Facing the option for the legalisation of cannabis use and supply in New Zealand: An overview of relevant evidence, concepts and considerations

• Published in: Drug and alcohol review 2020-07, Vol.39 (5), p.555-567
• Main Authors: Fischer, Benedikt, Daldegan‐Bueno, Dimitri, Boden, Joseph M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adults; Ambivalence; Cannabis; Coherence; Commercialization; Comprehensive Review; Criminal justice; Criminal justice policy; Criminalization; Decriminalization; Enforcement; Health Policy - legislation & jurisprudence; Health Policy - trends; Health status; Humans; legalisation; Legalization; Legislation, Drug - trends; Marijuana; Marijuana Use - legislation & jurisprudence; Marijuana Use - trends; Markets; Medical Marijuana - therapeutic use; New Zealand; New Zealand - epidemiology; policy; Policy making; Public health; Public Health - legislation & jurisprudence; Public Health - trends; Referendums; Reforms; Regulation; Social justice; Social reform; User training; Youth
• ISSN: 0959-5236; 1465-3362
• DOI: 10.1111/dar.13087

Issues Non‐medical cannabis policies are changing, including towards legalisation‐with‐regulation frameworks. New Zealand will hold a public referendum on cannabis legalisation in 2020. We reviewed data on cannabis use and health/social harms; policy reform options; experiences with and outcomes of reforms elsewhere; and other relevant considerations towards informing policy choices in the upcoming referendum. Approach Relevant epidemiological, health, social, criminal justice and policy studies and data were identified and comprehensively reviewed. Key Findings Cannabis use is common (including in New Zealand) and associated with risks for health and social harms, mainly concentrated in young users; key harms are attributable to criminalisation. ‘Decriminalisation’ reforms have produced ambivalent results. Existing cannabis legalisation frameworks vary considerably in main parameters. Legalisation offers some distinct advantages, for example regulated use, products and user education, yet outcomes depend on essential regulation parameters, including commercialisation, and policy ecologies. While major changes in use are not observed, legalisation experiences are inconclusive to date, including mixed health and social outcomes, with select harms increasing and resilient illegal markets. It is unclear whether legalisation reduces cannabis exposure or social harms (e.g. from enforcement) for youth. Implications/Conclusions No conclusive overall evidence on the outcomes of legalisation elsewhere exists, nor is evidence easily transferable to other settings. Legalisation offers direct social justice benefits for adults, yet overall public health impacts are uncertain. Legalisation may not categorically improve health or social outcomes for youth. Legalisation remains a well‐intended, while experimental policy option towards more measured and sensible cannabis control and overall greater policy coherence, requiring close monitoring and possible adjustments depending on setting‐specific outcomes.