Loading…

Multi-trait Genomic Selection Methods for Crop Improvement

Abstract Plant breeders make selection decisions based on multiple traits, such as yield, plant height, flowering time, and disease resistance. A commonly used approach in multi-trait genomic selection is index selection, which assigns weights to different traits relative to their economic importanc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Genetics (Austin) 2020-08, Vol.215 (4), p.931-945
Main Authors: Moeinizade, Saba, Kusmec, Aaron, Hu, Guiping, Wang, Lizhi, Schnable, Patrick S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-58e22b5d04ba11cbd4b29cc394a25b539cbb365878870b66aa0d20c28344a6e93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-58e22b5d04ba11cbd4b29cc394a25b539cbb365878870b66aa0d20c28344a6e93
container_end_page 945
container_issue 4
container_start_page 931
container_title Genetics (Austin)
container_volume 215
creator Moeinizade, Saba
Kusmec, Aaron
Hu, Guiping
Wang, Lizhi
Schnable, Patrick S
description Abstract Plant breeders make selection decisions based on multiple traits, such as yield, plant height, flowering time, and disease resistance. A commonly used approach in multi-trait genomic selection is index selection, which assigns weights to different traits relative to their economic importance. However, classical index selection only optimizes genetic gain in the next generation, requires some experimentation to find weights that lead to desired outcomes, and has difficulty optimizing nonlinear breeding objectives. Multi-objective optimization has also been used to identify the Pareto frontier of selection decisions, which represents different trade-offs across multiple traits. We propose a new approach, which maximizes certain traits while keeping others within desirable ranges. Optimal selection decisions are made using a new version of the look-ahead selection (LAS) algorithm, which was recently proposed for single-trait genomic selection, and achieved superior performance with respect to other state-of-the-art selection methods. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the new method, a case study is developed using a realistic data set where our method is compared with conventional index selection. Results suggest that the multi-trait LAS is more effective at balancing multiple traits compared with index selection.
doi_str_mv 10.1534/genetics.120.303305
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7404246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1534/genetics.120.303305</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2435548184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-58e22b5d04ba11cbd4b29cc394a25b539cbb365878870b66aa0d20c28344a6e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1KAzEURoMotlafQJABN26m5neacSFI0SooLtR1SDJpmzIzGZNMwbc3Ui3VlasEcu6Xe-8B4BTBMWKEXi5Ma6LVYYwwHBNICGR7YIhKSnJcELS_cx-AoxBWEMKiZPwQDAimHBcUDsHVU19Hm0cvbcxmpnWN1dmLqY2O1rXZk4lLV4Vs7nw29a7LHprOu7VpTBuPwcFc1sGcfJ8j8HZ3-zq9zx-fZw_Tm8dc0wmOOeMGY8UqSJVESKuKKlxqTUoqMVOMlFopUjA-4XwCVVFICSsMNeaEUlmYkozA9Sa361VjKp2-9rIWnbeN9B_CSSt-v7R2KRZuLSYUUkyLFHDxHeDde29CFI0N2tS1bI3rg8AUco4JTyscgfM_6Mr1vk3jJYowRjniNFFkQ2nvQvBmvm0GQfHlRvy4EcmN2LhJVWe7c2xrfmQkYLwBXN_9K_ETUn6bAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435548184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-trait Genomic Selection Methods for Crop Improvement</title><source>Freely Accessible Science Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Moeinizade, Saba ; Kusmec, Aaron ; Hu, Guiping ; Wang, Lizhi ; Schnable, Patrick S</creator><creatorcontrib>Moeinizade, Saba ; Kusmec, Aaron ; Hu, Guiping ; Wang, Lizhi ; Schnable, Patrick S</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Plant breeders make selection decisions based on multiple traits, such as yield, plant height, flowering time, and disease resistance. A commonly used approach in multi-trait genomic selection is index selection, which assigns weights to different traits relative to their economic importance. However, classical index selection only optimizes genetic gain in the next generation, requires some experimentation to find weights that lead to desired outcomes, and has difficulty optimizing nonlinear breeding objectives. Multi-objective optimization has also been used to identify the Pareto frontier of selection decisions, which represents different trade-offs across multiple traits. We propose a new approach, which maximizes certain traits while keeping others within desirable ranges. Optimal selection decisions are made using a new version of the look-ahead selection (LAS) algorithm, which was recently proposed for single-trait genomic selection, and achieved superior performance with respect to other state-of-the-art selection methods. