Loading…

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is superior to hepatic resection in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma

It is not known whether percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) has the same treatment efficacy and fewer complications than laparoscopic resection in patients with small centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To compare the effectiveness of PRFA with classical laparoscopic resection...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of clinical cases 2020-10, Vol.8 (19), p.4380-4387
Main Authors: Zhang, Yan-Hua, Su, Bo, Sun, Pei, Li, Ru-Meng, Peng, Xiao-Chun, Cai, Jun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-611c816853564b01f03737928bec7c13e619612abd4f50af8e8f6911a6adad193
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-611c816853564b01f03737928bec7c13e619612abd4f50af8e8f6911a6adad193
container_end_page 4387
container_issue 19
container_start_page 4380
container_title World journal of clinical cases
container_volume 8
creator Zhang, Yan-Hua
Su, Bo
Sun, Pei
Li, Ru-Meng
Peng, Xiao-Chun
Cai, Jun
description It is not known whether percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) has the same treatment efficacy and fewer complications than laparoscopic resection in patients with small centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To compare the effectiveness of PRFA with classical laparoscopic resection in patients with small HCC and document the safety parameters. In this retrospective study, 85 patients treated with hepatic resection (HR) and 90 PRFA-treated patients were enrolled in our hospital from July 2016 to July 2019. Treatment outcomes, including major complications and survival data, were evaluated. The results showed that minor differences existed in the baseline characteristics between the patients in the two groups. PRFA significantly increased cumulative recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 1.048, 95%CI: 0.265-3.268) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.126, 95%CI: 0.025-0.973); PRFA had a lower rate of major complications than HR (7.78% 20.0%, < 0.05), and hospital stay was shorter in the PRFA group than in the HR group (7.8 ± 0.2 d 9.5 ± 0.3 d, < 0.001). Based on the data obtained, we conclude that PRFA was superior to HR and may reduce complications and hospital stay in patients with small HCC.
doi_str_mv 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4380
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7559644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2452977683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-611c816853564b01f03737928bec7c13e619612abd4f50af8e8f6911a6adad193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1OwzAQhC0EAlR4AC7IRy4t3jhx7AsSqviTkOAAZ2vjONRVEhc7KerbkxKoysnWenZ2PR8hF8BmkCglr7-WxszWcuZAzVIu2QE5TTjLp1IJdrh3PyHnMS4ZYwAsA8GPyQnnTHKu8lPSv9pg-g5b6_tIA5bOV8F-9rY1G4pFjZ3zLXWRxn5lg_OBdp4u7GqoGxpstGYUtHRbsm0X6ZfrFjQ2WNej0Btb132NgRoMxrW-wTNyVGEd7fnvOSHv93dv88fp88vD0_z2eWq4Ut1UABgJQmY8E2nBoGI857lKZGFNboBbAUpAgkWZVhnDSlpZCQWAAkssQfEJuRl9V33R2NIM-wWs9Sq4BsNGe3T6_0vrFvrDr3WeZUqk6WBw9WsQ_BBK7HTj4vY_Y2A6SbNE5bkY0pwQGKUm-BiDrXZjgOkfYnpLTK-lHojpLbGh53J_v13HHx_-Da--l3I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2452977683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is superior to hepatic resection in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><creator>Zhang, Yan-Hua ; Su, Bo ; Sun, Pei ; Li, Ru-Meng ; Peng, Xiao-Chun ; Cai, Jun</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yan-Hua ; Su, Bo ; Sun, Pei ; Li, Ru-Meng ; Peng, Xiao-Chun ; Cai, Jun</creatorcontrib><description>It is not known whether percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) has the same treatment efficacy and fewer complications than laparoscopic resection in patients with small centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To compare the effectiveness of PRFA with classical laparoscopic resection in patients with small HCC and document the safety parameters. In this retrospective study, 85 patients treated with hepatic resection (HR) and 90 PRFA-treated patients were enrolled in our hospital from July 2016 to July 2019. Treatment outcomes, including major complications and survival data, were evaluated. The results showed that minor differences existed in the baseline characteristics between the patients in the two groups. PRFA significantly increased cumulative recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 1.048, 95%CI: 0.265-3.268) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.126, 95%CI: 0.025-0.973); PRFA had a lower rate of major complications than HR (7.78% 20.0%, &lt; 0.05), and hospital stay was shorter in the PRFA group than in the HR group (7.8 ± 0.2 d 9.5 ± 0.3 d, &lt; 0.001). Based on the data obtained, we conclude that PRFA was superior to HR and may reduce complications and hospital stay in patients with small HCC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2307-8960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2307-8960</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4380</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33083397</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Retrospective Study</subject><ispartof>World journal of clinical cases, 2020-10, Vol.8 (19), p.4380-4387</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2020</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-611c816853564b01f03737928bec7c13e619612abd4f50af8e8f6911a6adad193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-611c816853564b01f03737928bec7c13e619612abd4f50af8e8f6911a6adad193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559644/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559644/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083397$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yan-Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ru-Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xiao-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Jun</creatorcontrib><title>Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is superior to hepatic resection in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma</title><title>World