Loading…

Comparative in silico design and validation of GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test

Aims Providing a ready‐to‐use reverse transcriptase qPCR (RT‐qPCR) method fully validated to detect the SARS‐CoV‐2 with a higher exclusivity than this shown by early published RT‐qPCR designs. Methods and Results The specificity of the GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test by analysis of sequence alignmen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied microbiology 2021-01, Vol.130 (1), p.2-13
Main Authors: Martínez‐Murcia, A., Bru, G., Navarro, A., Ros‐Tárraga, P., García‐Sirera, A., Pérez, L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2
container_title Journal of applied microbiology
container_volume 130
creator Martínez‐Murcia, A.
Bru, G.
Navarro, A.
Ros‐Tárraga, P.
García‐Sirera, A.
Pérez, L.
description Aims Providing a ready‐to‐use reverse transcriptase qPCR (RT‐qPCR) method fully validated to detect the SARS‐CoV‐2 with a higher exclusivity than this shown by early published RT‐qPCR designs. Methods and Results The specificity of the GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test by analysis of sequence alignments was approached and compared with other RT‐qPCR designs. The GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test was validated following criteria of UNE/EN ISO 17025:2005 and ISO/IEC 15189:2012. Diagnostic validation was achieved by two independent reference laboratories, the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, (Madrid, Spain), the Public Health England (Colindale, London, UK), and received the label CE‐IVD. The GPS design showed the highest exclusivity and passed all parameters of validation with strict acceptance criteria. Results from reference laboratories 100% correlated with these obtained by using reference methods and showed 100% of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions The CE‐IVD GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test, available worldwide with full analytical and diagnostic validation, is the more exclusive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by far. Significance and Impact of the Study Considering the CoVID‐19 pandemic status, the exclusivity of RT‐qPCR tests is crucial to avoid false positives due to related coronaviruses. This work provides of a highly specific and validated RT‐qPCR method for detection of SARS‐CoV‐2, which represents a case of efficient transfer of technology successfully used since the pandemic was declared.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jam.14781
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7405274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2423069743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctO3DAUhi1EBRRY8AKVJTZ0EfAtcbJBGoVLqaiKKLC1zvgCHiXxEGcGseuiD8Az8Gg8SV0GUItUL-wjnU-ffutHaIuSXZrO3gTaXSpkSZfQGuVFnrFCsuXnWWQ5kWwVfYxxQgjlJC9W0CpnRc5KytfQVR3aKfQw-LnFvsPRN14HbGz01x2GzuA5NN6kfehwcPj47MfTr0dch6uTg6efD7TCZrA6TecX6bo9q8_xYOOwgT44aKLdfHnX0eXR4UX9JTv9fnxSj04zzfOSZs4ZAYa4Ymx4zismpAMOFakYsBIKayo2HguneVFKZkHSnArNSVWVTmpnga-j_YV3Ohu31mjbDT00atr7Fvp7FcCrfzedv1HXYa6kIDmTIgl2XgR9uJ2l5Kr1Udumgc6GWVRMME6KKpEJ3X6HTsKs79L3EiUFo4KVJFGfF5TuQ4y9dW9hKFF_2lKpLfXcVmI__Z3-jXytJwF7C-DON_b-_yb1dfRtofwNvs6hPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474214280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative in silico design and validation of GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Martínez‐Murcia, A. ; Bru, G. ; Navarro, A. ; Ros‐Tárraga, P. ; García‐Sirera, A. ; Pérez, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Murcia, A. ; Bru, G. ; Navarro, A. ; Ros‐Tárraga, P. ; García‐Sirera, A. ; Pérez, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Aims Providing a ready‐to‐use reverse transcriptase qPCR (RT‐qPCR) method fully validated to detect the SARS‐CoV‐2 with a higher exclusivity than this shown by early published RT‐qPCR designs. Methods and Results The specificity of the GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test by analysis of sequence alignments was approached and compared with other RT‐qPCR designs. The GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test was validated following criteria of UNE/EN ISO 17025:2005 and ISO/IEC 15189:2012. Diagnostic validation was achieved by two independent reference laboratories, the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, (Madrid, Spain), the Public Health England (Colindale, London, UK), and received the label CE‐IVD. The GPS design showed the highest exclusivity and passed all parameters of validation with strict acceptance criteria. Results from reference laboratories 100% correlated with these obtained by using reference methods and showed 100% of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions The CE‐IVD GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test, available worldwide with full analytical and diagnostic validation, is the more exclusive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by far. Significance and Impact of the Study Considering the CoVID‐19 pandemic status, the exclusivity of RT‐qPCR tests is crucial to avoid false positives due to related coronaviruses. This work provides of a highly specific and validated RT‐qPCR method for detection of SARS‐CoV‐2, which represents a