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the new method, a case study is developed using a realistic data set where our method is compared with conventional index selection. Results suggest that the multi-trait LAS is more effective at balancing multiple traits compared with index selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-2631</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0016-6731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-2631</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303305</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32482640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Algorithms ; Corn ; Crop improvement ; Datasets ; Decisions ; Disease resistance ; Economic importance ; Experimentation ; Flowering ; Genetics ; Investigations ; Methods ; Multiple objective analysis ; Objectives ; Optimization ; Pareto optimization ; Plant breeding ; Population ; Simulation</subject><ispartof>Genetics (Austin), 2020-08, Vol.215 (4), p.931-945</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 by the Genetics Society of America 2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 by the Genetics Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Genetics Society of America Aug 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-58e22b5d04ba11cbd4b29cc394a25b539cbb365878870b66aa0d20c28344a6e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-58e22b5d04ba11cbd4b29cc394a25b539cbb365878870b66aa0d20c28344a6e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7402-3385 ; 0000-0001-8392-8442 ; 0000-0001-9169-5204 ; 0000-0002-5527-4047 ; 0000-0003-2295-385X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32482640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moeinizade, Saba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusmec, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Guiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lizhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnable, Patrick S</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-trait Genomic Selection Methods for Crop Improvement</title><title>Genetics (Austin)</title><addtitle>Genetics</addtitle><description>Abstract Plant breeders make selection decisions based on multiple traits, such as yield, plant height, flowering time, and disease resistance. A commonly used approach in multi-trait genomic selection is index selection, which assigns weights to different traits relative to their economic importance. However, classical index selection only optimizes genetic gain in the next generation, requires some experimentation to find weights that lead to desired outcomes, and has difficulty optimizing nonlinear breeding objectives. Multi-objective optimization has also been used to identify the Pareto frontier of selection decisions, which represents different trade-offs across multiple traits. We propose a new approach, which maximizes certain traits while keeping others within desirable ranges. Optimal selection decisions are made using a new version of the look-ahead selection (LAS) algorithm, which was recently proposed for single-trait genomic selection, and achieved superior performance with respect to other state-of-the-art selection methods. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the new method, a case study is developed using a realistic data set where our method is compared with conventional index selection. Results suggest that the multi-trait LAS is more effective at balancing multiple traits compared with index selection.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop improvement</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Disease resistance</subject><subject>Economic importance</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pareto optimization</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><issn>1943-2631</issn><issn>0016-6731</issn><issn>1943-2631</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1KAzEURoMotlafQJABN26m5neacSFI0SooLtR1SDJpmzIzGZNMwbc3Ui3VlasEcu6Xe-8B4BTBMWKEXi5Ma6LVYYwwHBNICGR7YIhKSnJcELS_cx-AoxBWEMKiZPwQDAimHBcUDsHVU19Hm0cvbcxmpnWN1dmLqY2O1rXZk4lLV4Vs7nw29a7LHprOu7VpTBuPwcFc1sGcfJ8j8HZ3-zq9zx-fZw_Tm8dc0wmOOeMGY8UqSJVESKuKKlxqTUoqMVOMlFopUjA-4XwCVVFICSsMNeaEUlmYkozA9Sa361VjKp2-9rIWnbeN9B_CSSt-v7R2KRZuLSYUUkyLFHDxHeDde29CFI0N2tS1bI3rg8AUco4JTyscgfM_6Mr1vk3jJYowRjniNFFkQ2nvQvBmvm0GQfHlRvy4EcmN2LhJVWe7c2xrfmQkYLwBXN_9K_ETUn6bAQ</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Moeinizade, Saba</creator><creator>Kusmec, Aaron</creator><creator>Hu, Guiping</creator><creator>Wang, Lizhi</creator><creator>Schnable, Patrick S</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Genetics Society of America</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7402-3385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8392-8442</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9169-5204</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5527-4047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-385X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Multi-trait