Loading…

Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics. The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pathology. The foveal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Translational vision science & technology 2020-10, Vol.9 (11), p.7-7
Main Authors: Kraker, Jessica A, Omoba, Bisola S, Cava, Jenna A, Gilat Schmidt, Taly, Chui, Toco Y, Rosen, Richard B, Kim, Judy E, Carroll, Joseph, Linderman, Rachel E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63
container_end_page 7
container_issue 11
container_start_page 7
container_title Translational vision science & technology
container_volume 9
creator Kraker, Jessica A
Omoba, Bisola S
Cava, Jenna A
Gilat Schmidt, Taly
Chui, Toco Y
Rosen, Richard B
Kim, Judy E
Carroll, Joseph
Linderman, Rachel E
description The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics. The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pathology. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was segmented manually by two observers, from which estimates of FAZ area (using both the nominal image scale and the axial length corrected image scale) and acircularity were derived. Three scan sizes (3 mm, 6 mm HD, and 8 mm) from the AngioVue system were included for 15 eyes of 15 subjects without ocular pathology. For each subject, larger image sizes were resized to the same resolution as 3 × 3 mm scans, aligned, then cropped to a common area. FAZ area, FAZ acircularity, average and total parafoveal intercapillary area, vessel density, and vessel end points were computed. Between the devices used here, there were no significant differences in FAZ acircularity ( = 0.88) or FAZ area using scaled ( = 0.11) or unscaled images ( = 0.069). Although there was no significant difference in FAZ area across scan sizes ( = 0.30), vessel morphometry metrics were all significantly influenced by scan size. The scan devices and sizes used here do not affect FAZ area measures derived from manual segmentations. In contrast, vessel morphometry metrics are affected by scan size. As individual differences in axial length induce differences in absolute scan size, extreme care should be taken when interpreting metrics of vessel morphometry, both between and within OCT-A devices. A better characterization of the confounds surrounding OCT-A retinal vasculature metrics can lead to improved application of these metrics as biomarkers for retinal and systemic diseases.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/tvst.9.11.7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7545061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2454413634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1LAzEQDaKo1J68S46CbE022SS9CKV-FZSiVa8hyc5qZJvVzW5Bf70pVdG5zBve483wBqFDSkaUCnnarWI3Gic8kltoP6eCZ3kxptt_8B4axvhKUglVcC520R5jlFCp-D66m8QIMfrwjLsXwLNQ1T0EB7ip8Hz6kE3wOax8mk0o8cKZgBf-M7EB30Png6nxk4mur02Lb6FrvYsHaKcydYThdx-gx8uLh-l1djO_mk0nN5ljinYZUFLm1oEleWVUyaqispJaxY1VToHLCbPSqoIZAZWU3JZ5oRQBJgpnmBNsgM42vm-9XULpIHStqfVb65em_dCN8fo_E_yLfm5WWha8IIImg-Nvg7Z57yF2eumjg7o2AZo-6pyntCgTjCfpyUbq2ibGFqrfNZTo9R_0-g96nLCWSX3097Jf7U_q7At4c4S9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2454413634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kraker, Jessica A ; Omoba, Bisola S ; Cava, Jenna A ; Gilat Schmidt, Taly ; Chui, Toco Y ; Rosen, Richard B ; Kim, Judy E ; Carroll, Joseph ; Linderman, Rachel E</creator><creatorcontrib>Kraker, Jessica A ; Omoba, Bisola S ; Cava, Jenna A ; Gilat Schmidt, Taly ; Chui, Toco Y ; Rosen, Richard B ; Kim, Judy E ; Carroll, Joseph ; Linderman, Rachel E</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics. The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pathology. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was segmented manually by two observers, from which estimates of FAZ area (using both the nominal image scale and the axial length corrected image scale) and acircularity were derived. Three scan sizes (3 mm, 6 mm HD, and 8 mm) from the AngioVue system were included for 15 eyes of 15 subjects without ocular pathology. For each subject, larger image sizes were resized to the same resolution as 3 × 3 mm scans, aligned, then cropped to a common area. FAZ area, FAZ acircularity, average and total parafoveal intercapillary area, vessel density, and vessel end points were computed. Between the devices used here, there were no significant differences in FAZ acircularity ( = 0.88) or FAZ area using scaled ( = 0.11) or unscaled images ( = 0.069). Although there was no significant difference in FAZ area across scan sizes ( = 0.30), vessel morphometry metrics were all significantly influenced by scan size. The scan devices and sizes used