Loading…

ESGAR consensus statement on the imaging of fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis

Objectives To develop imaging guidelines for patients with fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis. Methods An expert group of 13 members of the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) used a modified Delphi process to vote on a series of consensus statements rela...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European radiology 2020-09, Vol.30 (9), p.4734-4740
Main Authors: Halligan, S., Tolan, D., Amitai, M. M., Hoeffel, C., Kim, S. H., Maccioni, F., Morrin, M. M., Mortele, K. J., Rafaelsen, S. R., Rimola, J., Schmidt, S., Stoker, J., Yang, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-bbafbd2169a9b216a2e508676509805c2b9499ab4315a245fa1984618e512b4b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-bbafbd2169a9b216a2e508676509805c2b9499ab4315a245fa1984618e512b4b3
container_end_page 4740
container_issue 9
container_start_page 4734
container_title European radiology
container_volume 30
creator Halligan, S.
Tolan, D.
Amitai, M. M.
Hoeffel, C.
Kim, S. H.
Maccioni, F.
Morrin, M. M.
Mortele, K. J.
Rafaelsen, S. R.
Rimola, J.
Schmidt, S.
Stoker, J.
Yang, J.
description Objectives To develop imaging guidelines for patients with fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis. Methods An expert group of 13 members of the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) used a modified Delphi process to vote on a series of consensus statements relating to the imaging of patients with potential anal sepsis. Participants first completed a questionnaire to gather practice information and to help frame the statements posed. Results In the first round of voting, the expert group scored 51 statements of which 45 (88%) achieved immediate consensus. The remaining 6 statements were redrafted following input from the expert group and consensus achieved for all during a second round of voting, including an additional statement drafted. No statement was rejected due to a lack of consensus. After redrafting to improve clarity, 53 individual statements were presented. Conclusion These expert consensus statements can be used to guide appropriate indication, acquisition, interpretation and reporting of medical imaging for patients with potential fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis. Key Points • Medical imaging, notably magnetic resonance imaging, is used widely for the diagnosis and monitoring of fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal and perianal sepsis. • While the indexed medical literature is clear that diagnostic accuracy is potentially excellent, this depends on competent image acquisition and interpretation. • In order to facilitate this, the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) has produced expert consensus guidelines regarding the imaging of fistula-in-ano and related conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-020-06826-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7431441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2392454263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-bbafbd2169a9b216a2e508676509805c2b9499ab4315a245fa1984618e512b4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vFDEMhiNERbeFP8ABReLCJZAPZ2ZyQaqqUpAqIbXlwiVyZjPbqWaTJZ5B4t-Tdkv5OHCwfPDj16_1MvZSybdKyvYdSWmMFFLXajrdCPuErRQYLZTs4ClbSWc60ToHh-yI6FZK6RS0z9ih0Ua2toEV-3p2dX5yyfucKCZaiNOMc9zGNPOc-HwT-bjFzZg2PA98GGleJhRjEpgyx7TmuSKF97hQpDsEE06c4o5Ges4OBpwovnjox-zLh7Pr04_i4vP5p9OTC9FDC7MIAYew1qpx6EJtqKOVXdM2VrpO2l4HB85hAKMsarADKtdBo7polQ4QzDF7v9fdLWEb1331XnDyu1Kdlx8-4-j_nqTxxm_yd99WSQBVBd48CJT8bYk0--1IfZwmTDEv5LVx9S7oxlT09T_obV5K_blSYKorraGtlN5TfclEJQ6PZpT0d9H5fXS-Rufvo_O2Lr36843HlV9ZVcDsAaqjtInl9-3_yP4EaEqjeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434612247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ESGAR consensus statement on the imaging of fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Halligan, S. ; Tolan, D. ; Amitai, M. M. ; Hoeffel, C. ; Kim, S. H. ; Maccioni, F. ; Morrin, M. M. ; Mortele, K. J. ; Rafaelsen, S. R. ; Rimola, J. ; Schmidt, S. ; Stoker, J. ; Yang, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Halligan, S. ; Tolan, D. ; Amitai, M. M. ; Hoeffel, C. ; Kim, S. H. ; Maccioni, F. ; Morrin, M. M. ; Mortele, K. J. ; Rafaelsen, S. R. ; Rimola, J. ; Schmidt, S. ; Stoker, J. ; Yang, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To develop imaging guidelines for patients with fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis. Methods An expert group of 13 members of the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) used a modified Delphi process to vote on a series of consensus statements relating to the imaging of patients with potential anal sepsis. Participants first completed a questionnaire to gather practice information and to help frame the statements posed. Results In the first round of voting, the expert group scored 51 statements of which 45 (88%) achieved immediate consensus. The remaining 6 statements were redrafted following input from the expert group and consensus achieved for all during a second round of voting, including an additional statement drafted. No statement was rejected due to a lack of consensus. After redrafting to improve clarity, 53 individual statements were presented. Conclusion These expert consensus statements can be used to guide appropriate indication, acquisition, interpretation and reporting of medical imaging for patients with potential fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis. Key