Reduced-port totally robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: 100 consecutive cases in comparison with conventional robotic and laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy

By overcoming technical difficulties with limited access faced when performing reduced-port surgery for gastric cancer, reduced-port totally robotic gastrectomy (RPRDG) could be a safe alternative to conventional minimally invasive gastrectomy. An initial 100 consecutive cases of RPRDG for gastric c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2020-09, Vol.10 (1), p.16015-16015, Article 16015
Main Authors: Seo, Won Jun, Son, Taeil, Shin, Hyejung, Choi, Seohee, Roh, Chul Kyu, Cho, Minah, Kim, Hyoung-Il, Hyung, Woo Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
692/4020/1503
692/4020/2741/533
Adult
Aged
C-Reactive Protein - metabolism
Female
Gastrectomy - instrumentation
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Laparoscopy
Lymph Node Excision - methods
Male
Middle Aged
multidisciplinary
Operative Time
Retrospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Stomach Neoplasms - metabolism
Stomach Neoplasms - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:By overcoming technical difficulties with limited access faced when performing reduced-port surgery for gastric cancer, reduced-port totally robotic gastrectomy (RPRDG) could be a safe alternative to conventional minimally invasive gastrectomy. An initial 100 consecutive cases of RPRDG for gastric cancer were performed from February 2016 to September 2018. Short-term outcomes for RPRDG with those for 261 conventional laparoscopic (CLDG) and for 241 robotic procedures (CRDG) over the same period were compared. Learning curve analysis for RPRDG was conducted to determine whether this procedure could be readily performed despite fewer access. During the first 100 cases of RPRDG, no surgeries were converted to open or laparoscopic surgery, and no additional ports were required. RPRDG showed longer operation time than CLDG (188.4 min vs. 166.2 min, p 
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-73118-9