here do not affect FAZ area measures derived from manual segmentations. In contrast, vessel morphometry metrics are affected by scan size. As individual differences in axial length induce differences in absolute scan size, extreme care should be taken when interpreting metrics of vessel morphometry, both between and within OCT-A devices. A better characterization of the confounds surrounding OCT-A retinal vasculature metrics can lead to improved application of these metrics as biomarkers for retinal and systemic diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2164-2591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.11.7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33101784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Fluorescein Angiography ; Fovea Centralis ; Humans ; Retinal Vessels - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><ispartof>Translational vision science &amp; technology, 2020-10, Vol.9 (11), p.7-7</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2020 The Authors.</rights><rights>Copyright 2020 The Authors 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545061/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7545061/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33101784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kraker, Jessica A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omoba, Bisola S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cava, Jenna A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilat Schmidt, Taly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chui, Toco Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Richard B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Judy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linderman, Rachel E</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics</title><title>Translational vision science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Transl Vis Sci Technol</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics. The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pathology. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was segmented manually by two observers, from which estimates of FAZ area (using both the nominal image scale and the axial length corrected image scale) and acircularity were derived. Three scan sizes (3 mm, 6 mm HD, and 8 mm) from the AngioVue system were included for 15 eyes of 15 subjects without ocular pathology. For each subject, larger image sizes were resized to the same resolution as 3 × 3 mm scans, aligned, then cropped to a common area. FAZ area, FAZ acircularity, average and total parafoveal intercapillary area, vessel density, and vessel end points were computed. Between the devices used here, there were no significant differences in FAZ acircularity ( = 0.88) or FAZ area using scaled ( = 0.11) or unscaled images ( = 0.069). Although there was no significant difference in FAZ area across scan sizes ( = 0.30), vessel morphometry metrics were all significantly influenced by scan size. The scan devices and sizes used here do not affect FAZ area measures derived from manual segmentations. In contrast, vessel morphometry metrics are affected by scan size. As individual differences in axial length induce differences in absolute scan size, extreme care should be taken when interpreting metrics of vessel morphometry, both between and within OCT-A devices. A better characterization of the confounds surrounding OCT-A retinal vasculature metrics can lead to improved application of these metrics as biomarkers for retinal and systemic diseases.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Fluorescein Angiography</subject><subject>Fovea Centralis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Retinal Vessels - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><issn>2164-2591</issn><issn>2164-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1LAzEQDaKo1J68S46CbE022SS9CKV-FZSiVa8hyc5qZJvVzW5Bf70pVdG5zBve483wBqFDSkaUCnnarWI3Gic8kltoP6eCZ3kxptt_8B4axvhKUglVcC520R5jlFCp-D66m8QIMfrwjLsXwLNQ1T0EB7ip8Hz6kE3wOax8mk0o8cKZgBf-M7EB30Png6nxk4mur02Lb6FrvYsHaKcydYThdx-gx8uLh-l1djO_mk0nN5ljinYZUFLm1oEleWVUyaqispJaxY1VToHLCbPSqoIZAZWU3JZ5oRQBJgpnmBNsgM42vm-9XULpIHStqfVb65em_dCN8fo_E_yLfm5WWha8IIImg-Nvg7Z57yF2eumjg7o2AZo-6pyntCgTjCfpyUbq2ibGFqrfNZTo9R_0-g96nLCWSX3097Jf7U_q7At4c4S9</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Kraker, Jessica A</creator><creator>Omoba, Bisola S</creator><creator>Cava, Jenna A</creator><creator>Gilat Schmidt, Taly</creator><creator>Chui, Toco Y</creator><creator>Rosen, Richard B</creator><creator>Kim, Judy E</creator><creator>Carroll, Joseph</creator><creator>Linderman, Rachel