Loading…
Occurrence of Residual Cancer Within Re-excisions After Subcutaneous Mastectomy of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ – A Retrospective Analysis
BACKGROUND/AIMSurgical margin status remains an important determinant for recurrence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. We compared the number of positive margins in initial histology with rates of residual tumor in re-excision specimens. Furthermore, we analysed cost-effectiven...
Saved in:
Published in: | In vivo (Athens) 2020-07, Vol.34 (4), p.2015-2019 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-32ce4dff1cd787828742295453e0248769ae226e6acce1c8186ba0df38df49463 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 2019 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2015 |
container_title | In vivo (Athens) |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | PAHMEYER, CAROLINE SCHABLACK, ANIKA RATIU, DOMINIK THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD MALLMANN, PETER MALTER, WOLFRAM WARM, MATHIAS EICHLER, CHRISTIAN |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMSurgical margin status remains an important determinant for recurrence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. We compared the number of positive margins in initial histology with rates of residual tumor in re-excision specimens. Furthermore, we analysed cost-effectiveness of re-excisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS101 patients treated with secondary surgery were included. The first group underwent breast conserving surgery and secondary mastectomy. The second group was primarily treated with subcutaneous mastectomy followed by secondary surgery. RESULTSWithin the first group, 22.7% did not show residual tumor in the re-excision specimen. Of the second group, 54.3% had no residual tumor. Consequentially 45.7% needed a re-excision to achieve R0 status. Cost-effectiveness was determined as secondary endpoint. If a patient needs a secondary mastectomy the hospital gains 602,65€ in comparison to a primary breast conserving operation. CONCLUSIONIn every second patient who had first received a subcutaneous mastectomy, no tumor could be detected in the secondary operation despite a previous R1 status. |
doi_str_mv | 10.21873/invivo.12000 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7439870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2419416787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-32ce4dff1cd787828742295453e0248769ae226e6acce1c8186ba0df38df49463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1uFDEQhS0EIkNgyd5LNh1st9t2b5CGCT-RgiIREOwsj7uaGHXbg39azI47cARuxklwZgISq5Lqvfqq7IfQU0rOGFWyfe784pZwRhkh5B5aUdnTRna8v49WhHWqUR39fIIepfSVECEJYQ_RScsEEVR2K_TrytoSI3gLOIz4PSQ3FDPhjamdiD-5fON8bTfw3brkgk94PeaqXJetLdl4CCXhdyZlsDnM-1vIhV9McgvglxGq8Jdl_IDPi80HerTOh9lUL752ueDfP37idd2TY0i7irodX3sz7ZNLj9GD0UwJntzVU_Tx9asPm7fN5dWbi836srGt4LlpmQU-jCO1g1RSMSU5Y33HuxYI40qK3gBjAoSxFqhVVImtIcPYqmHkPRftKXpx5O7KdobBgs_RTHoX3WziXgfj9P-Kdzf6S1i05G2vJKmAZ3eAGL4VSFnPLlmYpuM3acZpz6mo11Vrc7Ta-uAUYfy3hhJ9CFYfg9WHYNs_q76awg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2419416787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Occurrence of Residual Cancer Within Re-excisions After Subcutaneous Mastectomy of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ – A Retrospective Analysis</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE ; SCHABLACK, ANIKA ; RATIU, DOMINIK ; THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY ; LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN ; GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD ; MALLMANN, PETER ; MALTER, WOLFRAM ; WARM, MATHIAS ; EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</creator><creatorcontrib>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE ; SCHABLACK, ANIKA ; RATIU, DOMINIK ; THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY ; LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN ; GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD ; MALLMANN, PETER ; MALTER, WOLFRAM ; WARM, MATHIAS ; EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND/AIMSurgical margin status remains an important determinant for recurrence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. We compared the number of positive margins in initial histology with rates of residual tumor in re-excision specimens. Furthermore, we analysed cost-effectiveness of re-excisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS101 patients treated with secondary surgery were included. The first group underwent breast conserving surgery and secondary mastectomy. The second group was primarily treated with subcutaneous mastectomy followed by secondary surgery. RESULTSWithin the first group, 22.7% did not show residual tumor in the re-excision specimen. Of the second group, 54.3% had no residual tumor. Consequentially 45.7% needed a re-excision to achieve R0 status. Cost-effectiveness was determined as secondary endpoint. If a patient needs a secondary mastectomy the hospital gains 602,65€ in comparison to a primary breast conserving operation. CONCLUSIONIn every second patient who had first received a subcutaneous mastectomy, no tumor could be detected in the secondary operation despite a previous R1 status.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0258-851X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1791-7549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12000</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32606175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Institute of Anticancer Research</publisher><ispartof>In vivo (Athens), 2020-07, Vol.34 (4), p.2015-2019</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-32ce4dff1cd787828742295453e0248769ae226e6acce1c8186ba0df38df49463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439870/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439870/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHABLACK, ANIKA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RATIU, DOMINIK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALLMANN, PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALTER, WOLFRAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARM, MATHIAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</creatorcontrib><title>Occurrence of Residual Cancer Within Re-excisions After Subcutaneous Mastectomy of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ – A Retrospective Analysis</title><title>In vivo (Athens)</title><description>BACKGROUND/AIMSurgical margin status remains an important determinant for recurrence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. We