Loading…

Best period to replace or change plastic stents with self-expandable metallic stents using multivariate competing risk regression analysis

In endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) for various benign and malignant biliary disorders, the appropriate timing to replace or change a plastic stent (PS) with a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) remains unclear. This study aimed to define the best period to replace or change a PS with a SEMS. Be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2020-08, Vol.10 (1), p.13080-13080, Article 13080
Main Authors: Chiba, Masafumi, Kato, Masayuki, Kinoshita, Yuji, Shimamoto, Nana, Tomita, Youichi, Abe, Takahiro, Kawahara, Yosuke, Koyama, Seita, Kanazawa, Keisuke, Takakura, Kazuki, Tsukinaga, Shintaro, Nakano, Masanori, Torisu, Yuichi, Toyoizumi, Hirobumi, Ikeda, Keiichi, Arakawa, Hiroshi, Sumiyama, Kazuki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) for various benign and malignant biliary disorders, the appropriate timing to replace or change a plastic stent (PS) with a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) remains unclear. This study aimed to define the best period to replace or change a PS with a SEMS. Between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, 1,887 consecutive EBD procedures, including 170 SEMS placements, were retrospectively identified. The period to recurrent biliary obstruction (PRBO) was estimated and compared between the malignant and benign groups and according to each disease using time to event analysis and competing risk analysis. Compared with the benign group, the malignant group had significantly shorter median PRBO with interquartile range (IQR) after PS placement [108 (39 – 270) vs. 613 (191 – 1,329) days, P 
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-70081-3