Loading…
5PSQ-062 Management and effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel in metastasic pancreatic adenocarcinoma
BackgroundAlbumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is authorised to treat metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, as a first treatment in combination with gemcitabine.PurposeTo evaluate the management and effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer.Material and methodsObservational and...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice 2018-03, Vol.25 (Suppl 1), p.A193-A193 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | A193 |
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A193 |
container_title | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Romeo, A Llorente Torrón, A Martinez García, IZapico |
description | BackgroundAlbumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is authorised to treat metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, as a first treatment in combination with gemcitabine.PurposeTo evaluate the management and effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer.Material and methodsObservational and retrospective study included patients treated with nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15, from May 2013 to December 2016. Variables collected: sex, age, treatment line, Karnofsky performance-status score (KPS), tumour staging at diagnosis (pTNM, AJCC 7th Edition) and previous chemotherapy. Clinical data was obtained from electronic history Cerner–Millenium® and oncology prescription software Farmis-Oncofarm®. Effectiveness variables: overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with log-rank test.ResultsA total of 64 patients started nab-paclitaxel. The proportion of males was 50%. The median age was 64 years (44 to 75). Stage IV was diagnosed in 43.8%. Overall, 62.5% received it as a first line and 37.5% (24 patients) as >first line (off-label). Eighteen patients (75%) had previously been treated with combination therapy consisting of 5-FU/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX). Nab-paclitaxel associated with gemcitabine (GEM/nab-paclitaxel) was administered to 52 patients and nab-paclitaxel monotherapy (off-label) was administered to 12. The median OS (mOS) with GEM/nab-paclitaxel was 42.1 weeks (95% CI: 2.2 to 82.1: data for 51% of the patients was censored . Nab-paclitaxel monotherapy was compared with GEM/nab-paclitaxel and median PFS (mPFS) was similar in both groups (18.4 vs 19.3 weeks). The mPFS was different according to the treatment line: 35 weeks (95% CI: 23 to 47) and 11.7 (95% CI: 8. 4 to 15. 1) for 1 st line and >1 st line, respectively (p=0,001). The mPFS was 29. 4 weeks (95% CI: 14.1 to 40.7) for patients with KPS ≥80 versus 9.9 (95% CI: 8.4 to 11.3) with KPS ≤70, p=0.001. Patients were stratified according to age and staging: mPFS was higher for patients |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-eahpconf.416 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7535339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2552769257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2096-ab906eec2d3f8a97a29109297c7eb3f06b8613d790f290df6fa2b5fa85373e103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1LxDAQLaKgqP-h6LmajyZpLoKIX7Ciop7DJJ3sZtmmte2K3rz4R_0lRtYVvAgD82DePN7My7IDSo4o5fIY57NuBn1TMEKrAmHWuTb6o5LKjWyHkVIVWsty8xcLuZ3tD0OwRHBe6ZLrnQzE3cN9QST7fP-4gQhTbDCOOcQ6R-_RjeEFIw5D3vo8gi06cIswwisu8hDzBkcYUgWXdxBdjzAmCDXG1kHvQmwb2Mu2PCwG3P_pu9nTxfnj2VUxub28PjudFJYRLQuwmkhEx2ruK9AKmKZEM62cQss9kbaSlNdKE880qb30wKzwUAmuOFLCd7OTlW63tA3WLp3Rw8J0fWigfzMtBPN3EsPMTNsXowRP_9BJ4PBHoG-flziMZt4u-5g8GyYEU1Izof5lkWSDV1yUiSVWLNvMfy1QYr5zM-vcvhcqs87NpNz4FzhKkso</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2010338354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>5PSQ-062 Management and effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel in metastasic pancreatic adenocarcinoma</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Romeo, A Llorente ; Torrón, A Martinez ; García, IZapico</creator><creatorcontrib>Romeo, A Llorente ; Torrón, A Martinez ; García, IZapico</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundAlbumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is authorised to treat metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, as a first treatment in combination with gemcitabine.PurposeTo evaluate the management and effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer.Material and methodsObservational and retrospective study included patients treated with nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15, from May 2013 to December 2016. Variables collected: sex, age, treatment line, Karnofsky performance-status score (KPS), tumour staging at diagnosis (pTNM, AJCC 7th Edition) and previous chemotherapy. Clinical data was obtained from electronic history Cerner–Millenium® and oncology prescription software Farmis-Oncofarm®. Effectiveness variables: overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with log-rank test.ResultsA total of 64 patients started nab-paclitaxel. The proportion of males was 50%. The median age was 64 years (44 to 75). Stage IV was diagnosed in 43.8%. Overall, 62.5% received it as a first line and 37.5% (24 patients) as >first line (off-label). Eighteen patients (75%) had previously been treated with combination therapy consisting of 5-FU/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX). Nab-paclitaxel associated with gemcitabine (GEM/nab-paclitaxel) was administered to 52 patients and nab-paclitaxel monotherapy (off-label) was administered to 12. The median OS (mOS) with GEM/nab-paclitaxel was 42.1 weeks (95% CI: 2.2 to 82.1: data for 51% of the patients was censored . Nab-paclitaxel monotherapy was compared with GEM/nab-paclitaxel and median PFS (mPFS) was similar in both groups (18.4 vs 19.3 weeks). The mPFS was different according to the treatment line: 35 weeks (95% CI: 23 to 47) and 11.7 (95% CI: 8. 