case of efficient transfer of technology successfully used since the pandemic was declared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-5072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2672</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jam.14781</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32652813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acceptance criteria ; Computer Simulation ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods ; COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - standards ; diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Editor's Choice ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Original ; Pandemics ; polymerase chain reaction ; Public health ; quality control ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Reproducibility of Results ; RNA-directed DNA polymerase ; SARS-CoV-2 - classification ; SARS-CoV-2 - genetics ; SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification ; SARS‐CoV‐2 ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sequence Alignment ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Technology transfer</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied microbiology, 2021-01, Vol.130 (1), p.2-13</ispartof><rights>2020 The Society for Applied Microbiology</rights><rights>2020 The Society for Applied Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Society for Applied Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1550-9590</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32652813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Murcia, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bru, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ros‐Tárraga, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Sirera, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative in silico design and validation of GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test</title><title>Journal of applied microbiology</title><addtitle>J Appl Microbiol</addtitle><description>Aims Providing a ready‐to‐use reverse transcriptase qPCR (RT‐qPCR) method fully validated to detect the SARS‐CoV‐2 with a higher exclusivity than this shown by early published RT‐qPCR designs. Methods and Results The specificity of the GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test by analysis of sequence alignments was approached and compared with other RT‐qPCR designs. The GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test was validated following criteria of UNE/EN ISO 17025:2005 and ISO/IEC 15189:2012. Diagnostic validation was achieved by two independent reference laboratories, the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, (Madrid, Spain), the Public Health England (Colindale, London, UK), and received the label CE‐IVD. The GPS design showed the highest exclusivity and passed all parameters of validation with strict acceptance criteria. Results from reference laboratories 100% correlated with these obtained by using reference methods and showed 100% of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions The CE‐IVD GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test, available worldwide with full analytical and diagnostic validation, is the more exclusive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by far. Significance and Impact of the Study Considering the CoVID‐19 pandemic status, the exclusivity of RT‐qPCR tests is crucial to avoid false positives due to related coronaviruses. This work provides of a highly specific and validated RT‐qPCR method for detection of SARS‐CoV‐2, which represents a case of efficient transfer of technology successfully used since the pandemic was declared.</description><subject>Acceptance criteria</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods</subject><subject>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - standards</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Editor's Choice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>quality control</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>RNA-directed DNA polymerase</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - classification</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - genetics</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>SARS‐CoV‐2</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sequence Alignment</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Technology transfer</subject><issn>1364-5072</issn><issn>1365-2672</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctO3DAUhi1EBRRY8AKVJTZ0EfAtcbJBGoVLqaiKKLC1zvgCHiXxEGcGseuiD8Az8Gg8SV0GUItUL-wjnU-ffutHaIuSXZrO3gTaXSpkSZfQGuVFnrFCsuXnWWQ5kWwVfYxxQgjlJC9W0CpnRc5KytfQVR3aKfQw-LnFvsPRN14HbGz01x2GzuA5NN6kfehwcPj47MfTr0dch6uTg6efD7TCZrA6TecX6bo9q8_xYOOwgT44aKLdfHnX0eXR4UX9JTv9fnxSj04zzfOSZs4ZAYa4Ymx4zismpAMOFakYsBIKayo2HguneVFKZkHSnArNSVWVTmpnga-j_YV3Ohu31mjbDT00atr7Fvp7FcCrfzedv1HXYa6kIDmTIgl2XgR9uJ2l5Kr1Udumgc6GWVRMME6KKpEJ3X6HTsKs79L3EiUFo4KVJFGfF5TuQ4y9dW9hKFF_2lKpLfXcVmI__Z3-jXytJwF7C-DON_b-_yb1dfRtofwNvs6hPQ</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Martínez‐Murcia, A.</creator><creator>Bru, G.</creator><creator>Navarro, A.</creator><creator>Ros‐Tárraga, P.</creator><creator>García‐Sirera, A.</creator><creator>Pérez, L.