Loading…
Comparative in silico design and validation of GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test
Aims Providing a ready‐to‐use reverse transcriptase qPCR (RT‐qPCR) method fully validated to detect the SARS‐CoV‐2 with a higher exclusivity than this shown by early published RT‐qPCR designs. Methods and Results The specificity of the GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test by analysis of sequence alignmen...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of applied microbiology 2021-01, Vol.130 (1), p.2-13 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3 |
container_end_page | 13 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 2 |
container_title | Journal of applied microbiology |
container_volume | 130 |
creator | Martínez‐Murcia, A. Bru, G. Navarro, A. Ros‐Tárraga, P. García‐Sirera, A. Pérez, L. |
description | Aims
Providing a ready‐to‐use reverse transcriptase qPCR (RT‐qPCR) method fully validated to detect the SARS‐CoV‐2 with a higher exclusivity than this shown by early published RT‐qPCR designs.
Methods and Results
The specificity of the GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test by analysis of sequence alignments was approached and compared with other RT‐qPCR designs. The GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test was validated following criteria of UNE/EN ISO 17025:2005 and ISO/IEC 15189:2012. Diagnostic validation was achieved by two independent reference laboratories, the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, (Madrid, Spain), the Public Health England (Colindale, London, UK), and received the label CE‐IVD. The GPS design showed the highest exclusivity and passed all parameters of validation with strict acceptance criteria. Results from reference laboratories 100% correlated with these obtained by using reference methods and showed 100% of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusions
The CE‐IVD GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test, available worldwide with full analytical and diagnostic validation, is the more exclusive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by far.
Significance and Impact of the Study
Considering the CoVID‐19 pandemic status, the exclusivity of RT‐qPCR tests is crucial to avoid false positives due to related coronaviruses. This work provides of a highly specific and validated RT‐qPCR method for detection of SARS‐CoV‐2, which represents a case of efficient transfer of technology successfully used since the pandemic was declared. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jam.14781 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7405274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2423069743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctO3DAUhi1EBRRY8AKVJTZ0EfAtcbJBGoVLqaiKKLC1zvgCHiXxEGcGseuiD8Az8Gg8SV0GUItUL-wjnU-ffutHaIuSXZrO3gTaXSpkSZfQGuVFnrFCsuXnWWQ5kWwVfYxxQgjlJC9W0CpnRc5KytfQVR3aKfQw-LnFvsPRN14HbGz01x2GzuA5NN6kfehwcPj47MfTr0dch6uTg6efD7TCZrA6TecX6bo9q8_xYOOwgT44aKLdfHnX0eXR4UX9JTv9fnxSj04zzfOSZs4ZAYa4Ymx4zismpAMOFakYsBIKayo2HguneVFKZkHSnArNSVWVTmpnga-j_YV3Ohu31mjbDT00atr7Fvp7FcCrfzedv1HXYa6kIDmTIgl2XgR9uJ2l5Kr1Udumgc6GWVRMME6KKpEJ3X6HTsKs79L3EiUFo4KVJFGfF5TuQ4y9dW9hKFF_2lKpLfXcVmI__Z3-jXytJwF7C-DON_b-_yb1dfRtofwNvs6hPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474214280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative in silico design and validation of GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Martínez‐Murcia, A. ; Bru, G. ; Navarro, A. ; Ros‐Tárraga, P. ; García‐Sirera, A. ; Pérez, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Murcia, A. ; Bru, G. ; Navarro, A. ; Ros‐Tárraga, P. ; García‐Sirera, A. ; Pérez, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
Providing a ready‐to‐use reverse transcriptase qPCR (RT‐qPCR) method fully validated to detect the SARS‐CoV‐2 with a higher exclusivity than this shown by early published RT‐qPCR designs.