4 to 15. 1) for 1 st line and >1 st line, respectively (p=0,001). The mPFS was 29. 4 weeks (95% CI: 14.1 to 40.7) for patients with KPS ≥80 versus 9.9 (95% CI: 8.4 to 11.3) with KPS ≤70, p=0.001. Patients were stratified according to age and staging: mPFS was higher for patients<65 years and stages<IV, but the difference was not significant.ConclusionOS is higher than in the pivotal study (34 weeks) but it may not be analysable because more follow-up time would be needed. The results of PFS are optimised when nab-paclitaxel is used as a first line, according to the conditions of the marketing authorisation, and for patients with KPS ≥80.No conflict of interest</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-9956</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-9964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-eahpconf.416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Pancreatic cancer ; Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</subject><ispartof>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2018-03, Vol.25 (Suppl 1), p.A193-A193</ispartof><rights>2018, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2018 © 2018, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2018 2018, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2018, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7535339/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7535339/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romeo, A Llorente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrón, A Martinez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García, IZapico</creatorcontrib><title>5PSQ-062 Management and effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel in metastasic pancreatic adenocarcinoma</title><title>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</title><description>BackgroundAlbumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is authorised to treat metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, as a first treatment in combination with gemcitabine.PurposeTo evaluate the management and effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer.Material and methodsObservational and retrospective study included patients treated with nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15, from May 2013 to December 2016. Variables collected: sex, age, treatment line, Karnofsky performance-status score (KPS), tumour staging at diagnosis (pTNM, AJCC 7th Edition) and previous chemotherapy. Clinical data was obtained from electronic history Cerner–Millenium® and oncology prescription software Farmis-Oncofarm®. Effectiveness variables: overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with log-rank test.ResultsA total of 64 patients started nab-paclitaxel. The proportion of males was 50%. The median age was 64 years (44 to 75). Stage IV was diagnosed in 43.8%. Overall, 62.5% received it as a first line and 37.5% (24 patients) as >first line (off-label). Eighteen patients (75%) had previously been treated with combination therapy consisting of 5-FU/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX). Nab-paclitaxel associated with gemcitabine (GEM/nab-paclitaxel) was administered to 52 patients and nab-paclitaxel monotherapy (off-label) was administered to 12. The median OS (mOS) with GEM/nab-paclitaxel was 42.1 weeks (95% CI: 2.2 to 82.1: data for 51% of the patients was censored . Nab-paclitaxel monotherapy was compared with GEM/nab-paclitaxel and median PFS (mPFS) was similar in both groups (18.4 vs 19.3 weeks). The mPFS was different according to the treatment line: 35 weeks (95% CI: 23 to 47) and 11.7 (95% CI: 8. 4 to 15. 1) for 1 st line and >1 st line, respectively (p=0,001). The mPFS was 29. 4 weeks (95% CI: 14.1 to 40.7) for patients with KPS ≥80 versus 9.9 (95% CI: 8.4 to 11.3) with KPS ≤70, p=0.001. Patients were stratified according to age and staging: mPFS was higher for patients<65 years and stages<IV, but the difference was not significant.ConclusionOS is higher than in the pivotal study (34 weeks) but it may not be analysable because more follow-up time would be needed. The results of PFS are optimised when nab-paclitaxel is used as a first line, according to the conditions of the marketing authorisation, and for patients with KPS ≥80.No conflict of interest</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Pancreatic cancer</subject><subject>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</subject><issn>2047-9956</issn><issn>2047-9964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU1LxDAQLaKgqP-h6LmajyZpLoKIX7Ciop7DJJ3sZtmmte2K3rz4R_0lRtYVvAgD82DePN7My7IDSo4o5fIY57NuBn1TMEKrAmHWuTb6o5LKjWyHkVIVWsty8xcLuZ3tD0OwRHBe6ZLrnQzE3cN9QST7fP-4gQhTbDCOOcQ6R-_RjeEFIw5D3vo8gi06cIswwisu8hDzBkcYUgWXdxBdjzAmCDXG1kHvQmwb2Mu2PCwG3P_pu9nTxfnj2VUxub28PjudFJYRLQuwmkhEx2ruK9AKmKZEM62cQss9kbaSlNdKE880qb30wKzwUAmuOFLCd7OTlW63tA3WLp3Rw8J0fWigfzMtBPN3EsPMTNsXowRP_9BJ4PBHoG-flziMZt4u-5g8GyYEU1Izof5lkWSDV1yUiSVWLNvMfy1QYr5zM-vcvhcqs87NpNz4FzhKkso</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Romeo, A