E</creator><general>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics</title><author>Kraker, Jessica A ; Omoba, Bisola S ; Cava, Jenna A ; Gilat Schmidt, Taly ; Chui, Toco Y ; Rosen, Richard B ; Kim, Judy E ; Carroll, Joseph ; Linderman, Rachel E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Fluorescein Angiography</topic><topic>Fovea Centralis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Retinal Vessels - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kraker, Jessica A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omoba, Bisola S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cava, Jenna A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilat Schmidt, Taly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chui, Toco Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Richard B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Judy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linderman, Rachel E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Translational vision science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kraker, Jessica A</au><au>Omoba, Bisola S</au><au>Cava, Jenna A</au><au>Gilat Schmidt, Taly</au><au>Chui, Toco Y</au><au>Rosen, Richard B</au><au>Kim, Judy E</au><au>Carroll, Joseph</au><au>Linderman, Rachel E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics</atitle><jtitle>Translational vision science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Transl Vis Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>7-7</pages><issn>2164-2591</issn><eissn>2164-2591</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of device and scan size on quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics. The 3 × 3 mm scans from Optovue AngioVue and Zeiss AngioPlex systems were included for 18 eyes of 18 subjects without ocular pathology. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was segmented manually by two observers, from which estimates of FAZ area (using both the nominal image scale and the axial length corrected image scale) and acircularity were derived. Three scan sizes (3 mm, 6 mm HD, and 8 mm) from the AngioVue system were included for 15 eyes of 15 subjects without ocular pathology. For each subject, larger image sizes were resized to the same resolution as 3 × 3 mm scans, aligned, then cropped to a common area. FAZ area, FAZ acircularity, average and total parafoveal intercapillary area, vessel density, and vessel end points were computed. Between the devices used here, there were no significant differences in FAZ acircularity ( = 0.88) or FAZ area using scaled ( = 0.11) or unscaled images ( = 0.069). Although there was no significant difference in FAZ area across scan sizes ( = 0.30), vessel morphometry metrics were all significantly influenced by scan size. The scan devices and sizes used here do not affect FAZ area measures derived from manual segmentations. In contrast, vessel morphometry metrics are affected by scan size. As individual differences in axial length induce differences in absolute scan size, extreme care should be taken when interpreting metrics of vessel morphometry, both between and within OCT-A devices. A better characterization of the confounds surrounding OCT-A retinal vasculature metrics can lead to improved application of these metrics as biomarkers for retinal and systemic diseases.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</pub><pmid>33101784</pmid><doi>10.1167/tvst.9.11.7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2164-2591
ispartof Translational vision science & technology, 2020-10, Vol.9 (11), p.7-7
issn 2164-2591
2164-2591
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7545061
source PubMed Central
subjects Benchmarking
Fluorescein Angiography
Fovea Centralis
Humans
Retinal Vessels - diagnostic imaging
Tomography, Optical Coherence
title Assessing the Influence of OCT-A Device and Scan Size on Retinal Vascular Metrics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A37%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20Influence%20of%20OCT-A%20Device%20and%20Scan%20Size%20on%20Retinal%20Vascular%20Metrics&rft.jtitle=Translational%20vision%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Kraker,%20Jessica%20A&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=7-7&rft.issn=2164-2591&rft.eissn=2164-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/tvst.9.11.7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2454413634%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-e10d2bceb02fa8d3f5fb71b84ab8c8ec203b7b853a6ef774bd25880e365ca3c63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2454413634&rft_id=info:pmid/33101784&rfr_iscdi=true