Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone versus robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction: a matched analysis

Robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction is a recently developed minimally invasive surgery used in the treatment of patients with rectal cancer. However, its safety and feasibility remain undiscussed and controversial. This study reported the clinical outcomes and prognostic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2020-07, Vol.10 (1), p.12848-12848, Article 12848
Main Authors: Liu, Dongning, Luo, Rui, Wan, Zhikai, Zhu, Weiquan, He, Penghui, Ye, Shanping, Tang, Cheng, Lei, Xiong, Li, Taiyuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
631/67/1059
631/67/1504/1885/1777
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Cancer
Clinical outcomes
Colorectal cancer
Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods
Female
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - methods
Male
Medical prognosis
Middle Aged
Minimally invasive surgery
multidisciplinary
Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery - methods
Nose
Patients
Prognosis
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Rectum
Robotic surgery
Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
Robotics
Safety
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Surgery
Survival
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction is a recently developed minimally invasive surgery used in the treatment of patients with rectal cancer. However, its safety and feasibility remain undiscussed and controversial. This study reported the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors pertaining to traditional robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone against that of robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction to provide a discussion on this issue. 49 patients who underwent robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction and 49 matched patients who underwent conventional robotic assisted rectal cancer resection were systematically analyzed in this study. Regarding the baseline characteristics, after matching, no significant differences were observed between the natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) group and the robotic assisted rectal cancer resection (RARC) group. Patients in the NOSE group had a reduced visual analog scale ( p  
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-69830-1