accuracy: 97.4%). All macrometastases could be detected by TIC, whereas TIC identified approximately 50% of micrometastases and none of isolated tumor cells. The size detection limit of metastatic foci, defined as the smallest dimension of metastasis detected without false negatives, was 2 mm. The smallest metastatic focus identified was 0.8 mm. CONCLUSIONSTIC of SLNs is of great use given its negative predictive value of 100% for identification of macrometastasis in our study. For intraoperative evaluation of SLNs, based on our data, a practical two-step approach is proposed: SLN evaluation should be initially performed by TIC and then proceed to FS histological analysis only when cytologically positive to determine the size of metastatic focus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0974-5963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-5963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6413</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25259/Cytojournal_80_2019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32547631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scientific Scholar</publisher><ispartof>CytoJournal, 2020-05, Vol.17, p.11-11, Article 11</ispartof><rights>2020 Cytopathology Foundation Inc, Published by Scientific Scholar</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9af7c341b06c7cf4167249d769bc6646edb02267fb030c314b0aeffd263eec9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9af7c341b06c7cf4167249d769bc6646edb02267fb030c314b0aeffd263eec9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294180/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7294180/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uno, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akiyama, Naoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuzawa, Sayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitada, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takei, Hidehiro</creatorcontrib><title>The value and practical utility of intraoperative touch imprint cytology of sentinel lymph node(s) in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective cytology-histology correlation study</title><title>CytoJournal</title><description>OBJECTIVEIntraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) for patients with breast cancer is widely performed with frozen section (FS), cytology, or a combination of both. Touch imprint cytology (TIC) reportedly has an equivalent sensitivity to FS. We studied its diagnostic utility to detect SLN metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODSCases of 367 patients with breast cancer who underwent intraoperative valuation of SLNs (507 LNs) were evaluated. All FS and corresponding TIC slides of SLNs of each case were reviewed microscopically for the presence of metastases of any size. If present, the metastatic focus was measured on the FS. RESULTSOf these 507 SLNs, 82 LNs (16.2%) from 69 women were found to have metastases in the FS and consisted of 5 LNs of isolated tumor cells, 15 of micrometastasis, and 62 of macrometastasis. TIC identified metastases in 69 of these 82 SLNs (sensitivity: 84.1%, specificity: 100%, and accuracy: 97.4%). All macrometastases could be detected by TIC, whereas TIC identified approximately 50% of micrometastases and none of isolated tumor cells. The size detection limit of metastatic foci, defined as the smallest dimension of metastasis detected without false negatives, was 2 mm. The smallest metastatic focus identified was 0.8 mm. CONCLUSIONSTIC of SLNs is of great use given its negative predictive value of 100% for identification of macrometastasis in our study. For intraoperative evaluation of SLNs, based on our data, a practical two-step approach is proposed: SLN evaluation should be initially performed by TIC and then proceed to FS histological analysis only when cytologically positive to determine the size of metastatic focus.</description><issn>0974-5963</issn><issn>0974-5963</issn><issn>1742-6413</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkc1u3CAUhVHVqEmTvkEXLNOFW_4GD11Uikb9kyJlk6wRxtcxEQYX8ER-sr5emWRatVJXIJ1zvgv3IPSWkvdswzbqw24t8SEuKRivt0QzQtULdEZUK5qNkvzlX_dT9DrnB0I4F4q-QqecbUQrOT1DP29HwHvjF8Am9HhOxhZnjcdLcd6VFccBu1CSiTMkU9wecImLHbGb5lQFbOsrfLx_MmYIxQXw2K_TPOIQe7jM72oezzVaxYwfXRlxl8DkGjXBQvqIr3CCkmKewT4N-I1sRpePcBtTAl8hMeBcln69QCeD8RneHM9zdPfl8-3uW3N98_X77uq6sZxvS6PM0FouaEekbe0gqGyZUH0rVWelFBL6jjAm26EjnFhORUcMDEPPJAewyvJz9OmZOy_dBL2Fwy68rn-fTFp1NE7_qwQ36vu41y1Tgm5JBVweASn-WCAXPblswXsTIC5ZM0GFIFtBD1bxbLV1GTnB8GcMrfUeOtf_6Zz_Am82qfU</recordid><startdate>20200512</startdate><enddate>20200512</enddate><creator>Uno, Yuji</creator><creator>Akiyama, Naoko</creator><creator>Yuzawa, Sayaka</creator><creator>Kitada, Masahiro</creator><creator>Takei, Hidehiro</creator><general>Scientific