compared the number of positive margins in initial histology with rates of residual tumor in re-excision specimens. Furthermore, we analysed cost-effectiveness of re-excisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS101 patients treated with secondary surgery were included. The first group underwent breast conserving surgery and secondary mastectomy. The second group was primarily treated with subcutaneous mastectomy followed by secondary surgery. RESULTSWithin the first group, 22.7% did not show residual tumor in the re-excision specimen. Of the second group, 54.3% had no residual tumor. Consequentially 45.7% needed a re-excision to achieve R0 status. Cost-effectiveness was determined as secondary endpoint. If a patient needs a secondary mastectomy the hospital gains 602,65€ in comparison to a primary breast conserving operation. CONCLUSIONIn every second patient who had first received a subcutaneous mastectomy, no tumor could be detected in the secondary operation despite a previous R1 status.</description><issn>0258-851X</issn><issn>1791-7549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1uFDEQhS0EIkNgyd5LNh1st9t2b5CGCT-RgiIREOwsj7uaGHXbg39azI47cARuxklwZgISq5Lqvfqq7IfQU0rOGFWyfe784pZwRhkh5B5aUdnTRna8v49WhHWqUR39fIIepfSVECEJYQ_RScsEEVR2K_TrytoSI3gLOIz4PSQ3FDPhjamdiD-5fON8bTfw3brkgk94PeaqXJetLdl4CCXhdyZlsDnM-1vIhV9McgvglxGq8Jdl_IDPi80HerTOh9lUL752ueDfP37idd2TY0i7irodX3sz7ZNLj9GD0UwJntzVU_Tx9asPm7fN5dWbi836srGt4LlpmQU-jCO1g1RSMSU5Y33HuxYI40qK3gBjAoSxFqhVVImtIcPYqmHkPRftKXpx5O7KdobBgs_RTHoX3WziXgfj9P-Kdzf6S1i05G2vJKmAZ3eAGL4VSFnPLlmYpuM3acZpz6mo11Vrc7Ta-uAUYfy3hhJ9CFYfg9WHYNs_q76awg</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE</creator><creator>SCHABLACK, ANIKA</creator><creator>RATIU, DOMINIK</creator><creator>THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY</creator><creator>LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN</creator><creator>GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD</creator><creator>MALLMANN, PETER</creator><creator>MALTER, WOLFRAM</creator><creator>WARM, MATHIAS</creator><creator>EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</creator><general>International Institute of Anticancer Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Occurrence of Residual Cancer Within Re-excisions After Subcutaneous Mastectomy of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ – A Retrospective Analysis</title><author>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE ; SCHABLACK, ANIKA ; RATIU, DOMINIK ; THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY ; LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN ; GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD ; MALLMANN, PETER ; MALTER, WOLFRAM ; WARM, MATHIAS ; EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-32ce4dff1cd787828742295453e0248769ae226e6acce1c8186ba0df38df49463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHABLACK, ANIKA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RATIU, DOMINIK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALLMANN, PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALTER, WOLFRAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARM, MATHIAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>In vivo (Athens)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE</au><au>SCHABLACK, ANIKA</au><au>RATIU, DOMINIK</au><au>THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY</au><au>LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN</au><au>GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD</au><au>MALLMANN, PETER</au><au>MALTER, WOLFRAM</au><au>WARM, MATHIAS</au><au>EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Occurrence of Residual Cancer Within Re-excisions After Subcutaneous Mastectomy of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ – A Retrospective Analysis</atitle><jtitle>In vivo (Athens)</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2015</spage><epage>2019</epage><pages>2015-2019</pages><issn>0258-851X</issn><eissn>1791-7549</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND/AIMSurgical margin status remains an important determinant for recurrence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. We compared the number of positive margins in initial histology with rates of residual tumor in re-excision specimens. Furthermore, we analysed cost-effectiveness of re-excisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS101 patients treated with secondary surgery were included. The first group underwent breast conserving surgery and secondary mastectomy. The second group was primarily treated with subcutaneous mastectomy followed by secondary surgery. RESULTSWithin the first group, 22.7% did not show residual tumor in the re-excision specimen. Of the second group, 54.3% had no residual tumor. Consequentially 45.7% needed a re-excision to achieve R0 status. Cost-effectiveness was determined as secondary endpoint. If a patient needs a secondary mastectomy the hospital gains 602,65€ in comparison to a primary breast conserving operation. CONCLUSIONIn every second patient who had first received a subcutaneous mastectomy, no tumor could be detected in the secondary operation despite a previous R1 status.</abstract><pub>International Institute of Anticancer Research</pub><pmid>32606175</pmid><doi>10.21873/invivo.12000</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0258-851X |
ispartof | In vivo (Athens), 2020-07, Vol.34 (4), p.2015-2019 |
issn | 0258-851X 1791-7549 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7439870 |
source | PubMed Central |
title | Occurrence of Residual Cancer Within Re-excisions After Subcutaneous Mastectomy of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ – A Retrospective Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A19%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Occurrence%20of%20Residual%20Cancer%20Within%20Re-excisions%20After%20Subcutaneous%20Mastectomy%20of%20Invasive%20Breast%20Cancer%20and%20Ductal%20Carcinoma%20In%20Situ%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Retrospective%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=In%20vivo%20(Athens)&rft.au=PAHMEYER,%20CAROLINE&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2015&rft.epage=2019&rft.pages=2015-2019&rft.issn=0258-851X&rft.eissn=1791-7549&rft_id=info:doi/10.21873/invivo.12000&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2419416787%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-32ce4dff1cd787828742295453e0248769ae226e6acce1c8186ba0df38df49463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2419416787&rft_id=info:pmid/32606175&rfr_iscdi=true |