Genomic Selection Methods for Crop Improvement</title><author>Moeinizade, Saba ; Kusmec, Aaron ; Hu, Guiping ; Wang, Lizhi ; Schnable, Patrick S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-58e22b5d04ba11cbd4b29cc394a25b539cbb365878870b66aa0d20c28344a6e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop improvement</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Disease resistance</topic><topic>Economic importance</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pareto optimization</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moeinizade, Saba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusmec, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Guiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lizhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnable, Patrick S</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Family Health</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Genetics (Austin)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moeinizade, Saba</au><au>Kusmec, Aaron</au><au>Hu, Guiping</au><au>Wang, Lizhi</au><au>Schnable, Patrick S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-trait Genomic Selection Methods for Crop Improvement</atitle><jtitle>Genetics (Austin)</jtitle><addtitle>Genetics</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>215</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>931</spage><epage>945</epage><pages>931-945</pages><issn>1943-2631</issn><issn>0016-6731</issn><eissn>1943-2631</eissn><abstract>Abstract Plant breeders make selection decisions based on multiple traits, such as yield, plant height, flowering time, and disease resistance. A commonly used approach in multi-trait genomic selection is index selection, which assigns weights to different traits relative to their economic importance. However, classical index selection only optimizes genetic gain in the next generation, requires some experimentation to find weights that lead to desired outcomes, and has difficulty optimizing nonlinear breeding objectives. Multi-objective optimization has also been used to identify the Pareto frontier of selection decisions, which represents different trade-offs across multiple traits. We propose a new approach, which maximizes certain traits while keeping others within desirable ranges. Optimal selection decisions are made using a new version of the look-ahead selection (LAS) algorithm, which was recently proposed for single-trait genomic selection, and achieved superior performance with respect to other state-of-the-art selection methods. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the new method, a case study is developed using a realistic data set where our method is compared with conventional index selection. Results suggest that the multi-trait LAS is more effective at balancing multiple traits compared with index selection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32482640</pmid><doi>10.1534/genetics.120.303305</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7402-3385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8392-8442</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9169-5204</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5527-4047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-385X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1943-2631
ispartof Genetics (Austin), 2020-08, Vol.215 (4), p.931-945
issn 1943-2631
0016-6731
1943-2631
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7404246
source Freely Accessible Science Journals; Oxford Journals Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agricultural production
Algorithms
Corn
Crop improvement
Datasets
Decisions
Disease resistance
Economic importance
Experimentation
Flowering
Genetics
Investigations
Methods
Multiple objective analysis
Objectives
Optimization
Pareto optimization
Plant breeding
Population
Simulation
title Multi-trait Genomic Selection Methods for Crop Improvement
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A00%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-trait%20Genomic%20Selection%20Methods%20for%20Crop%20Improvement&rft.jtitle=Genetics%20(Austin)&rft.au=Moeinizade,%20Saba&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=215&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=931&rft.epage=945&rft.pages=931-945&rft.issn=1943-2631&rft.eissn=1943-2631&rft_id=info:doi/10.1534/genetics.120.303305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2435548184%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-58e22b5d04ba11cbd4b29cc394a25b539cbb365878870b66aa0d20c28344a6e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435548184&rft_id=info:pmid/32482640&rft_oup_id=10.1534/genetics.120.303305&rfr_iscdi=true