Loading…
Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach
Treatment options for myeloma continue to develop at a rapid pace, and it is becoming increasingly challenging to determine the optimal therapeutic approaches because demonstrating a clear survival benefit now requires many years of follow‐up. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is recog...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry Clinical cytometry, 2016-01, Vol.90 (1), p.21-25 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173 |
container_end_page | 25 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Rawstron, Andy C. Paiva, Bruno Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice |
description | Treatment options for myeloma continue to develop at a rapid pace, and it is becoming increasingly challenging to determine the optimal therapeutic approaches because demonstrating a clear survival benefit now requires many years of follow‐up. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is recognized as a sensitive and rapid approach to evaluate treatment efficacy that predicts progression‐free and overall survival independent of categorical response assessment and patients’ biology. The benefit of MRD analysis is reflected in the many different techniques (multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and high‐throughput sequencing) and collaborative groups (including EMN, ESCCA, ICCS, EuroFlow, and EuroMRD) that have performed collaborative projects to harmonize quantitative MRD detection. The time has come to adopt a consensus approach, and this report reviews the benefits and disadvantages of different strategies for MRD detection in myeloma and highlights the requirements for a sensitive, reproducible, and clinically meaningful cellular analytical approach. © 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cyto.b.21272 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7511969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3924062811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1v1DAQxSMEoqVw44wsceFAFtvxR3JBKgstSBWVSlGBi-U4E9YlsRdPAux_j8u2K-CAOM1I85s3fn5F8ZDRBaOUP3ObKS7aBWdc81vFPpOSl6KR-vauF81ecQ_xktJKCqXvFntcccprJfaLi0NEQBwhTCT2ZPTBj3YgCdB3c246j2ARiA9k3MAQR0ts6Mi0AhIAOtLHRCxxMSAEnJHY9TpF61b3izu9HRAeXNeD4v3Rq_Pl6_Lk9PjN8vCkdJLXvAStqdayq8G1VvSSSd5L1XIhgQvFnHAtq2petbYXnbJMcNFAVTOtO6tyqQ6K51vd9dyO0LnsI9nBrFO2kTYmWm_-nAS_Mp_jN6MlY41qssCTa4EUv86Akxk9OhgGGyDOaJiuJc9ntfoPVNG60Q2jGX38F3oZ5xTyT2RKalVLwWWmnm4plyJign73bkbNVbjmKlzTml_hZvzR71538E2aGRBb4LsfYPNPMbP8eH764ka33K55nODHbs2mL0bpSktz8fbYfDoSL9-dfWjMWfUTlgzAFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757685425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Rawstron, Andy C. ; Paiva, Bruno ; Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</creator><creatorcontrib>Rawstron, Andy C. ; Paiva, Bruno ; Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</creatorcontrib><description>Treatment options for myeloma continue to develop at a rapid pace, and it is becoming increasingly challenging to determine the optimal therapeutic approaches because demonstrating a clear survival benefit now requires many years of follow‐up. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is recognized as a sensitive and rapid approach to evaluate treatment efficacy that predicts progression‐free and overall survival independent of categorical response assessment and patients’ biology. The benefit of MRD analysis is reflected in the many different techniques (multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and high‐throughput sequencing) and collaborative groups (including EMN, ESCCA, ICCS, EuroFlow, and EuroMRD) that have performed collaborative projects to harmonize quantitative MRD detection. The time has come to adopt a consensus approach, and this report reviews the benefits and disadvantages of different strategies for MRD detection in myeloma and highlights the requirements for a sensitive, reproducible, and clinically meaningful cellular analytical approach. © 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21272</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26202864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Antigens, CD - analysis ; Antigens, CD - genetics ; Antigens, CD - immunology ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Consensus ; Flow Cytometry ; Gene Expression ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; high throughput sequencing ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - genetics ; Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - immunology ; minimal residual disease ; Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis ; Multiple Myeloma - immunology ; Multiple Myeloma - mortality ; Multiple Myeloma - therapy ; Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis ; Neoplasm, Residual - immunology ; Neoplasm, Residual - mortality ; Neoplasm, Residual - therapy ; PCR ; plasma cell myeloma ; Plasma Cells - drug effects ; Plasma Cells - pathology ; Polymorphism, Genetic - immunology ; Prognosis ; quantification ; rare event detection ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Remission Induction ; Survival Analysis ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry, 2016-01, Vol.90 (1), p.21-25</ispartof><rights>2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society</rights><rights>2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society.</rights><rights>2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26202864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rawstron, Andy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paiva, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach</title><title>Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry</title><addtitle>Cytometry</addtitle><description>Treatment options for myeloma continue to develop at a rapid pace, and it is becoming increasingly challenging to determine the optimal therapeutic approaches because demonstrating a clear survival benefit now requires many years of follow‐up. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is recognized as a sensitive and rapid approach to evaluate treatment efficacy that predicts progression‐free and overall survival independent of categorical response assessment and patients’ biology. The benefit of MRD analysis is reflected in the many different techniques (multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and high‐throughput sequencing) and collaborative groups (including EMN, ESCCA, ICCS, EuroFlow, and EuroMRD) that have performed collaborative projects to harmonize quantitative MRD detection. The time has come to adopt a consensus approach, and this report reviews the benefits and disadvantages of different strategies for MRD detection in myeloma and highlights the requirements for a sensitive, reproducible, and clinically meaningful cellular analytical approach. © 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society</description><subject>Antigens, CD - analysis</subject><subject>Antigens, CD - genetics</subject><subject>Antigens, CD - immunology</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Gene Expression</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>high throughput sequencing</subject><subject>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - genetics</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - immunology</subject><subject>minimal residual disease</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - immunology</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - mortality</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - immunology</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - therapy</subject><subject>PCR</subject><subject>plasma cell myeloma</subject><subject>Plasma Cells - drug effects</subject><subject>Plasma Cells - pathology</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic - immunology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>quantification</subject><subject>rare event detection</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1552-4949</issn><issn>1552-4957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1v1DAQxSMEoqVw44wsceFAFtvxR3JBKgstSBWVSlGBi-U4E9YlsRdPAux_j8u2K-CAOM1I85s3fn5F8ZDRBaOUP3ObKS7aBWdc81vFPpOSl6KR-vauF81ecQ_xktJKCqXvFntcccprJfaLi0NEQBwhTCT2ZPTBj3YgCdB3c246j2ARiA9k3MAQR0ts6Mi0AhIAOtLHRCxxMSAEnJHY9TpF61b3izu9HRAeXNeD4v3Rq_Pl6_Lk9PjN8vCkdJLXvAStqdayq8G1VvSSSd5L1XIhgQvFnHAtq2petbYXnbJMcNFAVTOtO6tyqQ6K51vd9dyO0LnsI9nBrFO2kTYmWm_-nAS_Mp_jN6MlY41qssCTa4EUv86Akxk9OhgGGyDOaJiuJc9ntfoPVNG60Q2jGX38F3oZ5xTyT2RKalVLwWWmnm4plyJign73bkbNVbjmKlzTml_hZvzR71538E2aGRBb4LsfYPNPMbP8eH764ka33K55nODHbs2mL0bpSktz8fbYfDoSL9-dfWjMWfUTlgzAFg</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Rawstron, Andy C.</creator><creator>Paiva, Bruno</creator><creator>Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach</title><author>Rawstron, Andy C. ; Paiva, Bruno ; Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Antigens, CD - analysis</topic><topic>Antigens, CD - genetics</topic><topic>Antigens, CD - immunology</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Gene Expression</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>high throughput sequencing</topic><topic>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - genetics</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - immunology</topic><topic>minimal residual disease</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - immunology</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - mortality</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - immunology</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - therapy</topic><topic>PCR</topic><topic>plasma cell myeloma</topic><topic>Plasma Cells - drug effects</topic><topic>Plasma Cells - pathology</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic - immunology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>quantification</topic><topic>rare event detection</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rawstron, Andy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paiva, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rawstron, Andy C.</au><au>Paiva, Bruno</au><au>Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach</atitle><jtitle>Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry</jtitle><addtitle>Cytometry</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>21-25</pages><issn>1552-4949</issn><eissn>1552-4957</eissn><abstract>Treatment options for myeloma continue to develop at a rapid pace, and it is becoming increasingly challenging to determine the optimal therapeutic approaches because demonstrating a clear survival benefit now requires many years of follow‐up. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is recognized as a sensitive and rapid approach to evaluate treatment efficacy that predicts progression‐free and overall survival independent of categorical response assessment and patients’ biology. The benefit of MRD analysis is reflected in the many different techniques (multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and high‐throughput sequencing) and collaborative groups (including EMN, ESCCA, ICCS, EuroFlow, and EuroMRD) that have performed collaborative projects to harmonize quantitative MRD detection. The time has come to adopt a consensus approach, and this report reviews the benefits and disadvantages of different strategies for MRD detection in myeloma and highlights the requirements for a sensitive, reproducible, and clinically meaningful cellular analytical approach. © 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26202864</pmid><doi>10.1002/cyto.b.21272</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1552-4949 |
ispartof | Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry, 2016-01, Vol.90 (1), p.21-25 |
issn | 1552-4949 1552-4957 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7511969 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Antigens, CD - analysis Antigens, CD - genetics Antigens, CD - immunology Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols Consensus Flow Cytometry Gene Expression Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation high throughput sequencing High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing Humans Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - genetics Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - immunology minimal residual disease Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis Multiple Myeloma - immunology Multiple Myeloma - mortality Multiple Myeloma - therapy Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis Neoplasm, Residual - immunology Neoplasm, Residual - mortality Neoplasm, Residual - therapy PCR plasma cell myeloma Plasma Cells - drug effects Plasma Cells - pathology Polymorphism, Genetic - immunology Prognosis quantification rare event detection Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Remission Induction Survival Analysis Transplantation, Autologous Treatment Outcome |
title | Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A52%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20minimal%20residual%20disease%20in%20myeloma%20and%20the%20need%20for%20a%20consensus%20approach&rft.jtitle=Cytometry.%20Part%20B,%20Clinical%20cytometry&rft.au=Rawstron,%20Andy%20C.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=21-25&rft.issn=1552-4949&rft.eissn=1552-4957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cyto.b.21272&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3924062811%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757685425&rft_id=info:pmid/26202864&rfr_iscdi=true |