Loading…
Completion norms for 3085 English sentence contexts
In everyday language processing, sentence context affects how readers and listeners process upcoming words. In experimental situations, it can be useful to identify words that are predicted to greater or lesser degrees by the preceding context. Here we report completion norms for 3085 English senten...
Saved in:
Published in: | Behavior research methods 2020-08, Vol.52 (4), p.1795-1799 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-62f3c1a018fbdad4064413ede73e51f604ad584806e148d89fc66aa9846c64a03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-62f3c1a018fbdad4064413ede73e51f604ad584806e148d89fc66aa9846c64a03 |
container_end_page | 1799 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1795 |
container_title | Behavior research methods |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Peelle, Jonathan E. Miller, Ryland L. Rogers, Chad S. Spehar, Brent Sommers, Mitchell S. Van Engen, Kristin J. |
description | In everyday language processing, sentence context affects how readers and listeners process upcoming words. In experimental situations, it can be useful to identify words that are predicted to greater or lesser degrees by the preceding context. Here we report completion norms for 3085 English sentences, collected online using a written cloze procedure in which participants were asked to provide their best guess for the word completing a sentence. Sentences varied between eight and ten words in length. At least 100 unique participants contributed to each sentence. All responses were reviewed by human raters to mitigate the influence of mis-spellings and typographical errors. The responses provide a range of predictability values for 13,438 unique target words, 6790 of which appear in more than one sentence context. We also provide entropy values based on the relative predictability of multiple responses. A searchable set of norms is available at
http://sentencenorms.net
. Finally, we provide the code used to collate and organize the responses to facilitate additional analyses and future research projects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13428-020-01351-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7406521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2348231002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-62f3c1a018fbdad4064413ede73e51f604ad584806e148d89fc66aa9846c64a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1PHDEMhiNUxGf_AAc0Ui-9DNhxks1ckKoVBSSkXuAchUxmGTSTLMlsRf99A7vl69CTLfnx69d6GTtCOKGZ1KcZSXBdA4cakCTWuMX2UEpRk-T6y7t-l-3n_ABAmqPYYbuETUONgj1G8zguBz_1MVQhpjFXXUwVgZbVeVgMfb6vsg-TD85XLpbmacqHbLuzQ_ZfN_WA3f48v5lf1te_Lq7mP65rJwVOteIdObSAurtrbStACYHkWz8jL7FTIGwrtdCgPArd6qZzSlnbaKGcEhbogJ2tdZeru9G3rvhIdjDL1I82_THR9ubjJPT3ZhF_m1m5JTkWge8bgRQfVz5PZuyz88Ngg4-rbDgJzQkBeEG_fUIf4iqF8p7hgkBpzaUsFF9TLsWck-9ezSCY50zMOhNTMjEvmZhnF8fv33hd-RdCAWgN5DIKC5_ebv9H9i9KN5Xh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430688255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Completion norms for 3085 English sentence contexts</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Peelle, Jonathan E. ; Miller, Ryland L. ; Rogers, Chad S. ; Spehar, Brent ; Sommers, Mitchell S. ; Van Engen, Kristin J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peelle, Jonathan E. ; Miller, Ryland L. ; Rogers, Chad S. ; Spehar, Brent ; Sommers, Mitchell S. ; Van Engen, Kristin J.</creatorcontrib><description>In everyday language processing, sentence context affects how readers and listeners process upcoming words. In experimental situations, it can be useful to identify words that are predicted to greater or lesser degrees by the preceding context. Here we report completion norms for 3085 English sentences, collected online using a written cloze procedure in which participants were asked to provide their best guess for the word completing a sentence. Sentences varied between eight and ten words in length. At least 100 unique participants contributed to each sentence. All responses were reviewed by human raters to mitigate the influence of mis-spellings and typographical errors. The responses provide a range of predictability values for 13,438 unique target words, 6790 of which appear in more than one sentence context. We also provide entropy values based on the relative predictability of multiple responses. A searchable set of norms is available at
http://sentencenorms.net
. Finally, we provide the code used to collate and organize the responses to facilitate additional analyses and future research projects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1554-3528</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1554-351X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-3528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01351-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31993960</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Comprehension ; Entropy ; Humans ; Language ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Behavior research methods, 2020-08, Vol.52 (4), p.1795-1799</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-62f3c1a018fbdad4064413ede73e51f604ad584806e148d89fc66aa9846c64a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-62f3c1a018fbdad4064413ede73e51f604ad584806e148d89fc66aa9846c64a03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9194-854X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993960$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peelle, Jonathan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Ryland L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Chad S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spehar, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommers, Mitchell S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Engen, Kristin J.</creatorcontrib><title>Completion norms for 3085 English sentence contexts</title><title>Behavior research methods</title><addtitle>Behav Res</addtitle><addtitle>Behav Res Methods</addtitle><description>In everyday language processing, sentence context affects how readers and listeners process upcoming words. In experimental situations, it can be useful to identify words that are predicted to greater or lesser degrees by the preceding context. Here we report completion norms for 3085 English sentences, collected online using a written cloze procedure in which participants were asked to provide their best guess for the word completing a sentence. Sentences varied between eight and ten words in length. At least 100 unique participants contributed to each sentence. All responses were reviewed by human raters to mitigate the influence of mis-spellings and typographical errors. The responses provide a range of predictability values for 13,438 unique target words, 6790 of which appear in more than one sentence context. We also provide entropy values based on the relative predictability of multiple responses. A searchable set of norms is available at