journal of clinical cases</title><addtitle>World J Clin Cases</addtitle><description>It is not known whether percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) has the same treatment efficacy and fewer complications than laparoscopic resection in patients with small centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To compare the effectiveness of PRFA with classical laparoscopic resection in patients with small HCC and document the safety parameters. In this retrospective study, 85 patients treated with hepatic resection (HR) and 90 PRFA-treated patients were enrolled in our hospital from July 2016 to July 2019. Treatment outcomes, including major complications and survival data, were evaluated. The results showed that minor differences existed in the baseline characteristics between the patients in the two groups. PRFA significantly increased cumulative recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 1.048, 95%CI: 0.265-3.268) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.126, 95%CI: 0.025-0.973); PRFA had a lower rate of major complications than HR (7.78% 20.0%, &lt; 0.05), and hospital stay was shorter in the PRFA group than in the HR group (7.8 ± 0.2 d 9.5 ± 0.3 d, &lt; 0.001). Based on the data obtained, we conclude that PRFA was superior to HR and may reduce complications and hospital stay in patients with small HCC.</description><subject>Retrospective Study</subject><issn>2307-8960</issn><issn>2307-8960</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc1OwzAQhC0EAlR4AC7IRy4t3jhx7AsSqviTkOAAZ2vjONRVEhc7KerbkxKoysnWenZ2PR8hF8BmkCglr7-WxszWcuZAzVIu2QE5TTjLp1IJdrh3PyHnMS4ZYwAsA8GPyQnnTHKu8lPSv9pg-g5b6_tIA5bOV8F-9rY1G4pFjZ3zLXWRxn5lg_OBdp4u7GqoGxpstGYUtHRbsm0X6ZfrFjQ2WNej0Btb132NgRoMxrW-wTNyVGEd7fnvOSHv93dv88fp88vD0_z2eWq4Ut1UABgJQmY8E2nBoGI857lKZGFNboBbAUpAgkWZVhnDSlpZCQWAAkssQfEJuRl9V33R2NIM-wWs9Sq4BsNGe3T6_0vrFvrDr3WeZUqk6WBw9WsQ_BBK7HTj4vY_Y2A6SbNE5bkY0pwQGKUm-BiDrXZjgOkfYnpLTK-lHojpLbGh53J_v13HHx_-Da--l3I</recordid><startdate>20201006</startdate><enddate>20201006</enddate><creator>Zhang, Yan-Hua</creator><creator>Su, Bo</creator><creator>Sun, Pei</creator><creator>Li, Ru-Meng</creator><creator>Peng, Xiao-Chun</creator><creator>Cai, Jun</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201006</creationdate><title>Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is superior to hepatic resection in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma</title><author>Zhang, Yan-Hua ; Su, Bo ; Sun, Pei ; Li, Ru-Meng ; Peng, Xiao-Chun ; Cai, Jun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-611c816853564b01f03737928bec7c13e619612abd4f50af8e8f6911a6adad193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Retrospective Study</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yan-Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ru-Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xiao-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Jun</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of clinical cases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Yan-Hua</au><au>Su, Bo</au><au>Sun, Pei</au><au>Li, Ru-Meng</au><au>Peng, Xiao-Chun</au><au>Cai, Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is superior to hepatic resection in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>World journal of clinical cases</jtitle><addtitle>World J Clin Cases</addtitle><date>2020-10-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>4380</spage><epage>4387</epage><pages>4380-4387</pages><issn>2307-8960</issn><eissn>2307-8960</eissn><abstract>It is not known whether percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) has the same treatment efficacy and fewer complications than laparoscopic resection in patients with small centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To compare the effectiveness of PRFA with classical laparoscopic resection in patients with small HCC and document the safety parameters. In this retrospective study, 85 patients treated with hepatic resection (HR) and 90 PRFA-treated patients were enrolled in our hospital from July 2016 to July 2019. Treatment outcomes, including major complications and survival data, were evaluated. The results showed that minor differences existed in the baseline characteristics between the patients in the two groups. PRFA significantly increased cumulative recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 1.048, 95%CI: 0.265-3.268) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.126, 95%CI: 0.025-0.973); PRFA had a lower rate of major complications than HR (7.78% 20.0%, &lt; 0.05), and hospital stay was shorter in the PRFA group than in the HR group (7.8 ± 0.2 d 9.5 ± 0.3 d, &lt; 0.001). Based on the data obtained, we conclude that PRFA was superior to HR and may reduce complications and hospital stay in patients with small HCC.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>33083397</pmid><doi>10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4380</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2307-8960
ispartof World journal of clinical cases, 2020-10, Vol.8 (19), p.4380-4387
issn 2307-8960
2307-8960
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7559644
source PubMed (Medline)
subjects Retrospective Study
title Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is superior to hepatic resection in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T03%3A57%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Percutaneous%20radiofrequency%20ablation%20is%20superior%20to%20hepatic%20resection%20in%20patients%20with%20small%20hepatocellular%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20clinical%20cases&rft.au=Zhang,%20Yan-Hua&rft.date=2020-10-06&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=4380&rft.epage=4387&rft.pages=4380-4387&rft.issn=2307-8960&rft.eissn=2307-8960&rft_id=info:doi/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4380&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2452977683%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-611c816853564b01f03737928bec7c13e619612abd4f50af8e8f6911a6adad193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2452977683&rft_id=info:pmid/33083397&rfr_iscdi=true