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1550-9590</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Comparative in silico design and validation of GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test</title><author>Martínez‐Murcia, A. ; Bru, G. ; Navarro, A. ; Ros‐Tárraga, P. ; García‐Sirera, A. ; Pérez, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acceptance criteria</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods</topic><topic>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - standards</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Editor's Choice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>quality control</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>RNA-directed DNA polymerase</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - classification</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - genetics</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>SARS‐CoV‐2</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sequence Alignment</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Technology transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Murcia, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bru, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ros‐Tárraga, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Sirera, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martínez‐Murcia, A.</au><au>Bru, G.</au><au>Navarro, A.</au><au>Ros‐Tárraga, P.</au><au>García‐Sirera, A.</au><au>Pérez, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative in silico design and validation of GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Microbiol</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>2-13</pages><issn>1364-5072</issn><eissn>1365-2672</eissn><abstract>Aims Providing a ready‐to‐use reverse transcriptase qPCR (RT‐qPCR) method fully validated to detect the SARS‐CoV‐2 with a higher exclusivity than this shown by early published RT‐qPCR designs. Methods and Results The specificity of the GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test by analysis of sequence alignments was approached and compared with other RT‐qPCR designs. The GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test was validated following criteria of UNE/EN ISO 17025:2005 and ISO/IEC 15189:2012. Diagnostic validation was achieved by two independent reference laboratories, the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, (Madrid, Spain), the Public Health England (Colindale, London, UK), and received the label CE‐IVD. The GPS design showed the highest exclusivity and passed all parameters of validation with strict acceptance criteria. Results from reference laboratories 100% correlated with these obtained by using reference methods and showed 100% of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions The CE‐IVD GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test, available worldwide with full analytical and diagnostic validation, is the more exclusive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by far. Significance and Impact of the Study Considering the CoVID‐19 pandemic status, the exclusivity of RT‐qPCR tests is crucial to avoid false positives due to related coronaviruses. This work provides of a highly specific and validated RT‐qPCR method for detection of SARS‐CoV‐2, which represents a case of efficient transfer of technology successfully used since the pandemic was declared.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32652813</pmid><doi>10.1111/jam.14781</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1550-9590</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-5072
ispartof Journal of applied microbiology, 2021-01, Vol.130 (1), p.2-13
issn 1364-5072
1365-2672
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7405274
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acceptance criteria
Computer Simulation
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
COVID-19 - diagnosis
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - standards
diagnosis
Diagnostic systems
Editor's Choice
Humans
Laboratories
Original
Pandemics
polymerase chain reaction
Public health
quality control
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Reproducibility of Results
RNA-directed DNA polymerase
SARS-CoV-2 - classification
SARS-CoV-2 - genetics
SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification
SARS‐CoV‐2
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sequence Alignment
Severe acute respiratory syndrome
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Technology transfer
title Comparative in silico design and validation of GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A25%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20in%20silico%20design%20and%20validation%20of%20GPS%E2%84%A2%20CoVID%E2%80%9019%20dtec%E2%80%90RT%E2%80%90qPCR%20test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20microbiology&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADnez%E2%80%90Murcia,%20A.&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=2-13&rft.issn=1364-5072&rft.eissn=1365-2672&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jam.14781&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2423069743%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474214280&rft_id=info:pmid/32652813&rfr_iscdi=true