Implementation and Evaluation of a Dual-Track Research Training Program for Community Members and Community-Based Organizations

• Published in: Progress in community health partnerships 2020-01, Vol.14 (1), p.75-87
• Main Authors: Cunningham-Erves, Jennifer, Joosten, Yvonne, Hollingsworth, Charrise P, Cockroft, Joshua D, Murry, Velma M, Lipham, Lexie, Luther, Patrick, Vaughn, Yolanda, Miller, Stephania T
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Codes; Collaboration; Community; Community involvement; Community Participation; Community-Based Participatory Research - organization & administration; Community-Institutional Relations; Curricula; Feedback; Funding; Humans; Likert scale; Participation; Participatory research; Program Development; Program Evaluation; Public health; Registration; Research methodology; Researchers; Sociology - education; Training; Universities - organization & administration
• ISSN: 1557-0541; 1557-055X; 1557-055X
• DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0010

It is a public health priority to increase community research participation to improve health outcomes and eliminate health disparities. There is a need for effective research training programs that build community stakeholders' capacity to engage as equitable partners. To describe the collaborative process of implementing and evaluating a dual-track community research training program-Meharry Vanderbilt Community Engaged Research Core-Community Research Training Program (MVC-CRT) Program-and present participant evaluations. The MVC-CRT is a six-session community-based organization (CBO) curriculum and a three-session community member (CM) curriculum, based on needs identified by various community stakeholders, that was piloted in 2016. Immediately post-training, an outcome evaluation (surveys) was used to measure trainees' confidence relative to 30 learning objectives for the combined training sessions (e.g., Introduction to research), satisfaction in preparing them for research roles, and impact on research activities (e.g., building sustainable partnerships). 2 and 3 months after training, a process evaluation (focus groups) was used to assess each session's flow, materials, group discussions, and facilitators. Trainees' immediate post-training confidence increased or remained the same across 26 of 30 learning objectives. Two to 3 months after training, trainees reported sustained confidence, perceived increased knowledge, and increased intentions to engage in or improve research activities. All participants were satisfied with the program and felt better prepared for research roles. Tailored community research training may result in positive outcomes that can ultimately increase community capacity to be equitable partners in research in support of efforts to improve health outcomes and eliminate health disparities.