Llorente</creator><creator>Torrón, A Martinez</creator><creator>García, IZapico</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>5PSQ-062 Management and effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel in metastasic pancreatic adenocarcinoma</title><author>Romeo, A Llorente ; Torrón, A Martinez ; García, IZapico</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2096-ab906eec2d3f8a97a29109297c7eb3f06b8613d790f290df6fa2b5fa85373e103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Pancreatic cancer</topic><topic>Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romeo, A Llorente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrón, A Martinez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García, IZapico</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romeo, A Llorente</au><au>Torrón, A Martinez</au><au>García, IZapico</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>5PSQ-062 Management and effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel in metastasic pancreatic adenocarcinoma</atitle><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A193</spage><epage>A193</epage><pages>A193-A193</pages><issn>2047-9956</issn><eissn>2047-9964</eissn><abstract>BackgroundAlbumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is authorised to treat metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, as a first treatment in combination with gemcitabine.PurposeTo evaluate the management and effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer.Material and methodsObservational and retrospective study included patients treated with nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15, from May 2013 to December 2016. Variables collected: sex, age, treatment line, Karnofsky performance-status score (KPS), tumour staging at diagnosis (pTNM, AJCC 7th Edition) and previous chemotherapy. Clinical data was obtained from electronic history Cerner–Millenium® and oncology prescription software Farmis-Oncofarm®. Effectiveness variables: overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with log-rank test.ResultsA total of 64 patients started nab-paclitaxel. The proportion of males was 50%. The median age was 64 years (44 to 75). Stage IV was diagnosed in 43.8%. Overall, 62.5% received it as a first line and 37.5% (24 patients) as >first line (off-label). Eighteen patients (75%) had previously been treated with combination therapy consisting of 5-FU/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX). Nab-paclitaxel associated with gemcitabine (GEM/nab-paclitaxel) was administered to 52 patients and nab-paclitaxel monotherapy (off-label) was administered to 12. The median OS (mOS) with GEM/nab-paclitaxel was 42.1 weeks (95% CI: 2.2 to 82.1: data for 51% of the patients was censored . Nab-paclitaxel monotherapy was compared with GEM/nab-paclitaxel and median PFS (mPFS) was similar in both groups (18.4 vs 19.3 weeks). The mPFS was different according to the treatment line: 35 weeks (95% CI: 23 to 47) and 11.7 (95% CI: 8. 4 to 15. 1) for 1 st line and >1 st line, respectively (p=0,001). The mPFS was 29. 4 weeks (95% CI: 14.1 to 40.7) for patients with KPS ≥80 versus 9.9 (95% CI: 8.4 to 11.3) with KPS ≤70, p=0.001. Patients were stratified according to age and staging: mPFS was higher for patients<65 years and stages<IV, but the difference was not significant.ConclusionOS is higher than in the pivotal study (34 weeks) but it may not be analysable because more follow-up time would be needed. The results of PFS are optimised when nab-paclitaxel is used as a first line, according to the conditions of the marketing authorisation, and for patients with KPS ≥80.No conflict of interest</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-eahpconf.416</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2047-9956 |
ispartof | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2018-03, Vol.25 (Suppl 1), p.A193-A193 |
issn | 2047-9956 2047-9964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7535339 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Cancer Pancreatic cancer Section 5: Patient safety and quality assurance |
title | 5PSQ-062 Management and effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel in metastasic pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A36%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=5PSQ-062%E2%80%85Management%20and%20effectiveness%20of%20nab-paclitaxel%20in%20metastasic%20pancreatic%20adenocarcinoma&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20hospital%20pharmacy.%20Science%20and%20practice&rft.au=Romeo,%20A%20Llorente&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A193&rft.epage=A193&rft.pages=A193-A193&rft.issn=2047-9956&rft.eissn=2047-9964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-eahpconf.416&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2552769257%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2096-ab906eec2d3f8a97a29109297c7eb3f06b8613d790f290df6fa2b5fa85373e103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2010338354&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |