Loading…
Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics. The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pathology. The foveal...
Saved in:
Published in: | Translational vision science & technology 2020-10, Vol.9 (11), p.7-7 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63 |
container_end_page | 7 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 7 |
container_title | Translational vision science & technology |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Kraker, Jessica A Omoba, Bisola S Cava, Jenna A Gilat Schmidt, Taly Chui, Toco Y Rosen, Richard B Kim, Judy E Carroll, Joseph Linderman, Rachel E |
description | The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics.
The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pathology. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was segmented manually by two observers, from which estimates of FAZ area (using both the nominal image scale and the axial length corrected image scale) and acircularity were derived. Three scan sizes (3 mm, 6 mm HD, and 8 mm) from the AngioVue system were included for 15 eyes of 15 subjects without ocular pathology. For each subject, larger image sizes were resized to the same resolution as 3 × 3 mm scans, aligned, then cropped to a common area. FAZ area, FAZ acircularity, average and total parafoveal intercapillary area, vessel density, and vessel end points were computed.
Between the devices used here, there were no significant differences in FAZ acircularity (
= 0.88) or FAZ area using scaled (
= 0.11) or unscaled images (
= 0.069). Although there was no significant difference in FAZ area across scan sizes (
= 0.30), vessel morphometry metrics were all significantly influenced by scan size.
The scan devices and sizes used here do not affect FAZ area measures derived from manual segmentations. In contrast, vessel morphometry metrics are affected by scan size. As individual differences in axial length induce differences in absolute scan size, extreme care should be taken when interpreting metrics of vessel morphometry, both between and within OCT-A devices.
A better characterization of the confounds surrounding OCT-A retinal vasculature metrics can lead to improved application of these metrics as biomarkers for retinal and systemic diseases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1167/tvst.9.11.7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7545061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2454413634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1LAzEQDaKo1J68S46CbE022SS9CKV-FZSiVa8hyc5qZJvVzW5Bf70pVdG5zBve483wBqFDSkaUCnnarWI3Gic8kltoP6eCZ3kxptt_8B4axvhKUglVcC520R5jlFCp-D66m8QIMfrwjLsXwLNQ1T0EB7ip8Hz6kE3wOax8mk0o8cKZgBf-M7EB30Png6nxk4mur02Lb6FrvYsHaKcydYThdx-gx8uLh-l1djO_mk0nN5ljinYZUFLm1oEleWVUyaqispJaxY1VToHLCbPSqoIZAZWU3JZ5oRQBJgpnmBNsgM42vm-9XULpIHStqfVb65em_dCN8fo_E_yLfm5WWha8IIImg-Nvg7Z57yF2eumjg7o2AZo-6pyntCgTjCfpyUbq2ibGFqrfNZTo9R_0-g96nLCWSX3097Jf7U_q7At4c4S9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2454413634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kraker, Jessica A ; Omoba, Bisola S ; Cava, Jenna A ; Gilat Schmidt, Taly ; Chui, Toco Y ; Rosen, Richard B ; Kim, Judy E ; Carroll, Joseph ; Linderman, Rachel E</creator><creatorcontrib>Kraker, Jessica A ; Omoba, Bisola S ; Cava, Jenna A ; Gilat Schmidt, Taly ; Chui, Toco Y ; Rosen, Richard B ; Kim, Judy E ; Carroll, Joseph ; Linderman, Rachel E</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics.
The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pathology. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was segmented manually by two observers, from which estimates of FAZ area (using both the nominal image scale and the axial length corrected image scale) and acircularity were derived. Three scan sizes (3 mm, 6 mm HD, and 8 mm) from the AngioVue system were included for 15 eyes of 15 subjects without ocular pathology. For each subject, larger image sizes were resized to the same resolution as 3 × 3 mm scans, aligned, then cropped to a common area. FAZ area, FAZ acircularity, average and total parafoveal intercapillary area, vessel density, and vessel end points were computed.
Between the devices used here, there were no significant differences in FAZ acircularity (
= 0.88) or FAZ area using scaled (
= 0.11) or unscaled images (
= 0.069). Although there was no significant difference in FAZ area across scan sizes (
= 0.30), vessel morphometry metrics were all significantly influenced by scan size.
The scan devices and sizes used here do not affect FAZ area measures derived from manual segmentations. In contrast, vessel morphometry metrics are affected by scan size. As individual differences in axial length induce differences in absolute scan size, extreme care should be taken when interpreting metrics of vessel morphometry, both between and within OCT-A devices.
A better characterization of the confounds surrounding OCT-A retinal vasculature metrics can lead to improved application of these metrics as biomarkers for retinal and systemic diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2164-2591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.11.7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33101784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Fluorescein Angiography ; Fovea Centralis ; Humans ; Retinal Vessels - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><ispartof>Translational vision science & technology, 2020-10, Vol.9 (11), p.7-7</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2020 The Authors.</rights><rights>Copyright 2020 The Authors 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545061/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545061/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kraker, Jessica A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omoba, Bisola S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cava, Jenna A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilat Schmidt, Taly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chui, Toco Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Richard B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Judy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linderman, Rachel E</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics</title><title>Translational vision science & technology</title><addtitle>Transl Vis Sci Technol</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics.
The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pathology. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was segmented manually by two observers, from which estimates of FAZ area (using both the nominal image scale and the axial length corrected image scale) and acircularity were derived. Three scan sizes (3 mm, 6 mm HD, and 8 mm) from the AngioVue system were included for 15 eyes of 15 subjects without ocular pathology. For each subject, larger image sizes were resized to the same resolution as 3 × 3 mm scans, aligned, then cropped to a common area. FAZ area, FAZ acircularity, average and total parafoveal intercapillary area, vessel density, and vessel end points were computed.
