Loading…
The impact of subclinical congestion on the outcome of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Background We investigated the impact of an elevated plasma volume status (PVS) in patients undergoing TAVI on early clinical safety and mortality and assessed the prognostic utility of PVS for outcome prediction. Materials and methods We retrospectively calculated the PVS in 652 patients undergoing...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of clinical investigation 2020-08, Vol.50 (8), p.e13251-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
We investigated the impact of an elevated plasma volume status (PVS) in patients undergoing TAVI on early clinical safety and mortality and assessed the prognostic utility of PVS for outcome prediction.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively calculated the PVS in 652 patients undergoing TAVI between 2009 and 2018 at two centres. They were then categorized into two groups depending on their preoperative PVS (PVS ≤−4; n = 257 vs PVS>−4; n = 379). Relative PVS was derived by subtracting calculated ideal (iPVS = c × weight) from actual plasma volume (aPVS = (1 − haematocrit) × (a + (b × weight in kg)).
Results
The need for renal replacement therapy (1 (0.4%) vs 17 (4.5%); P = .001), re‐operation for noncardiac reasons (9 (3.5%) vs 32 (8.4%); P = .003), re‐operation for bleeding (9 (3.5%) vs 27 (7.1%); P = .037) and major bleeding (14 (5.4%) vs 37 (9.8%); P = .033) were significantly higher in patients with a PVS>−4. The composite 30‐day early safety endpoint (234 (91.1%) vs 314 (82.8%); P = .002) confirms that an increased preoperative PVS is associated with a worse overall outcome after TAVI.
Conclusions
An elevated PVS (>−4) as a marker for congestion is associated with significantly worse outcome after TAVI and therefore should be incorporated in preprocedural risk stratification. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0014-2972 1365-2362 |
DOI: | 10.1111/eci.13251 |