http://sentencenorms.net
. Finally, we provide the code used to collate and organize the responses to facilitate additional analyses and future research projects.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Entropy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>1554-3528</issn><issn>1554-351X</issn><issn>1554-3528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1PHDEMhiNUxGf_AAc0Ui-9DNhxks1ckKoVBSSkXuAchUxmGTSTLMlsRf99A7vl69CTLfnx69d6GTtCOKGZ1KcZSXBdA4cakCTWuMX2UEpRk-T6y7t-l-3n_ABAmqPYYbuETUONgj1G8zguBz_1MVQhpjFXXUwVgZbVeVgMfb6vsg-TD85XLpbmacqHbLuzQ_ZfN_WA3f48v5lf1te_Lq7mP65rJwVOteIdObSAurtrbStACYHkWz8jL7FTIGwrtdCgPArd6qZzSlnbaKGcEhbogJ2tdZeru9G3rvhIdjDL1I82_THR9ubjJPT3ZhF_m1m5JTkWge8bgRQfVz5PZuyz88Ngg4-rbDgJzQkBeEG_fUIf4iqF8p7hgkBpzaUsFF9TLsWck-9ezSCY50zMOhNTMjEvmZhnF8fv33hd-RdCAWgN5DIKC5_ebv9H9i9KN5Xh</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Peelle, Jonathan E.</creator><creator>Miller, Ryland L.</creator><creator>Rogers, Chad S.</creator><creator>Spehar, Brent</creator><creator>Sommers, Mitchell S.</creator><creator>Van Engen, Kristin J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9194-854X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Completion norms for 3085 English sentence contexts</title><author>Peelle, Jonathan E. ; Miller, Ryland L. ; Rogers, Chad S. ; Spehar, Brent ; Sommers, Mitchell S. ; Van Engen, Kristin J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-62f3c1a018fbdad4064413ede73e51f604ad584806e148d89fc66aa9846c64a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Entropy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peelle, Jonathan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Ryland L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Chad S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spehar, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommers, Mitchell S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Engen, Kristin J.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen (Open Access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Behavior research methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peelle, Jonathan E.</au><au>Miller, Ryland L.</au><au>Rogers, Chad S.</au><au>Spehar, Brent</au><au>Sommers, Mitchell S.</au><au>Van Engen, Kristin J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Completion norms for 3085 English sentence contexts</atitle><jtitle>Behavior research methods</jtitle><stitle>Behav Res</stitle><addtitle>Behav Res Methods</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1795</spage><epage>1799</epage><pages>1795-1799</pages><issn>1554-3528</issn><issn>1554-351X</issn><eissn>1554-3528</eissn><abstract>In everyday language processing, sentence context affects how readers and listeners process upcoming words. In experimental situations, it can be useful to identify words that are predicted to greater or lesser degrees by the preceding context. Here we report completion norms for 3085 English sentences, collected online using a written cloze procedure in which participants were asked to provide their best guess for the word completing a sentence. Sentences varied between eight and ten words in length. At least 100 unique participants contributed to each sentence. All responses were reviewed by human raters to mitigate the influence of mis-spellings and typographical errors. The responses provide a range of predictability values for 13,438 unique target words, 6790 of which appear in more than one sentence context. We also provide entropy values based on the relative predictability of multiple responses. A searchable set of norms is available at
http://sentencenorms.net
. Finally, we provide the code used to collate and organize the responses to facilitate additional analyses and future research projects.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31993960</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13428-020-01351-1</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9194-854X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1554-3528 |
ispartof | Behavior research methods, 2020-08, Vol.52 (4), p.1795-1799 |
issn | 1554-3528 1554-351X 1554-3528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7406521 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognitive Psychology Comprehension Entropy Humans Language Psychology |
title | Completion norms for 3085 English sentence contexts |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A31%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Completion%20norms%20for%203085%20English%20sentence%20contexts&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20research%20methods&rft.au=Peelle,%20Jonathan%20E.&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1795&rft.epage=1799&rft.pages=1795-1799&rft.issn=1554-3528&rft.eissn=1554-3528&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13428-020-01351-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2348231002%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-62f3c1a018fbdad4064413ede73e51f604ad584806e148d89fc66aa9846c64a03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430688255&rft_id=info:pmid/31993960&rfr_iscdi=true |