Loading…

Effect of different starch sources in a raw meat-based diet on fecal microbiome in dogs housed in a shelter

A dietary intervention study was assessed to determine if different sources of starch in homemade diets could significantly modify fecal microbiome of dogs. Twenty-seven adult dogs were enrolled and fed a diet based on a mixture of rice and pasta with fresh raw meat (CD). After 90 d, 8 dogs continue...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal Nutrition 2020-09, Vol.6 (3), p.353-361
Main Authors: Sandri, Misa, Sgorlon, Sandy, Scarsella, Elisa, Stefanon, Bruno
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-c14c3e310f7fc9344d654a85be1ae2fb7adc597b010adced67d288bb4e0393493
cites
container_end_page 361
container_issue 3
container_start_page 353
container_title Animal Nutrition
container_volume 6
creator Sandri, Misa
Sgorlon, Sandy
Scarsella, Elisa
Stefanon, Bruno
description A dietary intervention study was assessed to determine if different sources of starch in homemade diets could significantly modify fecal microbiome of dogs. Twenty-seven adult dogs were enrolled and fed a diet based on a mixture of rice and pasta with fresh raw meat (CD). After 90 d, 8 dogs continued to receive CD diet, 10 dogs received a diet made of a raw meat and a complementary food with rice as the main source of starch (B1), and 9 dogs were fed a diet with the same raw meat and a complementary food with potato as the main source of starch (B2). Samples of feces were collected from each dog in the mornings at the beginning of the study and after 15 d and analyzed for pH, ammonia N (N–NH 3 ) and total N, short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and lactic acid. Relative abundance of fecal microbiota was assessed by sequencing and annotating the V3–V4 regions of the 16S rRNA. Total starch intake was similar between diets but differed in the in vitro rate digestion and in the resistant starch, which was higher in B2 than in B1 and CD diets. Dogs fed B2 diet showed lower ( P  
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.03.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7503078</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_73e60df6224e4e52803951181493e31d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2448405728</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-c14c3e310f7fc9344d654a85be1ae2fb7adc597b010adced67d288bb4e0393493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtv1TAQhS0EolXpL2DjJZuE8St2NkioKqVSJTawthx7cq8vSVxsB8S_x32w6GqOxud8M7YJec-gZ8CGj6febXHbew4cehA9gHhFzrkE1Q3CiNf_tZLqjFyWcgIANrJxhPEtORMCQOlhPCc_r-cZfaVppiE2mXGrtFSX_ZGWtGePhcaNOprdH7qiq93kCoZmxhbaaAu7ha7R5zTFtOKDOaRDoce0P_ges-WIS8X8jryZ3VLw8rlekB9frr9ffe3uvt3cXn2-67wCXjvPpBcoGMx69qOQMrRbOKMmZA75PGkXvBr1BAyawjDowI2ZJokgmn0UF-T2iRuSO9n7HFeX_9rkon1spHywLtfoF7Ra4ABhHjiXKFFx0xCKMcMapq0QGuvTE-t-n1Zs47aa3fIC-vJki0d7SL-tViBAmwb48AzI6deOpdo1Fo_L4jZsT2S5lKb9lOZG_AP0Uo-_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448405728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of different starch sources in a raw meat-based diet on fecal microbiome in dogs housed in a shelter</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sandri, Misa ; Sgorlon, Sandy ; Scarsella, Elisa ; Stefanon, Bruno</creator><creatorcontrib>Sandri, Misa ; Sgorlon, Sandy ; Scarsella, Elisa ; Stefanon, Bruno</creatorcontrib><description>A dietary intervention study was assessed to determine if different sources of starch in homemade diets could significantly modify fecal microbiome of dogs. Twenty-seven adult dogs were enrolled and fed a diet based on a mixture of rice and pasta with fresh raw meat (CD). After 90 d, 8 dogs continued to receive CD diet, 10 dogs received a diet made of a raw meat and a complementary food with rice as the main source of starch (B1), and 9 dogs were fed a diet with the same raw meat and a complementary food with potato as the main source of starch (B2). Samples of feces were collected from each dog in the mornings at the beginning of the study and after 15 d and analyzed for pH, ammonia N (N–NH 3 ) and total N, short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and lactic acid. Relative abundance of fecal microbiota was assessed by sequencing and annotating the V3–V4 regions of the 16S rRNA. Total starch intake was similar between diets but differed in the in vitro rate digestion and in the resistant starch, which was higher in B2 than in B1 and CD diets. Dogs fed B2 diet showed lower ( P  &lt; 0.05) N–NH 3 and pH but higher ( P  &lt; 0.05) molar proportion of lactic acid. Linear discriminant analysis of the genera relative abundances indicated a significant ( P  &lt; 0.01) increase of SMB53 genus at the end of the study in B1 diet and of Megamonas genus in B1 and B2 diets in comparison to CD diet. These results suggest that changes of starch source in a raw meat-based diet have limited effects on fecal microbiome in healthy dogs, but underline a high variability of microbiota among dogs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-6545</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-6383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33005769</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>KeAi Publishing</publisher><subject>Canis lupus familiaris ; Diets ; Microbiome ; Nutrition ; Original ; Starch fraction</subject><ispartof>Animal Nutrition, 2020-09, Vol.6 (3), p.353-361</ispartof><rights>2020 Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2020 Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-c14c3e310f7fc9344d654a85be1ae2fb7adc597b010adced67d288bb4e0393493</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7503078/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7503078/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sandri, Misa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sgorlon, Sandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarsella, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanon, Bruno</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of different starch sources in a raw meat-based diet on fecal microbiome in dogs housed in a shelter</title><title>Animal Nutrition</title><description>A dietary intervention study was assessed to determine if different sources of starch in homemade diets could significantly modify fecal microbiome of dogs. Twenty-seven adult dogs were enrolled and fed a diet based on a mixture of rice and pasta with fresh raw meat (CD). After 90 d, 8 dogs continued to receive CD diet, 10 dogs received a diet made of a raw meat and a complementary food with rice as the main source of starch (B1), and 9 dogs were fed a diet with the same raw meat and a complementary food with potato as the main source of starch (B2). Samples of feces were collected from each dog in the mornings at the beginning of the study and after 15 d and analyzed for pH, ammonia N (N–NH 3 ) and total N, short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and lactic acid. Relative abundance of fecal microbiota was assessed by sequencing and annotating the V3–V4 regions of the 16S rRNA. Total starch intake was similar between diets but differed in the in vitro rate digestion and in the resistant starch, which was higher in B2 than in B1 and CD diets. Dogs fed B2 diet showed lower ( P  &lt; 0.05) N–NH 3 and pH but higher ( P  &lt; 0.05) molar proportion of lactic acid. Linear discriminant analysis of the genera relative abundances indicated a significant ( P  &lt; 0.01) increase of SMB53 genus at the end of the study in B1 diet and of Megamonas genus in B1 and B2 diets in comparison to CD diet. These results suggest that changes of starch source in a raw meat-based diet have limited effects on fecal microbiome in healthy dogs, but underline a high variability of microbiota among dogs.</description><subject>Canis lupus familiaris</subject><subject>Diets</subject><subject>Microbiome</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Starch fraction</subject><issn>2405-6545</issn><issn>2405-6383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtv1TAQhS0EolXpL2DjJZuE8St2NkioKqVSJTawthx7cq8vSVxsB8S_x32w6GqOxud8M7YJec-gZ8CGj6febXHbew4cehA9gHhFzrkE1Q3CiNf_tZLqjFyWcgIANrJxhPEtORMCQOlhPCc_r-cZfaVppiE2mXGrtFSX_ZGWtGePhcaNOprdH7qiq93kCoZmxhbaaAu7ha7R5zTFtOKDOaRDoce0P_ges-WIS8X8jryZ3VLw8rlekB9frr9ffe3uvt3cXn2-67wCXjvPpBcoGMx69qOQMrRbOKMmZA75PGkXvBr1BAyawjDowI2ZJokgmn0UF-T2iRuSO9n7HFeX_9rkon1spHywLtfoF7Ra4ABhHjiXKFFx0xCKMcMapq0QGuvTE-t-n1Zs47aa3fIC-vJki0d7SL-tViBAmwb48AzI6deOpdo1Fo_L4jZsT2S5lKb9lOZG_AP0Uo-_</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Sandri, Misa</creator><creator>Sgorlon, Sandy</creator><creator>Scarsella, Elisa</creator><creator>Stefanon, Bruno</creator><general>KeAi