Loading…

Occurrence of Residual Cancer Within Re-excisions After Subcutaneous Mastectomy of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ – A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMSurgical margin status remains an important determinant for recurrence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. We compared the number of positive margins in initial histology with rates of residual tumor in re-excision specimens. Furthermore, we analysed cost-effectiven...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:In vivo (Athens) 2020-07, Vol.34 (4), p.2015-2019
Main Authors: PAHMEYER, CAROLINE, SCHABLACK, ANIKA, RATIU, DOMINIK, THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY, LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN, GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD, MALLMANN, PETER, MALTER, WOLFRAM, WARM, MATHIAS, EICHLER, CHRISTIAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-32ce4dff1cd787828742295453e0248769ae226e6acce1c8186ba0df38df49463
cites
container_end_page 2019
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2015
container_title In vivo (Athens)
container_volume 34
creator PAHMEYER, CAROLINE
SCHABLACK, ANIKA
RATIU, DOMINIK
THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY
LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN
GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD
MALLMANN, PETER
MALTER, WOLFRAM
WARM, MATHIAS
EICHLER, CHRISTIAN
description BACKGROUND/AIMSurgical margin status remains an important determinant for recurrence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. We compared the number of positive margins in initial histology with rates of residual tumor in re-excision specimens. Furthermore, we analysed cost-effectiveness of re-excisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS101 patients treated with secondary surgery were included. The first group underwent breast conserving surgery and secondary mastectomy. The second group was primarily treated with subcutaneous mastectomy followed by secondary surgery. RESULTSWithin the first group, 22.7% did not show residual tumor in the re-excision specimen. Of the second group, 54.3% had no residual tumor. Consequentially 45.7% needed a re-excision to achieve R0 status. Cost-effectiveness was determined as secondary endpoint. If a patient needs a secondary mastectomy the hospital gains 602,65€ in comparison to a primary breast conserving operation. CONCLUSIONIn every second patient who had first received a subcutaneous mastectomy, no tumor could be detected in the secondary operation despite a previous R1 status.
doi_str_mv 10.21873/invivo.12000
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7439870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2419416787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-32ce4dff1cd787828742295453e0248769ae226e6acce1c8186ba0df38df49463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1uFDEQhS0EIkNgyd5LNh1st9t2b5CGCT-RgiIREOwsj7uaGHXbg39azI47cARuxklwZgISq5Lqvfqq7IfQU0rOGFWyfe784pZwRhkh5B5aUdnTRna8v49WhHWqUR39fIIepfSVECEJYQ_RScsEEVR2K_TrytoSI3gLOIz4PSQ3FDPhjamdiD-5fON8bTfw3brkgk94PeaqXJetLdl4CCXhdyZlsDnM-1vIhV9McgvglxGq8Jdl_IDPi80HerTOh9lUL752ueDfP37idd2TY0i7irodX3sz7ZNLj9GD0UwJntzVU_Tx9asPm7fN5dWbi836srGt4LlpmQU-jCO1g1RSMSU5Y33HuxYI40qK3gBjAoSxFqhVVImtIcPYqmHkPRftKXpx5O7KdobBgs_RTHoX3WziXgfj9P-Kdzf6S1i05G2vJKmAZ3eAGL4VSFnPLlmYpuM3acZpz6mo11Vrc7Ta-uAUYfy3hhJ9CFYfg9WHYNs_q76awg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2419416787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Occurrence of Residual Cancer Within Re-excisions After Subcutaneous Mastectomy of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ – A Retrospective Analysis</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE ; SCHABLACK, ANIKA ; RATIU, DOMINIK ; THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY ; LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN ; GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD ; MALLMANN, PETER ; MALTER, WOLFRAM ; WARM, MATHIAS ; EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</creator><creatorcontrib>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE ; SCHABLACK, ANIKA ; RATIU, DOMINIK ; THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY ; LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN ; GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD ; MALLMANN, PETER ; MALTER, WOLFRAM ; WARM, MATHIAS ; EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND/AIMSurgical margin status remains an important determinant for recurrence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. We compared the number of positive margins in initial histology with rates of residual tumor in re-excision specimens. Furthermore, we analysed cost-effectiveness of re-excisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS101 patients treated with secondary surgery were included. The first group underwent breast conserving surgery and secondary mastectomy. The second group was primarily treated with subcutaneous mastectomy followed by secondary surgery. RESULTSWithin the first group, 22.7% did not show residual tumor in the re-excision specimen. Of the second group, 54.3% had no residual tumor. Consequentially 45.7% needed a re-excision to achieve R0 status. Cost-effectiveness was determined as secondary endpoint. If a patient needs a secondary mastectomy the hospital gains 602,65€ in comparison to a primary breast conserving operation. CONCLUSIONIn every second patient who had first received a subcutaneous mastectomy, no tumor could be detected in the secondary operation despite a previous R1 status.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0258-851X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1791-7549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12000</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32606175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Institute of Anticancer Research</publisher><ispartof>In vivo (Athens), 2020-07, Vol.34 (4), p.2015-2019</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-32ce4dff1cd787828742295453e0248769ae226e6acce1c8186ba0df38df49463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439870/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439870/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHABLACK, ANIKA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RATIU, DOMINIK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALLMANN, PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALTER, WOLFRAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARM, MATHIAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</creatorcontrib><title>Occurrence of Residual Cancer Within Re-excisions After Subcutaneous Mastectomy of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ – A Retrospective Analysis</title><title>In vivo (Athens)</title><description>BACKGROUND/AIMSurgical margin status remains an important determinant for recurrence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. We compared the number of positive margins in initial histology with rates of residual tumor in re-excision specimens. Furthermore, we analysed cost-effectiveness of re-excisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS101 patients treated with secondary surgery were included. The first group underwent breast conserving surgery and secondary mastectomy. The second group was primarily treated with subcutaneous mastectomy followed by secondary surgery. RESULTSWithin the first group, 22.7% did not show residual tumor in the re-excision specimen. Of the second group, 54.3% had no residual tumor. Consequentially 45.7% needed a re-excision to achieve R0 status. Cost-effectiveness was determined as secondary endpoint. If a patient needs a secondary mastectomy the hospital gains 602,65€ in comparison to a primary breast conserving operation. CONCLUSIONIn every second patient who had first received a subcutaneous mastectomy, no tumor could be detected in the secondary operation despite a previous R1 status.</description><issn>0258-851X</issn><issn>1791-7549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1uFDEQhS0EIkNgyd5LNh1st9t2b5CGCT-RgiIREOwsj7uaGHXbg39azI47cARuxklwZgISq5Lqvfqq7IfQU0rOGFWyfe784pZwRhkh5B5aUdnTRna8v49WhHWqUR39fIIepfSVECEJYQ_RScsEEVR2K_TrytoSI3gLOIz4PSQ3FDPhjamdiD-5fON8bTfw3brkgk94PeaqXJetLdl4CCXhdyZlsDnM-1vIhV9McgvglxGq8Jdl_IDPi80HerTOh9lUL752ueDfP37idd2TY0i7irodX3sz7ZNLj9GD0UwJntzVU_Tx9asPm7fN5dWbi836srGt4LlpmQU-jCO1g1RSMSU5Y33HuxYI40qK3gBjAoSxFqhVVImtIcPYqmHkPRftKXpx5O7KdobBgs_RTHoX3WziXgfj9P-Kdzf6S1i05G2vJKmAZ3eAGL4VSFnPLlmYpuM3acZpz6mo11Vrc7Ta-uAUYfy3hhJ9CFYfg9WHYNs_q76awg</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE</creator><creator>SCHABLACK, ANIKA</creator><creator>RATIU, DOMINIK</creator><creator>THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY</creator><creator>LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN</creator><creator>GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD</creator><creator>MALLMANN, PETER</creator><creator>MALTER, WOLFRAM</creator><creator>WARM, MATHIAS</creator><creator>EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</creator><general>International Institute of Anticancer Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Occurrence of Residual Cancer Within Re-excisions After Subcutaneous Mastectomy of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ – A Retrospective Analysis</title><author>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE ; SCHABLACK, ANIKA ; RATIU, DOMINIK ; THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY ; LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN ; GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD ; MALLMANN, PETER ; MALTER, WOLFRAM ; WARM, MATHIAS ; EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-32ce4dff1cd787828742295453e0248769ae226e6acce1c8186ba0df38df49463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHABLACK, ANIKA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RATIU, DOMINIK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALLMANN, PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALTER, WOLFRAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARM, MATHIAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>In vivo (Athens)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PAHMEYER, CAROLINE</au><au>SCHABLACK, ANIKA</au><au>RATIU, DOMINIK</au><au>THANGARAJAH, FABINSHY</au><au>LUDWIG, SEBASTIAN</au><au>GRUETTNER, BERTHOLD</au><au>MALLMANN, PETER</au><au>MALTER, WOLFRAM</au><au>WARM, MATHIAS</au><au>EICHLER, CHRISTIAN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Occurrence of Residual Cancer Within Re-excisions After Subcutaneous Mastectomy of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ – A Retrospective Analysis</atitle><jtitle>In vivo (Athens)</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2015</spage><epage>2019</epage><pages>2015-2019</pages><issn>0258-851X</issn><eissn>1791-7549</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND/AIMSurgical margin status remains an important determinant for recurrence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. We compared the number of positive margins in initial histology with rates of residual tumor in re-excision specimens. Furthermore, we analysed cost-effectiveness of re-excisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS101 patients treated with secondary surgery were included. The first group underwent breast conserving surgery and secondary mastectomy. The second group was primarily treated with subcutaneous mastectomy followed by secondary surgery. RESULTSWithin the first group, 22.7% did not show residual tumor in the re-excision specimen. Of the second group, 54.3% had no residual tumor. Consequentially 45.7% needed a re-excision to achieve R0 status. Cost-effectiveness was determined as secondary endpoint. If a patient needs a secondary mastectomy the hospital gains 602,65€ in comparison to a primary breast conserving operation. CONCLUSIONIn every second patient who had first received a subcutaneous mastectomy, no tumor could be detected in the secondary operation despite a previous R1 status.</abstract><pub>International Institute of Anticancer Research</pub><pmid>32606175</pmid><doi>10.21873/invivo.12000</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0258-851X
ispartof In vivo (Athens), 2020-07, Vol.34 (4), p.2015-2019
issn 0258-851X
1791-7549
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7439870
source PubMed Central
title Occurrence of Residual Cancer Within Re-excisions After Subcutaneous Mastectomy of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ – A Retrospective Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A19%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Occurrence%20of%20Residual%20Cancer%20Within%20Re-excisions%20After%20Subcutaneous%20Mastectomy%20of%20Invasive%20Breast%20Cancer%20and%20Ductal%20Carcinoma%20In%20Situ%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Retrospective%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=In%20vivo%20(Athens)&rft.au=PAHMEYER,%20CAROLINE&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2015&rft.epage=2019&rft.pages=2015-2019&rft.issn=0258-851X&rft.eissn=1791-7549&rft_id=info:doi/10.21873/invivo.12000&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2419416787%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-32ce4dff1cd787828742295453e0248769ae226e6acce1c8186ba0df38df49463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2419416787&rft_id=info:pmid/32606175&rfr_iscdi=true