Social capital and community disaster resilience: post-earthquake tourism recovery on Gili Trawangan, Indonesia

• Published in: Sustainability science 2021-01, Vol.16 (1), p.203-220
• Main Author: Partelow, Stefan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Climate Change Management and Policy; Coastal tourism; Collective action; Disaster Preparedness and Risk Management; Disasters; Earth and Environmental Science; Earthquakes; Empirical analysis; Environment; Environmental Economics; Environmental Management; Landscape Ecology; Original; Original Article; Public Health; Recovery; Resilience; Seismic activity; Social capital; Sustainable Development; Tourism
• ISSN: 1862-4065; 1862-4057
• DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00854-2

This study examines the hypothesis that social capital can be a foundation for community disaster resilience with an analysis of empirical findings from the August 2018 earthquake recovery on Gili Trawangan, Indonesia, a globally known coastal tourism destination. Positive links between community social capital and community disaster resilience are hypothesized, but the extent to which an iterative and interdependent relationship is co-shaping both is less understood. Social capital can enable collective action, providing self-organized social, psychological, financial and material resources following a disaster, that may otherwise need to be provided externally. In turn, disasters create collective action problems where collective response and recovery process are needed, creating an institutional space where the degree of usefulness, meaning and function of social capital can be shaped, recognized and drawn upon, often where external aid is insufficient. These relationships can be observed following disasters, because individuals and communities are often linked through emotive and meaningful sequences of common experiences, actions and activities. Findings descriptively detail Gili Trawangan’s response and recovery process through the events and activities that occurred, and are then theoretically analyzed with a social capital framework including bonding (within group), bridging (between group) and linking (across power and institutional) ties. Three conclusions can be summarized. (1) Community social capital and disaster resilience are iteratively co-shaped through collective experiences, actions and activities. (2) Understanding context is critical for understanding if and to what degree this relationship exists. (3) The mechanism through which social capital enhances resilience is that it can enable collective action that can lead to the provision of needed aid and services.