Points • Medical imaging, notably magnetic resonance imaging, is used widely for the diagnosis and monitoring of fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal and perianal sepsis. • While the indexed medical literature is clear that diagnostic accuracy is potentially excellent, this depends on competent image acquisition and interpretation. • In order to facilitate this, the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) has produced expert consensus guidelines regarding the imaging of fistula-in-ano and related conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06826-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32307564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Anal Canal - diagnostic imaging ; Anus Diseases - etiology ; Clinical practice guidelines ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Diagnostic systems ; Fistula ; Fistulae ; Gastrointestinal ; Guidelines ; Humans ; Image acquisition ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neuroradiology ; Radiography, Abdominal ; Radiology ; Rectal Fistula - complications ; Rectal Fistula - diagnostic imaging ; Sepsis ; Sepsis - etiology ; Ultrasound ; Voting</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2020-09, Vol.30 (9), p.4734-4740</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-bbafbd2169a9b216a2e508676509805c2b9499ab4315a245fa1984618e512b4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-bbafbd2169a9b216a2e508676509805c2b9499ab4315a245fa1984618e512b4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,780,784,789,790,885,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32307564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halligan, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolan, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amitai, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeffel, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maccioni, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrin, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortele, K. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rafaelsen, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimola, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoker, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, J.</creatorcontrib><title>ESGAR consensus statement on the imaging of fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives To develop imaging guidelines for patients with fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis. Methods An expert group of 13 members of the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) used a modified Delphi process to vote on a series of consensus statements relating to the imaging of patients with potential anal sepsis. Participants first completed a questionnaire to gather practice information and to help frame the statements posed. Results In the first round of voting, the expert group scored 51 statements of which 45 (88%) achieved immediate consensus. The remaining 6 statements were redrafted following input from the expert group and consensus achieved for all during a second round of voting, including an additional statement drafted. No statement was rejected due to a lack of consensus. After redrafting to improve clarity, 53 individual statements were presented. Conclusion These expert consensus statements can be used to guide appropriate indication, acquisition, interpretation and reporting of medical imaging for patients with potential fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis. Key Points • Medical imaging, notably magnetic resonance imaging, is used widely for the diagnosis and monitoring of fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal and perianal sepsis. • While the indexed medical literature is clear that diagnostic accuracy is potentially excellent, this depends on competent image acquisition and interpretation. • In order to facilitate this, the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) has produced expert consensus guidelines regarding the imaging of fistula-in-ano and related conditions.</description><subject>Anal Canal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Anus Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Clinical practice guidelines</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Fistula</subject><subject>Fistulae</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Radiography, Abdominal</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Rectal Fistula - complications</subject><subject>Rectal Fistula - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Sepsis - etiology</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1vFDEMhiNERbeFP8ABReLCJZAPZ2ZyQaqqUpAqIbXlwiVyZjPbqWaTJZ5B4t-Tdkv5OHCwfPDj16_1MvZSybdKyvYdSWmMFFLXajrdCPuErRQYLZTs4ClbSWc60ToHh-yI6FZK6RS0z9ih0Ua2toEV-3p2dX5yyfucKCZaiNOMc9zGNPOc-HwT-bjFzZg2PA98GGleJhRjEpgyx7TmuSKF97hQpDsEE06c4o5Ges4OBpwovnjox-zLh7Pr04_i4vP5p9OTC9FDC7MIAYew1qpx6EJtqKOVXdM2VrpO2l4HB85hAKMsarADKtdBo7polQ4QzDF7v9fdLWEb1331XnDyu1Kdlx8-4-j_nqTxxm_yd99WSQBVBd48CJT8bYk0--1IfZwmTDEv5LVx9S7oxlT09T_obV5K_blSYKorraGtlN5TfclEJQ6PZpT0d9H5fXS-Rufvo_O2Lr36843HlV9ZVcDsAaqjtInl9-3_yP4EaEqjeQ</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Halligan, S.</creator><creator>Tolan, D.</creator><creator>Amitai, M. M.</creator><creator>Hoeffel, C.</creator><creator>Kim, S. H.</creator><creator>Maccioni, F.</creator><creator>Morrin, M. M.</creator><creator>Mortele, K. J.</creator><creator>Rafaelsen, S. R.</creator><creator>Rimola, J.</creator><creator>Schmidt, S.