Publishing</general><general>KeAi Communications Co., Ltd</general><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Effect of different starch sources in a raw meat-based diet on fecal microbiome in dogs housed in a shelter</title><author>Sandri, Misa ; Sgorlon, Sandy ; Scarsella, Elisa ; Stefanon, Bruno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-c14c3e310f7fc9344d654a85be1ae2fb7adc597b010adced67d288bb4e0393493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Canis lupus familiaris</topic><topic>Diets</topic><topic>Microbiome</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Starch fraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sandri, Misa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sgorlon, Sandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarsella, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanon, Bruno</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Animal Nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sandri, Misa</au><au>Sgorlon, Sandy</au><au>Scarsella, Elisa</au><au>Stefanon, Bruno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of different starch sources in a raw meat-based diet on fecal microbiome in dogs housed in a shelter</atitle><jtitle>Animal Nutrition</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>353-361</pages><issn>2405-6545</issn><eissn>2405-6383</eissn><abstract>A dietary intervention study was assessed to determine if different sources of starch in homemade diets could significantly modify fecal microbiome of dogs. Twenty-seven adult dogs were enrolled and fed a diet based on a mixture of rice and pasta with fresh raw meat (CD). After 90 d, 8 dogs continued to receive CD diet, 10 dogs received a diet made of a raw meat and a complementary food with rice as the main source of starch (B1), and 9 dogs were fed a diet with the same raw meat and a complementary food with potato as the main source of starch (B2). Samples of feces were collected from each dog in the mornings at the beginning of the study and after 15 d and analyzed for pH, ammonia N (N–NH 3 ) and total N, short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and lactic acid. Relative abundance of fecal microbiota was assessed by sequencing and annotating the V3–V4 regions of the 16S rRNA. Total starch intake was similar between diets but differed in the in vitro rate digestion and in the resistant starch, which was higher in B2 than in B1 and CD diets. Dogs fed B2 diet showed lower ( P  &lt; 0.05) N–NH 3 and pH but higher ( P  &lt; 0.05) molar proportion of lactic acid. Linear discriminant analysis of the genera relative abundances indicated a significant ( P  &lt; 0.01) increase of SMB53 genus at the end of the study in B1 diet and of Megamonas genus in B1 and B2 diets in comparison to CD diet. These results suggest that changes of starch source in a raw meat-based diet have limited effects on fecal microbiome in healthy dogs, but underline a high variability of microbiota among dogs.</abstract><pub>KeAi Publishing</pub><pmid>33005769</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aninu.2020.03.003</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2405-6545
ispartof Animal Nutrition, 2020-09, Vol.6 (3), p.353-361
issn 2405-6545
2405-6383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7503078
source ScienceDirect Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Canis lupus familiaris
Diets
Microbiome
Nutrition
Original
Starch fraction
title Effect of different starch sources in a raw meat-based diet on fecal microbiome in dogs housed in a shelter
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20different%20starch%20sources%20in%20a%20raw%20meat-based%20diet%20on%20fecal%20microbiome%20in%20dogs%20housed%20in%20a%20shelter&rft.jtitle=Animal%20Nutrition&rft.au=Sandri,%20Misa&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=353-361&rft.issn=2405-6545&rft.eissn=2405-6383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2448405728%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-c14c3e310f7fc9344d654a85be1ae2fb7adc597b010adced67d288bb4e0393493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448405728&rft_id=info:pmid/33005769&rfr_iscdi=true