Methods and Results
The specificity of the GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test by analysis of sequence alignments was approached and compared with other RT‐qPCR designs. The GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test was validated following criteria of UNE/EN ISO 17025:2005 and ISO/IEC 15189:2012. Diagnostic validation was achieved by two independent reference laboratories, the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, (Madrid, Spain), the Public Health England (Colindale, London, UK), and received the label CE‐IVD. The GPS design showed the highest exclusivity and passed all parameters of validation with strict acceptance criteria. Results from reference laboratories 100% correlated with these obtained by using reference methods and showed 100% of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusions
The CE‐IVD GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test, available worldwide with full analytical and diagnostic validation, is the more exclusive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by far.
Significance and Impact of the Study
Considering the CoVID‐19 pandemic status, the exclusivity of RT‐qPCR tests is crucial to avoid false positives due to related coronaviruses. This work provides of a highly specific and validated RT‐qPCR method for detection of SARS‐CoV‐2, which represents a case of efficient transfer of technology successfully used since the pandemic was declared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-5072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2672</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jam.14781</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32652813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acceptance criteria ; Computer Simulation ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods ; COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - standards ; diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Editor's Choice ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Original ; Pandemics ; polymerase chain reaction ; Public health ; quality control ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Reproducibility of Results ; RNA-directed DNA polymerase ; SARS-CoV-2 - classification ; SARS-CoV-2 - genetics ; SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification ; SARS‐CoV‐2 ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sequence Alignment ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Technology transfer</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied microbiology, 2021-01, Vol.130 (1), p.2-13</ispartof><rights>2020 The Society for Applied Microbiology</rights><rights>2020 The Society for Applied Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Society for Applied Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1550-9590</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32652813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Murcia, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bru, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ros‐Tárraga, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Sirera, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative in silico design and validation of GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test</title><title>Journal of applied microbiology</title><addtitle>J Appl Microbiol</addtitle><description>Aims
Providing a ready‐to‐use reverse transcriptase qPCR (RT‐qPCR) method fully validated to detect the SARS‐CoV‐2 with a higher exclusivity than this shown by early published RT‐qPCR designs.
Methods and Results
The specificity of the GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test by analysis of sequence alignments was approached and compared with other RT‐qPCR designs. The GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test was validated following criteria of UNE/EN ISO 17025:2005 and ISO/IEC 15189:2012. Diagnostic validation was achieved by two independent reference laboratories, the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, (Madrid, Spain), the Public Health England (Colindale, London, UK), and received the label CE‐IVD. The GPS design showed the highest exclusivity and passed all parameters of validation with strict acceptance criteria. Results from reference laboratories 100% correlated with these obtained by using reference methods and showed 100% of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusions
The CE‐IVD GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test, available worldwide with full analytical and diagnostic validation, is the more exclusive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by far.
Significance and Impact of the Study
Considering the CoVID‐19 pandemic status, the exclusivity of RT‐qPCR tests is crucial to avoid false positives due to related coronaviruses. This work provides of a highly specific and validated RT‐qPCR method for detection of SARS‐CoV‐2, which represents a case of efficient transfer of technology successfully used since the pandemic was declared.</description><subject>Acceptance criteria</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods</subject><subject>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - standards</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Editor's Choice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>quality control</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>RNA-directed DNA polymerase</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - classification</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - genetics</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification</subject><subject>SARS‐CoV‐2</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sequence Alignment</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Technology transfer</subject><issn>1364-5072</issn><issn>1365-2672</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctO3DAUhi1EBRRY8AKVJTZ0EfAtcbJBGoVLqaiKKLC1zvgCHiXxEGcGseuiD8Az8Gg8SV0GUItUL-wjnU-ffutHaIuSXZrO3gTaXSpkSZfQGuVFnrFCsuXnWWQ5kWwVfYxxQgjlJC9W0CpnRc5KytfQVR3aKfQw-LnFvsPRN14HbGz01x2GzuA5NN6kfehwcPj47MfTr0dch6uTg6efD7TCZrA6TecX6bo9q8_xYOOwgT44aKLdfHnX0eXR4UX9JTv9fnxSj04zzfOSZs4ZAYa4Ymx4zismpAMOFakYsBIKayo2HguneVFKZkHSnArNSVWVTmpnga-j_YV3Ohu31mjbDT00atr7Fvp7FcCrfzedv1HXYa6kIDmTIgl2XgR9uJ2l5Kr1Udumgc6GWVRMME6KKpEJ3X6HTsKs79L3EiUFo4KVJFGfF5TuQ4y9dW9hKFF_2lKpLfXcVmI__Z3-jXytJwF7C-DON_b-_yb1dfRtofwNvs6hPQ</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Martínez‐Murcia, A.