Between the devices used here, there were no significant differences in FAZ acircularity (
= 0.88) or FAZ area using scaled (
= 0.11) or unscaled images (
= 0.069). Although there was no significant difference in FAZ area across scan sizes (
= 0.30), vessel morphometry metrics were all significantly influenced by scan size.
The scan devices and sizes used here do not affect FAZ area measures derived from manual segmentations. In contrast, vessel morphometry metrics are affected by scan size. As individual differences in axial length induce differences in absolute scan size, extreme care should be taken when interpreting metrics of vessel morphometry, both between and within OCT-A devices.
A better characterization of the confounds surrounding OCT-A retinal vasculature metrics can lead to improved application of these metrics as biomarkers for retinal and systemic diseases.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Fluorescein Angiography</subject><subject>Fovea Centralis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Retinal Vessels - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><issn>2164-2591</issn><issn>2164-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1LAzEQDaKo1J68S46CbE022SS9CKV-FZSiVa8hyc5qZJvVzW5Bf70pVdG5zBve483wBqFDSkaUCnnarWI3Gic8kltoP6eCZ3kxptt_8B4axvhKUglVcC520R5jlFCp-D66m8QIMfrwjLsXwLNQ1T0EB7ip8Hz6kE3wOax8mk0o8cKZgBf-M7EB30Png6nxk4mur02Lb6FrvYsHaKcydYThdx-gx8uLh-l1djO_mk0nN5ljinYZUFLm1oEleWVUyaqispJaxY1VToHLCbPSqoIZAZWU3JZ5oRQBJgpnmBNsgM42vm-9XULpIHStqfVb65em_dCN8fo_E_yLfm5WWha8IIImg-Nvg7Z57yF2eumjg7o2AZo-6pyntCgTjCfpyUbq2ibGFqrfNZTo9R_0-g96nLCWSX3097Jf7U_q7At4c4S9</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Kraker, Jessica A</creator><creator>Omoba, Bisola S</creator><creator>Cava, Jenna A</creator><creator>Gilat Schmidt, Taly</creator><creator>Chui, Toco Y</creator><creator>Rosen, Richard B</creator><creator>Kim, Judy E</creator><creator>Carroll, Joseph</creator><creator>Linderman, Rachel E</creator><general>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics</title><author>Kraker, Jessica A ; Omoba, Bisola S ; Cava, Jenna A ; Gilat Schmidt, Taly ; Chui, Toco Y ; Rosen, Richard B ; Kim, Judy E ; Carroll, Joseph ; Linderman, Rachel E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Fluorescein Angiography</topic><topic>Fovea Centralis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Retinal Vessels - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kraker, Jessica A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omoba, Bisola S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cava, Jenna A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilat Schmidt, Taly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chui, Toco Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Richard B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Judy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linderman, Rachel E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Translational vision science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kraker, Jessica A</au><au>Omoba, Bisola S</au><au>Cava, Jenna A</au><au>Gilat Schmidt, Taly</au><au>Chui, Toco Y</au><au>Rosen, Richard B</au><au>Kim, Judy E</au><au>Carroll, Joseph</au><au>Linderman, Rachel E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics</atitle><jtitle>Translational vision science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Transl Vis Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>7-7</pages><issn>2164-2591</issn><eissn>2164-2591</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics.
The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pathology. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was segmented manually by two observers, from which estimates of FAZ area (using both the nominal image scale and the axial length corrected image scale) and acircularity were derived. Three scan sizes (3 mm, 6 mm HD, and 8 mm) from the AngioVue system were included for 15 eyes of 15 subjects without ocular pathology. For each subject, larger image sizes were resized to the same resolution as 3 × 3 mm scans, aligned, then cropped to a common area. FAZ area, FAZ acircularity, average and total parafoveal intercapillary area, vessel density, and vessel end points were computed.
Between the devices used here, there were no significant differences in FAZ acircularity (
= 0.88) or FAZ area using scaled (
= 0.11) or unscaled images (
= 0.069). Although there was no significant difference in FAZ area across scan sizes (
= 0.30), vessel morphometry metrics were all significantly influenced by scan size.
The scan devices and sizes used here do not affect FAZ area measures derived from manual segmentations. In contrast, vessel morphometry metrics are affected by scan size. As individual differences in axial length induce differences in absolute scan size, extreme care should be taken when interpreting metrics of vessel morphometry, both between and within OCT-A devices.
A better characterization of the confounds surrounding OCT-A retinal vasculature metrics can lead to improved application of these metrics as biomarkers for retinal and systemic diseases.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</pub><pmid>33101784</pmid><doi>10.1167/tvst.9.11.7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2164-2591 |
ispartof | Translational vision science & technology, 2020-10, Vol.9 (11), p.7-7 |
issn | 2164-2591 2164-2591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7545061 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Benchmarking Fluorescein Angiography Fovea Centralis Humans Retinal Vessels - diagnostic imaging Tomography, Optical Coherence |
title | Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A37%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20Influence%20of%20OCT-A%20Device%20and%20Scan%20Size%20on%20Retinal%20Vascular%20Metrics&rft.jtitle=Translational%20vision%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Kraker,%20Jessica%20A&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=7-7&rft.issn=2164-2591&rft.eissn=2164-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/tvst.9.11.7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2454413634%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2454413634&rft_id=info:pmid/33101784&rfr_iscdi=true |