Loading…

Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach

Treatment options for myeloma continue to develop at a rapid pace, and it is becoming increasingly challenging to determine the optimal therapeutic approaches because demonstrating a clear survival benefit now requires many years of follow‐up. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is recog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry Clinical cytometry, 2016-01, Vol.90 (1), p.21-25
Main Authors: Rawstron, Andy C., Paiva, Bruno, Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 21
container_title Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry
container_volume 90
creator Rawstron, Andy C.
Paiva, Bruno
Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice
description Treatment options for myeloma continue to develop at a rapid pace, and it is becoming increasingly challenging to determine the optimal therapeutic approaches because demonstrating a clear survival benefit now requires many years of follow‐up. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is recognized as a sensitive and rapid approach to evaluate treatment efficacy that predicts progression‐free and overall survival independent of categorical response assessment and patients’ biology. The benefit of MRD analysis is reflected in the many different techniques (multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and high‐throughput sequencing) and collaborative groups (including EMN, ESCCA, ICCS, EuroFlow, and EuroMRD) that have performed collaborative projects to harmonize quantitative MRD detection. The time has come to adopt a consensus approach, and this report reviews the benefits and disadvantages of different strategies for MRD detection in myeloma and highlights the requirements for a sensitive, reproducible, and clinically meaningful cellular analytical approach. © 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cyto.b.21272
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7511969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3924062811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1v1DAQxSMEoqVw44wsceFAFtvxR3JBKgstSBWVSlGBi-U4E9YlsRdPAux_j8u2K-CAOM1I85s3fn5F8ZDRBaOUP3ObKS7aBWdc81vFPpOSl6KR-vauF81ecQ_xktJKCqXvFntcccprJfaLi0NEQBwhTCT2ZPTBj3YgCdB3c246j2ARiA9k3MAQR0ts6Mi0AhIAOtLHRCxxMSAEnJHY9TpF61b3izu9HRAeXNeD4v3Rq_Pl6_Lk9PjN8vCkdJLXvAStqdayq8G1VvSSSd5L1XIhgQvFnHAtq2petbYXnbJMcNFAVTOtO6tyqQ6K51vd9dyO0LnsI9nBrFO2kTYmWm_-nAS_Mp_jN6MlY41qssCTa4EUv86Akxk9OhgGGyDOaJiuJc9ntfoPVNG60Q2jGX38F3oZ5xTyT2RKalVLwWWmnm4plyJign73bkbNVbjmKlzTml_hZvzR71538E2aGRBb4LsfYPNPMbP8eH764ka33K55nODHbs2mL0bpSktz8fbYfDoSL9-dfWjMWfUTlgzAFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757685425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Rawstron, Andy C. ; Paiva, Bruno ; Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</creator><creatorcontrib>Rawstron, Andy C. ; Paiva, Bruno ; Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</creatorcontrib><description>Treatment options for myeloma continue to develop at a rapid pace, and it is becoming increasingly challenging to determine the optimal therapeutic approaches because demonstrating a clear survival benefit now requires many years of follow‐up. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is recognized as a sensitive and rapid approach to evaluate treatment efficacy that predicts progression‐free and overall survival independent of categorical response assessment and patients’ biology. The benefit of MRD analysis is reflected in the many different techniques (multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and high‐throughput sequencing) and collaborative groups (including EMN, ESCCA, ICCS, EuroFlow, and EuroMRD) that have performed collaborative projects to harmonize quantitative MRD detection. The time has come to adopt a consensus approach, and this report reviews the benefits and disadvantages of different strategies for MRD detection in myeloma and highlights the requirements for a sensitive, reproducible, and clinically meaningful cellular analytical approach. © 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21272</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26202864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Antigens, CD - analysis ; Antigens, CD - genetics ; Antigens, CD - immunology ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Consensus ; Flow Cytometry ; Gene Expression ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; high throughput sequencing ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - genetics ; Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - immunology ; minimal residual disease ; Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis ; Multiple Myeloma - immunology ; Multiple Myeloma - mortality ; Multiple Myeloma - therapy ; Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis ; Neoplasm, Residual - immunology ; Neoplasm, Residual - mortality ; Neoplasm, Residual - therapy ; PCR ; plasma cell myeloma ; Plasma Cells - drug effects ; Plasma Cells - pathology ; Polymorphism, Genetic - immunology ; Prognosis ; quantification ; rare event detection ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Remission Induction ; Survival Analysis ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry, 2016-01, Vol.90 (1), p.21-25</ispartof><rights>2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society</rights><rights>2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society.</rights><rights>2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26202864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rawstron, Andy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paiva, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach</title><title>Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry</title><addtitle>Cytometry</addtitle><description>Treatment options for myeloma continue to develop at a rapid pace, and it is becoming increasingly challenging to determine the optimal therapeutic approaches because demonstrating a clear survival benefit now requires many years of follow‐up. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is recognized as a sensitive and rapid approach to evaluate treatment efficacy that predicts progression‐free and overall survival independent of categorical response assessment and patients’ biology. The benefit of MRD analysis is reflected in the many different techniques (multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and high‐throughput sequencing) and collaborative groups (including EMN, ESCCA, ICCS, EuroFlow, and EuroMRD) that have performed collaborative projects to harmonize quantitative MRD detection. The time has come to adopt a consensus approach, and this report reviews the benefits and disadvantages of different strategies for MRD detection in myeloma and highlights the requirements for a sensitive, reproducible, and clinically meaningful cellular analytical approach. © 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society</description><subject>Antigens, CD - analysis</subject><subject>Antigens, CD - genetics</subject><subject>Antigens, CD - immunology</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Gene Expression</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>high throughput sequencing</subject><subject>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - genetics</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - immunology</subject><subject>minimal residual disease</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - immunology</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - mortality</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - immunology</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - therapy</subject><subject>PCR</subject><subject>plasma cell myeloma</subject><subject>Plasma Cells - drug effects</subject><subject>Plasma Cells - pathology</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic - immunology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>quantification</subject><subject>rare event detection</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1552-4949</issn><issn>1552-4957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1v1DAQxSMEoqVw44wsceFAFtvxR3JBKgstSBWVSlGBi-U4E9YlsRdPAux_j8u2K-CAOM1I85s3fn5F8ZDRBaOUP3ObKS7aBWdc81vFPpOSl6KR-vauF81ecQ_xktJKCqXvFntcccprJfaLi0NEQBwhTCT2ZPTBj3YgCdB3c246j2ARiA9k3MAQR0ts6Mi0AhIAOtLHRCxxMSAEnJHY9TpF61b3izu9HRAeXNeD4v3Rq_Pl6_Lk9PjN8vCkdJLXvAStqdayq8G1VvSSSd5L1XIhgQvFnHAtq2petbYXnbJMcNFAVTOtO6tyqQ6K51vd9dyO0LnsI9nBrFO2kTYmWm_-nAS_Mp_jN6MlY41qssCTa4EUv86Akxk9OhgGGyDOaJiuJc9ntfoPVNG60Q2jGX38F3oZ5xTyT2RKalVLwWWmnm4plyJign73bkbNVbjmKlzTml_hZvzR71538E2aGRBb4LsfYPNPMbP8eH764ka33K55nODHbs2mL0bpSktz8fbYfDoSL9-dfWjMWfUTlgzAFg</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Rawstron, Andy C.</creator><creator>Paiva, Bruno</creator><creator>Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach</title><author>Rawstron, Andy C. ; Paiva, Bruno ; Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Antigens, CD - analysis</topic><topic>Antigens, CD - genetics</topic><topic>Antigens, CD - immunology</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Gene Expression</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>high throughput sequencing</topic><topic>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - genetics</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - immunology</topic><topic>minimal residual disease</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - immunology</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - mortality</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - immunology</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - therapy</topic><topic>PCR</topic><topic>plasma cell myeloma</topic><topic>Plasma Cells - drug effects</topic><topic>Plasma Cells - pathology</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic - immunology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>quantification</topic><topic>rare event detection</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rawstron, Andy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paiva, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rawstron, Andy C.</au><au>Paiva, Bruno</au><au>Stetler-Stevenson, Maryalice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach</atitle><jtitle>Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry</jtitle><addtitle>Cytometry</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>21-25</pages><issn>1552-4949</issn><eissn>1552-4957</eissn><abstract>Treatment options for myeloma continue to develop at a rapid pace, and it is becoming increasingly challenging to determine the optimal therapeutic approaches because demonstrating a clear survival benefit now requires many years of follow‐up. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is recognized as a sensitive and rapid approach to evaluate treatment efficacy that predicts progression‐free and overall survival independent of categorical response assessment and patients’ biology. The benefit of MRD analysis is reflected in the many different techniques (multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and high‐throughput sequencing) and collaborative groups (including EMN, ESCCA, ICCS, EuroFlow, and EuroMRD) that have performed collaborative projects to harmonize quantitative MRD detection. The time has come to adopt a consensus approach, and this report reviews the benefits and disadvantages of different strategies for MRD detection in myeloma and highlights the requirements for a sensitive, reproducible, and clinically meaningful cellular analytical approach. © 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26202864</pmid><doi>10.1002/cyto.b.21272</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-4949
ispartof Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry, 2016-01, Vol.90 (1), p.21-25
issn 1552-4949
1552-4957
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7511969
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Antigens, CD - analysis
Antigens, CD - genetics
Antigens, CD - immunology
Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Consensus
Flow Cytometry
Gene Expression
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
high throughput sequencing
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - genetics
Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains - immunology
minimal residual disease
Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis
Multiple Myeloma - immunology
Multiple Myeloma - mortality
Multiple Myeloma - therapy
Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis
Neoplasm, Residual - immunology
Neoplasm, Residual - mortality
Neoplasm, Residual - therapy
PCR
plasma cell myeloma
Plasma Cells - drug effects
Plasma Cells - pathology
Polymorphism, Genetic - immunology
Prognosis
quantification
rare event detection
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Remission Induction
Survival Analysis
Transplantation, Autologous
Treatment Outcome
title Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A52%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20minimal%20residual%20disease%20in%20myeloma%20and%20the%20need%20for%20a%20consensus%20approach&rft.jtitle=Cytometry.%20Part%20B,%20Clinical%20cytometry&rft.au=Rawstron,%20Andy%20C.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=21-25&rft.issn=1552-4949&rft.eissn=1552-4957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cyto.b.21272&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3924062811%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5282-e770775d8ecba4f5152f56b245e2461c4cb13823baf4d6a14249e38177da68173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757685425&rft_id=info:pmid/26202864&rfr_iscdi=true