Adherence to the EAU Guideline Recommendations for Local Tumor Treatment in Penile Cancer: Results of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study Group Survey (E-PROPS)

• Published in: Advances in therapy 2020-12, Vol.37 (12), p.4969-4980
• Main Authors: Pallauf, Maximilian, Hempel, Marie C., Hupe, Marie C., May, Matthias, Haccius, Marlene, Weckermann, Dorothea, Lebentrau, Steffen, Hoschke, Bernd, Necknig, Ulrike, Pfitzenmaier, Jesco, Manka, Lukas, Nuhn, Philipp, Törzsök, Peter, Lusuardi, Lukas, Merseburger, Axel S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cardiology; Endocrinology; Europe; Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data; Health technology assessment; Humans; Internal Medicine; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Oncology; Organ Sparing Treatments; Original Research; Penile Neoplasms - pathology; Penile Neoplasms - surgery; Penile Neoplasms - therapy; Pharmacology/Toxicology; Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rheumatology; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 0741-238X; 1865-8652
• DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01514-8

Introduction Penile cancer (PeCa) is an orphan disease in European countries. The current guidelines are predominantly based on retrospective studies with a low level of evidence. In our study, we aimed to identify predictors for guideline-conform treatment and hypothesize that reference centers for PeCa and physicians' experience promote guideline compliance and therefore correct local tumor therapy. Methods This study is part of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study (E-PROPS), an international collaboration group evaluating therapeutic management for PeCa in Central Europe. For this module, a 14-item-survey was developed and sent to 681 urologists in 45 European centers. Three questions focused on therapeutic decisions for PeCa in clinical stage Tis, Ta-T1a, and T1b. Four questions addressed potential personal confounders. Survey results were analyzed by bootstrap-adjusted stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis to identify predictors for EAU guideline-conform local treatment of PeCa. Results For local therapy of cTis 80.4% recommended guideline-conform treatment, for cTa-cT1a 87.3% and for cT1b 59.1%. In total, 42.4% chose a correct approach in all tumor stages. The number of PeCa patients treated at the hospital, a higher level of training of the physicians, resource-based answering and the option of penile-sparing surgery offered at the hospital matched with giving guideline-conform recommendations and thus accurate local tumor treatment. Conclusion Patients with PeCa are best treated by experienced physicians, in centers with a high number of cases, which also offer a wide range of local tumor therapy. This could be offered in reference centers.