</creator><creator>Stoker, J.</creator><creator>Yang, J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>ESGAR consensus statement on the imaging of fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis</title><author>Halligan, S. ; Tolan, D. ; Amitai, M. M. ; Hoeffel, C. ; Kim, S. H. ; Maccioni, F. ; Morrin, M. M. ; Mortele, K. J. ; Rafaelsen, S. R. ; Rimola, J. ; Schmidt, S. ; Stoker, J. ; Yang, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-bbafbd2169a9b216a2e508676509805c2b9499ab4315a245fa1984618e512b4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anal Canal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Anus Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Clinical practice guidelines</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Fistula</topic><topic>Fistulae</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Radiography, Abdominal</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Rectal Fistula - complications</topic><topic>Rectal Fistula - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Sepsis - etiology</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halligan, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolan, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amitai, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeffel, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maccioni, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrin, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortele, K. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rafaelsen, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimola, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoker, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer_OA刊</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halligan, S.</au><au>Tolan, D.</au><au>Amitai, M. M.</au><au>Hoeffel, C.</au><au>Kim, S. H.</au><au>Maccioni, F.</au><au>Morrin, M. M.</au><au>Mortele, K. J.</au><au>Rafaelsen, S. R.</au><au>Rimola, J.</au><au>Schmidt, S.</au><au>Stoker, J.</au><au>Yang, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ESGAR consensus statement on the imaging of fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4734</spage><epage>4740</epage><pages>4734-4740</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives To develop imaging guidelines for patients with fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis. Methods An expert group of 13 members of the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) used a modified Delphi process to vote on a series of consensus statements relating to the imaging of patients with potential anal sepsis. Participants first completed a questionnaire to gather practice information and to help frame the statements posed. Results In the first round of voting, the expert group scored 51 statements of which 45 (88%) achieved immediate consensus. The remaining 6 statements were redrafted following input from the expert group and consensus achieved for all during a second round of voting, including an additional statement drafted. No statement was rejected due to a lack of consensus. After redrafting to improve clarity, 53 individual statements were presented. Conclusion These expert consensus statements can be used to guide appropriate indication, acquisition, interpretation and reporting of medical imaging for patients with potential fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis. Key Points • Medical imaging, notably magnetic resonance imaging, is used widely for the diagnosis and monitoring of fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal and perianal sepsis. • While the indexed medical literature is clear that diagnostic accuracy is potentially excellent, this depends on competent image acquisition and interpretation. • In order to facilitate this, the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) has produced expert consensus guidelines regarding the imaging of fistula-in-ano and related conditions.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32307564</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-020-06826-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0938-7994
ispartof European radiology, 2020-09, Vol.30 (9), p.4734-4740
issn 0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7431441
source Springer Nature
subjects Anal Canal - diagnostic imaging
Anus Diseases - etiology
Clinical practice guidelines
Diagnostic Radiology
Diagnostic systems
Fistula
Fistulae
Gastrointestinal
Guidelines
Humans
Image acquisition
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neuroradiology
Radiography, Abdominal
Radiology
Rectal Fistula - complications
Rectal Fistula - diagnostic imaging
Sepsis
Sepsis - etiology
Ultrasound
Voting
title ESGAR consensus statement on the imaging of fistula-in-ano and other causes of anal sepsis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T07%3A42%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ESGAR%20consensus%20statement%20on%20the%20imaging%20of%20fistula-in-ano%20and%20other%20causes%20of%20anal%20sepsis&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Halligan,%20S.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4734&rft.epage=4740&rft.pages=4734-4740&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-020-06826-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2392454263%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-bbafbd2169a9b216a2e508676509805c2b9499ab4315a245fa1984618e512b4b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434612247&rft_id=info:pmid/32307564&rfr_iscdi=true