Scholar</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200512</creationdate><title>The value and practical utility of intraoperative touch imprint cytology of sentinel lymph node(s) in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective cytology-histology correlation study</title><author>Uno, Yuji ; Akiyama, Naoko ; Yuzawa, Sayaka ; Kitada, Masahiro ; Takei, Hidehiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9af7c341b06c7cf4167249d769bc6646edb02267fb030c314b0aeffd263eec9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uno, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akiyama, Naoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuzawa, Sayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitada, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takei, Hidehiro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>CytoJournal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uno, Yuji</au><au>Akiyama, Naoko</au><au>Yuzawa, Sayaka</au><au>Kitada, Masahiro</au><au>Takei, Hidehiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The value and practical utility of intraoperative touch imprint cytology of sentinel lymph node(s) in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective cytology-histology correlation study</atitle><jtitle>CytoJournal</jtitle><date>2020-05-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>17</volume><spage>11</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>11-11</pages><artnum>11</artnum><issn>0974-5963</issn><eissn>0974-5963</eissn><eissn>1742-6413</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVEIntraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) for patients with breast cancer is widely performed with frozen section (FS), cytology, or a combination of both. Touch imprint cytology (TIC) reportedly has an equivalent sensitivity to FS. We studied its diagnostic utility to detect SLN metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODSCases of 367 patients with breast cancer who underwent intraoperative valuation of SLNs (507 LNs) were evaluated. All FS and corresponding TIC slides of SLNs of each case were reviewed microscopically for the presence of metastases of any size. If present, the metastatic focus was measured on the FS. RESULTSOf these 507 SLNs, 82 LNs (16.2%) from 69 women were found to have metastases in the FS and consisted of 5 LNs of isolated tumor cells, 15 of micrometastasis, and 62 of macrometastasis. TIC identified metastases in 69 of these 82 SLNs (sensitivity: 84.1%, specificity: 100%, and accuracy: 97.4%). All macrometastases could be detected by TIC, whereas TIC identified approximately 50% of micrometastases and none of isolated tumor cells. The size detection limit of metastatic foci, defined as the smallest dimension of metastasis detected without false negatives, was 2 mm. The smallest metastatic focus identified was 0.8 mm. CONCLUSIONSTIC of SLNs is of great use given its negative predictive value of 100% for identification of macrometastasis in our study. For intraoperative evaluation of SLNs, based on our data, a practical two-step approach is proposed: SLN evaluation should be initially performed by TIC and then proceed to FS histological analysis only when cytologically positive to determine the size of metastatic focus.</abstract><pub>Scientific Scholar</pub><pmid>32547631</pmid><doi>10.25259/Cytojournal_80_2019</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0974-5963
ispartof CytoJournal, 2020-05, Vol.17, p.11-11, Article 11
issn 0974-5963
0974-5963
1742-6413
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7294180
source PubMed Central
title The value and practical utility of intraoperative touch imprint cytology of sentinel lymph node(s) in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective cytology-histology correlation study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A22%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20value%20and%20practical%20utility%20of%20intraoperative%20touch%20imprint%20cytology%20of%20sentinel%20lymph%20node(s)%20in%20patients%20with%20breast%20cancer:%20A%20retrospective%20cytology-histology%20correlation%20study&rft.jtitle=CytoJournal&rft.au=Uno,%20Yuji&rft.date=2020-05-12&rft.volume=17&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=11-11&rft.artnum=11&rft.issn=0974-5963&rft.eissn=0974-5963&rft_id=info:doi/10.25259/Cytojournal_80_2019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2414408410%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-9af7c341b06c7cf4167249d769bc6646edb02267fb030c314b0aeffd263eec9c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414408410&rft_id=info:pmid/32547631&rfr_iscdi=true