</creator><creator>Bru, G.</creator><creator>Navarro, A.</creator><creator>Ros‐Tárraga, P.</creator><creator>García‐Sirera, A.</creator><creator>Pérez, L.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1550-9590</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Comparative in silico design and validation of GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test</title><author>Martínez‐Murcia, A. ; Bru, G. ; Navarro, A. ; Ros‐Tárraga, P. ; García‐Sirera, A. ; Pérez, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acceptance criteria</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods</topic><topic>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - standards</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Editor's Choice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>quality control</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>RNA-directed DNA polymerase</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - classification</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - genetics</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification</topic><topic>SARS‐CoV‐2</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sequence Alignment</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Technology transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Murcia, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bru, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ros‐Tárraga, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Sirera, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martínez‐Murcia, A.</au><au>Bru, G.</au><au>Navarro, A.</au><au>Ros‐Tárraga, P.</au><au>García‐Sirera, A.</au><au>Pérez, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative in silico design and validation of GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Microbiol</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>2-13</pages><issn>1364-5072</issn><eissn>1365-2672</eissn><abstract>Aims
Providing a ready‐to‐use reverse transcriptase qPCR (RT‐qPCR) method fully validated to detect the SARS‐CoV‐2 with a higher exclusivity than this shown by early published RT‐qPCR designs.
Methods and Results
The specificity of the GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test by analysis of sequence alignments was approached and compared with other RT‐qPCR designs. The GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test was validated following criteria of UNE/EN ISO 17025:2005 and ISO/IEC 15189:2012. Diagnostic validation was achieved by two independent reference laboratories, the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, (Madrid, Spain), the Public Health England (Colindale, London, UK), and received the label CE‐IVD. The GPS design showed the highest exclusivity and passed all parameters of validation with strict acceptance criteria. Results from reference laboratories 100% correlated with these obtained by using reference methods and showed 100% of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusions
The CE‐IVD GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test, available worldwide with full analytical and diagnostic validation, is the more exclusive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by far.
Significance and Impact of the Study
Considering the CoVID‐19 pandemic status, the exclusivity of RT‐qPCR tests is crucial to avoid false positives due to related coronaviruses. This work provides of a highly specific and validated RT‐qPCR method for detection of SARS‐CoV‐2, which represents a case of efficient transfer of technology successfully used since the pandemic was declared.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32652813</pmid><doi>10.1111/jam.14781</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1550-9590</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-5072 |
ispartof | Journal of applied microbiology, 2021-01, Vol.130 (1), p.2-13 |
issn | 1364-5072 1365-2672 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7405274 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acceptance criteria Computer Simulation Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - diagnosis COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - standards diagnosis Diagnostic systems Editor's Choice Humans Laboratories Original Pandemics polymerase chain reaction Public health quality control Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Reproducibility of Results RNA-directed DNA polymerase SARS-CoV-2 - classification SARS-CoV-2 - genetics SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification SARS‐CoV‐2 Sensitivity and Specificity Sequence Alignment Severe acute respiratory syndrome Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Technology transfer |
title | Comparative in silico design and validation of GPS™ CoVID‐19 dtec‐RT‐qPCR test |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A25%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20in%20silico%20design%20and%20validation%20of%20GPS%E2%84%A2%20CoVID%E2%80%9019%20dtec%E2%80%90RT%E2%80%90qPCR%20test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20microbiology&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADnez%E2%80%90Murcia,%20A.&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=2-13&rft.issn=1364-5072&rft.eissn=1365-2672&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jam.14781&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2423069743%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3581-ffd4ad0f6bd3539247fa3a9092a28a6ed92bb4fc36872ea71514c30998f7cfea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474214280&rft_id=info:pmid/32652813&rfr_iscdi=true |